Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

9. The EU, the Member States and International Law

Author : Henri de Waele

Published in: Legal Dynamics of EU External Relations

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Over the past decades, most issues concerning the interface between EU law and national law have been resolved, and Member States’ authorities have grown to accept the basic tenets of supremacy and direct effect. However, from the moment that rules of international law come into play as well, the relationship between norms from the EU and the national legal order becomes less clear-cut. To smoothen the interplay between international, European and national law, the Treaties contain several tools and mechanisms, but these do not succeed in eradicating the tensions altogether. In this chapter, we will explore some of the (potential) fracture lines, and analyse the legal provisions that seek to iron them out. After a brief introduction (Sect. 9.1), attention is first devoted to the place of the EU in the international legal order, and the way it has generally positioned itself (Sect. 9.2). Thereby, we shall also discuss the internal rank and effect of international law norms, as well as the meandering views of the EU Courts on that subject. Hereafter, we take a closer look at the position of the Member States, sandwiched between their international and European commitments (Sect. 9.3). In that investigation, a special focus is placed on the intricacies of managing mixed agreements, as well as on the (waning) possibilities for seeking enforcement at international courts and tribunals.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
2
The ability of the Community to join (other) international organisations was confirmed by the ECJ in Opinion 1/76, Draft agreement establishing a European laying-up fund for inland waterway vessels.
 
3
If an international organisation only admits states (e.g. the IMF and the World Bank), the Union may authorise its Member States to act there on its behalf and in its interest.
 
4
See e.g. Serrano de Haro (2012), p. 12.
 
5
Some partners have been more receptive to this claim than others, as demonstrated in e.g. de Waele and Kuipers (2013).
 
6
Case 6/64, Costa v ENEL. But cf. already the ‘new legal order’ postulate in Case 26/62, NV Internationale Transportonderneming Van Gend & Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen.
 
7
Opinion 1/76, Draft agreement establishing a European laying-up fund for inland waterway vessels.
 
8
Opinion 1/91, Draft agreement on the creation of the European Economic Area (I). Following renegotiations, a novel agreement was drawn up, which received the blessing of the ECJ in Opinion 1/92, Draft agreement on the creation of the European Economic Area (II).
 
9
Opinion 1/00, Envisaged agreement on the establishment of a European Common Aviation Area.
 
10
Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P, Kadi and Al-Barakaat International Foundation v Council.
 
11
Ibid., paragraph 316.
 
12
Opinion 2/13, Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights.
 
13
See e.g. Case C-286/90, Anklagemyndigheden v Poulsen and Diva Navigation Corp, and Case C-386/08, Brita GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen.
 
14
Cf. Case 294/83, Parti écologiste ‘Les Verts’ v European Parliament, paragraph 23.
 
15
Joined Cases 41-44/70, NV International Fruit Company and others v Commission.
 
16
See respectively Case C-308/06, The Queen on the application of International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (Intertanko) and Others v Secretary of State for Transport; Case C-366/10, Air Transport Association of America and Others v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change.
 
17
Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P, Kadi and Al-Barakaat International Foundation v Council. Some commentators read a primordial confirmation of this position in Case 41/74, Van Duyn v Home Office.
 
18
See e.g. Case T-115/94, Opel Austria GmbH v Council; Case C-344/04, The Queen on the application of International Air Transport Association and European Low Fares Airline Association v Department for Transport.
 
19
See e.g. Case C-61/94, Commission v Germany; Case C-341/95, Gianni Bettati v Safety Hi-Tech Srl.
 
20
See e.g. Case 181/73, Haegeman v Belgium; Case C-308/06, The Queen on the application of International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (Intertanko) and Others v Secretary of State for Transport.
 
21
See e.g. Case 87/75, Bresciani v Amministrazione Italiana delle Finanze; Case 12/86, Demirel v Stadt Schwäbisch Gmünd; Case C-18/90, Office national de l’emploi v Kziber; Case C-416/96, El-Yassini v Secretary of State for Home Department; Case C-438/00, Deutscher Handballbund eV v Kolpak.
 
22
See e.g. Case C-469/93, Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v Chiquita Italia SpA, and Case C-160/09, Ioannis Katsivardas – Nikolaos Tsitsikas OE v Ipourgos Ikonomikon.
 
23
See e.g. Case C-344/04, The Queen on the application of International Air Transport Association and European Low Fares Airline Association v Department for Transport.
 
24
See Chap. 4, Sect. 4.​4.
 
25
Case C-308/06, The Queen on the application of International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (Intertanko) and Others v Secretary of State for Transport.
 
26
Joined Cases C-404/12 P and C-405/12 P, Council and Commission v Stichting Natuur en Milieu and Pesticide Action Network Europe; see also Case C-612/13 P ClientEarth v Commission.
 
27
An excellent overviews offers Bronckers (2008).
 
28
As argued by Mendez (2013); see also Wouters et al. (2013).
 
29
See Case C-366/10, Air Transport Association of America and Others v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change. Contrast e.g. Case C-162/96, A. Racke GmbH & Co. v Hauptzollamt Mainz.
 
30
Further illustrated in Semertzi (2014).
 
31
E.g. education, culture, some aspects of public health. One might add topics that touch on military and defence issues, as the Treaties do not pronounce themselves unequivocally on the nature of the CSDP (nor, for that matter, on that of the CFSP).
 
32
For the founding members of the EU, the reference is to agreements concluded prior to 1 January 1958; for states that have acceded later, the date of their accession presents the relevant yardstick.
 
33
Case 812/79, Attorney General v Burgoa. If over time, the EU has fully subsumed areas of competence in which all the Member States had previously entered into treaty relations, ‘functional succession’ may take place, with the Union replacing them and assuming their legal entitlements and obligations. For the precise conditions, see Joined Cases 41-44/70, NV International Fruit Company and others v Commission; Case C-188/07, Commune de Mesquer v Total France and Total International Ltd; Case C-301/08, Bogiatzi v Deutscher Luftpool, Société Luxair, European Communities, Luxembourg Foyer Assurances SA; Case C-308/06, The Queen on the application of International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (Intertanko) and Others v Secretary of State for Transport.
 
34
See Case C-124/95, The Queen, ex parte Centro-Com Srl v HM Treasury and Bank of England.
 
35
See Case C-266/03, Commission v Luxembourg; Case C-433/03, Commission v Germany.
 
36
Of course, in case the EU does enjoy an exclusive power, any new commitments undertaken by the Member State in the field concerned would immediately constitute an egregious violation of EU law. Member States should proceed cautiously in case the EU possesses a shared power: judging from Case C-205/06, Commission v Austria and Case C-249/06, Commission v Sweden, they have to avoid a potential conflict of rules, and may have to rescind prior treaty commitments that potentially clash with provisions of EU law, even when the Union has not yet exercised its powers.
 
37
Case C-324/93, The Queen v Secretary of State for Home Department, ex parte Evans Medical Ltd and Macfarlan Smith Ltd.
 
38
Case C-62/98, Commission v Portugal. This entails that the inclusion of a ‘disconnection clause’, a provision according to which certain partners to a multilateral convention will apply special rules (here: EU law) in their relations inter se (in so far as such special rules govern the particular subject and apply to the case at hand), will not be enough. For illustrations of such clauses and their working, see Cremona (2010).
 
39
See e.g. Case C-170/98, Commission v Belgium; Case C-84/98, Commission v Portugal.
 
40
See Case C-205/06, Commission v Austria; Case C-249/06, Commission v Sweden; Case C-118/07, Commission v Finland.
 
41
The Court’s tenacity in letting the rules of EU law triumph over the Member States’ (prior) international commitments is magisterially portrayed in Klabbers (2009).
 
42
See e.g. Case C-216/01, Budvar v Rudolf Ammersin GmbH.
 
43
Of course, as long as there existed an adequate legal basis and no procedural errors were committed.
 
44
Evidently, at the exercise of a shared competence the Member States will be bound ipso facto.
 
45
See e.g. Case 14/83, Von Colson and Kamann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen and Case C-53/96, Hermès International v FHT Marketing Choice BV.
 
46
The literature on this subject is voluminous; see inter alia Schermers and O’Keeffe (1983); Heliskoski (2001); Hillion and Koutrakos (2010).
 
47
Cf. Delgado Casteleiro (2016).
 
48
Case C-266/03, Commission v Luxembourg; Case C-433/03, Commission v Germany.
 
49
This obligation has been held to stem from a general principle of unity in the international representation of the EU, e.g. in Opinion 2/91, Conclusion of ILO Convention No. 170 concerning safety in the use of chemicals at work.
 
50
Case C-266/03, Commission v Luxembourg; Case C-433/03, Commission v Germany.
 
51
Case C-246/07, Commission v Sweden, elaborated on in Chap. 5, Sect. 5.​3.​1. See also Case C-45/07, Commission v Greece, entailing that in the absence of a Union common position, Member States are equally to refrain from individual action within the framework of international organisations.
 
52
Opinion 2/91, Conclusion of ILO Convention No. 170 concerning safety in the use of chemicals at work.
 
53
Case C-399/12, Germany v Council.
 
54
Opinion 1/13, Accession of third states to the Hague Convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction.
 
55
See e.g. Council Decision 2000/278/EC on the approval, on behalf of the European Community, of the WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, OJ [2006] L 89/6; Council Decision 2002/358/EC concerning the approval, on behalf of the European Community, of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the joint fulfilment of commitments thereunder, OJ [2002] L 130/1.
 
56
Case C-53/96, Hermès International v FHT Marketing Choice BV; Joined Cases C-300/98 and C-392/98, Parfums Christian Dior SA v TUK Consultancy BV and Assco Gerüste GmbH and Rob van Dijk v Wilhelm Layher GmbH & Co. KG and Layher BV.
 
57
Case C-13/00, Commission v Ireland.
 
58
Joined Cases C-300/98 and C-392/98, Parfums Christian Dior SA v TUK Consultancy BV and Assco Gerüste GmbH and Rob van Dijk v Wilhelm Layher GmbH & Co. KG and Layher BV; Case C-431/05, Merck Genéricos – Produtos Farmacêuticos Lda v Merck & Co. Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Lda.
 
59
Case C-13/00, Commission v Ireland.
 
60
Case C-239/03, Commission v France.
 
61
Yet, as the EU is not itself a member of the UN, any action at the ICJ will have to be initiated by one or more Member States.
 
62
Case C-459/03, Commission v Ireland.
 
63
Remarkably, the UNCLOS in fact stipulated itself that specific dispute resolution mechanisms should take precedence over those in part XV of the Convention.
 
64
Cf. De Baere and Roes (2015).
 
Literature
go back to reference Bronckers M (2008) From ‘direct effect’ to ‘muted dialogue’: recent developments in the European Courts’ case law on the WTO and beyond. J Int Econ Law 11:885–898CrossRef Bronckers M (2008) From ‘direct effect’ to ‘muted dialogue’: recent developments in the European Courts’ case law on the WTO and beyond. J Int Econ Law 11:885–898CrossRef
go back to reference Cremona M (2010) Disconnection clauses in EC law and practice. In: Hillion C, Koutrakos P (eds) Mixed agreements revisited. Hart, Oxford, pp 160–186 Cremona M (2010) Disconnection clauses in EC law and practice. In: Hillion C, Koutrakos P (eds) Mixed agreements revisited. Hart, Oxford, pp 160–186
go back to reference Delgado Casteleiro A (2016) The international responsibility of the European Union – from competence to normative control. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Delgado Casteleiro A (2016) The international responsibility of the European Union – from competence to normative control. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
go back to reference De Baere G, Roes T (2015) EU loyalty as good faith. Int Comp Law Q 64:829–874CrossRef De Baere G, Roes T (2015) EU loyalty as good faith. Int Comp Law Q 64:829–874CrossRef
go back to reference de Waele H, Kuipers JJ (eds) (2013) The European Union’s emerging international identity – views from the Global Arena. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden-Boston de Waele H, Kuipers JJ (eds) (2013) The European Union’s emerging international identity – views from the Global Arena. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden-Boston
go back to reference Heliskoski J (2001) Mixed agreements as a technique for organizing the international relations of the European community and its member states. Kluwer Law International, The Hague Heliskoski J (2001) Mixed agreements as a technique for organizing the international relations of the European community and its member states. Kluwer Law International, The Hague
go back to reference Hillion C, Koutrakos P (eds) (2010) Mixed agreements revisited. Hart, Oxford Hillion C, Koutrakos P (eds) (2010) Mixed agreements revisited. Hart, Oxford
go back to reference Klabbers J (2009) Treaty conflict and the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Klabbers J (2009) Treaty conflict and the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Mendez M (2013) The legal effects of EU agreements: maximalist treaty enforcement and judicial avoidance techniques. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef Mendez M (2013) The legal effects of EU agreements: maximalist treaty enforcement and judicial avoidance techniques. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef
go back to reference Schermers HG, O’Keeffe D (eds) (1983) Mixed agreements. Kluwer, Deventer Schermers HG, O’Keeffe D (eds) (1983) Mixed agreements. Kluwer, Deventer
go back to reference Semertzi A (2014) The preclusion of direct effect in the recently concluded EU free trade agreements. Common Mark Law Rev 51:1125–1158 Semertzi A (2014) The preclusion of direct effect in the recently concluded EU free trade agreements. Common Mark Law Rev 51:1125–1158
go back to reference Serrano de Haro PA (2012) Participation of the EU in the work of the UN: General Assembly Resolution 65/276. CLEER Working Papers 2012/4 Serrano de Haro PA (2012) Participation of the EU in the work of the UN: General Assembly Resolution 65/276. CLEER Working Papers 2012/4
go back to reference Wouters J, Odermatt J, Ramopoulos T (2013) Worlds apart? Comparing the approaches of the European Court of Justice and the EU legislature to international law. In: Cremona M, Thies A (eds) The European Court of Justice and external relations law – constitutional challenges. Hart, Oxford, pp 249–279 Wouters J, Odermatt J, Ramopoulos T (2013) Worlds apart? Comparing the approaches of the European Court of Justice and the EU legislature to international law. In: Cremona M, Thies A (eds) The European Court of Justice and external relations law – constitutional challenges. Hart, Oxford, pp 249–279
Metadata
Title
The EU, the Member States and International Law
Author
Henri de Waele
Copyright Year
2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54817-2_9