Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

7. The Future of Regulatory Capacity Building in the EU

Author : Eva Heims

Published in: Building EU Regulatory Capacity

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The theoretical argument that this book developed in Chap. 2 was largely sustained in empirical analysis of four cases studies. Regulatory capacity in the EU is built despite the significant resource limitations faced by EU agencies and is based on inter-organisational relations between EU and national regulatory bodies. This mutual capacity building leads to a general enhancement of autonomy and influence of regulatory bodies vis-à-vis other government actors, and the chapter considers the implications of this for executive politics dynamics in the EU. It also discusses the UK’s exit from the EU. UK regulators have made a considerable contribution to EU capacity building, which implies that ‘Brexit’ is likely to be a lose-lose situation as far as regulatory capacity building is concerned.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Also clearly highlighted in interviews M5, M6 and M7.
 
2
Status in March 2018.
 
3
Status in March 2018.
 
4
Status in April 2018.
 
Literature
go back to reference Bach, T., & Ruffing, E. (2013). Networking for Autonomy? National Agencies in European Networks. Public Administration, 91(3), 712–726. Bach, T., & Ruffing, E. (2013). Networking for Autonomy? National Agencies in European Networks. Public Administration, 91(3), 712–726.
go back to reference Bach, T. and Ruffing, E. 2018. The Transformative Effects of Transnational Administrative Coordination in the European Multi-Level SYSTEM. In E. Ongaro and S. van Thiel (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Public Management in Europe (pp. 747-763). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Bach, T. and Ruffing, E. 2018. The Transformative Effects of Transnational Administrative Coordination in the European Multi-Level SYSTEM. In E. Ongaro and S. van Thiel (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Public Management in Europe (pp. 747-763). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Bach, T., Ruffing, E., & Yesilkagit, K. (2015). The Differential Empowering Effects of Europeanization on the Autonomy of National Agencies. Governance, 28(3), 285–304.CrossRef Bach, T., Ruffing, E., & Yesilkagit, K. (2015). The Differential Empowering Effects of Europeanization on the Autonomy of National Agencies. Governance, 28(3), 285–304.CrossRef
go back to reference Barroso, L. (2011). The Problems and the Controls of the New Administrative State of the EU. Ph.D. Thesis, The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). Barroso, L. (2011). The Problems and the Controls of the New Administrative State of the EU. Ph.D. Thesis, The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
go back to reference Brehm, J. O., & Gates, S. (1997). Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Brehm, J. O., & Gates, S. (1997). Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
go back to reference Busuioc, M. (2013). Rulemaking by the European Financial Supervisory Authorities: Walking a Tight Rope. European Law Journal, 19(1), 111–125.CrossRef Busuioc, M. (2013). Rulemaking by the European Financial Supervisory Authorities: Walking a Tight Rope. European Law Journal, 19(1), 111–125.CrossRef
go back to reference COWI (Consultancy within Engineering, Environmental Science and Economics). (2008, April). EMSA Evaluation Report. Denmark. COWI (Consultancy within Engineering, Environmental Science and Economics). (2008, April). EMSA Evaluation Report. Denmark.
go back to reference Danielsen, O. A., & Yesilkagit, K. (2014). The Effects of European Regulatory Networks on the Bureaucratic Autonomy of National Regulatory Authorities. Public Organization Review, 14(3), 353–371.CrossRef Danielsen, O. A., & Yesilkagit, K. (2014). The Effects of European Regulatory Networks on the Bureaucratic Autonomy of National Regulatory Authorities. Public Organization Review, 14(3), 353–371.CrossRef
go back to reference Eberlein, B. (2008). The Making of the European Energy Market: The Interplay of Governance and Government. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 73–92.CrossRef Eberlein, B. (2008). The Making of the European Energy Market: The Interplay of Governance and Government. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 73–92.CrossRef
go back to reference Eberlein, B., & Grande, E. (2005). Beyond Delegation: Transnational Regulatory Regimes and the EU Regulatory State. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(1), 89–112.CrossRef Eberlein, B., & Grande, E. (2005). Beyond Delegation: Transnational Regulatory Regimes and the EU Regulatory State. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(1), 89–112.CrossRef
go back to reference EFSA. (2017). Minutes of the 66th Meeting of the Advisory Forum. Parma: European Food Safety Authority. EFSA. (2017). Minutes of the 66th Meeting of the Advisory Forum. Parma: European Food Safety Authority.
go back to reference Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2009). National Agencies in the European Administrative Space: Government Driven, Commission Driven, or Networked? Public Administration, 87(4), 779–790.CrossRef Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2009). National Agencies in the European Administrative Space: Government Driven, Commission Driven, or Networked? Public Administration, 87(4), 779–790.CrossRef
go back to reference Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2011). EU-Level Agencies: New Executive Centre Formation or Vehicles for National Control? Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 868–887.CrossRef Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2011). EU-Level Agencies: New Executive Centre Formation or Vehicles for National Control? Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 868–887.CrossRef
go back to reference Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2016). Why Strong Coordination at One Level of Government is Incompatible with Strong Coordination Across Levels (and How to Live With It). The Case of the European Union. Public Administration, 94(3), 579–592.CrossRef Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2016). Why Strong Coordination at One Level of Government is Incompatible with Strong Coordination Across Levels (and How to Live With It). The Case of the European Union. Public Administration, 94(3), 579–592.CrossRef
go back to reference EMSA. (2012, June 8). Administrative Board Meeting Minutes of the 33th Meeting. Lisbon: EMSA. EMSA. (2012, June 8). Administrative Board Meeting Minutes of the 33th Meeting. Lisbon: EMSA.
go back to reference FSA. (2017). Annual Report and Accounts 2016–2017. London: Food Standards Agency. FSA. (2017). Annual Report and Accounts 2016–2017. London: Food Standards Agency.
go back to reference Groenleer, M., Kaeding, M., & Versluis, E. (2010). Regulatory Governance through Agencies of the European Union? The Role of the European Agencies for Aviation and Maritime Safety in the Implementation of European Transport Legislation. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(8), 1212–1230.CrossRef Groenleer, M., Kaeding, M., & Versluis, E. (2010). Regulatory Governance through Agencies of the European Union? The Role of the European Agencies for Aviation and Maritime Safety in the Implementation of European Transport Legislation. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(8), 1212–1230.CrossRef
go back to reference Hauray, B., & Urfalino, P. (2009). Mutual Transformation and the Development of European Policy Spaces: The Case of Medicines Licensing. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(3), 431–449.CrossRef Hauray, B., & Urfalino, P. (2009). Mutual Transformation and the Development of European Policy Spaces: The Case of Medicines Licensing. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(3), 431–449.CrossRef
go back to reference Heims, E. M. (2018). Why Cooperation Between Agencies Is (Sometimes) Possible: Turf Protection as Enabler of Regulatory Cooperation in the European Union. In T. Bach & K. Wegrich (Eds.), The Blind Spots of Public Bureaucracy and the Politics of Non-Coordination. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Heims, E. M. (2018). Why Cooperation Between Agencies Is (Sometimes) Possible: Turf Protection as Enabler of Regulatory Cooperation in the European Union. In T. Bach & K. Wegrich (Eds.), The Blind Spots of Public Bureaucracy and the Politics of Non-Coordination. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Héritier, A., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2008). Introduction: The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 1–17. Héritier, A., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2008). Introduction: The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 1–17.
go back to reference Joerges, C., & Neyer, J. (1997). From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalization of Comitology. European Law Journal, 3(3), 273–299.CrossRef Joerges, C., & Neyer, J. (1997). From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalization of Comitology. European Law Journal, 3(3), 273–299.CrossRef
go back to reference Kelemen, D. R. (2002). The Politics of ‘Eurocratic’ Structure and the New European Agencies. West European Politics, 25(4), 93–118.CrossRef Kelemen, D. R. (2002). The Politics of ‘Eurocratic’ Structure and the New European Agencies. West European Politics, 25(4), 93–118.CrossRef
go back to reference Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanisation of National Administrations: Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanisation of National Administrations: Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Kreher, A. (1997). Agencies in the European Community—A Step towards Administrative Integration in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 225–245.CrossRef Kreher, A. (1997). Agencies in the European Community—A Step towards Administrative Integration in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 225–245.CrossRef
go back to reference Le Den, X., Lessmann, F., Floristean, A., Blagoeva, T., Poteron, S., Ellegarrd, C., & Sandager Hansen, J. (2017). Evaluation on the Implementation of the Regulation (Ec) No 1406/2002 Establishing EMSA. Copenhagen: Ramboll. Le Den, X., Lessmann, F., Floristean, A., Blagoeva, T., Poteron, S., Ellegarrd, C., & Sandager Hansen, J. (2017). Evaluation on the Implementation of the Regulation (Ec) No 1406/2002 Establishing EMSA. Copenhagen: Ramboll.
go back to reference Maggetti, M. (2014). The Rewards of Cooperation: the Effects of Membership in European Regulatory Networks. European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 480–499.CrossRef Maggetti, M. (2014). The Rewards of Cooperation: the Effects of Membership in European Regulatory Networks. European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 480–499.CrossRef
go back to reference Maggetti, M., & Gilardi, F. (2011). The Policy-Making Structure of European Regulatory Networks and the Domestic Adoption of Standards. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 830–847.CrossRef Maggetti, M., & Gilardi, F. (2011). The Policy-Making Structure of European Regulatory Networks and the Domestic Adoption of Standards. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 830–847.CrossRef
go back to reference Majone, G. (1997). The New European Agencies: Regulation by Information. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 262–275.CrossRef Majone, G. (1997). The New European Agencies: Regulation by Information. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 262–275.CrossRef
go back to reference Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. (2013, June 21). Testing European Legislation for Subsidiarity and Proportionality—Dutch List of Points for Action. Policy note. Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. (2013, June 21). Testing European Legislation for Subsidiarity and Proportionality—Dutch List of Points for Action. Policy note.
go back to reference Niskanen, W. A. (1994 [1971]). Bureaucracy and Public Economics. Brookfield: Elgar Publishing. Niskanen, W. A. (1994 [1971]). Bureaucracy and Public Economics. Brookfield: Elgar Publishing.
go back to reference Rhodes, R. A. W. (1990). Policy Networks: A British Perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 293–317.CrossRef Rhodes, R. A. W. (1990). Policy Networks: A British Perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 293–317.CrossRef
go back to reference Richardson, J. (Ed.). (1982). Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: Allen and Unwin. Richardson, J. (Ed.). (1982). Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: Allen and Unwin.
go back to reference Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy Change and Learning. Boulder: Westview. Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy Change and Learning. Boulder: Westview.
go back to reference Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2010). Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2010). Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder: Westview Press. Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder: Westview Press.
go back to reference Van Boetzelaer, K., & Princen, S. (2012). The Quest for Co-ordination in European Regulatory Networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(5), 819–836.CrossRef Van Boetzelaer, K., & Princen, S. (2012). The Quest for Co-ordination in European Regulatory Networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(5), 819–836.CrossRef
go back to reference Wildavsky, A. (1994). Why Self-Interest Means Less Outside of a Social Context: Cultural Contributions to a Theory of Rational Choices. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(2), 131–159.CrossRef Wildavsky, A. (1994). Why Self-Interest Means Less Outside of a Social Context: Cultural Contributions to a Theory of Rational Choices. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(2), 131–159.CrossRef
go back to reference Wilks, S. (2005). Agency Escape: Decentralization or Dominance of the European Commission in the Modernization of Competition Policy? Governance, 18(3), 431–452.CrossRef Wilks, S. (2005). Agency Escape: Decentralization or Dominance of the European Commission in the Modernization of Competition Policy? Governance, 18(3), 431–452.CrossRef
go back to reference Wilson, J. Q. (2000 [1989]). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books. Wilson, J. Q. (2000 [1989]). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.
Metadata
Title
The Future of Regulatory Capacity Building in the EU
Author
Eva Heims
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97577-1_7