Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics 2/2022

23-01-2021 | Original Paper

The Gender Effects of Audit Partners on Audit Outcomes: Evidence of Rule 3211 Adoption

Authors: Jie Hao, Viet Pham, Meng Guo

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the impact of PCAOB Rule 3211 on the quality and cost of audit services differs between female and male audit partners. We find that the improvement of audit quality is more pronounced for female audit partners than male partners after Rule 3211 adoption. Female audit partners are also associated with higher increases in fees and report lags than male counterparts after the adoption of Rule 3211. Further, we find that the presence of female CFOs (or female audit committee members) attenuate the audit fees and report lag increases in the post-adoption periods. Overall, our findings confirm the importance of the gender effect on audit outcomes, which needs further consideration by standard setters. Our study also provides empirical evidence of the benefits of gender equality in the workplace.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Gender socialization is a process that educates or instructs women and men to encompass a range of behaviors and attitudes that are generally considered acceptable, appropriate, or desirable for a person based on the person's biological or perceived sex. Gender socialization starts in childhood. Through interaction with people and exposure to society's values, children learn what sex is attributed to them and what roles they are expected to learn. Reinforcement (through rewarding gender-appropriate behavior and punishing what may seem as deviation behavior) socialize children into their genders (Witt 1997).
 
2
Francis et al. (2017) find evidence of a contagion effect in reputation concern among clients of an auditor after the auditor experiences a loss of an important client. Further, Chen and Omer (2019) suggest that clients would migrate to a different audit office (not necessary in a different firm) if the current audit office suffers from high rates of audit failures.
 
3
A 2018 survey by the Accounting and Finance Women’s Alliance shows that while women are 51% of associate-level staff at U.S. CPA firms, they only make up 24% of partners and principals positions. This may suggest that the corporate power ladder is un-proportional between females and males. https://​www.​afwa.​org/​wp-content/​uploads/​2019/​06/​2019-accounting-MOVE-report.​pdf.
 
4
There is a long history of the PCAOB proposing to publicly disclose audit partners’ identification. In early 2009, the board started to consider the requirement of engagement partner signatures and issued Concept Release on requiring the engagement partners to sign the audit reports with the intention to improve audit quality (PCAOB 2009). The reasons for this requirement are to increase the engagement partner’s own sense of accountability and to increase the audit process transparency. In 2011, the PCAOB further released a proposal and proposed registered firms to disclose the names of the audit partners on Form 2 (PCAOB 2011). In 2015, the PCAOB approved the final audit partner identification requirement—Rule 3211, which requires registered public accounting firms to disclose the audit partner’s name and information on Form AP. The form needs to be filed within 35 days after the date that the auditor’s report is filed with the SEC.
 
6
Current accountability mechanisms include partner rotation, partner compensation, internal firm quality control review, peer review, potential inspection and regulatory sanction by SEC and PCAOB, and civil litigation (Basu and Shekhar 2019).
 
7
In the auditing literature, researchers have established the role of audit partner gender in determining audit outcomes. For example, Hossain et al. (2018), using Australian setting, find that female audit partners are more likely to issue going-concern audit opinions to financially distressed clients. Ittonen et al. (2013) and Garcia-Blandon et al. (2019)both find that clients of female audit partners have lower levels of discretionary accruals than clients of male audit partners. Similarly, Ittonen and Peni (2012), using a sample of companies from three Nordic countries, find that female audit partners charge higher audit fees than their male counterparts. These studies arrive at their findings after controlling for important determinants of audit quality and audit fees such as client characteristics and financial health, auditor change, the inclusion of non-audit services, auditor tenure, etc.; suggesting that the audit partner gender effect on audit outcomes is robust.
 
8
Gender socialization is a process of educating and instructing males and females as to the norms, behaviors, values, and belief of group members as men or women.
 
9
While audit delay is commonly used as a proxy for audit effort, it may potentially reflect inefficient time management, prior studies often conduct audit delay test along with audit fees test and interpret the findings jointly. If the results of both tests are consistent, we can draw a more definitive conclusion regarding audit effort.
 
10
PCAOB Auditing Standard 1301 (PCAOB 2012) requires that auditors communicate with the client's audit committee regarding matters related to an audit.
 
11
Results using OLS models are consistent with the main results.
 
12
We control for power dynamics between CFO and audit partner by including the variable CFO_POWER. CFO_POWER is calculated based on CFO pay slice—a ratio of the total compensation of the CFO scaled by the aggregated compensation of the top-five executives. This measure reflects the relative importance of the CFO as well as the extent to which the CFO is able to extract rents (Bebchuk et al. 2011; Cheng et al. 2015).
 
13
Column (2) and column (5) report the regression results without controlling audit partners’ individual characteristics (i.e., the education level, the counts of prior employers, and the number of linked connections). Column (3) and (6) report regression results after controlling theses partners’ characteristics.
 
14
Cunningham et al. (2019) do not find improvement of audit quality, proxied by the absolute value of discretionary accrual, F-Score, and incorrect material weakness measures, in the post-adoption periods. However, Burke et al. (2019) find significant improvement of audit quality, measured by absolute value of discretionary accrual, in the post adoption period.
 
15
The F-statistics of POST + POST*FEMALE, reported on the bottom of columns (2) and (3), are 5.56 (p < 0.001) and 7.16 (p < 0.001), repectively.
 
16
The F statistics of POST + POST*FEMALE in column (5) and (6) are 2.55 and 2.66 (both p < 0.001).
 
17
Column (2) shows the regression result without the partner's personal characteristics, and column (3) includes these characteristics.
 
18
The three times mandatory rotation is calculated as (2001–1987)/7 + (2016–2001)/5 = 3.
 
Literature
go back to reference Abbasi, K., Alam, A., & Bhuiyan, M. B. U. (2020). Audit committees, female directors and the types of female and male financial experts: Further evidence. Journal of Business Research, 114, 186–197. CrossRef Abbasi, K., Alam, A., & Bhuiyan, M. B. U. (2020). Audit committees, female directors and the types of female and male financial experts: Further evidence. Journal of Business Research, 114, 186–197. CrossRef
go back to reference Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291–309. CrossRef Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291–309. CrossRef
go back to reference American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2011). Trends in the supply of accounting graduates and the demand for public accounting recruits. New York, NY: AICPA. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2011). Trends in the supply of accounting graduates and the demand for public accounting recruits. New York, NY: AICPA.
go back to reference Anderson, J. C., Johnson, E. N., & Reckers, P. M. (1994). Perceived effects of gender, family structure, and hysical appearance on career progression in public accounting: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(6), 483–491. CrossRef Anderson, J. C., Johnson, E. N., & Reckers, P. M. (1994). Perceived effects of gender, family structure, and hysical appearance on career progression in public accounting: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(6), 483–491. CrossRef
go back to reference Ashbaugh, H. (2004). Ethical issues related to the provision of audit and non-audit services: Evidence from academic research. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(2), 143–148. CrossRef Ashbaugh, H. (2004). Ethical issues related to the provision of audit and non-audit services: Evidence from academic research. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(2), 143–148. CrossRef
go back to reference Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., & Mayhew, B. W. (2003). Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 611–639. CrossRef Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., & Mayhew, B. W. (2003). Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 611–639. CrossRef
go back to reference Bailey, C., Collins, D. L., & Abbott, L. J. (2018). The impact of enterprise risk management on the audit process: Evidence from audit fees and audit delay. Auditing, 37(3), 25–46. CrossRef Bailey, C., Collins, D. L., & Abbott, L. J. (2018). The impact of enterprise risk management on the audit process: Evidence from audit fees and audit delay. Auditing, 37(3), 25–46. CrossRef
go back to reference Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2006). The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(2), 207–242. CrossRef Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2006). The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(2), 207–242. CrossRef
go back to reference Bamber, E. M., & Iyer, V. M. (2007). Auditors’ identification with their clients and its effect on auditors’ objectivity. Auditing, 26(2), 1–24. CrossRef Bamber, E. M., & Iyer, V. M. (2007). Auditors’ identification with their clients and its effect on auditors’ objectivity. Auditing, 26(2), 1–24. CrossRef
go back to reference Barua, A., Hossain, M. S., & Rama, D. V. (2019). Financial versus operating liability leverage and audit fees. International Journal of Auditing, 23(2), 231–244. CrossRef Barua, A., Hossain, M. S., & Rama, D. V. (2019). Financial versus operating liability leverage and audit fees. International Journal of Auditing, 23(2), 231–244. CrossRef
go back to reference Bebchuk, L. A., Cremers, K. M., & Peyer, U. C. (2011). The CEO pay slice. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), 199–221. CrossRef Bebchuk, L. A., Cremers, K. M., & Peyer, U. C. (2011). The CEO pay slice. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), 199–221. CrossRef
go back to reference Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24. CrossRef Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24. CrossRef
go back to reference Bedard, J. C., Deis, D. R., Curtis, M. B., & Jenkins, J. G. (2008). Risk monitoring and control in audit firms: A research synthesis. Auditing, 27(1), 187–218. CrossRef Bedard, J. C., Deis, D. R., Curtis, M. B., & Jenkins, J. G. (2008). Risk monitoring and control in audit firms: A research synthesis. Auditing, 27(1), 187–218. CrossRef
go back to reference Beneish, M. D. (1999). Incentives and penalties related to earnings overstatements that violate GAAP. The Accounting Review, 74(4), 425–457. CrossRef Beneish, M. D. (1999). Incentives and penalties related to earnings overstatements that violate GAAP. The Accounting Review, 74(4), 425–457. CrossRef
go back to reference Bernardi, R. A. (1994). Fraud detection: The effect of client integrity and competence and auditor cognitive style. Auditing, 13, 68. Bernardi, R. A. (1994). Fraud detection: The effect of client integrity and competence and auditor cognitive style. Auditing, 13, 68.
go back to reference Berscheid, E., Walster, E., & Barclay, A. (1969). Effect of time on tendency to compensate a victim. Psychological Reports, 25(2), 431–436. CrossRef Berscheid, E., Walster, E., & Barclay, A. (1969). Effect of time on tendency to compensate a victim. Psychological Reports, 25(2), 431–436. CrossRef
go back to reference Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324. CrossRef Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324. CrossRef
go back to reference Blay, A. D., Sneathen, L. D., Jr., & Kizirian, T. (2007). The effects of fraud and going-concern risk on auditors’ assessments of the risk of material misstatement and resulting audit procedures. International Journal of Auditing, 11(3), 149–163. CrossRef Blay, A. D., Sneathen, L. D., Jr., & Kizirian, T. (2007). The effects of fraud and going-concern risk on auditors’ assessments of the risk of material misstatement and resulting audit procedures. International Journal of Auditing, 11(3), 149–163. CrossRef
go back to reference Bonner, S. (2008). Judgment and decision making in accounting. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Bonner, S. (2008). Judgment and decision making in accounting. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
go back to reference Burke, J. J., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2019). Audit partner identification and characteristics: Evidence from US Form AP filings. Auditing, 38(3), 71–94. CrossRef Burke, J. J., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2019). Audit partner identification and characteristics: Evidence from US Form AP filings. Auditing, 38(3), 71–94. CrossRef
go back to reference Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm (Vol. 462). New York: Academic Press. Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm (Vol. 462). New York: Academic Press.
go back to reference Byrnes, J., Miller, D., & Schafer, W. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383. CrossRef Byrnes, J., Miller, D., & Schafer, W. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383. CrossRef
go back to reference Cao, J., Luo, X., & Zhang, W. (2020). Corporate employment, red flags, and audit effort. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(1), 106710. CrossRef Cao, J., Luo, X., & Zhang, W. (2020). Corporate employment, red flags, and audit effort. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(1), 106710. CrossRef
go back to reference Carcello, J. V., & Nagy, A. L. (2004). Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing, 23(2), 55–69. CrossRef Carcello, J. V., & Nagy, A. L. (2004). Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing, 23(2), 55–69. CrossRef
go back to reference Carcello, J. V., & Santore, R. (2015). Engagement partner identification: A theoretical analysis. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 297–311. CrossRef Carcello, J. V., & Santore, R. (2015). Engagement partner identification: A theoretical analysis. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 297–311. CrossRef
go back to reference Carter, M. E., Franco, F., & Gine, M. (2017). Executive gender pay gaps: The roles of female risk aversion and board representation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 1232–1264. CrossRef Carter, M. E., Franco, F., & Gine, M. (2017). Executive gender pay gaps: The roles of female risk aversion and board representation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 1232–1264. CrossRef
go back to reference Che, L., Langli, J. C., & Svanström, T. (2018). Education, experience, and audit effort. Auditing, 37(3), 91–115. CrossRef Che, L., Langli, J. C., & Svanström, T. (2018). Education, experience, and audit effort. Auditing, 37(3), 91–115. CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, Y., & Omer, T. C. (2019). Moving to Less Contaminated Audit Offices and the Likelihood of Misstatement. Available at SSRN 3411779. University of Nebraska—Lincoln working paper. Chen, Y., & Omer, T. C. (2019). Moving to Less Contaminated Audit Offices and the Likelihood of Misstatement. Available at SSRN 3411779. University of Nebraska—Lincoln working paper.
go back to reference Cheng, I. H., Hong, H., & Scheinkman, J. A. (2015). Yesterday’s heroes: compensation and risk at financial firms. The Journal of Finance, 70(2), 839–879. CrossRef Cheng, I. H., Hong, H., & Scheinkman, J. A. (2015). Yesterday’s heroes: compensation and risk at financial firms. The Journal of Finance, 70(2), 839–879. CrossRef
go back to reference Chi, H. Y., & Chin, C. L. (2011). Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality. Auditing, 30(2), 201–229. CrossRef Chi, H. Y., & Chin, C. L. (2011). Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality. Auditing, 30(2), 201–229. CrossRef
go back to reference Chin, C. L., & Chi, H. Y. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729–765. CrossRef Chin, C. L., & Chi, H. Y. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729–765. CrossRef
go back to reference Chu, J., A. Florou, and P. F. Pope. (2016). Does Accounting Education add Value in Auditing? Evidence from the U.K. Working paper, University of Cambridge, King’s College London, and The London School of Economics and Political Sciences Chu, J., A. Florou, and P. F. Pope. (2016). Does Accounting Education add Value in Auditing? Evidence from the U.K. Working paper, University of Cambridge, King’s College London, and The London School of Economics and Political Sciences
go back to reference Cunningham, L. M., Li, C., Stein, S. E., & Wright, N. S. (2019). What’s in a name? Initial evidence of US audit partner identification using difference-in-differences analyses. The Accounting Review, 94(5), 139–163. CrossRef Cunningham, L. M., Li, C., Stein, S. E., & Wright, N. S. (2019). What’s in a name? Initial evidence of US audit partner identification using difference-in-differences analyses. The Accounting Review, 94(5), 139–163. CrossRef
go back to reference Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary accounting research, 28(1), 17–82. CrossRef Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary accounting research, 28(1), 17–82. CrossRef
go back to reference Dechow, P., Sloan, R., & Sweeney, A. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70, 193–225. Dechow, P., Sloan, R., & Sweeney, A. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70, 193–225.
go back to reference DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 275–326. CrossRef DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 275–326. CrossRef
go back to reference Eagly, A. H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1380–1383. CrossRef Eagly, A. H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1380–1383. CrossRef
go back to reference Ege, M. S. (2015). Does internal audit function quality deter management misconduct? The Accounting Review, 90(2), 495–527. CrossRef Ege, M. S. (2015). Does internal audit function quality deter management misconduct? The Accounting Review, 90(2), 495–527. CrossRef
go back to reference Ettredge, M. L., Li, C., & Sun, L. (2006). The impact of SOX Section 404 internal control quality assessment on audit delay in the SOX era. Auditing, 25(2), 1–23. CrossRef Ettredge, M. L., Li, C., & Sun, L. (2006). The impact of SOX Section 404 internal control quality assessment on audit delay in the SOX era. Auditing, 25(2), 1–23. CrossRef
go back to reference Ettredge, M., Scholz, S., Smith, K. R., & Sun, L. (2010). How do restatements begin? Evidence of earnings management preceding restated financial reports. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37(3–4), 332–355. CrossRef Ettredge, M., Scholz, S., Smith, K. R., & Sun, L. (2010). How do restatements begin? Evidence of earnings management preceding restated financial reports. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37(3–4), 332–355. CrossRef
go back to reference Firth, M. (1997). The provision of nonaudit services by accounting firms to their audit clients. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(2), 1–21. CrossRef Firth, M. (1997). The provision of nonaudit services by accounting firms to their audit clients. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(2), 1–21. CrossRef
go back to reference Fondas, N., & Sassalos, S. (2000). A different voice in the boardroom: How the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Global Focus, 12, 13–22. Fondas, N., & Sassalos, S. (2000). A different voice in the boardroom: How the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Global Focus, 12, 13–22.
go back to reference Francis, J. R., Mehta, M. N., & Zhao, W. (2017). Audit office reputation shocks from gains and losses of major industry clients. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(4), 1922–1974. CrossRef Francis, J. R., Mehta, M. N., & Zhao, W. (2017). Audit office reputation shocks from gains and losses of major industry clients. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(4), 1922–1974. CrossRef
go back to reference Francis, J. R., Michas, P. N., & Seavey, S. E. (2013). Does audit market concentration harm the quality of audited earnings? Evidence from audit markets in 42 countries. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), 325–355. CrossRef Francis, J. R., Michas, P. N., & Seavey, S. E. (2013). Does audit market concentration harm the quality of audited earnings? Evidence from audit markets in 42 countries. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), 325–355. CrossRef
go back to reference Garcia-Blandon, J., Argilés-Bosch, J. M., & Ravenda, D. (2019). Is there a gender effect on the quality of audit services? Journal of Business Research, 96, 238–249. CrossRef Garcia-Blandon, J., Argilés-Bosch, J. M., & Ravenda, D. (2019). Is there a gender effect on the quality of audit services? Journal of Business Research, 96, 238–249. CrossRef
go back to reference Gibbins, M., McCracken, S. A., & Salterio, S. E. (2007). The chief financial officer’s perspective on auditor-client negotiations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(2), 387–422. CrossRef Gibbins, M., McCracken, S. A., & Salterio, S. E. (2007). The chief financial officer’s perspective on auditor-client negotiations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(2), 387–422. CrossRef
go back to reference Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard: Harvard University Press. CrossRef Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard: Harvard University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Givoly, D., & Palmon, D. (1982). Timeliness of annual earnings announcements: Some empirical evidence. The Accounting Review, 57, 486–508. Givoly, D., & Palmon, D. (1982). Timeliness of annual earnings announcements: Some empirical evidence. The Accounting Review, 57, 486–508.
go back to reference Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 314–338. CrossRef Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 314–338. CrossRef
go back to reference Gul, F. A., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2013). Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993–2023. CrossRef Gul, F. A., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2013). Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993–2023. CrossRef
go back to reference Habib, A., Bhuiyan, M. B. U., Huang, H. J., & Miah, M. S. (2019). Determinants of audit report lag: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 23(1), 20–44. CrossRef Habib, A., Bhuiyan, M. B. U., Huang, H. J., & Miah, M. S. (2019). Determinants of audit report lag: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 23(1), 20–44. CrossRef
go back to reference Hao, J., Pham, V., Sanchez, D., and Sanchez, J. (2018). The CEO gender compensation Gap: Do CEO abilities and labor market mobilities matter? University of Texas-San Antonio working paper. Hao, J., Pham, V., Sanchez, D., and Sanchez, J. (2018). The CEO gender compensation Gap: Do CEO abilities and labor market mobilities matter? University of Texas-San Antonio working paper.
go back to reference Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2015). The female audit fee premium. Auditing, 34(4), 171–195. CrossRef Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2015). The female audit fee premium. Auditing, 34(4), 171–195. CrossRef
go back to reference Hardies, K., Lennox, C. S., & Li, B. (2020). Gender discrimination? Evidence from the Belgian public accounting profession.  Contemporary Accounting Research, Forthcoming. Hardies, K., Lennox, C. S., & Li, B. (2020). Gender discrimination? Evidence from the Belgian public accounting profession.  Contemporary Accounting Research, Forthcoming.
go back to reference Hardies, K., Vandenhaute, M. L., & Breesch, D. (2018). An Analysis of auditors’ going-concern reporting accuracy in private firms. Accounting Horizons, 32(4), 117–132. CrossRef Hardies, K., Vandenhaute, M. L., & Breesch, D. (2018). An Analysis of auditors’ going-concern reporting accuracy in private firms. Accounting Horizons, 32(4), 117–132. CrossRef
go back to reference Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2018). Measuring accounting reporting complexity with XBRL. The Accounting Review, 93(1), 259–287. CrossRef Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2018). Measuring accounting reporting complexity with XBRL. The Accounting Review, 93(1), 259–287. CrossRef
go back to reference Hossain, S., Chapple, L., & Monroe, G. S. (2018). Does auditor gender affect issuing going-concern decisions for financially distressed clients? Accounting & Finance, 58(4), 1027–1061. CrossRef Hossain, S., Chapple, L., & Monroe, G. S. (2018). Does auditor gender affect issuing going-concern decisions for financially distressed clients? Accounting & Finance, 58(4), 1027–1061. CrossRef
go back to reference Huang, T., Huang, H., & Lee, C. (2014). Corporate executive’s gender and audit fees. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(6), 527–547. CrossRef Huang, T., Huang, H., & Lee, C. (2014). Corporate executive’s gender and audit fees. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(6), 527–547. CrossRef
go back to reference Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex-typing. Handbook of child psychology, 4(4), 387–467. Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex-typing. Handbook of child psychology, 4(4), 387–467.
go back to reference Ibarra, H. (1997). Paving an alternative route: Gender differences in managerial networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 91–102. CrossRef Ibarra, H. (1997). Paving an alternative route: Gender differences in managerial networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 91–102. CrossRef
go back to reference Ittonen, K., Miettinen, J., & Vähämaa, S. (2010). Does female representation on audit committees affect audit fees? Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 49(3/4), 113–139. Ittonen, K., Miettinen, J., & Vähämaa, S. (2010). Does female representation on audit committees affect audit fees? Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 49(3/4), 113–139.
go back to reference Ittonen, K., & Peni, E. (2012). Auditor’s gender and audit fees. International Journal of Auditing, 16(1), 1–18. CrossRef Ittonen, K., & Peni, E. (2012). Auditor’s gender and audit fees. International Journal of Auditing, 16(1), 1–18. CrossRef
go back to reference Ittonen, K., Vähämaa, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2013). Female auditors and accruals quality. Accounting Horizons, 27(2), 205–228. CrossRef Ittonen, K., Vähämaa, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2013). Female auditors and accruals quality. Accounting Horizons, 27(2), 205–228. CrossRef
go back to reference Kassman v. KPMG LLP (2011) United States District Court Southern District of New York. Complaint filed on June 2. Kassman v. KPMG LLP (2011) United States District Court Southern District of New York. Complaint filed on June 2.
go back to reference Kim, J. B., Chung, R., & Firth, M. (2003). Auditor conservatism, asymmetric monitoring, and earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(2), 323–359. CrossRef Kim, J. B., Chung, R., & Firth, M. (2003). Auditor conservatism, asymmetric monitoring, and earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(2), 323–359. CrossRef
go back to reference Knapp, C. A., & Knapp, M. C. (2001). The effects of experience and explicit fraud risk assessment in detecting fraud with analytical procedures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(1), 25–37. CrossRef Knapp, C. A., & Knapp, M. C. (2001). The effects of experience and explicit fraud risk assessment in detecting fraud with analytical procedures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(1), 25–37. CrossRef
go back to reference Knechel, W. R., Vanstraelen, A., & Zerni, M. (2015). Does the identity of engagement partners matter? An analysis of audit partner reporting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(4), 1443–1478. CrossRef Knechel, W. R., Vanstraelen, A., & Zerni, M. (2015). Does the identity of engagement partners matter? An analysis of audit partner reporting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(4), 1443–1478. CrossRef
go back to reference Krishnan, G. V., & Parsons, L. M. (2008). Getting to the bottom line: An exploration of gender and earnings quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 65–76. CrossRef Krishnan, G. V., & Parsons, L. M. (2008). Getting to the bottom line: An exploration of gender and earnings quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 65–76. CrossRef
go back to reference Krishnan, J., Sami, H., & Zhang, Y. (2005). Does the provision of nonaudit services affect investor perceptions of auditor independence? Auditing, 24(2), 111–135. CrossRef Krishnan, J., Sami, H., & Zhang, Y. (2005). Does the provision of nonaudit services affect investor perceptions of auditor independence? Auditing, 24(2), 111–135. CrossRef
go back to reference Lai, K. M., Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. S. (2017). Board gender diversity, auditor fees, and auditor choice. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(3), 1681–1714. CrossRef Lai, K. M., Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. S. (2017). Board gender diversity, auditor fees, and auditor choice. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(3), 1681–1714. CrossRef
go back to reference Laurion, H., Lawrence, A., & Ryans, J. P. (2017). US audit partner rotations. The Accounting Review, 92(3), 209–237. CrossRef Laurion, H., Lawrence, A., & Ryans, J. P. (2017). US audit partner rotations. The Accounting Review, 92(3), 209–237. CrossRef
go back to reference Lee, H. S., Nagy, A. L., & Zimmerman, A. B. (2019). Audit partner assignments and audit quality in the United States. The Accounting Review, 94(2), 297–323. CrossRef Lee, H. S., Nagy, A. L., & Zimmerman, A. B. (2019). Audit partner assignments and audit quality in the United States. The Accounting Review, 94(2), 297–323. CrossRef
go back to reference Lennox, C. S., & Wu, X. (2018). A review of the archival literature on audit partners. Accounting Horizons, 32(2), 1–35. CrossRef Lennox, C. S., & Wu, X. (2018). A review of the archival literature on audit partners. Accounting Horizons, 32(2), 1–35. CrossRef
go back to reference Li, L., Qi, B., Tian, G., & Zhang, G. (2017). The contagion effect of low-quality audits at the level of individual auditors. The Accounting Review, 92(1), 137–163. CrossRef Li, L., Qi, B., Tian, G., & Zhang, G. (2017). The contagion effect of low-quality audits at the level of individual auditors. The Accounting Review, 92(1), 137–163. CrossRef
go back to reference Liao, J., Smith, D., & Liu, X. (2019). Female CFOs and accounting fraud: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 53, 449–463. CrossRef Liao, J., Smith, D., & Liu, X. (2019). Female CFOs and accounting fraud: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 53, 449–463. CrossRef
go back to reference Mason, E. S., & Mudrack, P. E. (1996). Gender and ethical orientation: A test of gender and occupational socialization theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 599–604. CrossRef Mason, E. S., & Mudrack, P. E. (1996). Gender and ethical orientation: A test of gender and occupational socialization theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 599–604. CrossRef
go back to reference Newton, N. J., Wang, D., & Wilkins, M. S. (2013). Does a lack of choice lead to lower quality? Evidence from auditor competition and client restatements. Auditing, 32(3), 31–67. CrossRef Newton, N. J., Wang, D., & Wilkins, M. S. (2013). Does a lack of choice lead to lower quality? Evidence from auditor competition and client restatements. Auditing, 32(3), 31–67. CrossRef
go back to reference Numan, W., & Willekens, M. (2012). An empirical test of spatial competition in the audit market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1–2), 450–465. CrossRef Numan, W., & Willekens, M. (2012). An empirical test of spatial competition in the audit market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1–2), 450–465. CrossRef
go back to reference O’Connor, M. A. (2006). Women executives in gladiator corporate cultures: The behavioral dynamics of gender, ego, and power. Md. L. Rev., 65, 465. O’Connor, M. A. (2006). Women executives in gladiator corporate cultures: The behavioral dynamics of gender, ego, and power. Md. L. Rev., 65, 465.
go back to reference O’Donnell, E., & Johnson, E. N. (2001). The effects of auditor gender and task complexity on information processing efficiency. International Journal of Auditing, 5(2), 91–105. CrossRef O’Donnell, E., & Johnson, E. N. (2001). The effects of auditor gender and task complexity on information processing efficiency. International Journal of Auditing, 5(2), 91–105. CrossRef
go back to reference Page v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (2004) In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division. Complaint filed on June 21. Page v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (2004) In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division. Complaint filed on June 21.
go back to reference Palmrose, Z. V. (1988). 1987 Competitive manuscript co-winner: An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. Accounting Review, 20, 55–73. CrossRef Palmrose, Z. V. (1988). 1987 Competitive manuscript co-winner: An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. Accounting Review, 20, 55–73. CrossRef
go back to reference Parker, R., Dao, M., Huang, H., & Yan, Y. (2017). Disclosing material weakness in internal controls: Does the gender of audit committee members matter? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 24(3–4), 407–420. CrossRef Parker, R., Dao, M., Huang, H., & Yan, Y. (2017). Disclosing material weakness in internal controls: Does the gender of audit committee members matter? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 24(3–4), 407–420. CrossRef
go back to reference Peni, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2010). Female executives and earnings management. Managerial Finance, 36(7), 629–645. CrossRef Peni, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2010). Female executives and earnings management. Managerial Finance, 36(7), 629–645. CrossRef
go back to reference Pillsbury, C. M., Capozzoli, L., & Ciampa, A. (1989). A synthesis of research studies regarding the upward mobility of women in public accounting. Accounting Horizons, 3(1), 63. Pillsbury, C. M., Capozzoli, L., & Ciampa, A. (1989). A synthesis of research studies regarding the upward mobility of women in public accounting. Accounting Horizons, 3(1), 63.
go back to reference Reichelt, K. J., & Wang, D. (2010). National and office-specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(3), 647–686. CrossRef Reichelt, K. J., & Wang, D. (2010). National and office-specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(3), 647–686. CrossRef
go back to reference Reid, C. D., & Youngman, J. F. (2017). New audit partner identification rules may offer opportunities and benefits. Business Horizons, 60(4), 507–518. CrossRef Reid, C. D., & Youngman, J. F. (2017). New audit partner identification rules may offer opportunities and benefits. Business Horizons, 60(4), 507–518. CrossRef
go back to reference Ruegger, D., & King, E. W. (1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business ethics, 11(3), 179–186. CrossRef Ruegger, D., & King, E. W. (1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business ethics, 11(3), 179–186. CrossRef
go back to reference Schubert, R. (2006). Analyzing and managing risks – on the importance of gender differences in risk attitudes. Managerial Finance, 32(9), 706–715. CrossRef Schubert, R. (2006). Analyzing and managing risks – on the importance of gender differences in risk attitudes. Managerial Finance, 32(9), 706–715. CrossRef
go back to reference Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190. CrossRef Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190. CrossRef
go back to reference Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644. CrossRef Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644. CrossRef
go back to reference Sundgren, S., & Svanström, T. (2014). Auditor-in-charge characteristics and going-concern reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(2), 531–550. CrossRef Sundgren, S., & Svanström, T. (2014). Auditor-in-charge characteristics and going-concern reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(2), 531–550. CrossRef
go back to reference Velury, U., & Jenkins, D. S. (2006). Institutional ownership and the quality of earnings. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 1043–1051. CrossRef Velury, U., & Jenkins, D. S. (2006). Institutional ownership and the quality of earnings. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 1043–1051. CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, Y., Yu, L., & Zhao, Y. (2015). The association between audit-partner quality and engagement quality: Evidence from financial report misstatements. Auditing, 34(3), 81–111. CrossRef Wang, Y., Yu, L., & Zhao, Y. (2015). The association between audit-partner quality and engagement quality: Evidence from financial report misstatements. Auditing, 34(3), 81–111. CrossRef
go back to reference Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989) In the Supreme Court of the United States (490 U.S. 228). Case decided on May 1. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989) In the Supreme Court of the United States (490 U.S. 228). Case decided on May 1.
go back to reference Whisenant, S., Sankaraguruswamy, S., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non-audit fees. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(4), 721–744. CrossRef Whisenant, S., Sankaraguruswamy, S., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non-audit fees. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(4), 721–744. CrossRef
go back to reference Wilks, T. J., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2004). Decomposition of fraud-risk assessments and auditors’ sensitivity to fraud cues. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(3), 719–745. CrossRef Wilks, T. J., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2004). Decomposition of fraud-risk assessments and auditors’ sensitivity to fraud cues. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(3), 719–745. CrossRef
go back to reference Witt, S. D. (1997). Parental influence on children’s socialization to gender roles. Adolescence, 32(126), 253. Witt, S. D. (1997). Parental influence on children’s socialization to gender roles. Adolescence, 32(126), 253.
go back to reference Wood, W., Polek, D., & Aiken, C. (1985). Sex differences in group task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 63. CrossRef Wood, W., Polek, D., & Aiken, C. (1985). Sex differences in group task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 63. CrossRef
go back to reference Zalata, A. M., Tauringana, V., & Tingbani, I. (2018). Audit committee financial expertise, gender, and earnings management: Does gender of the financial expert matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 55, 170–183. CrossRef Zalata, A. M., Tauringana, V., & Tingbani, I. (2018). Audit committee financial expertise, gender, and earnings management: Does gender of the financial expert matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 55, 170–183. CrossRef
go back to reference Zhang, J. H. (2018). Accounting comparability, audit effort, and audit outcomes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 245–276. CrossRef Zhang, J. H. (2018). Accounting comparability, audit effort, and audit outcomes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 245–276. CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Gender Effects of Audit Partners on Audit Outcomes: Evidence of Rule 3211 Adoption
Authors
Jie Hao
Viet Pham
Meng Guo
Publication date
23-01-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04732-w

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Journal of Business Ethics 2/2022 Go to the issue

Premium Partner