Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book
This study examines the impact of nonlinearity on the targeted observations for tropical cyclone prediction. The nonlinearity of the typhoon is determined by comparing the first singular vector (FSV) and the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP), which is the nonlinear extension of FSV. If the similarity between the CNOP and FSV is larger than 0.5, then the typhoon is categorized as weak nonlinearity, otherwise, the typhoon is categorized as strong nonlinearity. First, the impact of nonlinearity on the typhoon targeted observations due to different resolutions is studied. Two typhoons, Meari (2004) and Matsa (2005), with 24 h forecast length are chosen, with 120-, 60-, and 30-km resolutions, respectively. It is found that the nonlinearity of both cases becomes stronger as the resolution increases. However, the sensitive areas identified with lower resolutions are more similar to each other than those identified with finer resolutions. This means that when the motion of typhoon has been described as linear or weakly nonlinear, the sensitive area may be easier to determine. Then, the impact of nonlinearity on the typhoon targeted observations due to different forecast length is investigated. In this part, typhoons Meari (2004) and Matsa (2005) with 60 km resolution are considered with 12-, 24-, and 36-h forecast lengths. We further studied two issues. In the first the initial time is fixed, while in the second the forecast time is fixed. Results show that no matter which issue is considered, typhoon Matsa exhibits stronger nonlinearity than typhoon Meari. Accordingly, Meari is categorized as a linear case, while Matsa as a nonlinear case. In the linear case, the sensitive areas identified for special forecast times (when the initial time is fixed) resemble those identified for other forecast times. Targeted observations deployed to improve a specific time forecast would thus also benefit forecasts at other times. In the nonlinear case, the similarities among the sensitive areas identified for different forecast times were more limited. The deployment of targeted observations in the nonlinear case would therefore need to be adapted to achieve large improvements for different targeted forecasts. For both cases, the closer the forecast time, the higher the similarities of the sensitive areas. When the forecast time is fixed, the sensitive areas in the linear case diverge continuously from the verification area as the forecast period lengthens due to the determination of the subtropical high in the movement of the typhoon, while those in the nonlinear case are always located around the initial cyclone indicating that the main factors affecting the typhoon movements are located within the typhoon. The deployment of targeted observations to improve a special forecast depends strongly on the time of deployment. Generally, it seems that the sensitive areas are easy to be determined in the linear case and more beneficial for the forecast. In the nonlinear case, the identification of sensitive areas is more difficult, which results in harder deployments in targeted observations.
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
Ancell, B.C., and C.F. Mass. 2006. Structure, growth rates, and tangent linear accuracy of adjoint sensitivities with respect to horizontal and vertical resolution. Monthly Weather Review 134: 2971–2988. CrossRef
Birgin, E.G., J.E. Martinez, and R. Marcos. 2001. Algorithm 813: SPG—software for convex-constrained optimization. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 27: 340–349. CrossRef
Bishop, C.H., and Z. Toth. 1999. Ensemble transformation and adaptive observations. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 56: 1748–1765. CrossRef
Bishop, C.H., B.J. Etherton, and S.J. Majumdar. 2001. Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: Theoretical aspects. Monthly Weather Review 129: 420–436. CrossRef
Buizza, R., and A. Montani. 1999. Targeting observations using singular vectors. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 56: 2965–2985. CrossRef
Buizza, R., C. Cardinali, G. Kelly, and J. Thépaut. 2007. The value of targeted observations part II: The value of observations taken in singular vectors-based target areas. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 133: 1817–1832. CrossRef
Chen, B.-Y., and M. Mu. 2012. The roles of spatial locations and patterns of initial errors in the uncertainties of tropical cyclone forecasts. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 29: 63–78. CrossRef
Chen, B.-Y., M. Mu, and X.H. Qin. 2013. The impact of assimilating drop-windsonde data deployed at different sites on typhoon track forecasts. Monthly Weather Review 141 (8): 2669–2682. CrossRef
Dudhia, J. 1993. A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Monthly Weather Review 121: 1493–1513. CrossRef
Ehrendorfer, M., and R.M. Errico. 1995. Mesoscale predictability and the spectrum of optimal perturbations. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 52: 3475–3500. CrossRef
Hamill, T.M., and C. Snyder. 2002. Using improved background-error covariance from an ensemble kalman filter for adaptive observations. Monthly Weather Review 130: 1552–1572. CrossRef
Huang, L., and Z. Meng. 2014. Quality of the target area for metrics with different nonlinearities in a mesoscale convective system. Monthly Weather Review 142: 2379–2397. CrossRef
Kim, H.M., M.C. Morgan, and R.E. Morss. 2004. Evolution of analysis error and adjoint-based sensitivities: Implications for adaptive observations. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 61: 795–812. CrossRef
Majumdar, S.J., S.D. Aberson, C.H. Bishop, R. Buizza, M.S. Peng, and C.A. Reynolds. 2006. A comparison of adaptive observing guidance for Atlantic tropical cyclones. Monthly Weather Review 134: 2354–2372. CrossRef
Mu, M., and W.S. Duan. 2003. A new approach to studying ENSO predictability: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. Chinese Science Bulletin 48: 747–749. CrossRef
Mu, M., and Z.N. Jiang. 2008. A new method to generate the initial perturbations in ensemble forecast: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations. Chinese Science Bulletin 53: 2062–2068S.
Mu, M., H.L. Wang, and F.F. Zhou. 2007. A preliminary application of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation to adaptive observation. Chinese Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 31: 1102–1112. (in Chinese).
Mu, M., F.F. Zhou, and H.L. Wang. 2009. A method to identify the sensitive areas in targeting for tropical cyclone prediction: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. Monthly Weather Review 137: 1623–1639. CrossRef
Palmer, T.N., R. Gelaro, J. Barkmeijer, and R. Buizza. 1998. Singular vectors, metrics, and adaptive observations. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 55: 633–653. CrossRef
Qin, X.-H., and M. Mu. 2011a. Influence of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations sensitivity on typhoon track forecasts. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 138: 185–197. CrossRef
———. 2011b. A study on the reduction of forecast error variance by three adaptive observation approaches for tropical cyclone prediction. Monthly Weather Review 139: 2218–2232. CrossRef
Rivier, O., G. Lapeyre, and O. Talagrand. 2008. Nonlinear generalization of singular vectors: Behavior in a baroclinic unstable flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65: 1896–1911. CrossRef
Tan, X.W., B. Wang, and D.L. Wang. 2010. Impact of different guidances on sensitive areas of targeting observations based on the CNOP method. Acta Metallurgica Sinica 24: 17–30.
Terwisscha van Scheltinga, A.D., and H.A. Dijkstra. 2008. Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations of the double-gyre ocean circulation. Nonlinear Processes Geophysics 15: 727–734. CrossRef
Wu, C.C., J.H. Chen, P.H. Lin, and K.H. Chou. 2007. Targeted observations of tropical cyclone movement based on the adjoint-derived sensitivity steering vector. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64: 2611–2626. CrossRef
Zhou, F.F., and H. Zhang. 2014. Study of the schemes based on CNOP method to identify sensitive areas for typhoon targeted observations [J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (in Chinese) 38 (2): 261–272.
Zou, X., F. Vandenberghe, M. Pondeca, and Y.-H. Kuo. 1997. Introduction to adjoint techniques and the MM5 adjoint modeling system. NCAR Tech. Note, NCAR/TN-435_STR.
- The Impact of Nonlinearity on the Targeted Observations for Tropical Cyclone Prediction
- Springer International Publishing
- Sequence number
in-adhesives, MKVS, Zühlke/© Zühlke