Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Published in:

19-12-2022

The Impact of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulation-Based Learning on Motivation and Academic Achievement Among Malawian Physics Students

Authors: Herbert James Banda, Joseph Nzabahimana

Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Issue 1/2023

Abstract

The study investigated the impact of PhET simulation-based learning on students’ motivation and academic achievement in learning oscillations and waves among Malawian secondary students. The following research questions guided the study: (i) What were students’ motivation and academic achievement levels at the beginning of the study in oscillation and waves? (ii) To what levels do PhET interactive simulation-based learning impact students’ motivation and achievement in oscillations and waves? (iii) Is the change in post-test scores due to the students’ characteristics in non-randomized settings or the PhET interactive simulation-based learning? A sample of 280 (44.6% females) form three secondary school students with a mean age of 17.5 (SD = 1.424) from four schools in Blantyre urban district in Malawi was used in a quasi-experimental design of non-equivalent groups. The experimental group was exposed to PhET simulation-based learning, while the conventional teaching methods were used in the control group. Pre- and post-tests were used to collect data on academic achievement, and questionnaires collected data on motivation. Independent samples t-test showed a statistical difference between the two groups on post-test of the academic achievement. Results from linear regression indicated that the differences between the two groups in the post-test were not due to students’ characteristics but rather the intervention with p < 0.01. The ANCOVA test on motivation constructs showed a significant difference with a small effect size between the study groups on self-efficacy, active learning strategies, performance goals, achievement goals, learning environment stimulation, and attitudes towards learning with computer learning. The results from the study suggest that PhET simulation-based learning improved the learning of oscillations and waves. PhET simulation-based learning provides visualizations and teaching aids that help easily understand content knowledge, hence improving students’ academic achievement and motivation levels.

previous article Exploration of Students’ Social Presence in Web-Based Discussion for Conceptual Learning of Organic Chemistry

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 69.000 Bücher
über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 50.000 Bücher
über 380 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Aktamiş, H., Hiğde, E., & Özden, B. (2016). Effects of the inquiry-based learning method on students’ achievement, science process skills and attitudes towards science: A meta-analysis science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(4), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10183a

Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2021). Effect of integrating physics education technology simulations on students conceptual understanding in physics: A review of literature. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 23108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.023108

Batuyong, C. T., & Antonio, V. V. (2018). Exploring the effect of PhET interactive simulation- based activities on students’ performance and learning experiences in electromagnetism. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), 121–131. www.apjmr.com

Bhat, M. A. (2013). Research article academic achievement of secondary school students in relation to self-concept. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research Research, 4(6), 738–741.

Bozkurt, E., & Ilik, A. (2010). The effect of computer simulations over students’ beliefs on physics and physics success. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4587–4591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.735 CrossRef

Cheng, C., Wang, Y., & Liu, W. X. (2019). Exploring the related factors in students’ academic achievement for the sustainable education of rural areas. MDPI, 11(5974). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215974

Chumba, A. K., Omwenga, E. N., & Atemi, G. (2020). Effects of using computer simulations on learners’ academic achievement in physics in secondary schools in Ainamoi Sub-County, Kericho County. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education, 4(1), 126–138.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Cronk, B.C. (2020). How to use SPSS: A step-by-step guide to analysis and interpretation (11th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429340321

Crow, L., & Crow, K. (1969). Adolescent development and adjustment. Mc Grow Hill Book Company.

de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science (New York, N.Y.), 340(6130), 305308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579

de Vries, L. E., & May, M. (2019). Virtual laboratory simulation in the education of laboratory technicians–motivation and study intensity. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(3), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/BMB.21221 CrossRef

Dhull, P. D., & Rohtash. (2017). Elements of learning styles and academic achievement of secondary school students. International Journal of Research in Economics and Social Science, 7(5), 136–140.

Doster, H., & Cuevas, J. (2021). Comparing computer-based programs’ impact on problem solving ability and motivation. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 3(3), 457–488. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.121

Eckhardt, M., Urhahne, D., Conrad, O., & Harms, U. (2013). How effective is instructional support for learning with computer simulations? Instructional Science, 41, 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9220-y CrossRef

Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1–22). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009048817385

Fan, X., Geelan, D., & Gillies, R. (2018). Evaluating a novel instructional sequence for conceptual change in physics using interactive simulations. Education Sciences, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010029 CrossRef

Farrokhnia, M. R., & Esmailpour, A. (2010). A study on the impact of real, virtual and comprehensive experimenting on students’ conceptual understanding of DC electric circuits and their skills in undergraduate electricity. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5474–5482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.893 CrossRef

Fritz, C., Morris, P., & Richler, J. (2012). Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 218. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338

Ganasen, S., & Shamuganathan, S. (2017). The effectiveness of physics education technology (PhET) interactive simulations in enhancing matriculation students’ understanding of chemical equilibrium and remediating their misconceptions. In: Karpudewan M., Md Zain A., Chandrasegaran A. (eds).Overco. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3437-4_9

Gani, A., Syukri, M., Khairunnisak, K., Nazar, M., Sari, R. P., Nazar, N., Sari, R. P., Nazar, M., & Sari, R. P. (2020). Improving concept understanding and motivation of learners through Phet simulation word. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567, 042013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042013 CrossRef

Gondwe, F. (2018). ICT integration during teaching practicum in the face of national standards for teachers education in Malawi. In https://www.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/idec/intl_conference_2018#article24 (Ed.), 11th Biennal Comperative Education Society of ASIA, CESA 2018.

Gondwe, F. (2020). ICT Integration into teacher eduaction: teacher educators experience of policy at two teacher education institutions in Malawi. Journal of International Development Studies, 29(1), 117128. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jids/29/1/29_117/_pdf

Gross, R. (2010). Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour (6th ed). Hodder Education; An Hachette UK company.

Gunhaart, A., & Srisawasdi, N. (2012). Effect of integrated computer-based laboratory environment on students’ physics conceptual learning of sound wave properties. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5750–5755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.510 CrossRef

Guy, R. S., & Lownes-Jackson, M. (2015). The use of computer simulation to compare student performance in traditional versus distance learning environments. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 12, 095–109. https://doi.org/10.28945/2254

Hannel, S. L., & Cuevas, J. (2018). A study on science achievement and motivation using computer-based simulations compared to traditional hands-on manipulation a study on science achievement and motivation using computer-based. Georgia Educational Researcher, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2018.15103

Hensberry, K. K., Whitacre, I., Findley, K., Schellinger, J., & Wheeler, M. B. (2018). Engaging students with mathematics through play. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 24(3), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.24.3.0179 CrossRef

Hinde, E., & Perry, N. (2007). Elementary teachers application of jean piagets theories of cognitive development during social studies curriculum debates in Arizona. The Elementary School Journal, 1(108), 63–79.

Hollow, D., & Masperi, P. (2009). An evaluation of the use of ICT within primary education in Malawi. International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD), 2009, 27–34. CrossRef

Ibezim, N. E., & Asogwa, A. N. (2020). Computer simulation model effect on students’ academic achievement in computer logic. International Journal of Management, 11(8), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.11.8.2020.006

Imbert, C. (2017). Computer simulations and computational models in science. In Springer handbook of model-based science (pp. 735–781). Springer.

Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (1996). Validating the computer attitude questionnaire (CAQ). Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association.

Krobthong, T. (2015). Teaching university physics by using interactive science simulations methods. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1811–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.240

Koh, C., Tan, H. S., Tan, K. C., Fang, L., Fong, F. M., Kan, D., Lye, S. L., & Wee, M. L. (2010). Investigating the effect of 3D simulation- based learning on the motivation and. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01059.x CrossRef

Lasisi, A. R., Oti, E., Arowolo, J. G., Agbeyenku, P., & Ojoko, A. N. (2021). The effect of innovative computer simulation instruction on students’ academic performance in abstract concepts in science. British Journal of Education, 9(3), 1–8.

Lazonder, A., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366 CrossRef

Li, T., Yuan, L., Wang, Q., & Liao, B. (2014). An experimental study on the integrated mode of the computer simulation in scientific discovery learning in middle school physics education. In Internation Conference on Science Education 2012 Proceedings (pp. 93–104). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54365-4_9

Lin, L., Hsu, Y., & Yeh, Y. (2012). The role of computer simulation in an inquiry-based learning environment: Reconstructing geological events as geologists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 221, 370–383. CrossRef

Liu, C., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., & Bano, M. (2021). Inquiry-based mobile learning in secondary school science education: A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12505 CrossRef

Mallari, R., & Lumanog, G. (2020) The effectiveness of integrating PhET interactive simulation-based activities in improving the student’s academic performance in science. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 8(9) 1150–1153. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020.31708

MANEB. (2017). Malawi school certificate of education physical science I & II chief examier’s report. Retrieved December 5, 2020, from https://www.maneb.edu.mw/

MANEB. (2018). Malawi school certificate of education physical science I & II chief examier’s report. Retrieved September 5, 2020, from https://www.maneb.edu.mw/

MANEB. (2019a). Malawi school certificate of education physics I & II chief examiner’s report. Retrieved December 5, 2020, from https://www.maneb.edu.mw/

MANEB. (2019b). The Malawi national examination board (MANEB) newsletter. In MANEB newsletter (Vol. 1). Retrieved October 5, 2020, from https://www.maneb.edu.mw/reports.html

Marces, I. I. E., & Caballes, D. G. (2019). Enhancing the academic performance of grade 10 students in physics through interactive simulation laboratory experiments. CiiT International Journal of Data Mining and Knowledge Engineering, 11(4), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12869.60644

Maya, J., Luesia, J. F., Pérez-Padilla, J., & Sánchez-Santamaría, J. (2021). The relationship between learning styles and academic performance: Consistency among multiple assessment methods in psychology and education students. Sustainability, 13(3341). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063341

Mirana, V. P. (2016). Effects of computer simulations and constructivist approach on students’ epistemological beliefs, motivation and conceptual understanding in physics. International Conference on Research in Social Sciences, Humanities and Education, 89–93. https://doi.org/10.17758/URUAE.UH0516087

MoEST. (2008). National Education Sector Plan (NESP) 2008–2017.

Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00170.x CrossRef

Moreno, R. (2007). Optimizing learning from animations by minimizing cognitive load: Cognitive and affective consequences of signaling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1348 CrossRef

Mrani, C. A., El Hajjami, A., & El Khattabi, K. (2020). Effects of the integration of PhET simulations in the teaching and learning of the physical sciences of common core (Morocco). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 3014–3025. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080730

Mwale, C. C. K., & Bahati, B. (2021). Examining the effect of solve elec simulation on student’ s understanding of electric current in high school physics in Lilongwe, Malawi. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education, 5(3), 136–152.

Myers, D. G. (2011). Exploring psychology eighth edition in modules. Worth Publishers.

Nkemakolam, O. E., Chinelo, O. F., & Jane, M. C. (2018). Effect of computer simulations on secondary school students’ academic achievement in chemistry in Anambra State. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4(4), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2018.44.284.289

Nyirongo, N. K. (2009). Technology adoption and integration: A descriptive study of a higher education institution in a developing nation [Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State]. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920312803582960

Otrel-Cass, K., Girault, I., Renken, M., Peffer, M., & Chiocarriello, A. (2015). Considerations for integrating simulations in the science classroom (pp. 29–34). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24615-4_6

Otrel-Cass, K., Renken, M., Peffer, M. E., Girault, I., & Chiocarriello, A. (2016). Inquiry-based science education and problem-based learning: Motivations, objectives, and challenges relevant to computer simulations. In Simulations as scaffolds in science education. SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24615-4_4

Peffer, M., Matthew, L., Beckler, M., Schunn, C., Maggie, R., & Revak, A. (2016). Science classroom inquiry (SCI) simulations: A novel method to scaffold science learning. PLoS ONE, 10(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120638

Perkins, K. (2020). Transforming STEM learning at scale: PhET interactive simulations. Childhood Education, 96(4), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2020.1796451 CrossRef

PhET. (2021). PhET: Free online physics, chemistry, biology, earth science and math simulations. PhET. (2020). PhET. Retrieved December 5, 2020, from https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/browse

Podolefsky, N. S., Rehn, D., & Perkins, K. K. (2013). Affordances of play for student agency and student-centered pedagogy. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513(1), 306. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789713 CrossRef

Potane, J. D., Bayeta, R. R., Education, S., & Specialist, P. (2018). Virtual learning through PhET interactive simulation: A proactive approach in improving students’ academic achievement in science. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3166565 CrossRef

Prima, E. C., Putri, A. R., & Rustaman, N. (2018). Learning solar system using PhET simulation to improve students’ understanding and motivation. Journal of Science Learning, 1(March), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v1i2.10239

Renken, M., Peffer, M., Otrel-Cass, K., Girault, I., & Chiocarriello, A. (2016). Simulations as scaffolds in science education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24615-4 CrossRef

Rolland, R. (2012). Synthesizing the evidence on classroom goal structures in middle and secondary schools: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Review of Educational Research, 82(4), 396–435. CrossRef

Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and counternulls on other people’s published data: General procedures for research consumers. Psychological Methods, 1(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.4.331 CrossRef

Rutten, N. (2014). Teaching with simulations. University of Twente. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789402119589

Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017 CrossRef

Sanchez, D. R., Nelson, T., Kraiger, K., Weiner, E., Lu, Y., & Schnall, J. (2021). Defining motivation in video game-based training: Exploring the differences between measures of motivation. International Journal of Training and Development, 26(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJTD.12233 CrossRef

Sarabando, C., Cravino, J. P., & Soares, A. A. (2011). Improving student understanding of the concepts of weight and mass with a computer simulation. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 109–127. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.109

Senko, C., Hulleman, C., & Harackiewicz, J. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26–42. CrossRef

Simon, N. (2014). Simulated, and virtual science laboratory experiments: Improving critical thinking, and higher-order learning skills,. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.). Society for Information Technology, and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 453–459). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education(AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/130788

Slavin, R. (2018). Educational psychology :Theory and practice (Twelfth ed). London: Pearson Education, Inc.

Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370. https://www.oepos.ca.uky.edu

Talan, T. (2021). The effect of simulation technique on academic achievement : a meta- analysis study. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.141

Theobald, R., & Freeman, S. (2014). Is it the intervention or the students ? Using linear regression to control for student characteristics in undergraduate STEM education research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe-13-07-0136

Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323737 CrossRef

Usher, A., & Kober, N. (2012). Student motivation: An overlooked piece of school reform. Center on Education Policy.

Wentzel, K. R., & Brophy, J. (2014). Motivating students to learn. In Routledge (4th ed).

Whitacre, I., Hensberry, K., Schellinger, J., & Findley, K. (2019). Variations on play with interactive computer simulations: Balancing competing priorities. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(5), 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1532536 CrossRef

Wieman, C., Adams, W., Loeblein, P., & Perkins, K. (2010). Teaching physics using PhET simulations. The Physics Teacher, 48(4), 225–227. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3361987 CrossRef

Title: The Impact of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulation-Based Learning on Motivation and Academic Achievement Among Malawian Physics Students
Authors: Herbert James Banda
Joseph Nzabahimana
Publication date: 19-12-2022
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10010-3

Springer Professional

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Exploration of Students’ Social Presence in Web-Based Discussion for Conceptual Learning of Organic Chemistry

A Phenomenography Study of STEM Teachers’ Conceptions of Using Three-Dimensional Modeling and Printing (3DMP) in Teaching

Effects of Wearable Hybrid AR/VR Learning Material on High School Students’ Situational Interest, Engagement, and Learning Performance: the Case of a Physics Laboratory Learning Environment

Examining Science and Technology/Engineering Educators’ Views of Teaching Biomedical Concepts Through Physical Computing

Enhancing Students’ Understanding of Nerve Cells’ Structures and Their Symbiotic Functioning by Using Technology-Enhanced Instruction Incorporating Virtual Labs and Animations

Computational Thinking to Learn Environmental Sustainability: A Learning Progression

Premium Partners