Skip to main content
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
The Urban Review
Published in:

05-12-2018

The Impact of Texas “Wealth Equalization” Program on the Academic Performance of Poor and Wealthy Schools

Author: Hassan Tajalli

Published in: The Urban Review | Issue 3/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the propositions of “money matters/doesn’t matter” in a zero-sum public school system. Specifically, this study seeks to assess the impact of Texas Wealth Equalization Program on the academic performance of contributing wealthy school districts and the receiving poor school districts. Although the primary interest of this study is the aforementioned two sets of school districts, the study also incorporates a set of intermediate districts into the analysis in order to control for the possible threat of history. The study uses three state and national assessment tools to measure school performance. The results show that answer to the propositions of “money matters/doesn’t matter” is contextual. Controlling for the possible threat of history, the findings show that transfer of nearly $3.4 billion from wealthy to poor school districts did not result in lower academic achievement among the students of rich school districts while it resulted in modest performance improvement in poor districts. Policy implications of Wealth Equalization are discussed.
previous article Navigating the Challenges of Student-Centered Mathematics Teaching in an Urban Context
next article Students’ Perception of Cheating and the Best Time to Cheat During Examinations

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Business + Economics & Engineering + Technology"

Online-Abonnement

Springer Professional "Business + Economics & Engineering + Technology" gives you access to:

  • more than 102.000 books
  • more than 537 journals

from the following subject areas:

  • Automotive
  • Construction + Real Estate
  • Business IT + Informatics
  • Electrical Engineering + Electronics
  • Energy + Sustainability
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Leadership
  • Marketing + Sales
  • Mechanical Engineering + Materials
  • Insurance + Risk


Secure your knowledge advantage now!

inform now

Springer Professional "Business + Economics"

Online-Abonnement

Springer Professional "Business + Economics" gives you access to:

  • more than 67.000 books
  • more than 340 journals

from the following specialised fileds:

  • Construction + Real Estate
  • Business IT + Informatics
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Leadership
  • Marketing + Sales
  • Insurance + Risk



Secure your knowledge advantage now!

inform now
Literature
Alexander, K. (1998). Money matters: commentary and analysis. Journal of Economic Analysis, 24(2), 237–242.
Baker, B. D., Green, P. C., & Richards, C. E. (2008). Financing education systems. New York: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
Baker, B., & Weber, M. (2016). Beyond the echo-chamber: State investments and student outcomes in U.S. elementary and secondary education. Journal of Education Finance, 42(1), 1–27.
Bundt, J., & Leland, S. (2001). Wealthy or poor: Who receives and who pays? A closer look at measures of equity in Iowa School Finance. Journal of Education Finance, 26(4), 397–413.
Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1992). Does school quality matter? Returns to education the characteristics of public schools in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 100(1), 1–40.CrossRef
Card, D., & Payne, A. A. (2002). School finance reform, the distribution of school spending, and the distribution of student test scores. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1), 49–82.CrossRef
Coate, D., & VanderHoff, J. (1999). Public school spending and student achievement: The case of New Jersey. Cato Journal, 19(1), 85–99.
Coleman, J. S., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Condron, D. J. (2017). The waning impact of school finance litigation on inequality in per student revenue during the adequacy era. Journal of Education Finance, 43(1), 1–20.
Corcoran, S. P., & Evans, W. N. (2015). Equity, adequacy, and the evolving state role in education finance. In H. F. Ladd & M. E. Goertz (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (2nd ed., pp. 353–375). New York: Routledge.
Corcoran, M., Gordon, R., Laren, D., & Solon, G. (1992). The association between men’s economic status and their family and community origins. Journal of Human Resources, 27(4), 575–601.CrossRef
Deke, J. (2003). A study of the impact of public school spending on postsecondary educational attainment using statewide school district refinancing in Kansas. Economics of Education Review, 22(3), 275–284.CrossRef
Deutsch, F. (2003). How small schools benefit high school students. NASSP Bulletin, 87(June), 35–44.CrossRef
Downes, T. A. (1992). Evaluating the impact of school finance reform on the provision of public education: The California case. National Tax Journal, 45(4), 405–419.
Downes, T. (2004). School finance reform and school quality: Lessons from vermont. In J. Yinger (Ed.), Helping children left behind: State aid and the pursuit of educational equity (pp. 283–313). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Driscoll, L. G., & Salmon, R. G. (2008). How increased state equalization aid resulted in greater disparities: An unexpected consequence for the commonwealth of Virginia. Journal of Education Finance, 33(3), 238–261.
Edgewood Independent School District v. Kirby, 777 S.W. 2d 391 (Tex 1989).
Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28(2), 465–498.
Finn, J., & Achilles, C. (1999). Tennessee’s class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 97–109.CrossRef
Gregg, P., Jonsson, J. O., Macmillan, L., & Mood, C. (2017). The role of education for intergenerational income mobility: A comparison of the United States, Great Britain, and Sweden. Social Forces, 96(1), 121–152. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​sf/​sox051.
Guryan, J. (2001). Does money matter? Regression-discontinuity estimates from education finance reform in Massachusetts. NBER Working Paper 8269.
Hanushek, E. A. (1991). When school finance ‘reform’ may not be good policy. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28(2), 423–450.
Hanushek, E. A. (2003). The failure of input based schooling policies. Economic Journal, 113(485), 65–98.CrossRef
Harter, E. (1999). How educational expenditure relate to student achievement: Insights from Texas elementary schools. Journal of Education Finance, 24(3), 281–302.
Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Education Researcher, 23(4), 5–14.CrossRef
Hoxby, C. M. (2001). All school finance equalizations are not created equal. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1189–1231.CrossRef
Hoxby, C. M., & Kuziemko, I. (2004). Robin Hood and his not-so-merry plan: Capitalization and the self-destruction of Texas’ school finance equalization plan. Working Paper 10722, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
Hy, R. J. (2000). Education is an investment: A case study. Journal of Education Finance, 26(2), 209–218.
Imazeki, J., & Reschovsky, A. (2004). School finance reform in Texas: A never-ending story? In J. Yinger (Ed.), Helping children left behind: State aid and the pursuit of educational equity (pp. 251–282). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Izraeli, O., & Murphy, K. J. (2007). The impact of proposal a on school financing, equity, and quality of public schools in the state of Michigan. Journal of Education Finance, 33(2), 111–129.
Jackson, K. C., Johnson, R. C., & Persico, C. (2016). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157–218.CrossRef
Janssen, J. J. (2000). Public school finance, school choice, and equal educational opportunity in Texas: The enduring importance of background conditions. The Review of Litigation, 19(1), 1–24.
Keels, M. (2013). Getting them enrolled is only half the battle: College success as a function of race or ethnicity, gender, and class. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 83(23), 310–322.CrossRef
Koski, W., & Hahnel, J. (2008). The past, present and possible futures of educational finance reform litigation. In H. Ladd & E. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy, by and (pp. 42–60). New York: Routledge.
Loury, L. D., & Garman, D. (1995). College selectivity and earnings. Journal of Labor Economics, 13(2), 289–308.CrossRef
Mayer, S. E., & Lopoo, L. M. (2008). Government spending and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Public Economics, 92(1), 139–158.CrossRef
Mosteller, F., Light, R., & Sachs, J. (1996). Sustained inquiry in education: Lessons from skill grouping and class size. Harvard Education Review, 66(4), 797–842.CrossRef
Murdock, S. H., Cline, A., & Cline, G. (2014). Population change in Texas: Implications for education and the socioeconomic future of Texas. Wichita Falls, TX: Coalition for Hispanic Education.
Murdock, S. H., et al. (1997). The Texas challenge: Population change and the future of Texas. College Station: Texas A & M University Press.
Murray, S. E., Evans, W. N., & Schwab, R. M. (1998). Education-finance reform and the distribution of education resources. The American Economic Review, 88(4), 789–812.
Neal, D. A., & Johnson, W. (1996). The role of Premarket factors in Black-White wage differences. The Journal of Political Economy, 104(5), 869–895.CrossRef
Nguyen-Hoang, P., & Yinger, J. (2014). Education finance reform, local behavior, and student performance in Massachusetts. Journal of Education Finance, 39(4), 297–322.
Okpala, C. (2002). Educational resources, student demographics and achievement scores. Journal of Education Finance, 27(3), 885–908.
Olson, L. (1998). Will success spoil success for all? Education Week., Feb, 4.
Orfield, G., Eaton, S. E., & Jones, E. R. (1996). Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education. New York: New Press.
Papke, L. E. (2005). The effects of spending on test pass rates: Evidence from Michigan. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5), 821–839.CrossRef
Patterson, J. C. (2000). Texas’ TAAS miracle or mirage? Curriculum Administrator, 36(7), 31–37.
Peevely, G. L., & Ray, J. R. (2001). Does equalization litigation effect a narrowing of the gap of value added achievement outcomes among school districts? Journal of Education Finance, 26(4), 463–476.
Roy, J. (2011). Impact of school finance reform on resource equalization and academic performance: Evidence from Michigan. Education Finance and Policy, 6(2), 137–167.CrossRef
Ryan, J. E. (1999). Schools, race, and money. The Yale Law Journal, 109, 249–316.CrossRef
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 US 1 (1973).
Slavin, R. E. (1997). How title 1 can (still) save America’s children. Education Week. May 21.
Solon, G. (2004). A model of intergenerational mobility variation over time and place. In M. Corak (Ed.), Generational income mobility in North America and Europe (pp. 38–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
The Perryman Group. (2007). A tale of two States—And one million jobs!! An analysis of the economic benefits of Achieving the future goals of the “Closing the Gaps” initiative of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. Waco, TX: The Perryman Group.
Tienda, M. (2015). Texas’ education challenge: A demographic dividend or bust? In: Orrenius, P. M., & Cañas, J. (eds) Ten-gallon economy: Sizing up economic growth in Texas (pp. 61–77).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). The Hispanic population: 2010 (2010 U.S. Census Briefs No. C2010BR-04). U.S. Census Bureau.
Verstegen, D., & King, R. (1998). The relationship between school spending and student achievement: A review and analysis of 35 years of production function research. Journal of Education Finance, 24(2), 243–262.
Zhan, M. (2014). Education loans and college graduation: Differences by race/ethnicity. Social Development Issues, 36(2), 17–34.
Zimmer, R., & Jones, J. T. (2005). Unintended consequence of centralized public school funding in Michigan education. Southern Economic Journal, 71(3), 534–544.CrossRef
Zimmerman, D. J. (1992). Regression toward mediocrity in economic stature. American Economic Review, 82, 409–429.
Metadata
Title
The Impact of Texas “Wealth Equalization” Program on the Academic Performance of Poor and Wealthy Schools
Author
Hassan Tajalli
Publication date
05-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The Urban Review / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0042-0972
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1960
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-018-0490-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Navigating the Challenges of Student-Centered Mathematics Teaching in an Urban Context

Resettled Refugee Teens’ Perspectives: Identifying a Need to Centralize Youths’ “Funds of Strategies” in Future Efforts to Enact Culturally Responsive Pedagogy

Listening to and Learning from the Perspectives and Experiences of Black and Latinx Students with Disabilities: Examining the Challenges and Contradictions of High-Stakes Testing Policies

Hair Harassment in Urban Schools and How It Shapes the Physical Activity of Black Adolescent Girls

Students’ Perception of Cheating and the Best Time to Cheat During Examinations

Correction to: Schoolin’ Black Girls: Politicized Caring and Healing as Pedagogical Love

  • Correction