Top

TechTrends

Published in:

20-10-2022 | Original Paper

The Impact of Text-to-Speech on Reading Comprehension of Students with Learning Disabilities in an Urban School

Authors: Tolulope Sulaimon, John Schaefer

Published in: TechTrends | Issue 2/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

An A-B-A-B withdrawal design was used to explore the effects of a text-to-speech (TTS) program (Read & Write Gold 11) on reading comprehension scores for two fourth-grade students with learning disabilities in an urban school. For each session, students used the TTS program to read a fourth-grade-level comprehension passage. The number of correct comprehension questions was measured. All participants’ scores increased when the TTS program was introduced. Additionally, a Likert scale questionnaire was used to assess the participants’ perception of the TTS program. Results showed that the participants found the TTS program easy to use with little or no support. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed in this paper.

previous article Are Two Heads Better Than One?: The Effect of Student-AI Collaboration on Students' Learning Task Performance

next article Accessible Online Learning: A Preliminary Investigation of Educational Technologists’ and Faculty Members’ Knowledge and Skills

Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. (2007). Supported e-text: Assistive technology through text transformations. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 153–160. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4151710

Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.

Elkind, J., Cohen, K., & Murray, C. (1993). Using computer-based readers to improve the reading comprehension of students with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 43(1), 238–259.CrossRef

Forgrave, K. E. (2002). Assistive technology: Empowering students with learning disabilities. Clearing House, 75(3), 122.CrossRef

Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Routledge.CrossRef

Goldfus, C., & Gotesman, E. (2010). The impact of assistive technologies on the reading outcomes of college students with dyslexia. Educational Technology, 50(3), 21–25. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44429798

Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (1997). The compensatory effectiveness of optical character recognition/speech synthesis on reading comprehension of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(2), 75–87.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), Amendment of 2004, 20 USC (2004). https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/leg/idea/index.html

Izzo, M. V., Yurick, A., & McArrell, B. (2009). Supported e-text: Effects of text-to-speech on access and achievement for high school students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(3), 9–20.CrossRef

Joseph, L. M., & Ross, K. M. (2017). Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities to comprehend text using self-questioning. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(5), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217736866CrossRef

Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4CrossRef

Lai, S. A., George Benjamin, R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Kuhn, M. R. (2014). The longitudinal relationship between reading fluency and reading comprehension skills in second-grade children. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(2), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.789785CrossRef

Lange, A. A., McPhillips, M., Mulhern, G., & Wylie, J. (2006). Assistive software tools for secondary-level students with literacy difficulties. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(3), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340602100302CrossRef

Lundberg, I., & Olofsson, Å. (1993). Can computer speech support reading comprehension? Computers in Human Behavior, 9(2–3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(93)90012-HCrossRef

Montali, J., & Lewandowski, L. (1996). Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(3), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949602900305CrossRef

Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.6.2CrossRef

Rasinski, T. (2017). Fluency matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 3–12.

Roberts, G., Torgesen, J. K., Boardman, A., & Scammacca, N. (2008). Evidence-based strategies for reading instruction of older students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(2), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.00264.xCrossRef

Schmitt, A. J., Hale, A. D., McCallum, E., & Mauck, B. (2011). Accommodating remedial readers in the general education setting: Is listening-while-reading sufficient to improve factual and inferential comprehension? Psychology in the Schools, 48(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20540CrossRef

Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of Reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.2307/747348CrossRef

Uysal, P. K., & Bilge, H. (2019). An investigation on the relationship between reading fluency and level of reading comprehension according to the type of texts. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(2), 161–172.

Wood, S. G., Moxley, J. H., Tighe, E. L., & Wagner, R. K. (2018). Does the use of text-to-speech and related read-aloud tools improve reading comprehension for students with reading disabilities? A Meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416688170CrossRef

Young, M.C (2017). The effects of text-to-speech on Reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Theses and Dissertations. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/718

Fourth Grade Reading Passages (n.d.). Retrieved May 21, 2019, from https://projects.ncsu.edu/project/lancet/fourth.htm

K12 Reader: Reading Instruction Resources (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://www.k12reader.com/subject/reading-skills/reading-comprehension/4th-grade-reading-comprehension-worksheets/

NAEP Reading: Reading Results. Nationsreportcard.gov. (2020). Retrieved 1 June 2020, from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading?grade=4

Title: The Impact of Text-to-Speech on Reading Comprehension of Students with Learning Disabilities in an Urban School
Authors: Tolulope Sulaimon
John Schaefer
Publication date: 20-10-2022
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: TechTrends / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Electronic ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00800-2

Springer Professional

The Impact of Text-to-Speech on Reading Comprehension of Students with Learning Disabilities in an Urban School

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Microlearning in Diverse Contexts: A Bibliometric Analysis

Protecting Students: Data Privacy in the African Union

Multiple Perspectives with Online EFL Practicum Technology Learning: Case Study on a Cloud

Supporting Dynamic Instructional Design Decisions Within a Bounded Rationality

The use of the Video Platform FlipGrid for Practicing Science Oral Communication

Are Two Heads Better Than One?: The Effect of Student-AI Collaboration on Students' Learning Task Performance