Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

The Influence of Build Orientation on the Flatness Error in Artifact Produced by Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) Process

Authors : S. Rizzuti, L. De Napoli, S. Ventra

Published in: Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing II

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM) involves a set of production processes in which a layer-based material deposition approach to build parts is applied. These technologies are now extensively used in the industry in many cases as the main manufacturing process for making components with high shape complexity. The dimensional and geometric accuracy of the parts manufactured by means of AM are mostly determined by the specific type of additive process employed and the related process parameters. The part orientation in the build space is an important process parameter that has an influence on the stair-step effect and on the need of support structures and the subsequent post-processing refinements. In addition, the position of the part in the build volume may have an influence on the shape. These factors concur to the surface finish and to the dimensional and shape accuracy. In this paper, the flatness error on several surfaces, built on a test artefact ad hoc conceived, has been measured by means of a CMM-based setup in order to quantify the variation of the error in relation to: the orientation of the surfaces with respect to the platform, and the position of the part in the build volume of the AM machine. The test part has been produced by Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) process using the EOS Stainless Steel GP1. The test artifact has been designed with five flat surfaces at different angles with respect to the building platform. Two specimens were built in the same DMLS session with different position and alignment. The influence of the surface slope on the flatness error has been investigated. Flatness, 3D Roughness and orientation errors (parallelism, inclination, perpendicularity) have been measured and compared between both specimens.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference ASTM F2792-12a (2015) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies (Withdrawn 2015). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, pp 1–3 ASTM F2792-12a (2015) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies (Withdrawn 2015). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, pp 1–3
2.
go back to reference Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, Ramani K, Chen Y, Williams C, Wang C, Shin Y, Zhang S, Zavattieri P (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput Aided Des 69:65–89 (2015) Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, Ramani K, Chen Y, Williams C, Wang C, Shin Y, Zhang S, Zavattieri P (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput Aided Des 69:65–89 (2015)
4.
go back to reference Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917–1928CrossRef Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917–1928CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shellabear M, Nyrhilä O (2004) DMLS-Development history and state of the art. In: Proceedings of the 4th LANE, 2004 Sep 21–24, Erlangen, Germany. Meisenbach-Verlag, Bamberg (2004) Shellabear M, Nyrhilä O (2004) DMLS-Development history and state of the art. In: Proceedings of the 4th LANE, 2004 Sep 21–24, Erlangen, Germany. Meisenbach-Verlag, Bamberg (2004)
6.
go back to reference Monzon MD, Ortega Z, Martinez A, Ortega F (2015) Standardization in additive manufacturing: activities carried out by international organizations and projects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5–8):1111–1121CrossRef Monzon MD, Ortega Z, Martinez A, Ortega F (2015) Standardization in additive manufacturing: activities carried out by international organizations and projects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5–8):1111–1121CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Seifi M, Gorelik M, Waller J, Hrabe N, Shamsaei N, Daniewicz S, Lewandowski JJ (2017) Progress towards metal additive manufacturing standardization to support qualification and certification. JOM 69(3):439–455CrossRef Seifi M, Gorelik M, Waller J, Hrabe N, Shamsaei N, Daniewicz S, Lewandowski JJ (2017) Progress towards metal additive manufacturing standardization to support qualification and certification. JOM 69(3):439–455CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Moylan S, Slotwinski J, Cooke A, Jurrens K, Donmez MA (2014) An additive manufacturing test artifact. J Res Natl Inst Stan 119:429–459CrossRef Moylan S, Slotwinski J, Cooke A, Jurrens K, Donmez MA (2014) An additive manufacturing test artifact. J Res Natl Inst Stan 119:429–459CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Moylan S, Cooke A, Jurrens K, Slotwinski J, Donmez MA (2012) A review of test artifacts for additive manufacturing. Report No. NISTIR, 7858, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD Moylan S, Cooke A, Jurrens K, Slotwinski J, Donmez MA (2012) A review of test artifacts for additive manufacturing. Report No. NISTIR, 7858, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD
10.
go back to reference Moylan S (2015) Progress toward standardized additive manufacturing test artifacts. In: Achieving precision tolerances in additive manufacturing, ASPE 2015 Spring Topical Meeting. ASPE, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (2015) Moylan S (2015) Progress toward standardized additive manufacturing test artifacts. In: Achieving precision tolerances in additive manufacturing, ASPE 2015 Spring Topical Meeting. ASPE, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (2015)
11.
go back to reference Rebaioli L, Fassi I (2017) A review on benchmark artifacts for evaluating the geometrical performance of additive manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5–8):2571–2598CrossRef Rebaioli L, Fassi I (2017) A review on benchmark artifacts for evaluating the geometrical performance of additive manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5–8):2571–2598CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Berger A, Sharon Y, Ashkenazi D, Stern A (2016) Test artefact for additive manufacturing technology: FDM and SLM preliminary results. In: The Annals of “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati. Fascicle XII: welding equipment and technology, Galati, vol 2729-37 Berger A, Sharon Y, Ashkenazi D, Stern A (2016) Test artefact for additive manufacturing technology: FDM and SLM preliminary results. In: The Annals of “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati. Fascicle XII: welding equipment and technology, Galati, vol 2729-37
13.
go back to reference ISO 1101:2017 (2017) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—geometrical tolerancing—tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland ISO 1101:2017 (2017) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—geometrical tolerancing—tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland
14.
go back to reference ASME Y14.5-2009 (2009) Dimensioning and tolerancing. ASME, New York ASME Y14.5-2009 (2009) Dimensioning and tolerancing. ASME, New York
15.
go back to reference Ameta G, Lipman R, Moylan S, Witherell P (2015) Investigating the role of geometric dimensioning and tolerancing in additive manufacturing. J Mech Des 137:111401–111410CrossRef Ameta G, Lipman R, Moylan S, Witherell P (2015) Investigating the role of geometric dimensioning and tolerancing in additive manufacturing. J Mech Des 137:111401–111410CrossRef
16.
go back to reference ISO 12781-1:2011 (2011) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Flatness—Part 1: Vocabulary and parameters of flatness, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland ISO 12781-1:2011 (2011) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Flatness—Part 1: Vocabulary and parameters of flatness, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland
17.
go back to reference ISO 12781-2:2011 (2011) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Flatness—Part 2: Specification operators, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland ISO 12781-2:2011 (2011) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Flatness—Part 2: Specification operators, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland
19.
go back to reference Yap CY, Chua CK, Dong ZL, Liu ZH, Zhang DQ, Loh LE, Sing SL (2015) Review of selective laser melting: materials and applications. Appl Phys Rev 2(4), art. no. 041101 Yap CY, Chua CK, Dong ZL, Liu ZH, Zhang DQ, Loh LE, Sing SL (2015) Review of selective laser melting: materials and applications. Appl Phys Rev 2(4), art. no. 041101
20.
go back to reference ISO 25178-2:2012 (2012) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Surface texture: areal—Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland ISO 25178-2:2012 (2012) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Surface texture: areal—Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland
Metadata
Title
The Influence of Build Orientation on the Flatness Error in Artifact Produced by Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) Process
Authors
S. Rizzuti
L. De Napoli
S. Ventra
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12346-8_45

Premium Partners