Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. The Institutional Footprint of Organizations

Author : Julien Jourdan

Published in: Materiality in Institutions

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Jourdan develops the notion of institutional footprint of organizations and provides an empirical illustration of how footprints vary in depth and availability. He discusses the contribution of this notion for the study of materiality in institutional theory and considers its implications for the understanding of organizations and institutions.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Other chapters in the book take into consideration business schools and education organizations as a vivid arena of institutional dynamics. In Chap. 5, Arena and Douai analyze the emergence of business education as an alternate institutional logic in Oxford University. In Chap. 7, De Vaujany, Winterstorm, Valander, and Vaast examine how universities rely on campus tours to enhance their legitimacy. Finally, in Chap. 9, Thomas Abrunhosa and Canales present Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) as a competing institutional logic to traditional education.
 
2
For more discussion about durability, please refer to the postface of the book.
 
3
In Chap. 9, Thomas, Abrunhosa, and Canales also explore the co-existence of institutional logics and the associated conflicts.
 
4
Variations in availability—related to heterogeneous diffusion and readability—opens the possibility that perceptions of institutional footprint vary across audiences.
 
5
Conceptually, failing to adopt (e.g., a practice that gains momentum) could also be a source of institutional alteration.
 
Literature
go back to reference Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.CrossRef Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.CrossRef
go back to reference Baumann, S. (2001). Intellectualization and art world development: Film in the United States. American Sociological Review, 66(3), 404–426.CrossRef Baumann, S. (2001). Intellectualization and art world development: Film in the United States. American Sociological Review, 66(3), 404–426.CrossRef
go back to reference Boxenbaum, E., Jones, C., Meyer, R. E., & Svejenova, S. (2018). Towards an articulation of the material and visual turn in organization studies. London: Sage.CrossRef Boxenbaum, E., Jones, C., Meyer, R. E., & Svejenova, S. (2018). Towards an articulation of the material and visual turn in organization studies. London: Sage.CrossRef
go back to reference Briscoe, F., & Safford, S. (2008). The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 460–491.CrossRef Briscoe, F., & Safford, S. (2008). The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 460–491.CrossRef
go back to reference Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., & Allison, P. D. (2014). Insiders, outsiders, and the struggle for consecration in cultural fields: A core-periphery perspective. American Sociological Review, 79(2), 258–281.CrossRef Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., & Allison, P. D. (2014). Insiders, outsiders, and the struggle for consecration in cultural fields: A core-periphery perspective. American Sociological Review, 79(2), 258–281.CrossRef
go back to reference De Vaujany, F.-X., & Vaast, E. (2013). If these walls could talk: The mutual construction of organizational space and legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(3), 713–731.CrossRef De Vaujany, F.-X., & Vaast, E. (2013). If these walls could talk: The mutual construction of organizational space and legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(3), 713–731.CrossRef
go back to reference DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
go back to reference Durand, R., & Jourdan, J. (2012). Jules or Jim: Alternative conformity to minority logics. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1295–1315.CrossRef Durand, R., & Jourdan, J. (2012). Jules or Jim: Alternative conformity to minority logics. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1295–1315.CrossRef
go back to reference Fiss, P. C., Kennedy, M. T., & Davis, G. F. (2012). How golden parachutes unfolded: Diffusion and variation of a controversial practice. Organization Science, 23(4), 1077–1099.CrossRef Fiss, P. C., Kennedy, M. T., & Davis, G. F. (2012). How golden parachutes unfolded: Diffusion and variation of a controversial practice. Organization Science, 23(4), 1077–1099.CrossRef
go back to reference Jourdan, J. (2018). Institutional specialization and survival: Theory and evidence from the French film industry. Strategy Science, 3(2), 408.CrossRef Jourdan, J. (2018). Institutional specialization and survival: Theory and evidence from the French film industry. Strategy Science, 3(2), 408.CrossRef
go back to reference Jourdan, J., Durand, R., & Thornton, P. H. (2017). The price of admission: Organizational deference as strategic behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 123(1), 232–275.CrossRef Jourdan, J., Durand, R., & Thornton, P. H. (2017). The price of admission: Organizational deference as strategic behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 123(1), 232–275.CrossRef
go back to reference Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 195–245.CrossRef Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 195–245.CrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Schneiberg, M. (2007). What’s on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950. Socio-Economic Review, 5(1), 47–80.CrossRef Schneiberg, M. (2007). What’s on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950. Socio-Economic Review, 5(1), 47–80.CrossRef
go back to reference Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
go back to reference Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. E. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.CrossRef Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. E. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.CrossRef
go back to reference Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago: Rand McNally. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago: Rand McNally.
go back to reference Tetlock, P., & Belkin, A. (1996). Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: Logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Tetlock, P., & Belkin, A. (1996). Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: Logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.CrossRef Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.CrossRef
go back to reference Zietsma, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 189–221.CrossRef Zietsma, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 189–221.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Institutional Footprint of Organizations
Author
Julien Jourdan
Copyright Year
2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97472-9_3