Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Learning Environments Research 3/2018

15-01-2018 | Original Paper

The interplay between teachers’ approaches to teaching, students’ approaches to learning and learning outcomes: a qualitative multi-case study

Authors: Kaire Uiboleht, Mari Karm, Liisa Postareff

Published in: Learning Environments Research | Issue 3/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The interaction between approaches to teaching and students’ learning has been the focus of research for more than 20 years. Previous studies concerning approaches to teaching in higher education have identified two broad categories: content- and learning-focused approaches. Some studies indicate that teachers do not always adopt a consonant teaching- or learning-focused approach, but might employ elements of both, which results in a dissonant approach. Research on how dissonant approaches to teaching and students’ quality of learning are related is scant. This study explored relationships between how teachers’ approaches to teaching and undergraduate students’ self-reported approaches to learning and learning outcomes. The data for this study consisted of 33 semi-structured interviews with students from three courses. Interviews were analysed with qualitative content analysis. The results demonstrated that, when the teacher used a consonant learning-focused approach to teaching, students’ learning outcomes and approaches to learning were of a slightly higher quality than when the teacher employed a dissonant approach to teaching. However, a dissonant approach to teaching did not always result in a lower quality of approaches to learning and learning outcomes.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Allan, J. (1996). Learning outcomes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 93–108.CrossRef Allan, J. (1996). Learning outcomes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 93–108.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
go back to reference Baeten, M., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., Parmentier, E., & Vanderbruggen, A. (2016). Student-centred learning environments: An investigation into student teachers’ instructional preferences and approaches to learning. Learning Environments Research, 19, 43–62.CrossRef Baeten, M., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., Parmentier, E., & Vanderbruggen, A. (2016). Student-centred learning environments: An investigation into student teachers’ instructional preferences and approaches to learning. Learning Environments Research, 19, 43–62.CrossRef
go back to reference Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5, 243–260.CrossRef Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5, 243–260.CrossRef
go back to reference Barnett, R. (2004). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research & Development, 23, 247–260.CrossRef Barnett, R. (2004). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research & Development, 23, 247–260.CrossRef
go back to reference Bennett, N., Dunne, E., & Carré, C. (1999). Patterns of core and generic skill provision in higher education. Higher Education, 37, 71–93.CrossRef Bennett, N., Dunne, E., & Carré, C. (1999). Patterns of core and generic skill provision in higher education. Higher Education, 37, 71–93.CrossRef
go back to reference Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research. Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
go back to reference Biggs, J., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press. Biggs, J., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
go back to reference Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. Berkshire: Open University Press. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. Berkshire: Open University Press.
go back to reference Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning. New York: Routledge Falmer. Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning. New York: Routledge Falmer.
go back to reference Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRef Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Drew, S. (1998). Students’ perceptions of their learning outcomes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3, 197–217.CrossRef Drew, S. (1998). Students’ perceptions of their learning outcomes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3, 197–217.CrossRef
go back to reference Elen, J., Clarebout, G., Léonard, R., & Lowyck, J. (2007). Student-centred and teacher-centred learning environments: What students think. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 105–117.CrossRef Elen, J., Clarebout, G., Léonard, R., & Lowyck, J. (2007). Student-centred and teacher-centred learning environments: What students think. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 105–117.CrossRef
go back to reference Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2007). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–115.CrossRef Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2007). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–115.CrossRef
go back to reference Entwistle, N. J. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Entwistle, N. J. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 325–345.CrossRef Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 325–345.CrossRef
go back to reference Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Walker, P. (2001). Conceptions, styles and approaches within higher education: Analytic abstractions and everyday experience. In R. J. Sernberg & L.-F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning and cognitive styles. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Walker, P. (2001). Conceptions, styles and approaches within higher education: Analytic abstractions and everyday experience. In R. J. Sernberg & L.-F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning and cognitive styles. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Entwistle, N., & Nisbet, J. (2013). The nature and experience of academic understanding. The Psychology of Education Review, 37, 5–14. Entwistle, N., & Nisbet, J. (2013). The nature and experience of academic understanding. The Psychology of Education Review, 37, 5–14.
go back to reference Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm. Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
go back to reference Fraser, B. J. (1998). The birth of a new journal: Editor’s introduction. Learning Environments Research, 1, 1–5.CrossRef Fraser, B. J. (1998). The birth of a new journal: Editor’s introduction. Learning Environments Research, 1, 1–5.CrossRef
go back to reference Gijbels, D., Segers, M., & Stryf, E. (2008). Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 36, 431–443.CrossRef Gijbels, D., Segers, M., & Stryf, E. (2008). Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 36, 431–443.CrossRef
go back to reference Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2003). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.CrossRef Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2003). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.CrossRef
go back to reference Harvey, L. (2000). New realities: The relationship between higher education and employment. Tertiary Education and Management, 6, 3–17.CrossRef Harvey, L. (2000). New realities: The relationship between higher education and employment. Tertiary Education and Management, 6, 3–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Holmes, L. (2000). Questioning the skills agenda. In S. Fallows & C. Steven (Eds.), Integrating key skills in higher education (pp. 201–214). London: Kogan Page. Holmes, L. (2000). Questioning the skills agenda. In S. Fallows & C. Steven (Eds.), Integrating key skills in higher education (pp. 201–214). London: Kogan Page.
go back to reference Jones, A. (2009). Generic attributes as espoused theory: The importance of context. Higher Education, 58, 175–191.CrossRef Jones, A. (2009). Generic attributes as espoused theory: The importance of context. Higher Education, 58, 175–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Kahl, D. J., & Venette, S. (2010). To lecture or let go: A comparative analysis of student speech outlines form teacher-centred and learner-centred classrooms. Communication Teacher, 24, 178–186.CrossRef Kahl, D. J., & Venette, S. (2010). To lecture or let go: A comparative analysis of student speech outlines form teacher-centred and learner-centred classrooms. Communication Teacher, 24, 178–186.CrossRef
go back to reference Kember, D., & Kwan, K. (2000). Lecturer’s approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469–490.CrossRef Kember, D., & Kwan, K. (2000). Lecturer’s approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469–490.CrossRef
go back to reference Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2003). Broadening an understanding of the phenomenon of dissonance. Studies in Higher Education, 1, 63–77.CrossRef Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2003). Broadening an understanding of the phenomenon of dissonance. Studies in Higher Education, 1, 63–77.CrossRef
go back to reference Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 27–52.CrossRef Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 27–52.CrossRef
go back to reference Maggioni, L., & Alexander, P. A. (2010). Knowledge domains and domain learning. In B. McGaw, P. L. Peternson, & E. Baker (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 255–264). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef Maggioni, L., & Alexander, P. A. (2010). Knowledge domains and domain learning. In B. McGaw, P. L. Peternson, & E. Baker (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 255–264). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef
go back to reference Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Research, 46, 4–11. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Research, 46, 4–11.
go back to reference Meyer, J. H. F. (2000). The modelling of dissonant study orchestration in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 5–18.CrossRef Meyer, J. H. F. (2000). The modelling of dissonant study orchestration in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 5–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Mintz, K., & Tal, T. (2013). Education for sustainability in higher education: A multiple-case study or three courses. Journal of Biological Education, 47, 140–149.CrossRef Mintz, K., & Tal, T. (2013). Education for sustainability in higher education: A multiple-case study or three courses. Journal of Biological Education, 47, 140–149.CrossRef
go back to reference Newton, D. P. (2000). Teaching for understanding: What it is and how to do it. London: Routledge Falmer. Newton, D. P. (2000). Teaching for understanding: What it is and how to do it. London: Routledge Falmer.
go back to reference Parpala, A. (2010). Exploring the experiences and conceptions of good teaching in higher education: Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ approaches to learning and experiences of the teaching-learning environment. Doctoral thesis, University of Helsinki. Parpala, A. (2010). Exploring the experiences and conceptions of good teaching in higher education: Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ approaches to learning and experiences of the teaching-learning environment. Doctoral thesis, University of Helsinki.
go back to reference Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., Litmanen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2010). Students’ approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching–learning environment in different disciplines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 269–282.CrossRef Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., Litmanen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2010). Students’ approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching–learning environment in different disciplines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 269–282.CrossRef
go back to reference Postareff, L., Katajavouri, N., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Trigwell, K. (2008). Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 49–61.CrossRef Postareff, L., Katajavouri, N., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Trigwell, K. (2008). Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 49–61.CrossRef
go back to reference Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers’ descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18, 109–120.CrossRef Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers’ descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18, 109–120.CrossRef
go back to reference Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 557–571.CrossRef Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 557–571.CrossRef
go back to reference Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (2003). Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 37–48.CrossRef Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (2003). Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 37–48.CrossRef
go back to reference Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
go back to reference Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2014). Qualitative variation in approaches to university teaching and learning in large first-year classes. Higher Education, 67, 783–795.CrossRef Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2014). Qualitative variation in approaches to university teaching and learning in large first-year classes. Higher Education, 67, 783–795.CrossRef
go back to reference Quinn, F., & Stein, S. (2013). Relationships between learning approaches and outcomes of students studying a first-year biology topic on-campus and by distance. Higher Education Research & Development, 4, 617–631.CrossRef Quinn, F., & Stein, S. (2013). Relationships between learning approaches and outcomes of students studying a first-year biology topic on-campus and by distance. Higher Education Research & Development, 4, 617–631.CrossRef
go back to reference Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.CrossRef Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.CrossRef
go back to reference Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93–111.CrossRef Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93–111.CrossRef
go back to reference Stes, A., & Van Petegem, P. (2014). Profiling approaches to teaching in higher education: A cluster-analytic study. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 644–659.CrossRef Stes, A., & Van Petegem, P. (2014). Profiling approaches to teaching in higher education: A cluster-analytic study. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 644–659.CrossRef
go back to reference Strijbos, J., Engels, N., & Struyven, K. (2015). Criteria and standards of generic competences at bachelor degree level: A review study. Educational Research Review, 14, 18–32.CrossRef Strijbos, J., Engels, N., & Struyven, K. (2015). Criteria and standards of generic competences at bachelor degree level: A review study. Educational Research Review, 14, 18–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 4, 325–341.CrossRef Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 4, 325–341.CrossRef
go back to reference Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16, 279–294.CrossRef Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16, 279–294.CrossRef
go back to reference Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251–266.CrossRef Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251–266.CrossRef
go back to reference Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education, 27, 75–84.CrossRef Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education, 27, 75–84.CrossRef
go back to reference Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70.CrossRef Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70.CrossRef
go back to reference Tynjälä, P. (1998a). Writing as a tool for constructive learning: Students’ learning experiences during an experiment. Higher Education, 36, 209–230.CrossRef Tynjälä, P. (1998a). Writing as a tool for constructive learning: Students’ learning experiences during an experiment. Higher Education, 36, 209–230.CrossRef
go back to reference Tynjälä, P. (1998b). Traditional studying for examination versus constructivist learning tasks: Do learning outcomes differ? Studies in Higher Education, 2, 173–189.CrossRef Tynjälä, P. (1998b). Traditional studying for examination versus constructivist learning tasks: Do learning outcomes differ? Studies in Higher Education, 2, 173–189.CrossRef
go back to reference Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 357–442.CrossRef Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 357–442.CrossRef
go back to reference Tynjälä, P., & Gijbels, D. (2012). Changing world – Changing pedagogy. In P. Tynjälä, M.-L. Stenström, & M. Saarnivaara (Eds.), Transitions and transformations in learning and education (pp. 205–222). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef Tynjälä, P., & Gijbels, D. (2012). Changing world – Changing pedagogy. In P. Tynjälä, M.-L. Stenström, & M. Saarnivaara (Eds.), Transitions and transformations in learning and education (pp. 205–222). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Tynjälä, P., Pirhonen, M., Vartainen, T., & Helle, L. (2009). Educating IT project managers through project-based learning: A working-life perspective. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24, 270–288. Tynjälä, P., Pirhonen, M., Vartainen, T., & Helle, L. (2009). Educating IT project managers through project-based learning: A working-life perspective. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24, 270–288.
go back to reference Uiboleht, K., Karm, M., & Postareff, L. (2016). How do university teachers combine different approaches to teaching in a specific course? A qualitative multi-case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 7, 854–869.CrossRef Uiboleht, K., Karm, M., & Postareff, L. (2016). How do university teachers combine different approaches to teaching in a specific course? A qualitative multi-case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 7, 854–869.CrossRef
go back to reference Vanthournout, G., Donche, V., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2014). (Dis)similarities in research on learning approaches and learning patterns. In D. Gijbels, V. Donche, J. T. E. Richardson, & J. D. Vermunt (Eds.), Learning patterns in higher education: Dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 11–32). New York: Routledge. Vanthournout, G., Donche, V., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2014). (Dis)similarities in research on learning approaches and learning patterns. In D. Gijbels, V. Donche, J. T. E. Richardson, & J. D. Vermunt (Eds.), Learning patterns in higher education: Dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 11–32). New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Walker, P., & Finney, N. (1999). Skill development and critical thinking in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 4, 531–541.CrossRef Walker, P., & Finney, N. (1999). Skill development and critical thinking in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 4, 531–541.CrossRef
go back to reference Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students’ approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1, 87–101.CrossRef Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students’ approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1, 87–101.CrossRef
go back to reference Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
go back to reference Young, J., & Chapman, E. (2010). Generic competency frameworks: A brief historical overview. Education Research and Perspectives, 37, 1–24. Young, J., & Chapman, E. (2010). Generic competency frameworks: A brief historical overview. Education Research and Perspectives, 37, 1–24.
Metadata
Title
The interplay between teachers’ approaches to teaching, students’ approaches to learning and learning outcomes: a qualitative multi-case study
Authors
Kaire Uiboleht
Mari Karm
Liisa Postareff
Publication date
15-01-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Learning Environments Research / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1387-1579
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1855
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9257-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Learning Environments Research 3/2018 Go to the issue