Top

Published in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

12. The Limits of Imagination

Author : Liese Coulter

Published in: Limits to Climate Change Adaptation

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This chapter examines the role of imagination when reflecting projected climate change impacts in assumptions of future environmental and social conditions. While it is clear that some nations will reach limits of environmental and social adaptation to climate change sooner than those that are highly developed, several current benefits gained from having a high adaptive capacity will diminish with recurrent impacts of unprecedented and extreme weather events. Therefore, adaptation options may become more limited in industrialised countries that continue to invest resources in inappropriate long-term infrastructure without taking into account the non-stationary climate system. This research aims to better understand how individuals with currently high adaptive capacity use imagination to inform subjective views of possible climate change, in order to deduce the role of imagining the future when considering adaptation strategies and actions. The chapter is informed by a study of researchers, policy makers, and practitioners in Australia and Canada that is focused on the intersections of climate change knowledge, narrative communication, future thinking, and change over time. Results indicate that these decision-makers are limited in discussing and imagining themselves as vulnerable to climate change over the next two decades. This study suggests that behaviour to address near-term climate impacts may be limited by (1) a lack of perceived personal vulnerability; (2) little sense of urgency; and (3) expectations of societal interventions. It is concluded that low levels of imagination may place significant limits on the adaptive effectiveness of current infrastructure investments, with long-term consequences. This work aims to highlight the value of a higher capacity in imaginative future thinking among decision-makers; to better understand the context for ongoing shifts in climate change knowledge; and to guide new framing for climate narratives that reflect projected direct and indirect impacts of climate change.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Local Adaptation to Climate Extremes in Domboshawa: Opportunities and Limitations

next chapter Climate Change Adaptation in Coastal East Arctic Ecosystems: Complexity and Challenges of Monitoring and Evaluation

Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R., et al. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93, 335–354. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z.CrossRef

Atance, C. M., & O’Neill, D. K. (2001). Episodic future thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(12), 533–539. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01804-0.CrossRef

Barnett, J., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change, 20(2), 211–213. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004.CrossRef

Bateson, M. (2007). Narrative, adaptation, and change. Interchange, 38(3), 213–222. doi:10.1007/s10780-007-9030-3.CrossRef

Brown, K., & Westaway, E. (2011). Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: Lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36(1), 321–342. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-052610-092905.CrossRef

Caney, S. (2014). Two kinds of climate justice: Avoiding harm and sharing burdens. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22(2), 125–149. doi:10.1111/jopp.12030.CrossRef

Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., & Upham, P. (2015). International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(1), 35–61. doi:10.1002/wcc.321.

Chen, X. (2011). Why do people misunderstand climate change? Heuristics, mental models and ontological assumptions. Climatic Change, 108(1–2), 31–46. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-0013-5.CrossRef

Dilling, L., & Moser, S. C. (2007). Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Feenstra, J. F., Burton, I., Smith, J. B., & Tol, R. S. J. (1998). Handbook on methods for climate change impact assessment and adaptation strategies. Retrieved from http://www.ivm.vu.nl/en/Images/UNEPhandbookEBA2ED27-994E-4538-B0F0C424C6F619FE_tcm53-102683.pdf.

Fincher, R., Barnett, J., Graham, S., & Hurlimann, A. (2014). Time stories: Making sense of futures in anticipation of sea-level rise. Geoforum, 56, 201–210. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.07.010.CrossRef

Gardner, G., & Assadourian, E. (2004). Rethinking the good life state of the world 2004; a Worldwatch Institute report on progress toward a sustainable society, special focus: The consumer society (pp. 164–179). New York and London: WW Norton.

Grothmann, T., & Patt, A. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(3), 199–213. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002.CrossRef

Hulme, M. (2010). Cosmopolitan climates: Hybridity, foresight and meaning. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 267–276. doi:10.1177/0263276409358730.CrossRef

Hurlbert, M. A. (2011). Evaluating climate justice—attitudes and opinions of individual stakeholders in the United Nations Framework Climate Change Convention Conference of the Parties. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 8(4), 267–286. doi:10.1080/1943815X.2011.599812.CrossRef

IPCC. (2014a). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Working group II summary for policymakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

IPCC. (2014b). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC.

Jones, S. (2012). A tale of two cities: Climate change policies in Vancouver and Melbourne—Barometers of cooperative federalism? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(6), 1242–1267. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01083.x.CrossRef

Juhola, S., Glaas, E., Linnér, B.-O., & Neset, T.-S. (2016). Redefining maladaptation. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 135–140. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.014.CrossRef

Kirtman, B., Power, S. B., Adedoyin, J. A., Boer, G. J., Bojariu, R., Camilloni, I., et al. (2013). Near-term climate change: Projections and predictability. In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis (pp. 953–1028). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C.-Y., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2015). Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change, 5(11), 1014–1020. doi:10.1038/nclimate2728.CrossRef

Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 31–53. doi:10.1002/wcc.011.

O’Neill, S. J., & Hulme, M. (2009). An iconic approach for representing climate change. Global Environmental Change, 19(4), 402–410. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.07.004.CrossRef

Oyserman, D., & James, L. (2011). Possible identities. In S. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity: Theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 117–145). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Patchen, M. (2006). Public attitudes and behavior about climate change: What shapes them and how to influence them. Retrieved from http://www.purdue.edu/DP/climate/assets/pdfs/PatchenOP0601.pdf.

Reed, I. (2008). Justifying sociological knowledge: From realism to interpretation. Sociological Theory, 26(2), 101–130. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00321.x.CrossRef

Reisinger, A., Kitching, R. L., Chiew, F., Hughes, L., Newton, P. C. D., Schuster, S. S., et al. (2014). Australasia. In V. R. Barros, C. B. Field, D. J. Dokken, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1371–1438). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reser, J., & Swim, J. K. (2011). Adapting to and coping with the threat and impacts of climate change. The American Psychologist, 66(4), 277–289. doi:10.1037/a0023412.CrossRef

Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475. doi:10.1038/461472a.CrossRef

Romero-Lankao, P., Smith, J. B., Davidson, D. J., Diffenbaugh, N. S., Kinney, P. L., Kirshen, P., et al. (2014). North America. In V. R. Barros, C. B. Field, D. J. Dokken, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1439–1498). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Roncoli, C., Crane, T., & Orlove, B. (2009). Fielding climate change in cultural anthropology. In M. Nutall & S. Crate (Eds.), Anthropology and climate change: From encounters to actions (pp. 87–115). San Francisco: Left Coast Press.

Savin-Baden, M., & Niekerk, L. V. (2007). Narrative inquiry: Theory and practice. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(3), 459–472. doi:10.1080/03098260601071324.CrossRef

Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(9), 657–661. doi:10.1038/nrn2213.CrossRef

Serrao-Neumann, S., Harman, B., Leitch, A., & Low Choy, D. (2014). Public engagement and climate adaptation: Insights from three local governments in Australia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(7), 1196–1216. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.920306.CrossRef

Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x.CrossRef

Stuiver, M., Leeuwis, C., Klostermann, J. E. M., Turnhout, E., & Harms, B. (2013). New roles of science in society: Different repertoires of knowledge brokering. Science and Public Policy, 40(3), 354–365. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs114.CrossRef

Szpunar, K. K. (2010). Evidence for an implicit influence of memory on future thinking. Memory & Cognition, 38(5), 531–540. doi:10.3758/MC.38.5.531.CrossRef

Szpunar, K. K., Spreng, R. N., & Schacter, D. L. (2014). A taxonomy of prospection: Introducing an organizational framework for future-oriented cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 111(52), 18414–18421. doi:10.1073/pnas.1417144111.CrossRef

Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and Conciousness Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 26(1), 1–12. doi:10.1037/h0080017.CrossRef

Warren, F. J., & Lemmen, D. S. (Eds.). (2014). Canada in a changing climate: Sector perspectives on impacts and adaptation. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada.

Wright, C., Nyberg, D., De Cock, C., & Whiteman, G. (2013). Future imaginings: Organizing in response to climate change. Organization, 20(5), 647–658. doi:10.1177/1350508413489821.CrossRef

Title: The Limits of Imagination
Author: Liese Coulter
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Limits to Climate Change Adaptation
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64598-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-64599-5

Copyright Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64599-5_12

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"