Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. The Puzzle of Extreme Media and Political Tolerance: An Immigration Case Study

Author : J. Benjamin Taylor

Published in: Extreme Media and American Politics

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Using immigration content as a case study, Taylor explores the way extreme media framing and affect impact political tolerance for groups associated with S.B. 1070. Until now, there is no research looking into extreme media and political tolerance. Taylor finds that all media treatments decrease political tolerance, but—when interacted with affective engagement—liberal extreme media are able to increase political tolerance for pro-immigration groups and actors. The negative results for conservative extreme media and mainstream also dissipate when interacted with affective engagement—but are not significant—which highlights the importance of media activated emotion on political tolerance. These results show political tolerance is affected by extreme media, but significant changes in tolerance occur when the host’s framing and emotional engagement align for ideological congruity.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Altemeyer, Robert. 1996. The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Altemeyer, Robert. 1996. The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Ansolabehere, Stephen, Roy L. Behr, and Shanto Iyengar. 1993. The Media Game: American Politics in the Television Age. New York, NY: Macmillan. Ansolabehere, Stephen, Roy L. Behr, and Shanto Iyengar. 1993. The Media Game: American Politics in the Television Age. New York, NY: Macmillan.
go back to reference Arceneaux, Kevin, and Martin Johnson. 2013. Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Arceneaux, Kevin, and Martin Johnson. 2013. Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Baum, Matthew A. 2003a. Soft News and Political Knowledge: Evidence of Absence or Absence of Evidence? Political Communication 20: 173–190.CrossRef Baum, Matthew A. 2003a. Soft News and Political Knowledge: Evidence of Absence or Absence of Evidence? Political Communication 20: 173–190.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2003b. Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ———. 2003b. Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Berry, Jeffrey M., and Sarah Sobieraj. 2013. The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Berry, Jeffrey M., and Sarah Sobieraj. 2013. The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Bobo, Lawrence, and Frederick C. Licari. 1989. Education and Political Tolerance: Testing the Effects of Cognitive Sophistication and Target Group Affect. Public Opinion Quarterly 53(3): 285–308.CrossRef Bobo, Lawrence, and Frederick C. Licari. 1989. Education and Political Tolerance: Testing the Effects of Cognitive Sophistication and Target Group Affect. Public Opinion Quarterly 53(3): 285–308.CrossRef
go back to reference Dalton, Russell J. 2015. The Good Citizen: How a Younger Generation Is Reshaping American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Dalton, Russell J. 2015. The Good Citizen: How a Younger Generation Is Reshaping American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
go back to reference Dilliplane, Susanna. 2011. All the News You Want to Hear: The Impact of Partisan News Exposure on Political Participation. Public Opinion Quarterly 75: 287–316.CrossRef Dilliplane, Susanna. 2011. All the News You Want to Hear: The Impact of Partisan News Exposure on Political Participation. Public Opinion Quarterly 75: 287–316.CrossRef
go back to reference Druckman, James N. 2011. What’s It All about?: Framing in Political Science. In Perspectives on Framing, ed. Gideon Keren, 279–302. New York: Psychology Press. Druckman, James N. 2011. What’s It All about?: Framing in Political Science. In Perspectives on Framing, ed. Gideon Keren, 279–302. New York: Psychology Press.
go back to reference Egan, Patrick J. 2013. Partisan Priorities: How Issue Ownership Drives and Distorts American Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Egan, Patrick J. 2013. Partisan Priorities: How Issue Ownership Drives and Distorts American Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Entman, Robert M. 2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Entman, Robert M. 2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Feldman, Stanley, and Karen Stenner. 1997. Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism. Political Psychology 4(18): 741–770.CrossRef Feldman, Stanley, and Karen Stenner. 1997. Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism. Political Psychology 4(18): 741–770.CrossRef
go back to reference Forgette, Richard, and Jonathan S. Morris. 2006. High-Conflict Television News and Public Opinion. Political Research Quarterly 59: 447–456.CrossRef Forgette, Richard, and Jonathan S. Morris. 2006. High-Conflict Television News and Public Opinion. Political Research Quarterly 59: 447–456.CrossRef
go back to reference Gamson, William A., and Andre Modigliani. 1987. The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action. In Equal Employment Opportunity: Labor Market Discrimination and Public Policy, ed. Paul Burstein. New York, NY: Transaction Publishers. Gamson, William A., and Andre Modigliani. 1987. The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action. In Equal Employment Opportunity: Labor Market Discrimination and Public Policy, ed. Paul Burstein. New York, NY: Transaction Publishers.
go back to reference Gibson, James L. 1992. The Political Consequences of Intolerance: Cultural Conformity and Political Freedom. The American Political Science Review 86(2): 338–356.CrossRef Gibson, James L. 1992. The Political Consequences of Intolerance: Cultural Conformity and Political Freedom. The American Political Science Review 86(2): 338–356.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2007. Political Intolerance. In Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, ed. Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 323–341. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. ———. 2007. Political Intolerance. In Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, ed. Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 323–341. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference ———. 2013. Measuring Political Tolerance and General Support for Pro-Civil Liberties Policies Notes, Evidence, and Cautions. Public Opinion Quarterly 77(S1): 45–68. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs073.CrossRef ———. 2013. Measuring Political Tolerance and General Support for Pro-Civil Liberties Policies Notes, Evidence, and Cautions. Public Opinion Quarterly 77(S1): 45–68. doi:10.​1093/​poq/​nfs073.CrossRef
go back to reference Halperin, Eran. 2015. Emotions in Conflict: Inhibitors and Facilitators of Peace Making. New York, NY: Routledge. Halperin, Eran. 2015. Emotions in Conflict: Inhibitors and Facilitators of Peace Making. New York, NY: Routledge.
go back to reference Hetherington, Marc J., and Jonathan D. Weiler. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Hetherington, Marc J., and Jonathan D. Weiler. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Hiskey, Jonathan, Mason Moseley, and Mariana Rodríguez. 2013. Democracy Progress Report: Political Tolerance in the Americas, 2006–2012. AmericasBarometer Insights: 2013. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University. http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/IO900en.pdf. Hiskey, Jonathan, Mason Moseley, and Mariana Rodríguez. 2013. Democracy Progress Report: Political Tolerance in the Americas, 2006–2012. AmericasBarometer Insights: 2013. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University. http://​www.​vanderbilt.​edu/​lapop/​insights/​IO900en.​pdf.​
go back to reference Huckfeldt, Robert, Paul E. Johnson, and John Sprague. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Huckfeldt, Robert, Paul E. Johnson, and John Sprague. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Iyengar, Shanto. 1994. Is Anyone Responsible?: How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Iyengar, Shanto. 1994. Is Anyone Responsible?: How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. 1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion, Updated Edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. 1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion, Updated Edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Iyengar, Shanto, and Kyu S. Hahn. 2009. Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use. Journal of Communication 59(1): 19–39.CrossRef Iyengar, Shanto, and Kyu S. Hahn. 2009. Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use. Journal of Communication 59(1): 19–39.CrossRef
go back to reference Jamieson, K.H., and Joseph N. Cappella. 2010. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Jamieson, K.H., and Joseph N. Cappella. 2010. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1948. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1948. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
go back to reference Levendusky, Matthew. 2013a. How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Levendusky, Matthew. 2013a. How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1960. Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics. New York, NY: Doubleday. Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1960. Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics. New York, NY: Doubleday.
go back to reference Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael MacKuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael MacKuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Marcus, George E., John L. Sullivan, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse, and Daniel Stevens. 2005. The Emotional Foundation of Political Cognition: The Impact of Extrinsic Anxiety on the Formation of Political Tolerance Judgments. Political Psychology 26(December): 949–963. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00452.x.CrossRef Marcus, George E., John L. Sullivan, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse, and Daniel Stevens. 2005. The Emotional Foundation of Political Cognition: The Impact of Extrinsic Anxiety on the Formation of Political Tolerance Judgments. Political Psychology 26(December): 949–963. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1467-9221.​2005.​00452.​x.CrossRef
go back to reference McClosky, Herbert. 1964. Consensus and Ideology in American Politics. The American Political Science Review 58(2): 361–382.CrossRef McClosky, Herbert. 1964. Consensus and Ideology in American Politics. The American Political Science Review 58(2): 361–382.CrossRef
go back to reference McCombs, Maxwell E., and Donald L. Shaw. 1972. The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176–187.CrossRef McCombs, Maxwell E., and Donald L. Shaw. 1972. The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176–187.CrossRef
go back to reference Mutz, Diana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Mutz, Diana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Mutz, Diana C., and Paul S. Martin. 2001. Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of the Mass Media. American Political Science Review 95(1): 97–114. Mutz, Diana C., and Paul S. Martin. 2001. Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of the Mass Media. American Political Science Review 95(1): 97–114.
go back to reference Mutz, Diana C., and Jeffery J. Mondak. 2006. The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse. The Journal of Politics 68(1): 140–155.CrossRef Mutz, Diana C., and Jeffery J. Mondak. 2006. The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse. The Journal of Politics 68(1): 140–155.CrossRef
go back to reference Nelson, Thomas E., Rosalee A. Clawson, and Zoe M. Oxley. 1997. Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance. American Political Science Review 91(3): 567–583.CrossRef Nelson, Thomas E., Rosalee A. Clawson, and Zoe M. Oxley. 1997. Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance. American Political Science Review 91(3): 567–583.CrossRef
go back to reference Nie, Norman H., Jane Junn, and Kenneth Stehlik-Barry. 1996. Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Nie, Norman H., Jane Junn, and Kenneth Stehlik-Barry. 1996. Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Paluck, Elizabeth Levy. 2010. Is It Better Not to Talk? Group Polarization, Extended Contact, and Perspective Taking in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, August. doi:10.1177/0146167210379868. Paluck, Elizabeth Levy. 2010. Is It Better Not to Talk? Group Polarization, Extended Contact, and Perspective Taking in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, August. doi:10.1177/0146167210379868.
go back to reference Prothro, James W., and Charles M. Grigg. 1963. Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement. Journal of Politics 22: 276–294.CrossRef Prothro, James W., and Charles M. Grigg. 1963. Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement. Journal of Politics 22: 276–294.CrossRef
go back to reference Putnam, Robert D. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Putnam, Robert D. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
go back to reference Schudson, Michael. 2001. The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism. Journalism 2(2): 149–170.CrossRef Schudson, Michael. 2001. The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism. Journalism 2(2): 149–170.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, Amy Erica. 2016. Do Americans Still Believe in Democracy? The Washington Post, April 9. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/04/09/do-americans-still-believe-in-democracy/. Smith, Amy Erica. 2016. Do Americans Still Believe in Democracy? The Washington Post, April 9. https://​www.​washingtonpost.​com/​news/​monkey-cage/​wp/​2016/​04/​09/​do-americans-still-believe-in-democracy/​.​
go back to reference Stenner, Karen. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Stenner, Karen. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Stouffer, Samuel. 1955. Communism, Conformity and Civil Liberties. New York: Doubleday. Stouffer, Samuel. 1955. Communism, Conformity and Civil Liberties. New York: Doubleday.
go back to reference Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2008. Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure. Political Behavior 30: 341–366.CrossRef Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2008. Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure. Political Behavior 30: 341–366.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2010. Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure. Journal of Communication 60(3): 556–576.CrossRef ———. 2010. Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure. Journal of Communication 60(3): 556–576.CrossRef
go back to reference Sullivan, John L., and John E. Transue. 1999. The Psychological Underpinnings of Democracy: A Select Review of the Research on Political Tolerance, Interpersonal Trust, and Social Capital. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 625–650.CrossRef Sullivan, John L., and John E. Transue. 1999. The Psychological Underpinnings of Democracy: A Select Review of the Research on Political Tolerance, Interpersonal Trust, and Social Capital. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 625–650.CrossRef
go back to reference Sullivan, John L., George E. Marcus, Stanley Feldman, and James Piereson. 1981. The Sources of Political Tolerance: A Multivariate Analysis. The American Political Science Review 75(1): 92–106.CrossRef Sullivan, John L., George E. Marcus, Stanley Feldman, and James Piereson. 1981. The Sources of Political Tolerance: A Multivariate Analysis. The American Political Science Review 75(1): 92–106.CrossRef
go back to reference Sullivan, John L., James Piereson, and George E. Marcus. 1993. Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Sullivan, John L., James Piereson, and George E. Marcus. 1993. Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Puzzle of Extreme Media and Political Tolerance: An Immigration Case Study
Author
J. Benjamin Taylor
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41183-5_5