Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Read chapter Read first chapter

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

The Questionable Role of Experts in Global Governance

Toward a More Democratic Approach

Author : Marcin Kilanowski

Published in: Democracy and Globalization

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the role of experts in creating regulations and policies on the global level. The questions that should be answered are what role do experts actually play, what do they represent, how are they elected, and how accountable are they. The analysis will start by presenting M. Foucault’s and D. Kennedy’s arguments regarding knowledge and the role of experts. It will be argued that experts not only represent ‘knowledge’ but also different intuitions and presumptions. They are subject to various institutional pressures, to interests combined with values and to the politics of daily life. We should be aware of that and to see that the dichotomy of knowledge and politics collapses, that there is no longer pure knowledge that is detached from politics. Unfortunately we are not aware of that, especially when experts use the language that supports the outcome that is desired. In effect, they preserve the private law actors-public law actors dichotomy, because it serves, for example, the interests of multinational corporations, not to expand the scope of their responsibility. In the light of this we can say that changing our understanding of knowledge should also change our understanding of law as separate from politics, as mirroring a reality thanks to those that know best. With this in mind, we can start to look for better ways of holding experts accountable for what they do and to try to ensure transparency in the process of the creation of regulation and policy formation.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Participation in Standard Setting for the Agro-food Industry
next chapter Experts, Citizens, and the Politics of Common Sense
Footnotes
1
An earlier version of the argument presented in this chapter was published in: Kilanowski (2016), pp. 481–491.
 
2
Kennedy (2008), p. 832.
 
3
See Benforado and Hanson (2012); Chen and Hanson (2004), pp. 1103–1253.
 
4
See Collins and Evans (2006), pp. 39–110.
 
5
Kennedy (2005b), p. 5.
 
6
Kennedy (2005b), p. 6.
 
7
Foucault (1979), p. 28.
 
8
Foucault (1979), p. 27.
 
9
Kennedy (2005b), p. 10. Even though several multilateral initiatives have been very successful in securing world peace, David Kennedy argues that too often they function through a vocabulary that promotes war.
 
10
More on that see: Kennedy (2004), p. 112.
 
11
See, for example, Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. 569 U.S. 108, 133 S. Ct. 1659; 185 L. Ed. 2d671; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3159; 81 U.S.L.W. 4241.
 
12
Kennedy (2005b), p. 5.
 
13
Kennedy (2005b), p. 11.
 
14
See Robbins (1993).
 
15
Kennedy (2005b), p. 20. More on that see Kennedy (2005a).
 
16
See Sorrel (2018), pp. 20–36; Silver (2018), pp. 95–116.
 
17
Kennedy (2005a), p. 1.
 
18
For more on this issue, see Michelman (1998), pp. 1717–1734; Parker (1994).
 
19
About the role that unexpressed various legal doctrines play in decisions of arbitrators and judges, see Gaillard (2010), pp. 1–11.
 
20
See Mansbridge (2008), pp. 251–271.
 
21
See Bourdieu (1991), pp. 655–669.
 
22
See Danielsen (2006), pp. 85–99; Ruggie (2004), pp. 10–15.
 
23
See, for example, Weissbrodt and Kruger (2003), pp. 901–922.
 
24
See Danielsen (2005), pp. 411–425. See also Roe (2003), pp. 21–28.
 
25
See Danielsen (2010), pp. 49–68. See also Braithwaite and Drahos (2008).
 
26
As an example of regulatory approach, see Danielsen (2005), see Kingsbury et al. (2005), pp. 15–61.
 
27
See Ruggie (2008, 2010).
 
28
See, for example, Bogs (2001); Hart and Zingales (2017), pp. 247–274.
 
29
Kasturi et al. (2015), pp. 1–15, https://​hbr.​org/​2015/​01/​the-truth-about-csr, accessed on November 30, 2020.
 
30
For example, the future of the Alien Tort Statute in the USA, which allows to hold corporations accountable for their human rights violations, is no longer clear after the court ruling in the Kiobel Case. For more information on the Alien Tort Statue, see Hufbauer and Mitrokostas (2004), pp. 245–262.
 
31
Danielsen (2006), p. 99.
 
32
Ibidem. For more information on decentralization and system change see Holtmann and Rademacher (2016), pp. 281–298.
 
33
Such approach would mirror, to a certain extend, the bottom-up approach presented as a solution to the problems of creation of global administrative law, whose main problem is the lack of transparency, accountability and democratic review. See Kingsbury et al. (2005), p. 55.
 
34
It is worth mentioning that among the advocates of the disaggregated system today is Anne-Marie Slaughter who argues that we can witness in the future disaggregated sovereignty thanks to establishing cooperation within the networks of experts. She understands that such networks present significant accountability and legitimacy concerns, however she believes that there are means to increase accountability and proposes norms to govern the relations of members of government networks with one another. See: Slaughter (2004), pp. 159–190.
 
35
On the role of a common vocabulary, see Kennedy (2005a), p. 26, 42. See also Michelman (1989), pp. 256–269.
 
36
Kingsbury et al. (2005), p. 57.
 
37
The business judgment rule is a doctrine in corporate law in common law countries that protects corporate executives from legal allegations about the way it conducts business. The business judgment rule protects the business decisions of corporate directors and officers who are sued by shareholders for claims of a breach of the duty of care. In case of lack of evidence that the board has blatantly violated some rule of conduct, the courts will not review or question its decisions. It should be noted however that by doing that the courts are confusing the business judgment rule with the standard of care that governs the conduct of corporate directors and officers. See: Triem (2007), pp. 23–44.
 
38
Kingsbury et al. (2005), p. 57.
 
39
See Kingsbury et al. (2005), p. 57, 56.
 
40
Kennedy (2005a), p. 22.
 
41
Such a future is envisaged in Hansmann and Kraakman (2004), pp. 33–68.
 
42
There are many initiatives in particular regions, such as those in Switzerland or Poland, to include people in the decision making process, and there are further propositions as to how to establish an “open” democracy. See Landemore (2020).
 
43
See, for example, the variety of issues raised, in recent years, by the “Me Too”, Black Lives Matter, and Yellow Vests movements, as well as by the Global Climate Strikes.
 
44
For more on this issue, see for example Rothstein (2017); Goldstone (2018); Burgess (2018), pp. 342–367.
 
45
For the importance of culture and the politics of place, see Kennedy (2008), p. 835.
 
46
Kennedy, The Dark Side of Virtue, 112. For more on how language constrains our ability to think and see problems, see Tolmach Lakoff (1992).
 
47
For example, we could look at how experts dealt with the problems caused by the financial crisis. For more detail, see Mellor (2010); O’Halloran and Groll (2019).
 
48
There are number of initiatives in that regard. See: Volker (2012), pp. 99–158.
 
49
Kennedy (2005a), p. 10.
 
50
On the end of history, see Fukuyama (2006).
 
51
See, for example, Dahinden (2013); Ruus (2011), pp. 268–289.
 
52
On the issue of the possibility of democratization, transparency and legitimacy in international law, see Koskenniemi (2006).
 
Literature
Bogs C (2001) The end of politics: corporate power and the decline of the public sphere. The Guilford Press, New York
Bourdieu P (1991) Universal corporatism: the role of intellectuals in the modern world. Poetics Today 12(4):655–669CrossRef
Braithwaite J, Drahos P (2008) Regulatory capitalism: how it works, ideas for making it work better. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, CheltenhamCrossRef
Burgess SK (2018) Between the desire for law and the law of desire: #MeToo and the cost of telling the truth today. Philosophy Rhetoric 51(4):342–367CrossRef
Chen R, Hanson J (2004) Categorically biased: the influence of knowledge structures on law and legal theory. Calif Law Rev 77:1103–1253
Collins HM, Evans R (2006) The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. In: Selinger E, Crease RP (eds) The philosophy of expertise. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 39–110
Danielsen D (2005) How corporations govern: taking corporate power seriously in transnational regulation and governance. Harv Int Law J 46(2):411–425
Danielsen D (2006) Corporate power and global order. In: Orford A (ed) International law and its others. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 85–99CrossRef
Foucault M (1979) Discipline and punish, the birth of the prison. Vintage Books, New York
Fukuyama F (2006) The end of history and the last man. Free Press, New York
Hansmann H, Kraakman R (2004) The end of history for corporate law. In: Gordon JN, Roe MJ (eds) Convergence and persistence in corporate governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 33–68CrossRef
Hart O, Zingales L (2017) Companies should maximize shareholder welfare not market value. J Law Financ Account 2(2):247–274CrossRef
Holtmann E, Rademacher C (2016) Decentralization of power and of decision-making — an institutional driver for systems change to democracy. Hist Soc Res 41(3):281–298
Kennedy D (2004) The dark sides of virtue. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRef
Kennedy D (2005a) Of war and law. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Kennedy D (2005b) Challenging expert rule: the politics of global governance. Sydney J Int Law, 27
Kennedy D (2008) The mystery of global governance. Ohio Northern Univ Law Rev 34(3):827–860
Kilanowski M (2016) The questionable role of experts in global governance. Beyond David Kennedy’s approach. Econ Law 4:481–491
Kingsbury B, Krisch N, Stewart R (2005) The emergence of global administrative law. Law Contemp Probl 68(3):15–62
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. 569 U.S. 108, 133 S. Ct. 1659; 185 L. Ed. 2d671; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3159; 81 U.S.L.W. 4241
Lakoff RT (1992) Talking power: the politics of language. Basic Books, New York
Landemore H (2020) Open democracy. Reinventing popular rule for the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRef
Mansbridge J (2008) Deliberative democracy or democratic deliberation? In: Rosenberg SW (ed) Deliberation, participation, and democracy: can the people govern? Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 251–271
Mellor M (2010) The future of money: from financial crisis to public resource. Pluto Press, London
Michelman F (1989) Bringing the law to life: a plea for disenchantment. Cornell Law Rev 74(2):256–269
Michelman F (1998) Protecting the people from themselves,’ or how direct can democracy be? UCLA Law Rev 45(6):1717–1734
O’Halloran S, Groll T (2019) After the crash: financial crises and regulatory responses. Columbia University Press, New YorkCrossRef
Parker R (1994) Here, the people rule, a constitutional populist Manifesto. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Robbins B (1993) Secular vocations: intellectuals, professionalism, culture. Verso, New York
Rothstein R (2017) The color of law, a forgotten history of how our government segregated America. Liveright Publishing, New York
Ruggie J (2004) How to Marry civic politics and private governance. In: Kuper A (ed) The impact of corporations on global governance: a report of the empire and democracy project. Center on International Cooperation, New York, pp 10–15
Ruggie J (2008) Clarifying the Concepts of ‘Corporate Sphere of Influence’ and ‘Complicity’: report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, UN Human Rights Council, 15 May 2008, A/HRC/8/16, available at: http://​www.​refworld.​org/​docid/​484d1fe12.​html. Accessed 13 Nov 2016
Ruggie J (2010) Protect, respect and remedy: the united nations framework for business and human rights. In: Baderin M, Ssenyonjo M (eds) International human rights law: six decades after the UDHR and beyond. Ashgate, Farnham
Ruus J (2011) Democratic participation at the local level in post-communist states: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania. In: Schiller T (ed) Local direct democracy in Europe. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Berlin, pp 268–289CrossRef
Silver D (2018) The moral accountability of the financial industry for the global financial crisis. Midwest Stud Philosophy 42(1):95–116CrossRef
Slaughter A-M (2004) Disaggregated sovereignty: towards the public accountability of global government networks. Gov Opposition 39(2):159–190CrossRef
Sorrel T (2018) Responsibility in the financial crisis. Midwest Stud Philosophy 42(1):20–36CrossRef
Triem FW (2007) Judicial Schizophrenia in corporate law: confusing the standard of care with the business judgment rule. Alaska Law Rev 23(24):23–44
Volker R (2012) Responsibility in international law. In: von Bogdandy A, Wolfrum R (eds) Max Planck yearbook of United Nations law, vol 16, pp 99–158
Weissbrodt D, Kruger M (2003) Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights. Am J Int Law 97(4):901–922CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Questionable Role of Experts in Global Governance
Author
Marcin Kilanowski
Copyright Year
2021
Book
Democracy and Globalization

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69153-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-69154-7

Copyright Year: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69154-7_11

Premium Partner

    Image Credits