Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue
In this article, we demonstrate that individuals use motivated reasoning to convince themselves that their self-serving behavior is justified, which in turn affects the distribution of resources in business situations. Specifically, we explore how ambiguous contextual cues and individual beliefs can jointly form motivated reasoning. Across two experimental studies, we find that whereas individual ideologies that endorse status hierarchies (i.e., social dominance orientation) can strengthen the relationship between contextual ambiguity and motivated reasoning, individual beliefs rooted in fairness and equality (i.e., moral identity) can weaken it. Our findings contribute to person–situation theories of business ethics and provide evidence that two ubiquitous factors in business organizations—contextual ambiguity and social dominance orientation—give rise to motivated reasoning, enabling decision makers to engage in self-serving distributions of resources.
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
Allison, S. T., & Messick, D. M. (1990). Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,3, 195–204. CrossRef
Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., Lim, V. G., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,97(1), 123–141. CrossRef
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(6), 1423–1440. CrossRef
Aquino, K., Reed, A., Thau, S., & Freeman, D. A. (2007). A grotesque and dark beauty: How moral identity and mechanisms of moral disengagement influence cognitive and emotional reactions to war. Journal of Experiment and Social Psychology,43, 385–392. CrossRef
Blasi, A. (1984). Moral identity: Its role in moral functioning. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior and moral development (pp. 128–139). New York: Wiley.
Camerer, C., & Weber, M. (1992). Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,5, 325–370. CrossRef
Cozzolino, P. J., & Snyder, M. (2008). Good Times, bad Times: How personal disadvantage moderates the relationship between social dominance and efforts to win. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,34, 1420–1433. CrossRef
De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2005). When and why leaders put themselves first: Leader behavior in resource allocations as a function of feeling entitled. European Journal of Social Psychology,35, 553–563. CrossRef
Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology,93, 374–391. CrossRef
Diekmann, K. A., Samuels, S. M., Ross, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1997). Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: Allocators versus recipients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72, 1061–1074. CrossRef
Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,63, 568–584. CrossRef
Ditto, P. H., Munro, G. D., Apanovitch, A. M., Scepansky, J. A., & Lockhart, L. K. (2003). Spontaneous skepticism: The interplay of motivation and expectation in responses to favorable and unfavorable medical diagnoses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,29, 1120–1132. CrossRef
Ditto, P. H., Pizarro, D. A., & Tannenbaum, D. (2009). Motivated moral reasoning. In B. H. Ross, D. M. Bartels, C. W. Bauman, L. J. Skitka, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Moral judgment and decision making (pp. 307–338). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Ditto, P. H., Scepansky, J. A., Munro, G. D., Apanovitch, A. M., & Lockhart, L. K. (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75, 53–69. CrossRef
Dobers, P., & Halme, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and developing countries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,16, 237–249. CrossRef
Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,108(3), 436–449. CrossRef
Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83, 75–93. CrossRef
Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57, 1082–1090. CrossRef
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review,23, 660–679.
Esses, V. M., Bennett-Abuyyash, C., & Lapshina, N. (2014). How discrimination against ethnic and religious minorities contributes to the underutilization of immigrants’ skills. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1(1), 55–62. CrossRef
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin,117(1), 39–66. CrossRef
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Garcia, S. M., Bazerman, M. H., Kopelman, S., Tor, A., & Miller, D. T. (2009). The price of equality: Suboptimal resource allocations across social categories. Harvard PON working paper No. 1442078. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1442078.
Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective-taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal,54, 73–96. CrossRef
Griffin, R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1991). Laboratory research in management: Misconceptions and missed opportunities. Journal of Organizational Behavior,12(4), 301–311. CrossRef
Hernandez, M. (2012). Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship. Academy of Management Review,37(2), 172–193. CrossRef
Herr, N. A. (undated). Mediation with dichotomous outcomes. Accessed on January 31, 2017 from http://www.nrhpsych.com/mediation/logmed.html.
Higgins, E. T., King, G. A., & Mavin, G. H. (1982). Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,43(1), 35–47. CrossRef
Hoffman, E., & Spitzer, M. L. (1985). Entitlements, rights, and fairness: An experimental examination of subjects’ concepts of distributive justice. Journal of Legal Studies,14, 259–297. CrossRef
Jackson, L. E., & Gaertner, L. (2010). Mechanisms of moral disengagement and their differential use by right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in support of war. Aggresive Behavior,36(4), 238–250. CrossRef
Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justfying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science,14(5), 260–265. CrossRef
Keatings, M., & Dick, D. (1989). Ethics and politics of resource allocation: The role of nursing. Journal of Business Ethics,8, 187–192. CrossRef
Kish-Gephart, J., Detert, J., Treviño, L. K., Baker, V., & Martin, S. (2014). Situational moral disengagement: Can the effects of self-interest be mitgated? Journal of Business Ethics,125, 267–285. CrossRef
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology,95(1), 1–31. CrossRef
Knoll, M., Lord, R. G., Petersen, L. E., & Weigelt, O. (2016). Examining the moral grey zone: The role of moral disengagement, authenticity, and situational strength in predicting unethical managerial behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,46(1), 65–78. CrossRef
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin,108(3), 480–498. CrossRef
Kunda, Z., & Sanitioso, R. (1989). Motivated changes in the self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,25, 272–285. CrossRef
Lane, H., Maznevski, M., & Mendenhall, M. (2004). Globalization: Hercules meets Buddha. In H. V. Lane, M. L. Maznevski, M. E. Mendenhall, & J. McNett (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of global management: A guide to managing complexity (pp. 3–25). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. CrossRef
Leavitt, K., Zhu, L., & Aquino, K. (2016). Good without knowing it: Subtle contextual cues can activate moral identity and reshape moral intuition. Journal of Business Ethics,137, 785–800. CrossRef
MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review,17, 144–158. CrossRef
Martin, D., Seppala, E., Heinberg, Y., Rossomando, T., Doty, J., Zimbardo, P., et al. (2015). Multiple facets of compassion: The impact of social dominance orientation and economic systems justification. Journal of Business Ethics,129, 237–249. CrossRef
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research,45, 633–644. CrossRef
McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin,114, 376–390. CrossRef
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,34, 57–111. CrossRef
Messick, D. M. (1993). Equality as a decision heuristic. In B. E. Mellers & J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice (pp. 11–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management,36(1), 121–140. CrossRef
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review,80(4), 252–283. CrossRef
Miska, C., Stahl, G. K., & Fuchs, M. (2016). The moderating role of context in determining unethical managerial behavior: A case survey. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3374-5.
Molden, D. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Motivated thinking. In K. Holyoak & B. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 295–320). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Monin, B., & Jordan, A. H. (2009). The dynamic moral self: A social psychological perspective. In D. Narvaez & D. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 341–354). New York, NY: Cambridge University. CrossRef
Moore, C., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., Baker, V. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology,65, 1–48. CrossRef
Moore, C., & Gino, F. (2015). Approach, ability, and aftermath: A psychological process framework of unethical behavior at work. The Academy of Management Annals,9(1), 235–289. CrossRef
Noval, L. J., & Stahl, G. K. (2017). Accounting for proscriptive and prescriptive morality in the workplace: The double-edged sword effect of mood on managerial ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2767-1.
Noval, L. J., Stahl, G. K., & Molinsky, A. (2016). Motivated dissimilarity construal and self-serving behavior. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting. Anaheim, CA, USA.
Paharia, N., & Dehspandé, R. (2009). Sweatshop labor is wrong unless the jeans are cute: Motivated moral disengagement. Harvard Business School working paper No. 09- 079.
Paharia, N., Vohs, K. D., & Deshpande, R. (2013). Sweatshop labor is wrong unless the shoes are cute: Cognition can both help and hurt moral motivated reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,121, 81–88. CrossRef
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Bertram, F. M. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67, 741–763. CrossRef
Pratto, F., Tatar, D. G., & Conway-Lanz, S. (1999). Who gets what and why? Determinants of social allocations. Political Psychology,20(1), 127–150. CrossRef
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (vol. 17, pp. 271–320).
Preacher, K., Rucker, D., & Hayes, A. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research,42, 185–227. CrossRef
Reed, A. I., & Aquino, K. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard towards out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84(6), 1270–1286. CrossRef
Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology,92(6), 1610–1624. CrossRef
Reynolds, S. J., Schultz, F. C., & Hekman, D. R. (2006). Stakeholder theory and managerial decision-making: Constraints and implications of balancing stakeholder interests. Journal of Business Ethics,64, 285–301. CrossRef
Rosenblatt, V. (2012). Hierarchies, power inequalities, and organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics,111(2), 237–251. CrossRef
Rutte, C. G., Wilke, H. A. M., & Messick, D. M. (1987). The effects of framing social dilemmas as give-some or take-some games. British Journal of Social Psychology,26, 103–108. CrossRef
Samuelson, C. D., & Allison, S. T. (1994). Cognitive factors affecting the use of social decision heuristics in resource-sharing tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,58, 1–27. CrossRef
Shalvi, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R., & Ayal, S. (2015). Self-serving justifications: Doing wrong and feeling moral. Current Directions in Psychological Science,24(2), 125–130. CrossRef
Shao, R., Aquino, K., & Freeman, D. (2008). Beyond moral reasoning: A review of moral identity research and its implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly,18(4), 513–540. CrossRef
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Stahl, G. K., & Sully de Luque, M. (2014). Antecedents of responsible leader behavior: A research synthesis, conceptual framework, and agenda for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives,28(3), 235–254. CrossRef
Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research,17, 223–236. CrossRef
Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situationist interactionist model. Academy of Management Review,111(3), 601–617.
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. K., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management,32(6), 951–990. CrossRef
Tsang, J. A. (2002). Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in immoral behavior. Review of General Psychology,6(1), 25–50. CrossRef
Uhlmann, E., Pizarro, D. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Ditto, P. H. (2009). The motivated use of moral principles. Judgment and Decision Making,4(6), 476–491.
Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Tost, L. P., Hernandez, M., & Larrick, R. P. (2012). It’s only a matter of time: Death, legacies, and intergenerational decisions. Psychological Science,23, 704–709. CrossRef
Winterich, K. P., Aquino, K., Mittal, V., & Swartz, R. (2013). When moral identity symbolization motivates prosocial behavior: The role of recognition and moral identity internalization. Journal of Applied Psychology,98(5), 759–770. CrossRef
Xu, Z. K., & Ma, H. K. (2016). How can deontological decision lead to moral behavior? The moderating role of moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics,137, 537–549. CrossRef
- The Unwitting Accomplice: How Organizations Enable Motivated Reasoning and Self-Serving Behavior
Laura J. Noval
- Publication date
- Springer Netherlands
- Journal of Business Ethics
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww