Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

4. The US and the New Eastern Europe (Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan) Since 1991

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

What is distinct about the US approach to Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia? Since these states gained independence in 1991, the US has maintained an uneasy balance between its idealistic impulses and its realistic national interests. Viewed from outside the Eastern Partnership perspective, the US has developed very distinct relations with each member this collection of countries in Eastern Europe for country-specific reasons. The nature of each relationship is understood through identification of the foreign policy actors and constituencies in each. After NATO proved an imperfect institutional instrument for the promotion of Liberal Democratic values and regional stability, the US supported the EU’s Eastern Partnership. Whether the Trump Administration breaks with previous policy remains unclear, although Americans’ self-conception of themselves and the superiority of their own norms is unlikely to change.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
The six Eastern European states have been referred to elsewhere in this book as the Eastern Partnership countries. It is important to bear in mind that the Eastern Partnership policy only came into being after the blossoming of European CSDP in 2008. Prior to 2008, this chapter argues that the US was more involved than Europe in these six countries and was arguably the lead partner in the Western duo.
 
2
After the Cold War, ‘Eastern Europe’ for Westerners ceased to refer to the central European states that had formed the Cold War’s Warsaw Pact and can rightly be used to refer to the ‘new’ Eastern Europe of Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. Russia is a continental power with much of its territory in Asia and increasingly identifies with a vision of itself as a civilizational pole other than Europe.
 
3
George H.W. Bush, ‘Remarks to the Supreme Soviet of the Republic of the Ukraine in Kiev Soviet Union’, 1 August 1991, The American Presidency Project, University of California Santa Barbara. http://​www.​presidency.​ucsb.​edu/​ws/​?​pid=​19864. The ‘Chicken Kiev’ reference was coined by columnist William Safire in the New York Times.
 
4
The literature on both the missionary tendency in American foreign policy is vast. The classic study is McDougall Promised Land, Crusader State. Foglesong describes how this predilection played out specifically within US-Russian relations. David S. Foglesong, The American Mission and the ‘Evil Empire’: The Crusade for a ‘Free Russia’ since 1881. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
 
5
This article tries to stay true to the basic concepts of bandwagoning and balancing as defined by Stephen Walt, The Origins of Alliances, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987. As Walt points out, Jervis makes a similar argument using the terms Appeasement and Deterrence.
 
6
Its full title is the ‘Freedom for Russia and Emerging Eurasian Democracies and Open Markets Support Act of 1992’. President George H.W. Bush possessed a great deal of diplomatic experience and had been reluctant to emphasize democracy promotion in the former Soviet Union as a primary programmatic goal. Nevertheless, in the statement issued at his signing of the legislation he outlined its function ‘programs to support free market and democratic reforms being undertaken in Russia, Ukraine, Armenia, and the other states of the former Soviet Union.’ Bush Presidential Library. http://​www.​presidency.​ucsb.​edu/​ws/​?​pid=​21658.
 
7
Derek H. Chollet and James M. Goldgeier, America between the Wars: From 11/9 to 9/11: The Misunderstood Years between the Fall of the Berlin Wall and the Start of the War on Terror. 1st ed. (New York: BBS PublicAffairs, 2008).
 
8
‘Europe whole and free’ was the vision of a Europe governed by Liberal democratic norms outlined in George H.W. Bush Speech in Mainz, West Germany 31 May 1989 and afterward remembered as a catchphrase embodying that idea. https://​usa.​usembassy.​de/​etexts/​ga6-890531.​htm.
 
9
Jonathan Monten, ‘The Roots of the Bush Doctrine: Power, Nationalism, and Democracy Promotion in US Strategy’, International Security 29: 4 (2005): 112–156.
 
10
Charles A. Stevenson, SECDEF: The Nearly Impossible Job of Secretary of Defence. 1st ed. Washington, DC: Potomac Books, 2006.
 
11
Munich, Germany, February 5, 1995. Reprinted as ‘The Enduring, Dynamic Relationship That is NATO,’ Remarks by Secretary of Defence William J. Perry to the Wehrkunde Conference on Security Policy, Defence Issues, Vol. 10, No. 9.
 
12
Jackson Diehl characterized this view on the editorial page of The Washington Post on 4 April 2016 ‘In the end, NATO oversaw what was probably the most successful nation-building effort in history. A score of countries—Poland and Hungary, Latvia and Estonia, Serbia and Croatia, and yes, Ukraine and Georgia—adopted the Western, liberal model of statehood under the allies’ scrutiny, even though not all have yet joined NATO or the European Union.
 
13
Andrew Wilson, ‘Can Ukraine Save Its Revolution’. Current History, October 2015, p. 264.
 
14
Zbigniew Brzezinski, ‘The Premature Partnership’. Foreign Affairs 73 (1994): 67.
 
15
Madeleine Albright, The Rostov Lecture Series School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, January 18, 2000. https://​1997-2001.​state.​gov/​www/​statements/​2000/​000118.​html.
 
16
Steven Pifer, The Eagle and the Trident: U.S.-Ukraine Relations in Turbulent Times (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2017).
 
17
Vincent L. Morelli, ‘Ukraine: Current Issues and US Policy,’ Congressional Research Service, 3 January 2017.
 
19
Morelli, ‘Ukraine’.
 
20
Steve Pifer and John Herbst, both senior career diplomats and former US Ambassadors to Kyiv, were among many who argued this point. https://​www.​brookings.​edu/​blog/​order-from-chaos/​2016/​03/​18/​the-obama-doctrine-and-ukraine/​.
 
21
Grigory Ioffe, ‘What Are the Limits to Belarus’s Sovereignty?’, Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume:14 Issue123, October 4, 2017. https://​jamestown.​org/​program/​limits-belaruss-sovereignty/​.
 
22
Steven Woehrel, ‘Belarus: Background and US Policy Concerns’. Congressional Research Service, 12 February 2013.
 
23
Andrew Wilson, Belarus: The Last Dictatorship in Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011.
 
24
David Rotman, and Natalia Veremeeva, ‘Belarus in the Context of the Neighbourhood Policy: Between the EU and Russia’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27: 1 (March 2011): 73–98.
 
25
Millennium Challenge Corporation – Moldova. https://​www.​mcc.​gov/​where-we-work/​country/​moldova.
 
27
Moldovan Partnership with North Carolina. http://​www.​sua.​mfa.​md/​rm-north-carolina-en/​.
 
28
Vladimir Socor, ‘Vice-President Joe Biden Shows US Flag in Moldova (Part Two)’, https://​jamestown.​org/​program/​vice-president-joe-biden-shows-us-flag-in-moldova-part-two/​.
 
29
Julien Zarifian, ‘The Armenian-American Lobby and Its Impact on US Foreign Policy’. Society 51: 5 (October 2014): 503–512. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12115-014-9816-8.
 
30
David King and Miles Pomper, ‘The US Congress and the Contingent Influence of Diaspora Lobbies: Lessons from US Policy Toward Armenia and Azerbaijan’, Journal of Armenian Studies 8:1 (2004): 72–98.
 
32
Joshua Kucera, ‘At Last Minute, Armenia Drops Out of NATO Exercises in Georgia’, 4 September 2017, Eurasianet.​org, http://​www.​eurasianet.​org/​node/​84956.
 
33
Armen Grigoryan, ‘Armenia Likely to Yield Even More of its Sovereignty to Russia’, Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 14 Issue: 108. https://​jamestown.​org/​program/​armenia-likely-to-yield-even-more-of-its-sovereignty-to-russia/​.
 
34
Alexander Cooley, Great Games, Local Rules: The New Great Power Contest in Central Asia, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
 
35
Joshua Kucera, ‘Azerbaijan Has Advantage Over Armenia In US Military Aid’, 17 May 2016, Eurasianet.​org. http://​www.​eurasianet.​org/​node/​78831.
 
36
Jim Nichol, Azerbaijan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests, Congressional Research Service, 22 February 2013.
 
37
Nichol, Azerbaijan.
 
38
Joshua Kucera, ‘Azerbaijan Threatens to Cut Off Military Cooperation with US and NATO’, The Bug Pit, 11 September 2017, Eurasianet.​org. http://​www.​eurasianet.​org/​node/​85081.
 
39
Thomas Goltz, ‘The Caspian Oil Sweepstakes’, The Nation, 17 November 1997, p. 18.
 
40
Kucera, ‘Azerbaijan’.
 
41
Using 2014 budgetary information, the Security Assistance Monitor identified Georgia as the fourth most dependent recipient of US military assistance. ‘Military Aid Dependency: What Are the Major US Risks Around the World?’ http://​securityassistan​ce.​org/​fact_​sheet/​military-aid-dependency-what-are-major-us-risks-around-world.
 
42
Richard Weitz, ‘Enhancing the Georgia-US Security Partnership’. Institute for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies (IERES), 31 October 2016. https://​www2.​gwu.​edu/​~ieresgwu/​assets/​docs/​10.​31.​2016_​Weitz_​US-Georgia_​Security_​Partnership.​pdf.
 
43
Andrew C. Kuchins, Thomas M. Sanderson, Daniel Kimmage, Joseph Ferguson, Alexandros Petersen, Heidi Hoogerbeets, and David Gordon, ‘The Northern Distribution Network and Afghanistan’. CSIS Report, January 2010. http://​dspace.​africaportal.​org/​jspui/​bitstream/​123456789/​27230/​1/​Northern%20​Distribution%20​Network%20​and%20​Afghanistan.​pdf.
 
44
Jim Nichol, ‘Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia: Political Developments and Implications for US Interests’. Congressional Research Service, 2 April 2014.
 
46
Dan Eggen, ‘Georgia Marches on Washington’, The Washington Post, 17 May 2012.
 
48
In an editorial dated 27 April 2017, The Washington Post spoke for this element of the foreign policy establishment when they wrote, ‘One positive consequence of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has been to invigorate and accelerate efforts by the European Union to deepen its relations with two other former Soviet republics: Georgia and Moldova.’
 
49
For further reading: Articles provide the bulk of the material on the US relationship with the six since 1991. However, two books stand out as particularly relevant: Steven Pifer’s The Eagle and the Trident: U.S.-Ukraine Relations in Turbulent Times (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2017) is a detailed analysis by a respected Ukraine expert and former US Ambassador. Another book by a former practitioner that provides a unique perspective on bilateral relations with all of these countries is Strobe Talbot’s The Russia Hand (New York: Random House, 2002).
 
Literature
go back to reference Brzezinski, Zbigniew, ‘The Premature Partnership’, Foreign Affairs (1994): pp. 67–82.CrossRef Brzezinski, Zbigniew, ‘The Premature Partnership’, Foreign Affairs (1994): pp. 67–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Chollet, Derek H. and James M. Goldgeier, America between the Wars: From 11/9 to 9/11: The Misunderstood Years between the Fall of the Berlin Wall and the Start of the War on Terror (New York: BBS Public Affairs, 2008). Chollet, Derek H. and James M. Goldgeier, America between the Wars: From 11/9 to 9/11: The Misunderstood Years between the Fall of the Berlin Wall and the Start of the War on Terror (New York: BBS Public Affairs, 2008).
go back to reference Cooley, Alexander, Great Games, Local Rules: The New Great Power Contest in Central Asia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012). Cooley, Alexander, Great Games, Local Rules: The New Great Power Contest in Central Asia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).
go back to reference Diehl, Jackson, ‘The Editorial Page’, The Washington Post, 4 April 2016. Diehl, Jackson, ‘The Editorial Page’, The Washington Post, 4 April 2016.
go back to reference Eggen, Dan, ‘Georgia Marches on Washington’, The Washington Post, 17 May 2012. Eggen, Dan, ‘Georgia Marches on Washington’, The Washington Post, 17 May 2012.
go back to reference Foglesong, David, The American Mission and the ‘Evil Empire’: The Crusade for a ‘Free Russia’ since 1881 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007). Foglesong, David, The American Mission and the ‘Evil Empire’: The Crusade for a ‘Free Russia’ since 1881 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
go back to reference Goltz, Thomas, ‘The Caspian Oil Sweepstakes’, Nation-New York (1997), pp. 18–20. Goltz, Thomas, ‘The Caspian Oil Sweepstakes’, Nation-New York (1997), pp. 18–20.
go back to reference King, David and Miles Pomper, ‘The US Congress and the Contingent Influence of Diaspora Lobbies: Lessons from US Policy Toward Armenia and Azerbaijan’, Journal of Armenian Studies 8:1 (2004), pp. 72–98. King, David and Miles Pomper, ‘The US Congress and the Contingent Influence of Diaspora Lobbies: Lessons from US Policy Toward Armenia and Azerbaijan’, Journal of Armenian Studies 8:1 (2004), pp. 72–98.
go back to reference McDougall, Walter A., Promised land, crusader state: the American encounter with the world since 1776 (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1997). McDougall, Walter A., Promised land, crusader state: the American encounter with the world since 1776 (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1997).
go back to reference Monten, Jonathan, ‘The Roots of the Bush Doctrine: Power, Nationalism, and Democracy Promotion in US Strategy’, International Security 29:4 (2005), pp. 112–56. Monten, Jonathan, ‘The Roots of the Bush Doctrine: Power, Nationalism, and Democracy Promotion in US Strategy’, International Security 29:4 (2005), pp. 112–56.
go back to reference Morelli, Vincent L., ‘Ukraine: Current Issues and US Policy’. Congressional Research Service, 3 January 2017. Morelli, Vincent L., ‘Ukraine: Current Issues and US Policy’. Congressional Research Service, 3 January 2017.
go back to reference Nichol, Jim, Azerbaijan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests, Congressional Research Service, 22 February 2013. Nichol, Jim, Azerbaijan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests, Congressional Research Service, 22 February 2013.
go back to reference Nichol, Jim, ‘Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia: Political Developments and Implications for US Interests’, Congressional Research Service, 2 April 2014. Nichol, Jim, ‘Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia: Political Developments and Implications for US Interests’, Congressional Research Service, 2 April 2014.
go back to reference Perry, William J., ‘The Enduring, Dynamic Relationship That is NATO’, Wehrkunde Conference on Security Policy, Defence Issues 10:9 (1995). Perry, William J., ‘The Enduring, Dynamic Relationship That is NATO’, Wehrkunde Conference on Security Policy, Defence Issues 10:9 (1995).
go back to reference Pifer, Steven, The Eagle and the Trident: U.S.-Ukraine Relations in Turbulent Times (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2017). Pifer, Steven, The Eagle and the Trident: U.S.-Ukraine Relations in Turbulent Times (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2017).
go back to reference Rotman, David and Natalia Veremeeva, ‘Belarus in the Context of the Neighbourhood Policy: Between the EU and Russia’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27:1 (2011), pp. 73–98.CrossRef Rotman, David and Natalia Veremeeva, ‘Belarus in the Context of the Neighbourhood Policy: Between the EU and Russia’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27:1 (2011), pp. 73–98.CrossRef
go back to reference Stevenson, Charles A., SECDEF: The Nearly Impossible Job of Secretary of Defence (Washington, D.C: Potomac Books, 2006). Stevenson, Charles A., SECDEF: The Nearly Impossible Job of Secretary of Defence (Washington, D.C: Potomac Books, 2006).
go back to reference Talbot, Strobe, The Russia Hand (New York: Random House, 2002). Talbot, Strobe, The Russia Hand (New York: Random House, 2002).
go back to reference Walt, Stephen, The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987). Walt, Stephen, The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987).
go back to reference Wilson, Andrew, ‘Can Ukraine Save Its Revolution’, Current History, October 2015, p. 264. Wilson, Andrew, ‘Can Ukraine Save Its Revolution’, Current History, October 2015, p. 264.
go back to reference Wilson, Andrew, Belarus: The Last Dictatorship in Europe (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011). Wilson, Andrew, Belarus: The Last Dictatorship in Europe (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011).
go back to reference Woehrel, Steven, ‘Belarus: Background and US Policy Concerns’, Congressional Research Service, 12 February 2013. Woehrel, Steven, ‘Belarus: Background and US Policy Concerns’, Congressional Research Service, 12 February 2013.
Metadata
Title
The US and the New Eastern Europe (Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan) Since 1991
Author
Jason Bruder
Copyright Year
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26937-1_4