Skip to main content
Register
Springer Professional
SEARCH
MENU 1 2 3 4
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

Published in:
Entrepreneurship and Organizational Change: Managing Innovation and Creative Capabilities Read chapter Read first chapter

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Theoretical Insights into Organ Donation and Social Change

Authors: Amani Alsalem, Scott Weaven, Park Thaichon

Published in: Entrepreneurship and Organizational Change

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Abstract

This chapter provides a comprehensive review of the most dominant theories that have been widely applied in the organ donation and social change context, as well as presents the main strengths and limitations of these theories. The review included the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT); the Prospect theory (PT); the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA); and Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). This review serves to identify the gap of the current literature. This chapter provides a solid theoretical foundation and has initiated further pathways for future researchers who are interested in the fields of organ donation, social marketing and social change literature, as well as cognitive decision-making theory. In particular, the current review also advances social marketing and health care literature evidencing how theories can inform and guide the research.
previous chapter Creating Effective Franchising Relationships: Challenges of Managing Mature Franchisees
next chapter An Entrepreneurial Case Study from Australia
Literature
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Action control (pp. 11–39). Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683.
Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Taylor & Francis.
Ajzen, I., & Manstead, A. S. (2007). Changing health-related behaviours: An approach based on the theory of planned behaviour. The scope of social psychology (pp. 55–76). Psychology Press.
Anantachoti, P., Gross, C. R., & Gunderson, S. (2001). Promoting organ donation among high school students: an educational intervention. Progress in Transplantation, 11(3), 201–207.
Anker, A. E., Feeley, T. H., & Kim, H. (2010). Examining the attitude–behavior relationship in prosocial donation domains. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(6), 1293–1324.
Bae, H.-S. (2008). Entertainment-education and recruitment of cornea donors: The role of emotion and issue involvement. Journal of Health Communication, 13(1), 20–36.
Bae, H.-S., & Kang, S. (2008). The influence of viewing an entertainment–education program on cornea donation intention: A test of the theory of planned behavior. Health Communication, 23(1), 87–95.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1998). Personal and collective efficacy in human adaptation and change. Advances in Psychological Science, 1, 51–71.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180.
Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media effects (pp. 110–140). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bandura, A. (2010). Self-efficacy. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (pp. 1–3).
Bandura, A., & Jourden, F. J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 941.
Brug, J., Vugt, M. V., van Den Borne, B., Brouwers, A., & Hooff, H. V. (2000). Predictors of willingness to register as an organ donor among Dutch adolescents. Psychology and Health, 15(3), 357–368.
Cohen, E. L. (2007). “My loss is your gain”: Examining the role of message frame, perceived risk, and ambivalence in the decision to become an organ donor.
Cohen, E. L. (2010). The role of message frame, perceived risk, and ambivalence in individuals’ decisions to become organ donors. Health Communication, 25(8), 758–769.
Eastman, C., & Marzillier, J. S. (1984). Theoretical and methodological difficulties in Bandura’s self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8(3), 213–229.
Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., Berent, J. A., & Pereira, A. (2013). Social psychological factors of post-mortem organ donation: A theoretical review of determinants and promotion strategies. Health Psychology Review, 7(2), 202–247.
Feeley, T. H. (2007). College students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding organ donation: An integrated review of the literature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(2), 243–271.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Ghaffari, M., Latifi, M., Rocheleau, C., Najafizadeh, K., Rakhshanderou, S., & Ramezankhani, A. (2018). Using the theory of planned behavior framework for designing interventions related to organ donation. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971-), 187(3), 609–613.
Godin, G., Bélanger-Gravel, A., Gagné, C., & Blondeau, D. (2008). Factors predictive of signed consent for posthumous organ donation. Progress in Transplantation, 18(2), 109–117.
Horton, R. L., & Horton, P. J. (1990). Knowledge regarding organ donation: Identifying and overcoming barriers to organ donation. Social Science and Medicine, 31(7), 791–800.
Horton, R. L., & Horton, P. J. (1991). A model of willingness to become a potential organ donor. Social Science and Medicine, 33(9), 1037–1051.
Hyde, M. K., Knowles, S. R., & White, K. M. (2013). Donating blood and organs: Using an extended theory of planned behavior perspective to identify similarities and differences in individual motivations to donate. Health Education Research, 28(6), 1092–1104.
Hyde, M. K., & White, K. M. (2009a). Disclosing donation decisions: The role of organ donor prototypes in an extended theory of planned behaviour. Health Education Research, 24(6), 1080–1092.
Hyde, M. K., & White, K. M. (2009b). To be a donor or not to be? Applying an extended theory of planned behavior to predict posthumous organ donation intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(4), 880–900.
Hyde, M. K., & White, K. M. (2010). Are organ donation communication decisions reasoned or reactive? A test of the utility of an augmented theory of planned behaviour with the prototype/willingness model. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(2), 435–452.
Jeong, H., & Park, H. S. (2015). The effect of parasocial interaction on intention to register as organ donors through entertainment–education programs in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27(2), NP2040–NP2048.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013a). Choices, values, and frames. Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 269–278). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013b). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99–127). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
Kirsch, I. (1985). Self-efficacy and expectancy: Old wine with new labels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 824.
Kopfman, & Smith, S. W. (1996). Understanding the audiences of a health communication campaign: A discriminant analysis of potential organ donors based on intent to donate.
Lefebvre, R. C. (2013). Social marketing and social change: Strategies and tools for improving health, well-being, and the environment. California: Wiley.
Lewandowski, M. (2017). Prospect theory versus expected utility theory: Assumptions, predictions, intuition and modelling of risk attitudes. Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics.
Liska, A. E. (1984). A critical examination of the causal structure of the Fishbein/Ajzen attitude-behavior model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 61–74.
Luszczynska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Social cognitive theory. Predicting Health Behaviour, 2, 127–169.
Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 361–367.
Montano, D. E., & Kasprzyk, D. (2015). Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. Health behavior: Theory, research and practice (pp. 95–124).
Morgan, S. E., Stephenson, M. T., Harrison, T. R., Afifi, W. A., & Long, S. D. (2008). Facts versus feelings’: How rational is the decision to become an organ donor? Journal of Health Psychology, 13(5), 644–658.
Nijkamp, M. D., Hollestelle, M. L., Zeegers, M. P., van den Borne, B., & Reubsaet, A. (2008). To be (come) or not to be (come) an organ donor, that’s the question: A meta-analysis of determinant and intervention studies. Health Psychology Review, 2(1), 20–40.
O’Carroll, R. E., Ferguson, E., Hayes, P. C., & Shepherd, L. (2012). Increasing organ donation via anticipated regret (INORDAR): Protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 169.
O’Carroll, R. E., Foster, C., McGeechan, G., Sandford, K., & Ferguson, E. (2011). The “ick” factor, anticipated regret, and willingness to become an organ donor. Health Psychology, 30(2), 236.
Parisi, N., & Katz, I. (1986). Attitudes toward posthumous organ donation: A critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions. Health Psychology, 16, 183–195.
Park, H. S., & Smith, S. W. (2007). Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioral intent: A case of two behaviors critical to organ donation. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 194–218.
Park, H. S., Smith, S. W., & Yun, D. (2009). Ethnic differences in intention to enroll in a state organ donor registry and intention to talk with family about organ donation. Health Communication, 24(7), 647–659.
Pauli, J., Basso, K., & Ruffatto, J. (2017). The influence of beliefs on organ donation intention. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 11(3), 291–308.
Pligt, J., & Vries, N. K. (1998). Belief importance in expectancy-value models of attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1339–1354.
Quick, B. L., Anker, A. E., Feeley, T. H., & Morgan, S. E. (2016). An examination of three theoretical models to explain the organ donation attitude–registration discrepancy among mature adults. Health Communication, 31(3), 265–274.
Quick, B. L., Kam, J. A., Morgan, S. E., Montero Liberona, C. A., & Smith, R. A. (2014). Prospect theory, discrete emotions, and freedom threats: An extension of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Communication, 65(1), 40–61.
Radecki, C. M., & Jaccard, J. (1997). Psychological aspects of organ donation: A critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions. Health Psychology, 16(2), 183.
Reinhart, A. M., Marshall, H. M., Feeley, T. H., & Tutzauer, F. (2007). The persuasive effects of message framing in organ donation: The mediating role of psychological reactance. Communication Monographs, 74(2), 229–255.
Reubsaet, A., Brug, J., De Vet, E., & Van Den Borne, B. (2003). The effects of practicing registration of organ donation preference on self-efficacy and registration intention: An enactive mastery experience. Psychology and Health, 18(5), 585–594.
Reubsaet, A., Brug, J., Nijkamp, M., Candel, M., Van Hooff, J., & Van den Borne, H. (2005). The impact of an organ donation registration information program for high school students in the Netherlands. Social Science and Medicine, 60(7), 1479–1486.
Rocheleau, C. A. (2013). Organ donation intentions and behaviors: Application and extension of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(1), 201–213.
Rundle-Thiele, S., Kubacki, K., Leo, C., Arli, D., Carins, J., Dietrich, T., … Szablewska, N. (2013). Social marketing: Current issues and future challenges. United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Schoemaker, P. J. (2013). Experiments on decisions under risk: The expected utility hypothesis. New York, NY: Springer.
Siegel, J. T., Alvaro, E. M., Lac, A., Crano, W. D., & Dominick, A. (2008). Intentions of becoming a living organ donor among Hispanics: A theory-based approach exploring differences between living and nonliving organ donation. Journal of Health Communication, 13(1), 80–99.
Smits, M., Van Den Borne, B., Dijker, A. J., & Ryckman, R. M. (2005). Increasing Dutch adolescents’ willingness to register their organ donation preference: The effectiveness of an education programme delivered by kidney transplantation patients. The European Journal of Public Health, 16(1), 106–110.
Stone, D. N. (1994). Overconfidence in initial self-efficacy judgments: Effects on decision processes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59(3), 452–474.
Sun, H.-J. (2014). A study on the development of public campaign messages for organ donation promotion in Korea. Health Promotion International, 30(4), 903–918.
Super, S. (2005). Social foundations of thought & action: A social-cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
Van De Kuilen, G., & Wakker, P. P. (2011). The midweight method to measure attitudes toward risk and ambiguity. Management Science, 57(3), 582–598.
Vancouver, J. B., & Kendall, L. N. (2006). When self-efficacy negatively relates to motivation and performance in a learning context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1146.
Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., & Williams, A. A. (2001). The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 605.
Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect theory: For risk and ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Corrigan, M. (2007). Real donors, real consent: Testing the theory of reasoned action on organ donor consent. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(10), 2435–2450.
Werner, P. (2004). Reasoned action and planned behavior. Middle range theories: Application to nursing research (pp. 125–147). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Wu, A., & Lu, L-s. (2011). Cognitive obstacles against organ donation: The influence of negative attitudes, norms, and traditional beliefs on Chinese people’s intention to donate organs after death. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 21(1), 87–93.
Wu, A. M. & Tang, C. S. (2009). The negative impact of death anxiety on self-efficacy and willingness to donate organs among Chinese adults (referred).
Wu, A. M., Tang, C. S., & Yogo, M. (2013). Death anxiety, altruism, self-efficacy, and organ donation intention among Japanese college students: A moderated mediation analysis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65(2), 115–123.
Metadata
Title
Theoretical Insights into Organ Donation and Social Change
Authors
Amani Alsalem
Scott Weaven
Park Thaichon
Copyright Year
2020
Book
Entrepreneurship and Organizational Change

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35414-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-35415-2

Copyright Year: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35415-2_8

Premium Partner

Pluta Rombach Rechtsanwälte
    Image Credits

    Version: 0.2011.0