Top

TechTrends

Published in:

07-12-2019 | Organizational Training and Performance

Transforming Faculty Communication and Envisioning the Future with Design Thinking

Authors: Meng-Fen Grace Lin, Ariana Eichelberger

Published in: TechTrends | Issue 2/2020

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

For an academic unit to remain relevant, it must continually evolve. This paper provides a rare view into the process taken by one academic department embracing change to improve its communications and envision its future. Tasked with planning a departmental retreat, two faculty members designed a series of activities inspired by design thinking to prototype new ways to problem solve. This paper describes the activities used before and during the retreat, why these activities were designed, and shares reflections from the facilitators. Three rounds of online Delphi-style information gathering preceded the day-long retreat to build consensus and prioritize issues. Retreat activities followed the empathize, define, and ideate design thinking stages. Based on online anonymous surveys, facilitator reflections, and artifacts gathered, this paper offers a case study from one department discovering that change requires intentional effort and practice but can spark new possibilities. Limitations and future work are also discussed.

previous article Using Faculty Professional Development to Foster Organizational Change: a Social Learning Framework

next article Developing Faculty to Teach with Technology: Themes from the Literature

Allen, J. A., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2013). Manager-led group meetings: A context for promoting employee engagement. Group & Organization Management, 38(5), 543–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113503040.CrossRef

Allen, J. A., Rogelberg, S., & Scott, J. (2008). Meaningful meetings: Improve your organization’s effectiveness one meeting at a time. Quality Progress, 41, 48–53.

Allen, J. A., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2015). The Cambridge handbook of meeting science. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Bernstein, M., & Ringel, R. (2018). Plan a better meeting with design thinking. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/02/plan-a-better-meeting-with-design-thinking

Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, June 2008, 1–9.

Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 381–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00806.x.CrossRef

Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter 2010, 29–35 Retrieved from https://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/design/article/viewFile/1272/1089.

Carlgren, L. (2017). Design thinking in innovation, in practice: The case of Kaiser Permanente. EURAM Conference Proceedings, 1–26. Retrieved from http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/247487/local_247487.pdf

Chatterji, A. K. (2017). Innovation and American k–12 education. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 18, 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/694406.CrossRef

Cohen, M. A., Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, J. A., & Luong, A. (2011). Meeting design characteristics and attendee perceptions of staff/team meeting quality. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021549.CrossRef

Cooper, R. G., & Edgett, S. J. (2012). Best practices in the idea-to-launch process and its governance. Research-Technology Management, 55(2), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5502022.CrossRef

France, E. F., Anderson, A. H., & Gardner, M. (2001). The impact of status and audio conferencing technology on business meetings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54(6), 857–876. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0464.CrossRef

Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001.CrossRef

Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43(2), 130–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496411429599.CrossRef

Keith, E. (2015). 55 million: A fresh look at the number, effectiveness, and cost of meetings in the U.S. Retrieved March 26, 2019, from https://blog.lucidmeetings.com/blog/fresh-look-number-effectiveness-cost-meetings-in-us

Kolko, J. (2015). Design thinking comes of age. Harvard Business Review, 93(9), 66–69 Retrieved from http://eres.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=108820528&site=ehost-live.

Malouff, J. M., Calic, A., McGrory, C. M., Murrell, R. L., & Schutte, N. S. (2012). Evidence for a needs-based model of organizational-meeting leadership. Current Psychology, 31(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-012-9129-2.CrossRef

Martin, R. L. (2017). Use design thinking to build commitment to a new idea. Retrieved September 13, 2018, from Harvard Business Review website: https://hbr.org/2017/01/use-design-thinking-to-build-commitment-to-a-new-idea

Micheli, P., Wilner, S. J. S., Bhatti, S. H., Mura, M., & Beverland, M. B. (2019). Doing design thinking: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(2), 124–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466.CrossRef

Mickahail, B. (2015). Corporate implementation of design thinking for innovation and economic growth. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 10(2), 67–79.

Mroz, J. E., Allen, J. A., Verhoeven, D. C., & Shuffler, M. L. (2018). Do we really need another meeting? The science of workplace meetings. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 484–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418776307.CrossRef

Odermatt, I., König, C. J., Kleinmann, M., Bachmann, M., Röder, H., & Schmitz, P. (2018). Incivility in meetings: Predictors and outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9490-0.CrossRef

RAND. (n.d.). Delphi Method. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/topics/delphi-method.html

Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348 Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23260048.CrossRef

Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, J. A., Shanock, L., Scott, C., & Shuffler, M. (2010). Employee satisfaction with meetings: A contemporary facet of job satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 49(2), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20339.CrossRef

Rogelberg, S. G., Mueller, S. L., Mudd, M., Frear, K. A., Sands, S. J., & Allen, J. A. (2012). Employees’ feelings about more meetings: An overt analysis and recommendations for improving meetings. Management Research Review, 35(5), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211222331.CrossRef

Sato, S., Lucente, S., Meyer, D., & Mrazek, D. (2010). Design thinking to make organization change and development more responsive. Design Management Review, 21(2), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00064.x.CrossRef

Schwartzman, H. B. (1986). The meeting as a neglected social form in organizational studies. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 233–258.

Williams-Pulfer, K. (2013). 21st century strategic planning: Design thinking as a supplemental process. PublicINReview, 1(2), 77–87. Retrieved from https://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/spea/article/view/5820.

Wright, G., & West, R. (2010). Using design thinking to improve student innovation. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.), E-Learn: World conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2010 (pp. 391–395) Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/35577.

Yousuf, M. I. (2007). Using experts’ opinions through delphi technique. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(4), 1–8.

Title: Transforming Faculty Communication and Envisioning the Future with Design Thinking
Authors: Meng-Fen Grace Lin
Ariana Eichelberger
Publication date: 07-12-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: TechTrends / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Electronic ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00451-w

Springer Professional

Transforming Faculty Communication and Envisioning the Future with Design Thinking

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

The Utility of Design Thinking to Promote Systemic Instructional Design Practices in the Workplace

A Pragmatic but Hopeful Conception of Creativity: a Conversation with Dr. Barbara Kerr

Negentropy: Energy Creating Tools for Organizational Development

AECT International Conference 2019 Through the Eyes of a New Member

Developing Faculty to Teach with Technology: Themes from the Literature

Flexibility in Formal Workplace Learning: Technology Applications for Engagement through the Lens of Universal Design for Learning

Premium Partner