Skip to main content
Top

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

22. Trends in Multiagent Negotiation: From Bilateral Bargaining to Consensus Policies

Authors : Enrique de la Hoz, Miguel A. López-Carmona, Iván Marsá-Maestre

Published in: Agreement Technologies

Publisher: Springer Netherlands

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Automated negotiation provides an important mechanism to reach agreements among distributed decision makers. It has been extensively studied from the perspective of e-commerce, though it can be seen from a more general perspective as a paradigm to solve coordination and cooperation problems in complex systems, e.g., task allocation, resource sharing, or surplus division. A variety of negotiation models have been proposed according to the many different parameters which may characterize a negotiation scenario. In this chapter, we briefly review the key concepts about multi-attribute negotiation and the most relevant works in the field, and then we focus on one of the more challenging topics on the field in the last few years, namely complex negotiations. In particular, we focus on situations where unanimous agreement is not possible or simply not desired, which is very common in negotiations involving complex, non-monotonic utility spaces. We describe a framework with which to perform multiagent negotiations where we can specify the type of agreements needed in terms of utility sharing among the agents. The proposed multi-round mediation process is based on the analysis of the agents’ offers at each negotiation round. At each round, the mediator applies Global Pattern Search (GPS) to the offers and then a linguistic expressed mediation rule based on Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators (OWA) that formalizes the consensus policy. At each round this mediation process generates a social contract that is submitted as feedback to the agents.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Amgoud, L., S. Parsons, and N. Maudet. 2000. Arguments, dialogue and negotiation. In Proceedings of the European conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI-2000), Amsterdam, 338–342. Amgoud, L., S. Parsons, and N. Maudet. 2000. Arguments, dialogue and negotiation. In Proceedings of the European conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI-2000), Amsterdam, 338–342.
go back to reference Buttner, R. 2006. A classification structure for automated negotiations. In WI-IATW ’06: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology, Washington, DC, 523–530. Buttner, R. 2006. A classification structure for automated negotiations. In WI-IATW ’06: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology, Washington, DC, 523–530.
go back to reference Choi, S.P.M., J. Liu, and S.-P. Chan. 2001. A genetic agent-based negotiation system. Computer Networks 37(2): 195–204. Electronic Business Systems. Choi, S.P.M., J. Liu, and S.-P. Chan. 2001. A genetic agent-based negotiation system. Computer Networks 37(2): 195–204. Electronic Business Systems.
go back to reference Clarke, E.H. 1971. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11(1): 17–33.CrossRef Clarke, E.H. 1971. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11(1): 17–33.CrossRef
go back to reference de la Hoz, E., M. Lopez-Carmona, M. Klein, and I. Marsa-Maestre. 2011. Consensus policy based multi-agent negotiation. In Agents in principle, agents in practice, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 7047, ed. D. Kinny, J. Hsu, G. Governatori, and A. Ghose, 159–173. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. de la Hoz, E., M. Lopez-Carmona, M. Klein, and I. Marsa-Maestre. 2011. Consensus policy based multi-agent negotiation. In Agents in principle, agents in practice, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 7047, ed. D. Kinny, J. Hsu, G. Governatori, and A. Ghose, 159–173. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
go back to reference Faratin, P., C. Sierra, and N.R. Jennings. 1998. Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24(3–4): 159–182.CrossRef Faratin, P., C. Sierra, and N.R. Jennings. 1998. Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24(3–4): 159–182.CrossRef
go back to reference Faratin, P., C. Sierra, and N.R. Jennings. 2002. Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence 142(2): 205–237.MathSciNetCrossRef Faratin, P., C. Sierra, and N.R. Jennings. 2002. Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence 142(2): 205–237.MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Fatima, S., M. Wooldridge, and N.R. Jennings. 2006. Multi-issue negotiation with deadlines. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 27: 381–417.MathSciNetMATH Fatima, S., M. Wooldridge, and N.R. Jennings. 2006. Multi-issue negotiation with deadlines. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 27: 381–417.MathSciNetMATH
go back to reference Fatima, S., M. Wooldridge, and N.R. Jennings. 2009. An analysis of feasible solutions for multi-issue negotiation involving nonlinear utility functions. In AAMAS ’09: Proceedings of The 8th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, Richland, 1041–1048. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Fatima, S., M. Wooldridge, and N.R. Jennings. 2009. An analysis of feasible solutions for multi-issue negotiation involving nonlinear utility functions. In AAMAS ’09: Proceedings of The 8th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, Richland, 1041–1048. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
go back to reference Gatti, N., and F. Amigoni. 2005. An approximate pareto optimal cooperative negotiation model for multiple. In IAT ’05: Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on intelligent agent technology, 565–571. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society. Gatti, N., and F. Amigoni. 2005. An approximate pareto optimal cooperative negotiation model for multiple. In IAT ’05: Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on intelligent agent technology, 565–571. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
go back to reference Giovannucci, A., J. Cerquides, U. Endriss, and J. Rodríguez-Aguilar. 2010. A graphical formalism for mixed multi-unit combinatorial auctions. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 20: 342–368. doi:10.1007/s10458-009-9085-x.CrossRef Giovannucci, A., J. Cerquides, U. Endriss, and J. Rodríguez-Aguilar. 2010. A graphical formalism for mixed multi-unit combinatorial auctions. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 20: 342–368. doi:10.1007/s10458-009-9085-x.CrossRef
go back to reference Grabisch, M. 1997. k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets Systems 92(2): 167–189. Grabisch, M. 1997. k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets Systems 92(2): 167–189.
go back to reference Harsanyi, J.C. 2004. Games with incomplete information played by bayesian players. Management Science 50(12 Supplement): 1804–1817.CrossRef Harsanyi, J.C. 2004. Games with incomplete information played by bayesian players. Management Science 50(12 Supplement): 1804–1817.CrossRef
go back to reference Hindriks, K., C. Jonker, and D. Tykhonov. 2006. Eliminating interdependencies between issues for multi-issue negotiation. In Cooperative information agents X, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 4149, 301–316. Berlin: Springer. Hindriks, K., C. Jonker, and D. Tykhonov. 2006. Eliminating interdependencies between issues for multi-issue negotiation. In Cooperative information agents X, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 4149, 301–316. Berlin: Springer.
go back to reference Ito, T., M. Klein, and H. Hattori. 2008. A multi-issue negotiation protocol among agents with nonlinear utility functions. Journal of Multiagent and Grid Systems 4(1): 67–83.MATH Ito, T., M. Klein, and H. Hattori. 2008. A multi-issue negotiation protocol among agents with nonlinear utility functions. Journal of Multiagent and Grid Systems 4(1): 67–83.MATH
go back to reference Jennings, N.R., S. Parsons, P. Noriega, and C. Sierra. 1998. On argumentation-based negotiation. In Proceedings of international workshop on multi-agent systems (IWMAS-1998), Dedham, 1–7. Jennings, N.R., S. Parsons, P. Noriega, and C. Sierra. 1998. On argumentation-based negotiation. In Proceedings of international workshop on multi-agent systems (IWMAS-1998), Dedham, 1–7.
go back to reference Jennings, N.R., P. Faratin, A.R. Lomuscio, S. Parsons, C. Sierra, and M. Wooldridge. 2001. Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges. International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2): 199–215.CrossRef Jennings, N.R., P. Faratin, A.R. Lomuscio, S. Parsons, C. Sierra, and M. Wooldridge. 2001. Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges. International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2): 199–215.CrossRef
go back to reference Jonker, C., V. Robu, and J. Treur. 2007. An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 15: 221–252. doi:10.1007/s10458-006-9009-y.CrossRef Jonker, C., V. Robu, and J. Treur. 2007. An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 15: 221–252. doi:10.1007/s10458-006-9009-y.CrossRef
go back to reference Keeney, R.L., and H. Raiffa. 1993. Decisions with multiple objectives-preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge & New York, 569 pages, ISBN 0-521-44185-4 (hardback). Keeney, R.L., and H. Raiffa. 1993. Decisions with multiple objectives-preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge & New York, 569 pages, ISBN 0-521-44185-4 (hardback).
go back to reference Klein, M., P. Faratin, H. Sayama, and Y. Bar-Yam. 2003. Protocols for negotiating complex contracts. IEEE Intelligent Systems 18(6): 32–38.CrossRef Klein, M., P. Faratin, H. Sayama, and Y. Bar-Yam. 2003. Protocols for negotiating complex contracts. IEEE Intelligent Systems 18(6): 32–38.CrossRef
go back to reference Kraus, S. 2001. Automated negotiation and decision making in multiagent environments. In Mutli-agents systems and applications, 150–172. New York: Springer. Kraus, S. 2001. Automated negotiation and decision making in multiagent environments. In Mutli-agents systems and applications, 150–172. New York: Springer.
go back to reference Kraus, S. 2001. Strategic negotiation in multiagent environments. Cambridge: MIT.MATH Kraus, S. 2001. Strategic negotiation in multiagent environments. Cambridge: MIT.MATH
go back to reference Lai, G., and K. Sycara. 2009. A generic framework for automated multi-attribute negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation 18: 169–187.CrossRef Lai, G., and K. Sycara. 2009. A generic framework for automated multi-attribute negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation 18: 169–187.CrossRef
go back to reference Lai, G., C. Li, K. Sycara, and J. Giampapa. 2004. Literature review on multiattribute negotiations. Technical report CMU-RI-TR-04-66, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. Lai, G., C. Li, K. Sycara, and J. Giampapa. 2004. Literature review on multiattribute negotiations. Technical report CMU-RI-TR-04-66, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
go back to reference Lai, G., C. Li, and K. Sycara. 2006. Efficient multi-attribute negotiation with incomplete information. Group Decision and Negotiation 15(5): 511–528.CrossRef Lai, G., C. Li, and K. Sycara. 2006. Efficient multi-attribute negotiation with incomplete information. Group Decision and Negotiation 15(5): 511–528.CrossRef
go back to reference Lau, R.Y., M. Tang, and O. Wong. 2004. Towards genetically optimised responsive negotiation agents. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on intelligent agent technology (IAT’04), Beijing, ed. I.C. Society, 295–301, September 20–24 2004. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society. Lau, R.Y., M. Tang, and O. Wong. 2004. Towards genetically optimised responsive negotiation agents. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on intelligent agent technology (IAT’04), Beijing, ed. I.C. Society, 295–301, September 20–24 2004. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society.
go back to reference López-Carmona, M.A., and J.R. Velasco. 2006. An expressive approach to fuzzy constraint based agent purchase negotiation. In Proceedings of the international joint conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS-2006), 429–431, Hakodate. López-Carmona, M.A., and J.R. Velasco. 2006. An expressive approach to fuzzy constraint based agent purchase negotiation. In Proceedings of the international joint conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS-2006), 429–431, Hakodate.
go back to reference López-Carmona, M.A., J.R. Velasco, and I. Marsa-Maestre. 2007. The agents’ attitudes in fuzzy constraint based automated purchase negotiations. In Multi-agent systems and applications V, Lecture Notes in artificial intelligence, vol. 4696, 246–255. Berlin: Springer. López-Carmona, M.A., J.R. Velasco, and I. Marsa-Maestre. 2007. The agents’ attitudes in fuzzy constraint based automated purchase negotiations. In Multi-agent systems and applications V, Lecture Notes in artificial intelligence, vol. 4696, 246–255. Berlin: Springer.
go back to reference López-Carmona, M.A., I. Marsá-Maestre, M. Klein, and T. Ito. 2012. Addressing stability issues in mediated complex contract negotiations for constraint-based, non-monotonic utility spaces. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 24(3): 485–535.CrossRef López-Carmona, M.A., I. Marsá-Maestre, M. Klein, and T. Ito. 2012. Addressing stability issues in mediated complex contract negotiations for constraint-based, non-monotonic utility spaces. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 24(3): 485–535.CrossRef
go back to reference Luo, X., N.R. Jennings, N. Shadbolt, Ho-Fung-Leung, and J.H.M. Lee. 2003. A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environments. Artificial Intelligence 148(1–2): 53–102. Luo, X., N.R. Jennings, N. Shadbolt, Ho-Fung-Leung, and J.H.M. Lee. 2003. A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environments. Artificial Intelligence 148(1–2): 53–102.
go back to reference Luo, X., J.H. Lee, H.F. Leung, and N.R. Jennings. 2003. Prioritised fuzzy constraint satisfaction problems: Axioms, instantiation and validation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 136(2):151–188.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Luo, X., J.H. Lee, H.F. Leung, and N.R. Jennings. 2003. Prioritised fuzzy constraint satisfaction problems: Axioms, instantiation and validation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 136(2):151–188.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
go back to reference Osborne, M., and A. Rubinstein. 1990. Bargaining and markets. San Diego: Academic.MATH Osborne, M., and A. Rubinstein. 1990. Bargaining and markets. San Diego: Academic.MATH
go back to reference Parkes, D.C. and J. Kalagnanam. 2005. Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Science 51(3): 435–451.MATHCrossRef Parkes, D.C. and J. Kalagnanam. 2005. Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Science 51(3): 435–451.MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Rahwan, I., S.D. Ramchurn, N.R. Jennings, P. Mcburney, S. Parsons, and L. Sonenberg. 2003. Argumentation-based negotiation. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(4): 343–375.CrossRef Rahwan, I., S.D. Ramchurn, N.R. Jennings, P. Mcburney, S. Parsons, and L. Sonenberg. 2003. Argumentation-based negotiation. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(4): 343–375.CrossRef
go back to reference Rahwan, I., L. Sonenberg, N.R. Jennings, and P. McBurney. 2007. Stratum: A methodology for designing heuristic agent negotiation strategies. Applied Artificial Intelligence 21(6): 489–527.CrossRef Rahwan, I., L. Sonenberg, N.R. Jennings, and P. McBurney. 2007. Stratum: A methodology for designing heuristic agent negotiation strategies. Applied Artificial Intelligence 21(6): 489–527.CrossRef
go back to reference Robu, V., D.J.A. Somefun, and J.A. La Poutré. 2005. Modeling complex multi-issue negotiations using utility graphs. In AAMAS ’05: Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, 280–287. New York: ACM. Robu, V., D.J.A. Somefun, and J.A. La Poutré. 2005. Modeling complex multi-issue negotiations using utility graphs. In AAMAS ’05: Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, 280–287. New York: ACM.
go back to reference Ros, R., and C. Sierra. 2006. A negotiation meta strategy combining trade-off and concession moves. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 12(2): 63–181.CrossRef Ros, R., and C. Sierra. 2006. A negotiation meta strategy combining trade-off and concession moves. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 12(2): 63–181.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosenschein, J.S., and G. Zlotkin. 1994. Rules of encounter. Cambridge: MIT. Rosenschein, J.S., and G. Zlotkin. 1994. Rules of encounter. Cambridge: MIT.
go back to reference Teich, J.E., H. Wallenius, J. Wallenius, and A. Zaitsev. 1999. A multiple unit auction algorithm: Some theory and a web implementation. Electronic Markets 9(3): 199–205.CrossRef Teich, J.E., H. Wallenius, J. Wallenius, and A. Zaitsev. 1999. A multiple unit auction algorithm: Some theory and a web implementation. Electronic Markets 9(3): 199–205.CrossRef
go back to reference Teich, J.E., H. Wallenius, J. Wallenius, and A. Zaitsev. 2006. A multi-attribute e-auction mechanism for procurement: Theoretical foundations. European Journal of Operational Research 175(1): 90–100.MATHCrossRef Teich, J.E., H. Wallenius, J. Wallenius, and A. Zaitsev. 2006. A multi-attribute e-auction mechanism for procurement: Theoretical foundations. European Journal of Operational Research 175(1): 90–100.MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Xia, M., J. Stallaert, A.B. Whinston. 2005. Solving the combinatorial double auction problem. European Journal of Operational Research 164(1): 239–251.MATHCrossRef Xia, M., J. Stallaert, A.B. Whinston. 2005. Solving the combinatorial double auction problem. European Journal of Operational Research 164(1): 239–251.MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Yager, R. 2007. Multi-agent negotiation using linguistically expressed mediation rules. Group Decision and Negotiation 16(1): 1–23.CrossRef Yager, R. 2007. Multi-agent negotiation using linguistically expressed mediation rules. Group Decision and Negotiation 16(1): 1–23.CrossRef
go back to reference Yager, R., and Kacprzyk, J. 1997. The ordered weighted averaging operators: Theory and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef Yager, R., and Kacprzyk, J. 1997. The ordered weighted averaging operators: Theory and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Trends in Multiagent Negotiation: From Bilateral Bargaining to Consensus Policies
Authors
Enrique de la Hoz
Miguel A. López-Carmona
Iván Marsá-Maestre
Copyright Year
2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_22

Premium Partner