Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology 6/2015

30-04-2015

Understanding the Earth Systems: Expressions of Dynamic and Cyclic Thinking Among University Students

Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Issue 6/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this two-part study, we examine undergraduate university students’ expression of two important system thinking characteristics—dynamic thinking and cyclic thinking—focusing particularly on students of geology. The study was conducted using an Earth systems questionnaire designed to elicit and reflect either dynamic or cyclic thinking. The study’s first part was quantitative. Its population consisted of a research group (223 students majoring in geology or physical geography) and a control group (312 students with no background in geology). The students were asked to rate their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale. Overall, the students in the research group expressed higher levels of dynamic thinking than those in the control group. The geology students showed relatively strong dynamic thinking toward the geosphere and hydrosphere, but not the biosphere. In cyclic thinking, their levels were significantly higher for all Earth systems, suggesting a connection between learning about different cycles in Earth systems, developing cyclic thinking and applying it to other Earth cycles. The second part was qualitative and administered only to the students who majored in geology. They were asked to freely explain their answers to the questionnaire’s statements. Our aim was to identify recurring patterns in how these students express their dynamic and cyclic thinking. Their explanations were given to four experts in the field of Earth science, who then presented, in a semi-structured interview, the recurring characteristics of dynamic thinking that they found in the students’ explanations.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Some water does still enter when meteorites enter Earth’s atmosphere, and water molecules are still broken down into oxygen and hydrogen, but both processes are inconsequential in their influence on the overall amount of water on Earth.
 
Literature
go back to reference Ben-Zvi Assaraf O, Orion N (2005) Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. J Res Sci Teach 42(5):518–560CrossRef Ben-Zvi Assaraf O, Orion N (2005) Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. J Res Sci Teach 42(5):518–560CrossRef
go back to reference Cheek KA (2013) How geoscience novices reason about temporal duration: the role of spatial thinking and large numbers. J Geosci Educ 61(3):334–348 Cheek KA (2013) How geoscience novices reason about temporal duration: the role of spatial thinking and large numbers. J Geosci Educ 61(3):334–348
go back to reference Chi MTH, Slotta JD, de Leeuw N (1994) From things to processes: a theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learn Instr 4:27–43CrossRef Chi MTH, Slotta JD, de Leeuw N (1994) From things to processes: a theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learn Instr 4:27–43CrossRef
go back to reference Dodic J, Orion N (2003) Cognitive factors affecting students understanding of geological time. J Res Sci Teach 40(4):415–442CrossRef Dodic J, Orion N (2003) Cognitive factors affecting students understanding of geological time. J Res Sci Teach 40(4):415–442CrossRef
go back to reference Eilam B (2012) Systems thinking and feeding relations: learning with a live ecosystem model. Instr Sci 40(2):213–239CrossRef Eilam B (2012) Systems thinking and feeding relations: learning with a live ecosystem model. Instr Sci 40(2):213–239CrossRef
go back to reference Goel AK, Gomez de Silva Garza A, Gruşé N, Murdock JW, Recker MMT (1996) Towards design learning environments—I: exploring how devices work. In Intelligent tutoring systems. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1086, pp 493–501 Goel AK, Gomez de Silva Garza A, Gruşé N, Murdock JW, Recker MMT (1996) Towards design learning environments—I: exploring how devices work. In Intelligent tutoring systems. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1086, pp 493–501
go back to reference Gradstein FM, Ogg JG (2004) Geologic time scale 2004: why, how, and where next! Lethaia 37:175–181CrossRef Gradstein FM, Ogg JG (2004) Geologic time scale 2004: why, how, and where next! Lethaia 37:175–181CrossRef
go back to reference Herbert BE (2006) Student understanding of complex earth systems. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 413:95–104 Herbert BE (2006) Student understanding of complex earth systems. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 413:95–104
go back to reference Hidalgo AJ, Fernando SIES, Otero JICE (2004) An analysis of the understanding of geological time students at secondary and post-secondary level. Int J Sci Educ 26:845–857CrossRef Hidalgo AJ, Fernando SIES, Otero JICE (2004) An analysis of the understanding of geological time students at secondary and post-secondary level. Int J Sci Educ 26:845–857CrossRef
go back to reference Hmelo-Silver CE, Pfeffer MG (2004) Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cogn Sci 28:127–138CrossRef Hmelo-Silver CE, Pfeffer MG (2004) Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cogn Sci 28:127–138CrossRef
go back to reference Hmelo-Silver CE, Holton DL, Kolodner JL (2000) Designing learning about complex systems. J Learn Sci 9(1):247–298CrossRef Hmelo-Silver CE, Holton DL, Kolodner JL (2000) Designing learning about complex systems. J Learn Sci 9(1):247–298CrossRef
go back to reference Hmelo-Silver CE, Marathe S, Liu L (2007) Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: expert-novice understanding in complex systems. J Learn Sci 16(3):307–331CrossRef Hmelo-Silver CE, Marathe S, Liu L (2007) Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: expert-novice understanding in complex systems. J Learn Sci 16(3):307–331CrossRef
go back to reference Jacobson MJ (2001) Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: differences between experts and novices. Complexity 6(2):1–9 Jacobson MJ (2001) Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: differences between experts and novices. Complexity 6(2):1–9
go back to reference Jacobson MJ, Wilensky U (2006) Complex systems in education: scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. J Learn Sci 15(1):11–34CrossRef Jacobson MJ, Wilensky U (2006) Complex systems in education: scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. J Learn Sci 15(1):11–34CrossRef
go back to reference Kali Y, Orion N, Elon B (2003) The effect of knowledge integration activities on students’ perception of the earth’s crust as a cyclic system. J Res Sci Teach 40:545–565CrossRef Kali Y, Orion N, Elon B (2003) The effect of knowledge integration activities on students’ perception of the earth’s crust as a cyclic system. J Res Sci Teach 40:545–565CrossRef
go back to reference Kastens KA, Ishikawa T (2006) Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: a cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields. In: Manduca CA, Mogk DW (eds) Earth and mind—how geologists think and learn about the earth: geological society of America, vol 413, pp 53–76 Kastens KA, Ishikawa T (2006) Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: a cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields. In: Manduca CA, Mogk DW (eds) Earth and mind—how geologists think and learn about the earth: geological society of America, vol 413, pp 53–76
go back to reference Kastens KA, Manduca CA, Cervato C, Frodeman R, Goodwin C, Liben LS (2009) How geoscientists think and learn. Eos 90:265–272CrossRef Kastens KA, Manduca CA, Cervato C, Frodeman R, Goodwin C, Liben LS (2009) How geoscientists think and learn. Eos 90:265–272CrossRef
go back to reference King C (2008) Geoscience education: an overview. Stud Sci Educ 44:187–222CrossRef King C (2008) Geoscience education: an overview. Stud Sci Educ 44:187–222CrossRef
go back to reference Libarkin JC, Kurdzeil JP (2006) Ontology and the teaching of Earth system science. J Geosci Educ 54:408–413 Libarkin JC, Kurdzeil JP (2006) Ontology and the teaching of Earth system science. J Geosci Educ 54:408–413
go back to reference Libarkin JC, Anderson SW, Dahl J, Beilfuss M, Boone W (2005) Qualitative analysis of college students’ ideas about the Earth: interviews and open-ended questionnaires. J Geosci Educ 53:17–26 Libarkin JC, Anderson SW, Dahl J, Beilfuss M, Boone W (2005) Qualitative analysis of college students’ ideas about the Earth: interviews and open-ended questionnaires. J Geosci Educ 53:17–26
go back to reference Lock S, Libarkin J, Chang CY (2012) Geoscience education and global development. J Geosci Educ 60:199–200CrossRef Lock S, Libarkin J, Chang CY (2012) Geoscience education and global development. J Geosci Educ 60:199–200CrossRef
go back to reference Lövbrand E, Stripple J, Wiman B (2009) Earth system governmentality: reflections on science in the Anthropocene. Glob Environ Change 19(1):7–13CrossRef Lövbrand E, Stripple J, Wiman B (2009) Earth system governmentality: reflections on science in the Anthropocene. Glob Environ Change 19(1):7–13CrossRef
go back to reference Lyell C (1835) Principels of geology. Murry and Street, London Lyell C (1835) Principels of geology. Murry and Street, London
go back to reference Mayer VJ (1995) Using the earth system for integrating the science curriculum. Sci Educ 79:375–391CrossRef Mayer VJ (1995) Using the earth system for integrating the science curriculum. Sci Educ 79:375–391CrossRef
go back to reference Orion N (2002) An earth systems curriculum development model. In: Mayer VJ (ed) Global science literacy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 159–168CrossRef Orion N (2002) An earth systems curriculum development model. In: Mayer VJ (ed) Global science literacy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 159–168CrossRef
go back to reference Orion N, Ault C (2007) Learning earth sciences. In: Abell S, Lederman N (eds) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, USA, pp 653–688 Orion N, Ault C (2007) Learning earth sciences. In: Abell S, Lederman N (eds) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, USA, pp 653–688
go back to reference Raia F (2005) Students’ understanding of complex dynamic systems. J Geosci Educ 53(3):297–308 Raia F (2005) Students’ understanding of complex dynamic systems. J Geosci Educ 53(3):297–308
go back to reference Raia F (2008) Causality in complex dynamic systems: a challenge in earth systems science education. J Geosci Educ 56:81–94 Raia F (2008) Causality in complex dynamic systems: a challenge in earth systems science education. J Geosci Educ 56:81–94
go back to reference Richmond B (1993) Systems thinking: critical thinking skills for the 1990’s and beyond. Syst Dyn Rev 9(2):113–133CrossRef Richmond B (1993) Systems thinking: critical thinking skills for the 1990’s and beyond. Syst Dyn Rev 9(2):113–133CrossRef
go back to reference Sibley DF, Anderson CW, Heidemann M, Merrill JE, Parker JM, Szymanski DW (2007) Box diagrams to assess students’ systems thinking about the rock, water and carbon cycles. J Geosci Educ 55:138–146 Sibley DF, Anderson CW, Heidemann M, Merrill JE, Parker JM, Szymanski DW (2007) Box diagrams to assess students’ systems thinking about the rock, water and carbon cycles. J Geosci Educ 55:138–146
go back to reference Trend RD (2001) Deep time framework: a preliminary study of U.K. primary teachers’ conceptions of geological time and perceptions of geosciences. J Res Sci Teach 38:191–221CrossRef Trend RD (2001) Deep time framework: a preliminary study of U.K. primary teachers’ conceptions of geological time and perceptions of geosciences. J Res Sci Teach 38:191–221CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Understanding the Earth Systems: Expressions of Dynamic and Cyclic Thinking Among University Students
Publication date
30-04-2015
Published in
Journal of Science Education and Technology / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9562-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Journal of Science Education and Technology 6/2015 Go to the issue

Premium Partners