Skip to main content
Top

2011 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

7. Using Futures Prices to Forecast US Corn Prices: Model Performance with Increased Price Volatility

Author : Linwood A. Hoffman

Published in: Methods to Analyse Agricultural Commodity Price Volatility

Publisher: Springer New York

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A futures price forecasting model is presented which uses monthly futures prices, cash prices received, basis values (cash prices less futures) and marketing weights to forecast the season-average farm price for US corn. Performance of the model forecasts is examined using standard measures, such as mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error and mean squared error. Tests for statistical differences between the futures model forecast and price projections from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) are conducted using the Modified Diebold–Mariano test statistic. A measurement of price volatility identified the past 3 crop years, 2006/2007–2008/2009 with increased volatility compared to the prior 6 years, 2000/2001–2005/2006. Forecast errors from the futures forecast model increased during these volatile price years compared to the prior 6 year period which exhibited more stability. Suggestions are made to improve model price forecasts during periods of price volatility.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Counter-cyclical payments: Counter-cyclical payments are available to producers with historic program payment acres and yields of wheat, corn, barley, grain sorghum, oats, upland cotton, long-grain and medium-grain rice, soybeans, other oilseeds, peanuts and pulse crops (dry peas, lentils, small and large chickpeas). Payments are made whenever the current effective commodity price is less than the target price. The effective price is calculated by adding: (1) the national average farm price for the marketing year, or the commodity national loan rate, whichever is higher and (2) the direct payment rate for the commodity. For more information, see: http://​www.​ers.​usda.​gov/​publications/​FDS/​JAN05/​fds05a01/​.
 
2
Average crop revenue election (ACRE): An optional revenue-based program provision introduced in the 2008 farm legislation that replaces counter-cyclical payments for those producers who elect to participate in ACRE. Once producers elect to participate, participation continues until 2012. Producers continue to receive reduced direct payments and are eligible for reduced loan deficiency payments. For more information, see: http://​www.​ers.​usda.​gov/​Publications/​ERR84/​.
 
3
Future work will determine whether creating a composite forecast from futures model forecasts and WASDE projections provide improved forecasts compared to those from the futures price model. For example, see Sanders and Manfredo (2005).
 
4
Adequate supplies of a commodity usually cause the more distant futures to trade at a higher price than the nearby futures; this is referred to as a normal market. In such a market situation, the amount of the difference, or spread, between the futures months for a stored commodity tells the trader what the market will pay, on a given day, for the costs of carrying the commodity over time storage, interest and insurance. This amount is rarely equal to the full carrying charge, total cost of storage, interest rates and insurance, and it varies among different commodities (Besant, 1985, p. 70).
 
5
When supply and demand indicate that a shortage exists, the premium will narrow on the deferred contract months. If a scarcity develops, the carrying charges will disappear or actually “invert”. This situation is called an “inverted market” and it reflects negative carrying charges. Scarcity causes high prices in the cash and nearby futures contracts because the market gives priority to the present and discounts the future. Essentially the market is saying to the contract holder that it will pay a premium for the commodity if it is delivered now (Besant, 1985, p. 71).
 
6
The first expression in Eq. (7.1) refers to futures derived forecasts of the season-average price, and the second expression of Eq. (7.1) refers to the composite of actual and futures derived forecasts of the season-average price.
 
7
The nearby futures price is always used except when the forecast month coincides with the closing month of the nearby futures contract. For this situation, the next nearby futures contract is selected. This procedure is followed because futures prices for the maturing contract may be affected by a decline in liquidity during the month of maturity. Also, a contract usually closes about the third week of the month, and using the current futures contract during its closing month would lower the number of observations that could be used to calculate the average monthly closing price and corresponding basis.
 
8
This procedure provides a spot forecast based on the nearby or deferred contract, but the national average monthly price reported by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) is the price actually received for the crop that was delivered for the given month, which may be more than or less than the simple average of the daily average of prices posted by elevators for spot delivery. For example, July and August 2004 NASS prices were above the average of daily spot prices because farmers were delivering grain at prices that were contracted in the spring when corn prices were higher. Thus, there may be some error introduced by a time lag from when the farmer priced the grain to when it was actually delivered and recorded by NASS. Futures prices are based on “today’s” values.
 
9
Several factors affect the basis and help explain why the basis varies from one location to another. Some of these factors include: local supply and demand conditions for the commodity and its substitutes, transportation and handling charges, transportation bottlenecks, availability and costs of storage, drying capacities, grain quality and market expectations.
 
10
Future calculations will update these performance measures. However, for the time being it was determined that the present time span would be representative of any differences between the WASDE projections and the futures model forecasts.
 
11
Since the futures model deviates from the original assumptions of the efficient market hypothesis, the futures model forecasts will not be used to test for futures market efficiency.
 
12
These statistical tests are performed for crop years 1980 through 2005.
 
13
The futures forecast is determined from the settlement futures prices on the day of the WASDE release. Mid-points of the projected price range from the WASDE report are used.
 
14
This is a standard measurement of price volatility since its use in the Black–Scholes option pricing model (Black and Sholes, 1973).
 
15
Statistical differences between the means of these two forecast methods will be tested in the next section.
 
16
An Informa Economics (2008) study and a study by Aulerich et al. (2009) found increased volatility for grains and soybeans during their study periods of recent years. The Informa Economics study found no persuasive evidence that index traders or money managers caused increased volatility as some have alleged.
 
17
The 5-year-average basis included two of the volatile basis years of 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.
 
18
During the recent period of price volatility, some grain elevators have created new forward contracts that pass the futures margin and transportation costs to the producer, resulting in a quoted basis that may be adjusted downwards depending upon circumstances.
 
Literature
go back to reference Childs N.W., Westcott P.C. (1977). Projecting the season average price for U.S. rough rice. Rice situation and outlook yearbook. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, RCS-1997, December, 18–24. Childs N.W., Westcott P.C. (1977). Projecting the season average price for U.S. rough rice. Rice situation and outlook yearbook. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, RCS-1997, December, 18–24.
go back to reference Besant L. (ed.) (1985). Commodity Trading Manual. Chicago (IL): Chicago Board of Trade. Besant L. (ed.) (1985). Commodity Trading Manual. Chicago (IL): Chicago Board of Trade.
go back to reference Black F., Scholes M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–659.CrossRef Black F., Scholes M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–659.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama E.F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25, 383–423.CrossRef Fama E.F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25, 383–423.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama E.F. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. Journal of Finance, 46, 1575–1617.CrossRef Fama E.F. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. Journal of Finance, 46, 1575–1617.CrossRef
go back to reference Garcia P., Hudson M.A., Waller M.L. (1988). The pricing efficiency of agricultural futures markets: an analysis of previous research results. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 20(July), 119–130. Garcia P., Hudson M.A., Waller M.L. (1988). The pricing efficiency of agricultural futures markets: an analysis of previous research results. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 20(July), 119–130.
go back to reference Harvey D.I., Leybourne S., Newbold P. (1997). Testing the equality of prediction mean squared errors. International Journal of Forecasting, 13, 281–291.CrossRef Harvey D.I., Leybourne S., Newbold P. (1997). Testing the equality of prediction mean squared errors. International Journal of Forecasting, 13, 281–291.CrossRef
go back to reference Harvey D.I., Newbold P. (2000). Tests for multiple forecast encompassing. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 471–482.CrossRef Harvey D.I., Newbold P. (2000). Tests for multiple forecast encompassing. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 471–482.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoffman L.A., Irwin S.H., Toasa J. (2007). Forecast performance of futures price models for corn, soybeans, and wheat. Selected paper presented at the summer meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Portland, Oregon, July. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/9889 Hoffman L.A., Irwin S.H., Toasa J. (2007). Forecast performance of futures price models for corn, soybeans, and wheat. Selected paper presented at the summer meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Portland, Oregon, July. http://​ageconsearch.​umn.​edu/​handle/​9889
go back to reference Informa Economics (2008). An evaluation of the influence of large reporting traders on futures market performance. A study commissioned in May 2008 by the CME Group for the benefit of a consortium of futures exchanges that included the CME Group, Kansas City Board of Trade, Minneapolis Grain Exchange, New York Mercantile Exchange, and the International Exchange, October 2008. http://www.informaecon.com/TraderStudy/traderstudy.htm Informa Economics (2008). An evaluation of the influence of large reporting traders on futures market performance. A study commissioned in May 2008 by the CME Group for the benefit of a consortium of futures exchanges that included the CME Group, Kansas City Board of Trade, Minneapolis Grain Exchange, New York Mercantile Exchange, and the International Exchange, October 2008. http://​www.​informaecon.​com/​TraderStudy/​traderstudy.​htm
go back to reference Kastens T.L., Jones R., Schroeder T.C. (1998). Futures-based price forecasts for agricultural producers and businesses. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 23, 294–307. Kastens T.L., Jones R., Schroeder T.C. (1998). Futures-based price forecasts for agricultural producers and businesses. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 23, 294–307.
go back to reference Kastens T.L., Schroeder T.C. (1996). Efficiency tests of Kansas City wheat futures. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 21(December), 187–198. Kastens T.L., Schroeder T.C. (1996). Efficiency tests of Kansas City wheat futures. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 21(December), 187–198.
go back to reference Meyer L.A. (1998). Factors affecting the US farm price of upland cotton. Cotton and Wool Situation and Outlook Yearbook. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, CWS-1998, November, 16–22. Meyer L.A. (1998). Factors affecting the US farm price of upland cotton. Cotton and Wool Situation and Outlook Yearbook. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, CWS-1998, November, 16–22.
go back to reference Patel J., Zeckhauser R., Hendricks D. (1991). The rationality struggle: illustrations from financial markets. American Economic Review, 81(May), 232–236. Patel J., Zeckhauser R., Hendricks D. (1991). The rationality struggle: illustrations from financial markets. American Economic Review, 81(May), 232–236.
go back to reference Plato G.E., Chambers W. (2004). How does structural change in the global soybean market affect the U.S. price? Electronic Outlook Report, OCS04D01, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, April. Plato G.E., Chambers W. (2004). How does structural change in the global soybean market affect the U.S. price? Electronic Outlook Report, OCS04D01, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, April.
go back to reference Sanders D.R., Manfredo M.R. (2005). Forecast encompassing as the necessary condition to reject futures market efficiency: fluid milk futures. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(3), August, 610–620.CrossRef Sanders D.R., Manfredo M.R. (2005). Forecast encompassing as the necessary condition to reject futures market efficiency: fluid milk futures. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(3), August, 610–620.CrossRef
go back to reference Snedecor G.W., Cochran, W.G. (1989). Statistical Methods, Eighth Edition. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. Snedecor G.W., Cochran, W.G. (1989). Statistical Methods, Eighth Edition. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
go back to reference Streeter D.H., Tomek W.G. (1992). Variability in soybean futures prices: an integrated framework. The Journal of Future Markets, 12(6), 706–728. Streeter D.H., Tomek W.G. (1992). Variability in soybean futures prices: an integrated framework. The Journal of Future Markets, 12(6), 706–728.
go back to reference Tomek W.G. (1997). Commodity futures prices as forecasts. Review of Agricultural Economics, 19(Spring/Summer), 23–44.CrossRef Tomek W.G. (1997). Commodity futures prices as forecasts. Review of Agricultural Economics, 19(Spring/Summer), 23–44.CrossRef
go back to reference US Department of Agriculture (1975–2009a). National Agricultural Statistics Service. Crop production, December issues, 1975–2009. US Department of Agriculture (1975–2009a). National Agricultural Statistics Service. Crop production, December issues, 1975–2009.
Metadata
Title
Using Futures Prices to Forecast US Corn Prices: Model Performance with Increased Price Volatility
Author
Linwood A. Hoffman
Copyright Year
2011
Publisher
Springer New York
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7634-5_7