Skip to main content
Top

2023 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

What and How You Explain Matters: Inquisitive Teachable Agent Scaffolds Knowledge-Building for Tutor Learning

Authors : Tasmia Shahriar, Noboru Matsuda

Published in: Artificial Intelligence in Education

Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Students learn by teaching a teachable agent, a phenomenon called tutor learning. Literature suggests that tutor learning happens when students (who tutor the teachable agent) actively reflect on their knowledge when responding to the teachable agent’s inquiries (aka knowledge-building). However, most students often lean towards delivering what they already know instead of reflecting on their knowledge (aka knowledge-telling). The knowledge-telling behavior weakens the effect of tutor learning. We hypothesize that the teachable agent can help students commit to knowledge-building by being inquisitive and asking follow-up inquiries when students engage in knowledge-telling. Despite the known benefits of knowledge-building, no prior work has operationalized the identification of knowledge-building and knowledge-telling features from students’ responses to teachable agent’s inquiries and governed them toward knowledge-building. We propose a Constructive Tutee Inquiry that aims to provide follow-up inquiries to guide students toward knowledge-building when they commit to a knowledge-telling response. Results from an evaluation study show that students who were treated by Constructive Tutee Inquiry not only outperformed those who were not treated but also learned to engage in knowledge-building without the aid of follow-up inquiries over time.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
\(Normalized\;gain = \frac{Normalized\;Post\;score - Normalized\;Pre score}{{1 - Normalized\;Pre score}}\)
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.T.H.: Understanding tutor learning: knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Rev. Educ. Res. 77(4), 534–574 (2007)CrossRef Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.T.H.: Understanding tutor learning: knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Rev. Educ. Res. 77(4), 534–574 (2007)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chi, M.T.H., et al.: Learning from human tutoring. Cogn. Sci. 25, 471–533 (2001)CrossRef Chi, M.T.H., et al.: Learning from human tutoring. Cogn. Sci. 25, 471–533 (2001)CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K., Magliano, J.P.: Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 9(6), 495–522 (1995)CrossRef Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K., Magliano, J.P.: Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 9(6), 495–522 (1995)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Butler, D.L.: Structuring instruction to promote self-regulated learning by adolescents and adults with learning disabilities. Exceptionality 11(1), 39–60 (2003)CrossRef Butler, D.L.: Structuring instruction to promote self-regulated learning by adolescents and adults with learning disabilities. Exceptionality 11(1), 39–60 (2003)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hong, H.-Y., et al.: Advancing third graders’ reading comprehension through collaborative Knowledge Building: a comparative study in Taiwan. Comput. Educ. 157, 103962 (2020)CrossRef Hong, H.-Y., et al.: Advancing third graders’ reading comprehension through collaborative Knowledge Building: a comparative study in Taiwan. Comput. Educ. 157, 103962 (2020)CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.: Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions. Instr. Sci. 36(4), 321–350 (2008)CrossRef Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.: Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions. Instr. Sci. 36(4), 321–350 (2008)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.T.H.: The influence of the tutee in learning by peer tutoring. In: Forbus, K., Gentner, D., Regier, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1179–1184. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2004) Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.T.H.: The influence of the tutee in learning by peer tutoring. In: Forbus, K., Gentner, D., Regier, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1179–1184. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2004)
9.
go back to reference Roscoe, R.D.: Opportunities and Barriers for Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building, Metacognition, and Motivation. University of Pittsburgh (2008) Roscoe, R.D.: Opportunities and Barriers for Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building, Metacognition, and Motivation. University of Pittsburgh (2008)
10.
go back to reference Shahriar, T., Matsuda, N.: “Can you clarify what you said?”: Studying the impact of tutee agents’ follow-up questions on tutors’ learning. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: 22nd International Conference, AIED 2021, Utrecht, The Netherlands, June 14–18, 2021, Proceedings, Part I, pp. 395–407. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_32CrossRef Shahriar, T., Matsuda, N.: “Can you clarify what you said?”: Studying the impact of tutee agents’ follow-up questions on tutors’ learning. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: 22nd International Conference, AIED 2021, Utrecht, The Netherlands, June 14–18, 2021, Proceedings, Part I, pp. 395–407. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-78292-4_​32CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Li, N., et al.: Integrating representation learning and skill learning in a human-like intelligent agent. Artif. Intell. 219, 67–91 (2015)CrossRef Li, N., et al.: Integrating representation learning and skill learning in a human-like intelligent agent. Artif. Intell. 219, 67–91 (2015)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Williams, J.J., Lombrozo, T., Rehder, B.: The hazards of explanation: overgeneralization in the face of exceptions. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142(4), 1006 (2013)CrossRef Williams, J.J., Lombrozo, T., Rehder, B.: The hazards of explanation: overgeneralization in the face of exceptions. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142(4), 1006 (2013)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Aleven, V.A., Koedinger, K.R.: An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cogn. Sci. 26(2), 147–179 (2002)CrossRef Aleven, V.A., Koedinger, K.R.: An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cogn. Sci. 26(2), 147–179 (2002)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mayfield, E., Rosé, C.P.: LightSIDE: Open source machine learning for text. In: Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation, pp. 146–157. Routledge (2013) Mayfield, E., Rosé, C.P.: LightSIDE: Open source machine learning for text. In: Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation, pp. 146–157. Routledge (2013)
17.
go back to reference Carolyn, R.: Tools for authoring a dialogue agent that participates in learning studies. Artificial Intelligence. In: Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts That Work, vol. 158, p. 43 (2007) Carolyn, R.: Tools for authoring a dialogue agent that participates in learning studies. Artificial Intelligence. In: Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts That Work, vol. 158, p. 43 (2007)
18.
go back to reference Cohen, J.: Theoretical considerations of peer tutoring. Psychol. Sch. 23(2), 175–186 (1986)CrossRef Cohen, J.: Theoretical considerations of peer tutoring. Psychol. Sch. 23(2), 175–186 (1986)CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nilsson, P.: A framework for investigating qualities of procedural and conceptual knowledge in mathematics—An inferentialist perspective. J. Res. Math. Educ. 51(5), 574–599 (2020)CrossRef Nilsson, P.: A framework for investigating qualities of procedural and conceptual knowledge in mathematics—An inferentialist perspective. J. Res. Math. Educ. 51(5), 574–599 (2020)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
What and How You Explain Matters: Inquisitive Teachable Agent Scaffolds Knowledge-Building for Tutor Learning
Authors
Tasmia Shahriar
Noboru Matsuda
Copyright Year
2023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_11

Premium Partner