Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. What’s in a p? A Commentary

Authors : Agnieszka Chidlow, William Greene, Stewart R. Miller

Published in: Research Methods in International Business

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this commentary we not only applaud Meyer, Witteloostuijn and Beugelsdijk (Journal of International Business Studies 48: 535–551, 2017) for their efforts to address long-overdue issues relating to the validity and power of empirical tests used by researchers but we also further comment on three of the best practices proposed in their work. Mainly, the false sense of security developed by scholars with regard to the software advances, the statistical level of significance and ethical issues associated with scholarly research. In doing so, we are sincerely hoping to strengthen the trustworthiness of international business scholarship within social science research as well as to contribute to the development of good practices and encouragement of ethical empirical research.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Aguinis, H., W. Cascio, and R. Ramani. 2017. Science’s reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune. Journal of International Business Studies 48: 653–663.CrossRef Aguinis, H., W. Cascio, and R. Ramani. 2017. Science’s reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune. Journal of International Business Studies 48: 653–663.CrossRef
go back to reference Bergh, D., B. Sharp, H. Aguinis, and M. Li. 2017. Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings. Strategic Organization 15: 423–436.CrossRef Bergh, D., B. Sharp, H. Aguinis, and M. Li. 2017. Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings. Strategic Organization 15: 423–436.CrossRef
go back to reference Breusch, T., M. Ward, and H. Minh. 2011. FEVD: Just IV or just mistaken. Political Analysis 29: 165–169.CrossRef Breusch, T., M. Ward, and H. Minh. 2011. FEVD: Just IV or just mistaken. Political Analysis 29: 165–169.CrossRef
go back to reference Eden, L., K. Lund Dean, and P. Vaaler. 2018. The ethical professor: A practical guide to research, teaching, and professional life. New York: Routledge.CrossRef Eden, L., K. Lund Dean, and P. Vaaler. 2018. The ethical professor: A practical guide to research, teaching, and professional life. New York: Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Fisher, R. 1925. Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. Fisher, R. 1925. Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
go back to reference Gibbons, J., and J. Pratt. 1975. P-values: Interpretation and methodology. The American Statistician 29: 20–25. Gibbons, J., and J. Pratt. 1975. P-values: Interpretation and methodology. The American Statistician 29: 20–25.
go back to reference Greene, W. 2011. Fixed effects vector decomposition: A magical solution to the problem of time-invariant variables in fixed effects models. Political Analysis 19: 135–146.CrossRef Greene, W. 2011. Fixed effects vector decomposition: A magical solution to the problem of time-invariant variables in fixed effects models. Political Analysis 19: 135–146.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2018. Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Inc. ———. 2018. Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Inc.
go back to reference Ioannidis, J. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2: 696–701.CrossRef Ioannidis, J. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2: 696–701.CrossRef
go back to reference John, L., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec. 2012. Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science 23: 524–532.CrossRef John, L., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec. 2012. Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science 23: 524–532.CrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, K., A. van Witteloostuijn, and S. Beugelsdijk. 2017. What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research. Journal of International Business Studies 48: 535–551.CrossRef Meyer, K., A. van Witteloostuijn, and S. Beugelsdijk. 2017. What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research. Journal of International Business Studies 48: 535–551.CrossRef
go back to reference Murphy, K., and H. Aguinis. 2019. HARKing: How badly can cherry picking and question trolling produce bias in published results? Journal of Business and Psychology 34: 1–17.CrossRef Murphy, K., and H. Aguinis. 2019. HARKing: How badly can cherry picking and question trolling produce bias in published results? Journal of Business and Psychology 34: 1–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Skipper, J., Jr., A. Guenther, and G. Nass. 1967. The sacredness of.05: A note concerning the uses of statistical levels of significance in social science. The American Sociologist 3: 16–18. Skipper, J., Jr., A. Guenther, and G. Nass. 1967. The sacredness of.05: A note concerning the uses of statistical levels of significance in social science. The American Sociologist 3: 16–18.
go back to reference Stanford, L. 1968. Criteria for selecting a significance level: A note on the sacredness of.05. The American Sociologist 3: 220–222. Stanford, L. 1968. Criteria for selecting a significance level: A note on the sacredness of.05. The American Sociologist 3: 220–222.
go back to reference Wasserstein, R., and N. Lazar. 2016. The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. American Statistician 70: 129–133.CrossRef Wasserstein, R., and N. Lazar. 2016. The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. American Statistician 70: 129–133.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
What’s in a p? A Commentary
Authors
Agnieszka Chidlow
William Greene
Stewart R. Miller
Copyright Year
2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22113-3_5