Skip to main content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Published in: Political Behavior 3/2020

29-10-2018 | Original Paper

What to Believe? Social Media Commentary and Belief in Misinformation

Authors: Nicolas M. Anspach, Taylor N. Carlson

Published in: Political Behavior | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Abstract

Americans are increasingly turning to social media for political information. However, given that the average social media user only clicks through on a small fraction of the political content available, the brief article previews that appear in the News Feed likely serve as shortcuts to political information. Yet, in addition to sharing political news, social media also allow users to make their own comments on news posts, comments which may challenge or distort the information contained in the articles. In this paper, we first analyze how social media posts on Twitter and Facebook differ from the actual content of their linked news articles, finding that social media comments regularly misrepresent the facts reported in the news. We then use a survey experiment to test the consequences of these information discrepancies. Specifically, we randomly assign individuals to read a full news article, a news article preview post (as seen on Facebook), or a news article preview with misinformative social commentary attached. We find that individuals in the social commentary conditions are more misinformed about the featured topic, tending to report the factually-incorrect information relayed in the comments rather than the factually-correct information embedded within the article preview.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Trump’s tweet was made on March 11, 2018. The most recent Rasmussen poll before that date was released on March 9, 2018, and showed Trump’s approval rating to be 44%.
 
3
Crimson Hexagon (https://​www.​crimsonhexagon.​com/​) is a data vendor allowing subscribers to access data from Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Blogs, Forums, News, Comments, Reviews, YouTube, and other sources. Crimson Hexagon provides access to over 1 trillion social media posts going back to 2008. The platform provides sentiment scores using its proprietary algorithms and allows users to extract random samples of the posts.
 
4
The full text of the articles is available in the Online Appendix.
 
6
In the full article condition, this was phrased as the person who “wrote” the article.
 
7
Choices included 15%, 23%, 36%, 49%, and a “Don’t know” option. The Yahoo! News article and its preview reported that Trump’s approval rating was 36% at the time, while the liberal and conservative commentaries suggested that his approval rating was actually 23 or 49%, respectively.
 
8
Choices included “Sampled more Democrats,” “Sample more Republicans,” “Inaccurate during the 2016 election,” “Funded by liberals,” and a “Don’t know” option. The Yahoo! News article reported Trump’s claims that the poll was inaccurate during the 2016 election, while the liberal and conservative commentaries suggested that the poll sampled more Republicans or Democrats, respectively. The article preview did not include any information about survey flaws.
 
9
Because H4 is concerned only in the relationship whether partisan motivated reasoning explains belief in misinformation, H4’s analysis is limited to only those assigned to the misinformative experimental conditions.
 
10
Petty and Cacioppo’s (1981, 1986) Elaboration Likelihood Model considers two routes to persuasion: a central route in which individuals thoughtfully examine new pieces of information, and a peripheral route in which persuasion occurs as the result of some heuristic (e.g., a source cue) rather than careful consideration. Because individuals motivated by a need for cognition may be more likely to scrutinize competing pieces of information than those motivated by a need for affect (see Arceneaux and Vander Wielen 2017), we include measures for both NFC (Cacioppo et al. 1984) and for NFA (Maio and Esses 2001) as control variables in our analyses. We also include measures of political knowledge (measured using five factual questions about politics), age, gender, race, education, income, and party (with higher values indicating identification with the Republican party). The full survey and balance tests can be found in the Online Appendix.
 
Literature
go back to reference Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236.
go back to reference Anspach, N. M. (2017). The new personal influence: How our Facebook friends influence the news we read. Political Communication, 34(4), 590–606. Anspach, N. M. (2017). The new personal influence: How our Facebook friends influence the news we read. Political Communication, 34(4), 590–606.
go back to reference Anspach, N. M., Jennings, J. T., & Arceneaux, K. (2018). A little bit of knowledge: Facebook’s News Feed and self-perceptions of knowledge. In Presented at the 2017 midwest political science association conference. Anspach, N. M., Jennings, J. T., & Arceneaux, K. (2018). A little bit of knowledge: Facebook’s News Feed and self-perceptions of knowledge. In Presented at the 2017 midwest political science association conference.
go back to reference Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels? Partisan news in an age of choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels? Partisan news in an age of choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2017). Taming intuition: How reflection minimizes partisan reasoning and promotes democratic accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press. Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2017). Taming intuition: How reflection minimizes partisan reasoning and promotes democratic accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150. Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150.
go back to reference Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.
go back to reference Bernstein, M.S., Bakshy, E., Burke, M., & Karrer, B. (2013). Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In CHI’13 (pp. 21–30). Bernstein, M.S., Bakshy, E., Burke, M., & Karrer, B. (2013). Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In CHI’13 (pp. 21–30).
go back to reference Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24–48. Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24–48.
go back to reference Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680–700. Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680–700.
go back to reference Budak, C., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Fair and balanced? Quantifying media bias through crowdsourced content analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(1), 250–271. Budak, C., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Fair and balanced? Quantifying media bias through crowdsourced content analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(1), 250–271.
go back to reference Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.
go back to reference Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personal Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personal Assessment, 48(3), 306–307.
go back to reference Carlson, T. N. (2018). Modeling political information transmission as a game of telephone. Journal of Politics, 80(1), 348–352. Carlson, T. N. (2018). Modeling political information transmission as a game of telephone. Journal of Politics, 80(1), 348–352.
go back to reference Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olsen, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olsen, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M. R., Goncalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM, 133, 89–96. Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M. R., Goncalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM, 133, 89–96.
go back to reference DeMarzo, P. M., Vayanos, D., & Zwiebel, J. (2003). Persuasion bias, social influence, and unidimensional opinions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 909–968. DeMarzo, P. M., Vayanos, D., & Zwiebel, J. (2003). Persuasion bias, social influence, and unidimensional opinions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 909–968.
go back to reference Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
go back to reference Erisen, C., Redlawsk, D. P., & Erisen, E. (2017). Complex thinking as a result of incongruent information exposure. American Politics Research, 46(2), 217–245. Erisen, C., Redlawsk, D. P., & Erisen, E. (2017). Complex thinking as a result of incongruent information exposure. American Politics Research, 46(2), 217–245.
go back to reference Eyster, E., & Rabin, M. (2010). Naïve herding in rich-information settings. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(4), 221–243. Eyster, E., & Rabin, M. (2010). Naïve herding in rich-information settings. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(4), 221–243.
go back to reference Feezell, J. T. (2017). Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71, 482–494. Feezell, J. T. (2017). Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71, 482–494.
go back to reference Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. American Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 426–443. Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. American Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 426–443.
go back to reference Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication, 67, 476–498. Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication, 67, 476–498.
go back to reference Garrett, R. K., Weeks, B. E., & Neo, R. L. (2016). Driving a wedge between evidence and beliefs: How online ideological news exposure promotes political misperceptions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 331–348. Garrett, R. K., Weeks, B. E., & Neo, R. L. (2016). Driving a wedge between evidence and beliefs: How online ideological news exposure promotes political misperceptions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 331–348.
go back to reference Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing and Management, 44(4), 1467–1484. Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing and Management, 44(4), 1467–1484.
go back to reference Hochschild, J. L. (2001). Where you stand depends on what you see: Connections among values, perceptions of fact, and political prescriptions. In James Kuklinski (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press. Hochschild, J. L. (2001). Where you stand depends on what you see: Connections among values, perceptions of fact, and political prescriptions. In James Kuklinski (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2012). Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 672–684. Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2012). Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 672–684.
go back to reference Karnowski, V., Kumpel, A. S., Leonhard, L., & Leiner, D. J. (2017). From incidental news exposure to news engagement. How perceptions of the news post and news usage patterns influence engagement with news articles encountered on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 42–50. Karnowski, V., Kumpel, A. S., Leonhard, L., & Leiner, D. J. (2017). From incidental news exposure to news engagement. How perceptions of the news post and news usage patterns influence engagement with news articles encountered on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 42–50.
go back to reference Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New York: Free Press. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New York: Free Press.
go back to reference Kim, Y., Hsu, S., & Gil de Zuniga, H. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63, 498–516. Kim, Y., Hsu, S., & Gil de Zuniga, H. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63, 498–516.
go back to reference Krupnikov, Y., & Levine, A. S. (2014). Cross-sample comparisons and external validity. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1(1), 59–80. Krupnikov, Y., & Levine, A. S. (2014). Cross-sample comparisons and external validity. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1(1), 59–80.
go back to reference Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2002). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790–816. Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2002). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790–816.
go back to reference Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480.
go back to reference Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (1997). Voting correctly. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 585–598. Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (1997). Voting correctly. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 585–598.
go back to reference Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 951–971. Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 951–971.
go back to reference Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., et al. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., et al. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096.
go back to reference Levendusky, M. (2013). How partisan media polarize America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Levendusky, M. (2013). How partisan media polarize America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109.
go back to reference Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?. New York: Cambridge University Press. Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Maio, G. R., & Esses, V. M. (2001). The need for affect: individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Psychology, 69(4), 583–614. Maio, G. R., & Esses, V. M. (2001). The need for affect: individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Psychology, 69(4), 583–614.
go back to reference Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s mechanical turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1–23. Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s mechanical turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1–23.
go back to reference Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 20(10), 1042–1063. Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 20(10), 1042–1063.
go back to reference Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439.
go back to reference Muirhead, R. (2013). The case for party loyalty. Nomos, 54, 229–256. Muirhead, R. (2013). The case for party loyalty. Nomos, 54, 229–256.
go back to reference Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press. Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330.
go back to reference Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2017). The role of engagement in learning from active and incidental news exposure on social media. Mass Communication and Society, 21(2), 225–247. Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2017). The role of engagement in learning from active and incidental news exposure on social media. Mass Communication and Society, 21(2), 225–247.
go back to reference Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419.
go back to reference Pasek, J., Sood, G., & Krosnick, J. A. (2015). Misinformed about the affordable care act? Leveraging certainty to assess the prevalence of misperceptions. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 660–673. Pasek, J., Sood, G., & Krosnick, J. A. (2015). Misinformed about the affordable care act? Leveraging certainty to assess the prevalence of misperceptions. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 660–673.
go back to reference Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubueque: William C. Brown. Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubueque: William C. Brown.
go back to reference Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.
go back to reference Pirolli, P. (2005). Rational analyses of information foraging on the web. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 343–373. Pirolli, P. (2005). Rational analyses of information foraging on the web. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 343–373.
go back to reference Popkin, S. L. (1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Popkin, S. L. (1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 577–592. Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 577–592.
go back to reference Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increase inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York: Cambridge University Press. Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increase inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1021–1044. Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1021–1044.
go back to reference Ryan, J. B. (2011). Accuracy and bias in perceptions of political knowledge. Political Behavior, 33(2), 335–356. Ryan, J. B. (2011). Accuracy and bias in perceptions of political knowledge. Political Behavior, 33(2), 335–356.
go back to reference Settle, J. (2018). Frenemies: How social media polarizes America. New York: Cambridge University Press. Settle, J. (2018). Frenemies: How social media polarizes America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Shapiro, R. Y., & Bloch-Elkon, Y. (2008). Do the facts speak for themselves? Partisan disagreement as a challenge to democratic competence. Critical Review, 20(1–2), 115–139. Shapiro, R. Y., & Bloch-Elkon, Y. (2008). Do the facts speak for themselves? Partisan disagreement as a challenge to democratic competence. Critical Review, 20(1–2), 115–139.
go back to reference Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2017). Political rumoring on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election: Rumor diffusion and correction. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1214–1235. Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2017). Political rumoring on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election: Rumor diffusion and correction. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1214–1235.
go back to reference Sides, J., & Vavreck, L. (2012). The gamble: The hand you’re dealt with. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Sides, J., & Vavreck, L. (2012). The gamble: The hand you’re dealt with. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Stroud, N. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York: Oxford. Stroud, N. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York: Oxford.
go back to reference Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. Metzger & A. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). Cambridge: MIT Press. Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. Metzger & A. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.
go back to reference Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R. M., & Pingree, R. J. (2015). News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: Effects on media trust and information seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 520–535. Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R. M., & Pingree, R. J. (2015). News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: Effects on media trust and information seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 520–535.
go back to reference Valeriani, A., & Vaccari, C. (2016). Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1857–1874. Valeriani, A., & Vaccari, C. (2016). Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1857–1874.
go back to reference Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.
go back to reference Weeks, B. E., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2017). Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(2), 214–239. Weeks, B. E., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2017). Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(2), 214–239.
go back to reference Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Metadata
Title
What to Believe? Social Media Commentary and Belief in Misinformation
Authors
Nicolas M. Anspach
Taylor N. Carlson
Publication date
29-10-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Political Behavior / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9515-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Political Behavior 3/2020 Go to the issue

Premium Partner