Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book
Creating formal ontologies is one of the current information science trends. However, in the context of taxonomies existing in natural languages another type of class hierarchy seems to be more important – the so-called “covert ontologies” that categorize entities in terms of crypto classes or hidden classes.
The research aims to examine localization of the three entities in the Russian language natural ontology, which seem very different from the formal point of view. These entities are: “language” (i.e. belongs to the formal class of systems), “music” (i.e. represents the formal class of perception or activity), and, finally, “computer” (i.e. embodies the formal class of equipment).
According to our preliminary observations, all three entities under discussion are conceptualized in Russian language as living systems. Our further analysis of 500 occurrences in which the three entities’ names adjoin verbs designing different steps of vitality cycle showed that “music” enters the class of mythic heroes or Demiurges, “language” belongs to the covert class of Humans; at last, “computer” integrates the class of pets.
The revealed properties of natural categorization due to the effects of covert ontology also influence the eventual semantic roles of exploring entities’ names.
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
Aiken, D.W.: Essence and existence, transcendentalism and phenomenalism: aristotle’s answers to the questions of ontology. Rev. Metaphys. 45(1), 29–55 (1991)
Øhrstrøm, P., Andersen, J., Schärfe, H.: What has happened to ontology? In: Dau, F., Mugnier, M.-L., Stumme, G. (eds.) Conceptual Structures 2005, ICCS, pp. 135–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Husserl, E.: Formal and transcendental logic. Matinus Nijhoff, Nederlands (1969) CrossRef
Smith, B.: Logic and formal ontology. In: Mohanty, J.N., McKenna, W. (eds.) Husserl’s Phenomenology: A Textbook, Lanham, pp. 29–67. University Press of America, Lanham (1989)
Hartmann, N.: New Ways of Ontology. Henry Regnery Company, Chicago (1953)
Hovy, E., Knight, K., Junk, M.: Large Resources. Ontologies (SENSUS) and Lexicons. http://www.isi.edu/natural-language/projects/ONTOLOGIES.html. Accessed 24 May 2017
Gruber, Th.: What is an Ontology. http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/kst/what-is-an-ontology.html. Accessed 31 May 2017
Guarino, N.: Understanding, Building, and Using Ontologies. http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW96/guarino/guarino.html. Accessed 05 Jun 2017
Protégé. http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101.pdf. Accessed 01 June 2017
Humboldt, W.v.: On language. On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Whorf, B.L.: Language: Thought and Reality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1956)
Vinogradov, V.A.: Nominative categories in songai. In: Vinogradov, V.A. (ed.) Foundations of African linguistics. Nominative categories, vol. 1. Aspect Press, Moscow (1997)
Kretov, A.A., Titov, V.T.: The role of covert categories in typological description of Romance languages. Bull. Voronej State Univ. Linguist. Cross-Cult. Commun. 1(6), 7–12 (2010)
Boriskina, O.O.: Crypto Classes in English. Publishing House Istoky, Voronej (2011)
Stefanowitsch, A.: Words and theirs metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In: Stefanowitsch, A., Gries, Th. (eds.) Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, pp. 63–105. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2006) CrossRef
Church, K., Hanks, P.: Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Comput. Linguist. 1(16), 22–29 (1996)
Zakharov, V., Khokhlova, M.: Study of effectiveness of statistical measures for collocation extraction on Russian texts. Comput. Linguist. Intellect. Technol. 9(16), 137–143 (2010)
- When Language Survived, Music Resurrected and Computer Died: To the Problem of Covert Ontologies in Language
- Springer International Publishing
- Sequence number
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA