Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue
Signature strengths are individuals’ highest-ranked strengths, those that they own, celebrate, and frequently exercise. Their use has been theorized to elicit positive affect, and contribute significantly to individuals’ functioning and well-being. The present study examined two elements of these ideas in the work arena: (a) Associations of strengths use at work with work outcomes (work meaningfulness, engagement, job satisfaction, performance, organizational citizenship behavior, and counterproductive work behaviors), focusing on differences in the associations of signature-strengths use, lowest-strengths use, and happiness strengths-use at work; (b) The role of positive affect in mediating these associations. The results, based on self-reports of an international sample of 1031 working individuals, generally indicated that the use of all kinds of strengths had positive correlates. As expected, using signature strengths had the highest, robust unique contribution to behavioral outcomes (performance, organizational citizenship behavior, and lower counterproductive work behavior). But unexpectedly, using happiness strengths (and not signature strengths) had the highest, robust unique contribution to psycho-emotional work-related outcomes (work meaningfulness, engagement, and job satisfaction). Positive affect mediated the association between strengths use and all work-related outcomes for the three kinds of strengths, when each was examined separately. However, when uses of the three kinds of strengths were examined together, positive affect mediated the effects of lowest strengths use and those of happiness strengths use, but not the effects of signature strengths use. These findings highlight the differential benefits of using different kinds of strengths, and suggest that additional (and different) mechanisms may underlie these effects.
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: The development and measurement of perceptual indicators. New York: Plenum. CrossRef
Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2013). Extending self-regulated learning to include self-regulated emotion strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 37(3), 558–573. CrossRef
Engel, H. R., Westman, M., & Heller, D. (2012). C haracter strengths, employees’ subjective well being and performance: An experimental investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Forest, J., Mageau, G. A., Crevier-Braud, L., Bergeron, É., Dubreuil, P., & Lavigne, G. L. (2012). Harmonious passion as an explanation of the relation between signature-strengths’ use and well-being at work: Test of an intervention program. Human Relations, 65(9), 1233–1252. doi: 10.1177/0018726711433134. CrossRef
Govindji, R., & Linley, P. A. (2007). Strengths use, self-concordance and well-being: Implications for strengths coaching and coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2(2), 143–153.
Güsewell, A., & Ruch, W. (2012). Are only emotional strengths emotional? Character strengths and disposition to positive emotions. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being, 4(2), 218–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2012.01070.x.
Lavy, S., & Littman-Ovadia, H. (2016). My better self: Using strengths at work and work productivity, organizational citizenship behavior and satisfaction. Journal of Career Development, 1–15. doi: 10.1177/0894845316634056.
Lim, Y., & Kim, M. (2014). Relation of character strengths to personal teaching efficacy in Korean special education teachers. International Journal of Special Education, 29(2), 53–58.
Linley, P. A., Nielsen, K. M., Gillett, R., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). Using signature-strengths in pursuit of goals: Effects on goal progress, need satisfaction, and well-being, and implications for coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 5(1), 6–15.
Littman-Ovadia, H. (2015). Brief report: Short form of the VIA inventory of strengths—construction and initial tests of reliability and validity. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 2(4), 229–237.
Littman-Ovadia, H., & Lavy, S. (2015). Going the extra mile: Perseverance as a key character strength at work. Journal of Career Assessment,. doi: 10.1177/1069072715580322.
Littman-Ovadia, H., & Niemiec, R. M. (2016). Character strengths and mindfulness as core pathways to meaning in life. In P. Russo-Netzer, S. Schulenberg, & A. Batthyany (Eds.), To thrive, to cope, to understand: Meaning in positive and existential psychotherapy. New York: Springer.
Madden, W., Green, S., & Grant, A. M. (2011). A pilot study evaluating strengths-based coaching for primary school students: Enhancing engagement and hope. International Coaching Psychology Review, 6(1), 71–83.
Mayerson, N. M. (2013). Signature- strengths: Validating the construct. Presented at the meeting of International Positive Psychology Association, Los Angeles, CA, 82–83. doi: 10.1037/e574802013-112.
Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2009). Character strengths: Research and practice. Journal of College and Character, 10, 1–10. CrossRef
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Peterson, C., Stephens, J. P., Park, N., Lee, F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Strengths of character and work. In P. A. Linley, S. Harrington, & N. Garcea (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology and work (pp. 221–231). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2014). Positive psychology interventions in people aged 50–79 years: Long-term effects of placebo-controlled online interventions on well-being and depression. Aging & Mental Health, 18(8), 997–1005. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.899978. CrossRef
Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Buschor, C. (2013). Testing strengths-based interventions: A preliminary study on the effectiveness of a program targeting curiosity, gratitude, hope, humor, and zest for enhancing life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 275–292. doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9331-9. CrossRef
Rudolph, C. W., Clark, M. A., Jundt, D. K., & Baltes, B. B. (2015). Differential reactivity and the within-person job stressor–satisfaction relationship. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress,. doi: 10.1002/smi.2641.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY: Free Press.
Smith, M. R. (2011). The relationship between character strengths and work satisfaction. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology, Newton, MA.
Walker, J. V. (2012). Effects of a brief character strengths intervention: A comparison of capitalization and compensation models (2012). Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations. Paper 8656. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/etd/8656. (1507462147).
Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.004. CrossRef
- When Theory and Research Collide: Examining Correlates of Signature Strengths Use at Work
- Publication date
- Springer Netherlands