Skip to main content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Who Will Win in the Climate Crisis? A Reinterpretation of the Interaction Between Climate Change and Security Issues in the Arctic

Author : Edmund Li Sheng

Published in: Arctic Opportunities and Challenges

Publisher: Springer Singapore

share
SHARE

Abstract

This chapter analyzes how the major Arctic powers are responding to the conventional and unconventional challenges posed by climate change in the Arctic. Climate change in the Arctic is a double-edged sword for Russia, which faces the challenges of permafrost degradation and reduced food production but also opportunities from the opening of the Arctic shipping route. Meanwhile, growing Sino–Russian cooperation in the Arctic has given Russia an additional bargaining chip in the Arctic game with the United States.

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 69.000 Bücher
  • über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 58.000 Bücher
  • über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko





Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Footnotes
1
Sheng, L., & do Nascimento, D. F. (2021a). The belt and road initiative in south-south cooperation: The impact on world trade and geopolitics. Palgrave MacMillan.
 
2
Union of Concerned Scientists. (2020). Each country’s share of CO2 emissions, updated August 12, 2020.
 
3
British Petroleum. (2021). Statistical review of world energy—2021 Russia’s energy market in 2020.
 
4
GECF. (2021, February 24). Global gas outlook 2050.
 
5
Swanson, C., & Levin, A. (2020, December 8). Liquefied natural gas exports are a climate threat.
 
6
Vyalov, S. S., Gerasimov, A. S., & Fotiev, S. M. (1998, June 23–27). Influence of global warming on the state and geotechnical properties of permafrost. Permaf rost: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference, Yellowknife, NW, 1097–1102.
 
7
Chenguang|Zhuo yan tianxia: Yongjiu dongtu ronghua quanqiu weiji jiaju. [Chenguang|Focus on the world: Melting permafrost global crisis intensifies].
 
8
Conley, H. A. (2021). Climate change will reshape Russia. Center for Strategic International Studies,
 
9
Lyddon, C. (2021, August 8). Focus on Russia. World Grain.
 
10
Kiselev, S., Romashkin, R., Nelson, G. C., Mason-D’Croz, D., & Palazzo, A. (2013). Russia’s food security and climate change: Looking into the future. Economics, 7(1).
 
11
Oshchepkov, M. (2021, July 11). Russia has set an ambitious goal for reducing emissions by 2030. Climate Scorecard.
 
12
Tynkkynen, V.-P., & Tynkkynen, N. (2018). Climate denial revisited: (Re)contextualising Russian public discourse on climate change during Putin 2.0. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(7), 1103–1120.
 
13
Sharmina, M., Anderson, K., & Bows-Larkin, A. (2013). Climate change regional review: Russia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(5), 373–396.
 
14
Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, Greenhouse Gas emission reduction (Presidential Decree 752).
 
15
Climate Action Tracker: Russian Federation.
 
16
Champion, M., & Doff, N. (2021, August 15). Russia’s getting left behind in global dash for clean energy. Bloomberg.
 
17
Semenov, A. (2021). Russian political forces meet climate change. Center for Strategic International Studies.
 
18
Fang Lexian, & Wang Yujing. (2021). Oumeng yu eluosi qihou hezuo de jinzhan yu juxian. Heping yu Fazhan. 2021(03).
 
19
Arvin, J. (2021, February 22). The latest consequence of climate change: The Arctic is now open for business year-round. Vox.
 
20
Skepticism to acceptance: How Putin’s views on climate change evolved over the years. Moscow Times, July 1, 2021.
 
21
Ibid.
 
22
Union of Concerned Scientists. (2020). Each country’s share of CO2 emissions, updated August 12, 2020.
 
23
Kelemen, D. R., & Vogel, D. (2010). Trading places: The role of the US and EU in international environmental politics. Comparative Political Studies, 43(4), 427–456.
 
24
Parker, C. F., & Karlsson, C. (2018). The UN climate change negotiations and the role of the United States: Assessing American leadership from Copenhagen to Paris. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 519–540.
 
25
Kyoto Protocol, United Nations Climate Change.
 
26
Signing the Kyoto Protocol, White House Green Building: An exhibit on sustainability. Presidential Libraries.
 
27
Senate Resolution 98 (Congressional Record, Report No. 105–5412), June 1997.
 
28
Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. F., & Bang, G. (2010). Why the United States did not become a party to the Kyoto Protocol: German, Norwegian, and US perspectives. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 129–150.
 
29
Ibid.
 
30
Text of a Letter from the President to Senators Hagel, Helms, Craig, and Roberts, March 2001. White House Archives.
 
31
Borger, J. (2001, March 29). Bush kills global warming treaty. The Guardian.
 
32
Clean energy and climate change. Bush White House Archives.
 
33
Bush unveils voluntary plan to reduce global warming, February 14, 2002. CNN.
 
34
Outka, U. (2016). The Obama administration’s Clean Air Act legacy and the UNFCCC. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 48, 109–125.
 
35
Remarks by President Obama at the first session of COP21, November 30, 2015. White House Archives.
 
36
Ibid.
 
37
Statement by the President on the Paris Climate Agreement, December 12, 2015. White House Archives.
 
38
Parker, C. F., & Karlsson, C. (2018). The UN climate change negotiations and the role of the United States: Assessing American leadership from Copenhagen to Paris. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 519–540.
 
39
Yin, Y. C., & Sheng, L. (2021). Theorizing about global imbalances: An inequality perspective. Argumenta Oeconomica, 46, 169–181.
 
40
Sheng, L. (2021). How Covid-19 reshapes new world order: Political economy perspective. Springer.
 
41
In January 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency provoked an outcry in West Virginia by rejecting a permit to fill a river valley. West Virginia is America’s second-largest coal producing state, and this permission was crucial to the largest mountaintop removal mining operation in the United States.
 
42
Sheng, L. (2014b). Economic structure, cost outsourcing and global imbalances. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 74, 81–95.
 
43
Sheng, L. (2015). Theorizing income inequality in the face of financial globalization. The Social Science Journal, 52(3), 415–424.
 
44
Christopher, T. (2017, March 28). Trump signs executive order to roll back Obama-era climate actions, power plant emissions rule. CNBC.
 
45
Milman, O. (2021, January 20). Biden returns US to Paris climate accord hours after becoming president. The Guardian.
 
46
The Biden plan for the clean energy revolution and environmental justice.
 
47
FACT SHEET: President Biden sets 2030 greenhouse gas pollution reduction target aimed at creating good-paying union jobs and securing U.S. leadership on clean energy technologies, April 22, 2021. White House briefing.
 
48
Wishnick, E. (2021, June 5). Will Russia put China’s Arctic ambitions on ice? The Diplomat.
 
49
Liang, Y. (2019, June 6). China, Russia agree to upgrade relations for new era. Xinhua.
 
50
Overseas Project Encyclopedia. Dujia: Yamal LNG project: bingshang sichouzhilu de zhongyao jiedian [Yamal LNG project: An important pivot point of the Ice Silk Road, China Belt and Road Network].
 
51
Chen, G. (2012). China’s emerging Arctic strategy. The Polar Journal, 2(2), 358–371.
 
52
Pincus, R. (2020). Three-way power dynamics in the Arctic. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 14(1), 40–63.
 
53
Zhang, P., & Yang, J. (2016). Changes in the Arctic and China’s participation in Arctic governance. Asian Countries and the Arctic Future, 217–235.
 
54
Kopra, S. (2019, August 22). Will the Ice Silk Road become the compass for the Arctic? Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science.
 
55
Sheng, L. (2014a). Capital controls and international development: A theoretical reconsideration. Global Policy, 5(1), 114–120.
 
56
Sheng, L., & do Nascimento, D. F. (2021b). Love and trade war: China and the US in historical context. Springer.
 
57
Mariia, K. (2019). China’s Arctic policy: Present and future. The Polar Journal, 9(1), 94–112.
 
58
Kong, X. (2018). SCIO briefing on China’s policy on the Arctic (Translation provided by State Council Information office of the PRC).
 
59
Xinhua. (2018, June 26). China’s Arctic policy.
 
60
China Petroleum News Center. (2021, January 5). Nengyuan zhuanxing qushi xia eluosi de beiji nengyuan zhanlue [Russia’s Arctic energy strategy under the trend of energy transition].
 
61
Secretariat, R. (2020). Renewables 2020 global status report. Rep. Paris: REN12.
 
Literature
go back to reference Chen, G. (2012). China’s emerging Arctic strategy. The Polar Journal, 2(2), 358–371. CrossRef Chen, G. (2012). China’s emerging Arctic strategy. The Polar Journal, 2(2), 358–371. CrossRef
go back to reference Fang Lexian, & Wang Yujing. (2021). Oumeng yu eluosi qihou hezuo de jinzhan yu juxian [Progress of EU-Russian cooperation on climate]. Heping yu Fazhan [Peace and Development]. 2021(03). Fang Lexian, & Wang Yujing. (2021). Oumeng yu eluosi qihou hezuo de jinzhan yu juxian [Progress of EU-Russian cooperation on climate]. Heping yu Fazhan [Peace and Development]. 2021(03).
go back to reference Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. F., & Bang, G. (2010). Why the United States did not become a party to the Kyoto Protocol: German, Norwegian, and US perspectives. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 129–150. CrossRef Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. F., & Bang, G. (2010). Why the United States did not become a party to the Kyoto Protocol: German, Norwegian, and US perspectives. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 129–150. CrossRef
go back to reference Kelemen, D. R., & Vogel, D. (2010). Trading places: The role of the US and EU in international environmental politics. Comparative Political Studies, 43(4), 427–456. Kelemen, D. R., & Vogel, D. (2010). Trading places: The role of the US and EU in international environmental politics. Comparative Political Studies, 43(4), 427–456.
go back to reference Kiselev, S., Romashkin, R., Nelson, G. C., Mason-D’Croz, D., & Palazzo, A. (2013). Russia’s food security and climate change: Looking into the future. Economics, 7(1), 1–66. CrossRef Kiselev, S., Romashkin, R., Nelson, G. C., Mason-D’Croz, D., & Palazzo, A. (2013). Russia’s food security and climate change: Looking into the future. Economics, 7(1), 1–66. CrossRef
go back to reference Mariia, K. (2019). China’s Arctic policy: Present and future. The Polar Journal, 9(1), 94–112. CrossRef Mariia, K. (2019). China’s Arctic policy: Present and future. The Polar Journal, 9(1), 94–112. CrossRef
go back to reference Outka, U. (2016). The Obama administration’s Clean Air Act legacy and the UNFCCC. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 48(1), 109–125. Outka, U. (2016). The Obama administration’s Clean Air Act legacy and the UNFCCC. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 48(1), 109–125.
go back to reference Parker, C. F., & Karlsson, C. (2018). The UN climate change negotiations and the role of the United States: Assessing American leadership from Copenhagen to Paris. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 519–540. Parker, C. F., & Karlsson, C. (2018). The UN climate change negotiations and the role of the United States: Assessing American leadership from Copenhagen to Paris. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 519–540.
go back to reference Pincus, R. (2020). Three-way power dynamics in the Arctic. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 14(1), 40–63. Pincus, R. (2020). Three-way power dynamics in the Arctic. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 14(1), 40–63.
go back to reference Sharmina, M., Anderson, K., & Bows-Larkin, A. (2013). Climate change regional review: Russia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(5), 373–396. Sharmina, M., Anderson, K., & Bows-Larkin, A. (2013). Climate change regional review: Russia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(5), 373–396.
go back to reference Sheng, L. (2014a). Capital controls and international development: A theoretical reconsideration. Global Policy, 5(1), 114–120. CrossRef Sheng, L. (2014a). Capital controls and international development: A theoretical reconsideration. Global Policy, 5(1), 114–120. CrossRef
go back to reference Sheng, L. (2014b). Economic structure, cost outsourcing and global imbalances. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 74, 81–95. Sheng, L. (2014b). Economic structure, cost outsourcing and global imbalances. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 74, 81–95.
go back to reference Sheng, L. (2015). Theorizing income inequality in the face of financial globalization. The Social Science Journal, 52(3), 415–424. CrossRef Sheng, L. (2015). Theorizing income inequality in the face of financial globalization. The Social Science Journal, 52(3), 415–424. CrossRef
go back to reference Sheng, L. (2021). How Covid-19 reshapes new world order: Political economy perspective. Springer. Sheng, L. (2021). How Covid-19 reshapes new world order: Political economy perspective. Springer.
go back to reference Sheng, L., & do Nascimento, D. F. (2021a). The belt and road initiative in south-south cooperation: The impact on world trade and geopolitics. Palgrave MacMillan. Sheng, L., & do Nascimento, D. F. (2021a). The belt and road initiative in south-south cooperation: The impact on world trade and geopolitics. Palgrave MacMillan.
go back to reference Sheng, L., & do Nascimento, D. F. (2021b). Love and trade war: China and the US in historical context. Springer. Sheng, L., & do Nascimento, D. F. (2021b). Love and trade war: China and the US in historical context. Springer.
go back to reference Tynkkynen, V. P., & Tynkkynen, N. (2018). Climate denial revisited: (Re)contextualising Russian public discourse on climate change during Putin 2.0. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(7), 1103–1120. Tynkkynen, V. P., & Tynkkynen, N. (2018). Climate denial revisited: (Re)contextualising Russian public discourse on climate change during Putin 2.0. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(7), 1103–1120.
go back to reference Vyalov, S. S., Gerasimov, A. S., & Fotiev, S. M. (1998). Influence of global warming on the state and geotechnical properties of permafrost. Permafrost: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference, 1097–1102. Vyalov, S. S., Gerasimov, A. S., & Fotiev, S. M. (1998). Influence of global warming on the state and geotechnical properties of permafrost. Permafrost: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference, 1097–1102.
go back to reference Yin, Y. C., & Sheng, L. (2021). Theorizing about global imbalances: An inequality perspective. Argumenta Oeconomica, 46, 169–181. CrossRef Yin, Y. C., & Sheng, L. (2021). Theorizing about global imbalances: An inequality perspective. Argumenta Oeconomica, 46, 169–181. CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Who Will Win in the Climate Crisis? A Reinterpretation of the Interaction Between Climate Change and Security Issues in the Arctic
Author
Edmund Li Sheng
Copyright Year
2022
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1246-7_6

Premium Partner