Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue
Our empirical research in India shows the poor and the non-poor report different motivations for voting. The poor say they turn out to vote because it is their right while the non-poor report they vote because they expect material benefits from the state, some kind of access to the state, or because voting is their civic duty. We attribute the different reasons for voting offered by the poor and non-poor to their different relationships with the state. Unlike the non-poor, the poor mostly report the state mistreats or ignores them yet makes every effort on Election Day to ensure they are treated equally. The recognition the state grants to the poor on Election Day leads them to view voting as a valued right, one that gives them a rare chance to associate with those who govern as equals. The evidence in this paper was drawn from 30 focus groups with a total of 445 participants and 150 open-ended interviews conducted across Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh and three state and national-level surveys.
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
Alam J. Who wants democracy? Tracts for the times 15. Hyderabad: Orient Longman; 2004.
Banerjee M. Sacred election. Econ Polit Wkly. 2007;42:1556–62.
Bardhan P. The political economy of development in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1984.
Bardhan P. Awakening giants, feet of clay: assessing the rise of China and India. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2010.
Bass LE, Casper LM. Impacting the political landscape: who registers and votes among naturalized Americans? Polit Behav. 2001;23:103–30. CrossRef
Booth JA, Seligson MA. Inequality and democracy in Latin America: individual and contextual effects of wealth on political participation. In: Anirudh K, editor. Poverty, participation and democracy: a global perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
Brady HE, Verba S, Schlozman KL. Beyond SES: a resource model of political participation. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1995;89:271–94. CrossRef
Bratton M. Poor people and democratic citizenship in Africa. In: Anirudh K, editor. Poverty, participation and democracy: a global perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
Bueker CS. Political incorporation among immigrants from ten areas of origin: the persistence of source country effects. Int Migr Rev. 2005;39:103–40. CrossRef
Campbell DE. Why we vote: how schools and communities shape our civic life. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2006.
Chandhoke N. Seeing the state in India. Econ Polit Wkly. 2005;40:1033–40.
Chandra K. Why ethnic parties succeed: patronage and ethnic headcounts in india. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
Corbridge S, et al. Seeing the state: governance and governmentality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. CrossRef
Dreze J, Amartya S. India: economic development and social opportunity. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1996.
Dube S. In the land of poverty: memoirs of an Indian family, 1947–1997. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 1998.
Fearon JD. Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: selecting good types versus sanctioning poor performance. In: Bernard M, Adam P, Susan S, editors. Democracy, accountability, and representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
Gaventa J. Power and powerlessness: quiescence and rebellion in an appalachian valley. Oxford: Clarendon; 1980.
Gerber AS, Green DP, Larimer CW. Social pressure and voter turnout: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2008;102:33–48. CrossRef
Harriss J. Political participation, representation and the urban poor: finding from research in Delhi. Econ Polit Wkly. 2005;40:1041–54.
Holston J. Insurgent citizenship: disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2008a.
Holston J. Dangerous spaces of citizenship: gang talk, rights talk, and rule of law in Brazil. Berkeley: Center for Latin American Studies; 2008b.
Holston J. Contesting privilege with right: the transformation of differentiated citizenship in Brazil. Citizenship Stud. 2011;15(3–4):335–52. CrossRef
Horowitz DL. Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1985.
Jha S, Rao V, Woolcock M. Governance in the gullies: democratic responsiveness and leadership in Delhi’s slums. Washington, DC: World Bank Development Research Team; 2007.
Kohli A. The state and poverty in India: the politics of reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
Krishna A. Poor people and democracy. In: Krishna A, editor. Poverty, participation and democracy: a global perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008. CrossRef
Kumar S. Patterns of political participation: trends and perspective. Econ Polit Wkly. 2009;44:47–51.
Linz J, Alfred S, Yogendra Y. “Nation-state” or “state-nation”: comparative reflections on Indian democracy. In: Shankar B, editor. Managing diversity in democracies: India and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
Lyngdoh JM. Chronicle of an impossible election: the 2002 Jammu and Kashmir assembly election. New Delhi: Vyking Penguin; 2004.
Marrow HB. New destinations and immigrant incorporation. Perspect Polit. 2005;3:781–99.
Mehta PB. The burden of democracy. New Delhi: Penguin; 2003.
Mehta PB, Kapur D, editors. Public institutions in India: performance and design. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2005.
Mitra S. Power, protest and participation: local elites and development in India. London: Routledge; 1992. CrossRef
Mitra S. Making local government work: local elites, panchayati raj and governance in India. In: Atul K, editor. The success of India’s democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
Mitra S, Singh VB. Democracy and social change in India: a cross-sectional analysis of the national electorate. New Delhi: Sage; 1999.
Nichter S. Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2008;102:19–31. CrossRef
O'Brien JK, Li L. Rightful resistance in rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. CrossRef
Piven FF, Cloward RA. Low income people and the political process. In: Piven FF, Cloward RA, editors. The breaking of the American social compact. New York: The New Press; 1997.
Posner DN. Institutions and ethnic politics in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005. CrossRef
Ramakrishnan SK, Espenshade TJ. Immigrant incorporation and political participation in the United States. Int Migr Rev. 2001;35:870–909. CrossRef
Rao R. A positive verdict. Econ Polit Wkly. 2004;39:5437–40.
Rehfeld A. Towards a general theory of political representation. J Polit. 2006;68:1–21. CrossRef
Rudolph LI, Rudolph SH. The modernity of tradition: political development in India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1967.
Scott J. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1985.
Somers MR. Rights, relationality, and membership: rethinking the making and meaning of citizenship. Law Soc Inq. 1994;19:63–112. CrossRef
Somers MR. Genealogies of citizenship: markets, statelessness, and the right to have rights. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press; 2008.
Stokes S. Perverse accountability: a formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2005;99:315–25. CrossRef
Sunstein CR. Democracy and shifting preferences. In: Copp D, Hampton J, Roemer J, editors. The idea of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
Urbinati N. Representation as advocacy: a study of democratic deliberation. Polit Theory. 2000;28:758–86. CrossRef
Urbinati N. Representative democracy: principles and genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2006.
Urbinati N, Warren ME. The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Am Rev Polit Sci. 2008;11:387–412. CrossRef
Varshney A. Democracy and poverty. In: Narayan D, editor. Measuring empowerment: cross-disciplinary perspectives. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2005.
Weiner M. The child and the state in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1991.
Wilkinson SI. Explaining changing patterns of party-voter linkages in India. In: Kitschelt H, Wilkinson SI, editors. Patrons, clients and policies: patterns of democratic accountability and political competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
Wood E. Insurgent collective action and civil war in El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. CrossRef
Yadav Y. Reconfiguration in Indian politics. Econ Polit Wkly. 1996;31:96–104.
Yadav Y. India’s third electoral system—1989–1999. Econ Polit Wkly. 1999;34:2393–9.
Yadav Y. The elusive mandate of 2004. Econ Polit Wkly. 2004;37:5383–98.
- Why the Poor Vote in India: “If I Don’t Vote, I Am Dead to the State”
- Publication date
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta