Advertisement
Published in:
2011 | OriginalPaper | Chapter
Wild McEliece Incognito
Authors : Daniel J. Bernstein, Tanja Lange, Christiane Peters
Published in: Post-Quantum Cryptography
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
The wild McEliece cryptosystem uses wild Goppa codes over finite fields to achieve smaller public key sizes compared to the original McEliece cryptosystem at the same level of security against all attacks known. However, the cryptosystem drops one of the confidence-inspiring shields built into the original McEliece cryptosystem, namely a large pool of Goppa polynomials to choose from.
This paper shows how to achieve almost all of the same reduction in key size while preserving this shield. Even if support splitting could be (1) generalized to handle an unknown support set and (2) sped up by a square-root factor, polynomial-searching attacks in the new system will still be at least as hard as information-set decoding.
Furthermore, this paper presents a set of concrete cryptanalytic challenges to encourage the cryptographic community to study the security of code-based cryptography. The challenges range through codes over
F
2
,
F
3
, …,
F
32
, and cover two different levels of how much the wildness is hidden.