Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Multimodellbasierte Zusammenarbeit in Bauprojekten Read chapter Read first chapter

2014 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

19. Wissensmodelle als Basis für intelligente Visualisierungssysteme

Authors : Martin Voigt, Jan Polowinski, Klaus Meißner

Published in: Informationssysteme im Bauwesen 1

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Durch die stetig wachsende Datenflut wird es zunehmend schwerer, interessante Informationen zu erkennen, diese richtig zu interpretieren und letztlich Erkenntnisse zu gewinnen. Durch den Einsatz von Visualisierungswerkzeugen kann dieser Prozess erheblich verbessert werden. Jedoch adressieren aktuelle Anwendungen vor allem den Experten. Um auch Endanwendern die Informationsvisualisierung zu ermöglichen, muss das Visualisierungssystem fehlendes Expertenwissen kompensieren. Hierzu eignen sich besonders Wissensmodelle. Ein verbreiteter Ansatz sind Ontologien, da sie die Beschreibung von komplexen Zusammenhängen und dabei die gleichzeitige Trennung vom Anwendungscode ermöglichen. Für die Visualisierung existierten zwar schon erste Bestrebungen für eine Visualisierungsontologie, jedoch sind diese nicht für die Verwendung in aktuellen intelligenten Systemen geeignet und zugänglich. Daher wird eine modulare, frei zugängliche Visualisierungsontologie, VISO, vorgestellt und deren praktischer Einsatz skizziert. Die iterativ entwickelte Ontologie basiert auf einer Vielzahl von verbreiteten Terminologien und Taxonomien der Domäne und deckt dabei Teilbereiche wie Daten, graphisches Vokabular und menschliche Aktivität ab.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Visualisierungsframework für Bauprojektinformationen in Multimodellen
next chapter Visuelle Prüfung und Vergleich von Multimodellen
Footnotes
Literature
1.
Pierre Audion Conultants (2012) In-Memory-Datenanalyse in Zeiten von Big Data. Tech report
2.
Heer J, van Ham F, Carpendale S, Weaver C, Isenberg P (2008) Creation and collaboration: engaging new audiences for information visualization. In: Information visualization, Bd 4950. Springer, Berlin, S 92–133 CrossRef
3.
Grammel L, Tory M, Storey MA (2010) How information visualization novices construct visualizations. In: Proc of InfoVis 2010
4.
Ruiz F, Hilera JR (2006) Using ontologies in software engineering and technology. In: Calero C, Ruiz F, Piattini M (Hrsg) Ontologies for software engineering and software technology. Springer, Berlin, S 49–102 CrossRef
5.
Schapke SE, Katranuschkov P, Scherer RJ (2010) Towards ontology-based management of distributed multi-model project spaces. In: Proc of the CIB-W78 conference on IT in construction 2010
6.
Paulheim H, Probst F (2010) Ontology-enhanced user interfaces: a survey. Int J Semantic Web Inf Syst, 36–59
7.
Haber R, McNabb DA (1990) Visualization idioms: a conceptual model for scientific visualization systems visualization. In: Scientific computing. IEEE Comput Soc, Los Alamitos, S 74–93
8.
Card SK, Mackinlay JD, Shneiderman B (1999) Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo
9.
Chi EA (2000) Taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data state reference model. In: IEEE symposium on information visualization, S 69–75
10.
Boukhelifa N, Roberts J, Rodgers P (2003) A coordination model for exploratory multiview visualization. In: Coordinated and multiple views in exploratory visualization, S 76–85
11.
van Wijk JJ (2005) The value of visualization. In: Proc of IEEE visualization, S 79–86
12.
Tory M, Möller T (2004) Rethinking visualization: a high-level taxonomy. In: IEEE symposium on information visualization, S 151–158 CrossRef
13.
Duke D, Brodlie K, Duce D, Herman I (2005) Do you see what I mean? IEEE Comput Graph Appl 25:6–9 CrossRef
14.
Allen RB (1997) Mental models and user models. In: Helander MG, Landauer TK, Prabhu PV (Hrsg) Handbook of human-computer interaction. Elsevier, Amsterdam, S 49–63
15.
Gilson O, Silva N, Grant P, Chen M (2008) From web data to visualization via ontology mapping. Comput Graph Forum 27:959–966 CrossRef
16.
Duke D, Brodlie K, Duce D (2004) Building an Ontology of Visualization. IEEE Vis
17.
Potter R, Wright H (2006) An ontological approach to visualization resource management. DSV-IS, S 151–156
18.
Rhodes P, Kraemer E, Reed B (2006) VisIOn: an interactive visualization ontology. ACM-SE 44. In: Proc of the 44th annual Southeast regional conference. ACM, New York, S 405–410 CrossRef
19.
Shu G, Avis N, Rana O (2008) Bringing semantics to visualization services. Adv Eng Softw 39:514–520 CrossRef
20.
Paulheim H (2009) Ontologies for user interface integration. In: Proc of the 8th international semantic web conference. Springer, Berlin, S 973–981
21.
Pietschmann S (2012) Modellgetriebene Entwicklung adaptiver, komponentenbasierter Mashup-Anwendungen. Dissertation, TU Dresden
22.
Wang X, Jeong DH, Dou W, Lee SW, Ribarsky W, Chang R (2009) Defining and applying knowledge conversion processes to a visual analytics system. Comput Graph 33:616–623 CrossRef
23.
Chen M, Ebert D, Hagen H, Laramee R, van Liere R, Ma KL, Ribarsky W, Scheuermann G, Silver D (2009) Data, information, and knowledge in visualization. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 29:12–19 CrossRef
24.
Andrienko N, Andrienko G (2006) Exploratory analysis of spatial and temporal data: a systematic approach. Springer, New York
25.
Keim DA (2002) Information visualization and visual data mining. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 8:1–8 CrossRef
26.
Mazza R (2009) Introduction to information visualization. Springer, Berlin
27.
Kemp K, Vckovski A (1998) Towards an ontology of fields. In: Third international conference on GeoComputation
28.
29.
Ware C (2004) Information visualization: perception for design, 2. Aufl. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo
30.
Wilkinson L (2005) The grammar of graphics. Springer, Berlin MATH
31.
Taylor BN, Thompson A (2001) The international system of units (SI). US Dept. of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology
32.
Engelhardt vJ (2002) The language of graphics. PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam
33.
Mackinlay J (1986) Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Trans Graph 5:110–141 CrossRef
34.
Lengler R, Eppler MJ (2007) Towards a periodic table of visualization methods for management. In: Proc of the conference on graphics and visualization in engineering (GVE 2007), IASTED, S 1–6
35.
Bertin J (1983) Semiology of graphics. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
36.
Limbourg Q, Vanderdonckt J (2003) Comparing task models for user interface design. In: Diaper D, Stanton N (Hrsg) The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, S 135–154
37.
Norman DA (1988) The psychology of everyday things. Doubleday, New York
38.
Zhang J (1996) A representational analysis of relational information displays. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 45(1):59–74 CrossRef
39.
OASIS BPEL4People (2009). TC Web services – human task (ws-humantask) specification
40.
Zhou MX, Feiner SK (1998) Visual task characterization for automated visual discourse synthesis. In: Proc of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, S 392–399
41.
Yi JS, Kang Ya, Stasko J, Jacko J (2007) Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 13:1224–1231 CrossRef
42.
Bardram JE (1997) I love the system – I just don’t use it! GROUP’97: proc of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work ACM, New York, S 251–260
43.
Card SK, Newell A, Moran TP (1983) The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Mahwah
44.
Gotz D, Zhou M (2008) Characterizing users’ visual analytic activity for insight provenance. In: IEEE symposium on visual analytics science and technology (VAST’008), S 123–130 CrossRef
45.
Paterno F (2001) Task models in interactive software systems. In: Chang S (Hrsg) Handbook of software engineering and knowledge engineering. World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, S 1
46.
Amar R, Stasko J (2004) A knowledge task-based framework for design and evaluation of information visualizations. In: IEEE symposium on information visualization, S 143–150 CrossRef
47.
Amar R, Eagan J, Stasko J (2005) Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization. In: IEEE symposium on information visualization, S 111–117
48.
Nigay L, Vernier F (1998) Design method of interaction techniques for large information spaces. In: Proc of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces. ACM, New York, S 37–46
49.
Bezold M (2009) Describing user interactions in adaptive interactive systems. In: User modeling, adaptation, and personalization, Bd 5535. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, S 150–161 CrossRef
50.
Wehrend S, Lewis C (1990) A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques. In: Proc of the 1st conference on Visualization’90. IEEE Comput Soc, Los Alamitos, S 139–143
51.
Shneiderman B (1996) The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: IEEE symposium on visual languages, S 336–343
52.
Chi EHH, Riedl J (1998) An operator interaction framework for visualization systems. In: IEEE symposium on information visualization, S 63–70
53.
Fikkert W, D’Ambros M, Bierz T, Jankun-Kelly TJ (2007) Interacting with visualizations. Human-centered visualization environments, Bd 4417. Springer, Berlin, S 77–162 CrossRef
54.
Allen RB (1997) Mental models and user models. In: Helander MG, Landauer TK, Prabhu PV (Hrsg) Handbook of human-computer interaction. Elsevier, Amsterdam, S 49–63
55.
Brusilovsky P, Millán E (2007) User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In: The adaptive web: methods and strategies of web personalization. Springer, Berlin, S 3–53 CrossRef
56.
Rich E (1983) Users are individuals: individualizing user models. Int J Man-Mach Stud 18:199–214 CrossRef
57.
Golemati M, Halatsis C, Vassilakis C, Katifori A, Lepouras GA (2006) Context-based adaptive visualization environment. In: Tenth international conference on information visualization, S 62–67
58.
Golemati M, Katifori A, Vassilakis C, Lepouras G, Halatsis C (2007) Creating an ontology for the user profile: method and applications. In: Proc of the first international conference on research challenges in information science
59.
Heckmann D, Schwartz T, Brandherm B, Schmitz M, von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff M (2005) GUMO – the general user model ontology. User modeling, Bd 3538. Springer, Berlin, S 428–432
60.
Brickley D, Miller L (2010) FOAF vocabulary specification 0.98. Online
61.
Abel F, Heckmann D, Herder E, Hidders J, Houben GJ, Krause D, Leonardi E, van der Slujis K (2009) A framework for flexible user profile mashups. In: Proc of international workshop on adaptation and personalization for Web 2.0 (AP-WEB 2.0 2009), S 1–10.
62.
Pietschmann S, Mitschick A, Winkler R, Meißner K (2008) CroCo: ontology-based, cross-application context management. In: Proc of the 3rd international workshop on semantic media adaptation and personalization (SMAP 2008), IEEE CPS
63.
Strang T, Linnhoff-Popien C (2004) A context modeling survey. In: First international workshop on advanced context modelling, reasoning and management
64.
Strassner J, O’Sullivan D (2009) Knowledge management for context-aware, policy-based ubiquitous computing systems. In: Proc of the 6th international workshop on managing ubiquitous communications and services. ACM, New York, S 67–76
65.
Fernández-López M, Gómez-Pérez A, Juristo N (1997) Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. In: Proc symposium on ontological engineering of AAAI
66.
Simperl E, Mochol M, Bürger T, Popov I (2009) Achieving maturity: the state of practice in ontology engineering. In: Meersman R, Dillon T, Herrero P (Hrsg) On the move to meaningful Internet systems: OTM 2009, Bd 5871. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, S 983–991 CrossRef
67.
Bergman MA (2010) New methodology for building lightweight, domain ontologies. Online 01.09.2010
68.
Fuchs S, Kadolsky M, Scherer RJ (2011) Formal description of a generic multi-model. In: Proc of 20th IEEE international workshops on enabling technologies: infrastructure for collaborative enterprises (WETICE’11)
69.
Pietschmann SA (2009) Model-driven development process and runtime platform for adaptive composite web applications. Int J Adv Internet Technol 2(4)
70.
Voigt M, Pietschmann S, Meißner K (2013) A semantics-based, end-user-centered information visualization process for semantic web data. Semantic models for adaptive interactive systems. Springer, Berlin
71.
Voigt M, Werstler A, Polowinski J, Klaus M (2012) Weighted faceted browsing for characteristics-based visualization selection through end users. In: Proc of the 4th ACM SIGCHI symposium on engineering interactive computing systems (EICS). ACM, New York, S 151–156 CrossRef
72.
Voigt M, Pietschmann S, Grammel L, Meißner K (2012) Context-aware recommendation of visualization components. In: Proc of the 4th international conference on information, process, and knowledge management. (eKNOW 2012), XPS
73.
Pietschmann S, Voigt M, Meißner K (2009) Adaptive rich user interfaces for human interaction in business processes. In: Proc of the 10th international conference on web information systems engineering (WISE 2009). Springer, Berlin, S 351–364 CrossRef
74.
Tauscher H, Scherer RJ (2012) Towards a configurable nd-viewer for building information models. In: Gudnason G, Scherer R (Hrsg) eWork and eBusiness in architecture, engineering and construction, European conference on product and process modelling 2012. CRC Press/Balkema, Boca Raton/Rotterdam, S 271–277, ISBN 978-0415621281 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Wissensmodelle als Basis für intelligente Visualisierungssysteme
Authors
Martin Voigt
Jan Polowinski
Klaus Meißner
Copyright Year
2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Book
Informationssysteme im Bauwesen 1

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40882-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-40883-0

Copyright Year: 2014

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40883-0_19