Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

80. Worker and Manager Judgements About Factors that Facilitate Knowledge Sharing: Insights from the Brazilian Glass Segment

Authors : Jorge Muniz Jr., Cleginaldo Pereira de Carvalho, Vagner Batista Ribeiro

Published in: Operations Management for Social Good

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess factors of the tacit knowledge in the glass sector. Its focus is based on the managerial and worker perspectives about better knowledge sharing on the shop floor. Design/Methodology/Approach: The methodology applied was based on a comprehensive literature review about operation management, knowledge sharing and knowledge management assessment. A review of works relating these topics to the glass and foundry segments was also realized considering documents selected from the Web of Science (1997–2018). The field research work was conducted in the Brazilian glass sector, and the data collecting procedure used was a survey applied to 110 employees selected from the hot glass production line. An exploratory data analysis was performed to capture the employees’ and managers’ perceptions about the studied knowledge sharing factors. Research Questions: The study aims to answer the following research questions: What are the factors for a production system to align people, processes and knowledge? How to assess such factors? What is the importance of these factors in the production managers and workers’ opinion? Findings: The results evidence that, in accordance with the employees’ perceptions, the important factors for the KS are: conversation among the operators and study of work instruction. But it was evidenced that, in accordance with the managers’ perceptions the important factors are: registration in the work instruction and study of work instruction. Research Limitations/Implications: This study was limited to the shop floor context and focused on the blue-collar workers’ perception. The proposed approach can also be applied in other departments or organizations, even considering different cultures, worker groups or production sectors. Practical Implications: The findings support evidences to promote knowledge sharing through the shop floor context in the glass segment, which has a strong dependency on worker tacit knowledge. The work is also aligned with current research gaps identified on the literature. Originality/Value: This paper contributes to increase the understanding of KS to support managers’ actions on practical implications and its implementation process.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Armaghan, N., Renaud, J.: Evaluation of knowledge management in an organisation. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. 16(1) (2017) Armaghan, N., Renaud, J.: Evaluation of knowledge management in an organisation. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. 16(1) (2017)
2.
go back to reference Brusamolin, V.: Narrative approaches to change management: a case study in the glass industry. Transinformação 23(1), 15–28 (2011)CrossRef Brusamolin, V.: Narrative approaches to change management: a case study in the glass industry. Transinformação 23(1), 15–28 (2011)CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chen, M.Y., Chen, A.P.: Knowledge management performance evaluation: a decade review from 1995 to 2004. J. Inf. Sci. 32(1), 17–38 (2006)CrossRef Chen, M.Y., Chen, A.P.: Knowledge management performance evaluation: a decade review from 1995 to 2004. J. Inf. Sci. 32(1), 17–38 (2006)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cochrane, S.D., et al.: Knowledge sharing between design and manufacture. In: Servicing Manufacturing: Proceedings of the 21st International Manufacturing Conference, pp. 3–10 (2004) Cochrane, S.D., et al.: Knowledge sharing between design and manufacture. In: Servicing Manufacturing: Proceedings of the 21st International Manufacturing Conference, pp. 3–10 (2004)
5.
go back to reference Counsell, J., et al.: Schemebuilder: computer aided knowledge based design of mechatronic systems abstract (summary). Assem. Autom. 19(2), 129–138 (1999)CrossRef Counsell, J., et al.: Schemebuilder: computer aided knowledge based design of mechatronic systems abstract (summary). Assem. Autom. 19(2), 129–138 (1999)CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fteimi, N., Lehner, F.: Main research topics in knowledge management: a content analysis of Eckm Publications. Proc. Eur. Conf. Knowl. Manag. 14(1), 283–292 (2015) Fteimi, N., Lehner, F.: Main research topics in knowledge management: a content analysis of Eckm Publications. Proc. Eur. Conf. Knowl. Manag. 14(1), 283–292 (2015)
7.
go back to reference Gardan, N., Gardan, Y.: An application of knowledge based modelling using scripts. Expert Syst. Appl. 25(4), 555–568 (2003)CrossRef Gardan, N., Gardan, Y.: An application of knowledge based modelling using scripts. Expert Syst. Appl. 25(4), 555–568 (2003)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ho, W.R.J., et al.: Combined DEMATEL technique with a novel MCDM model for exploring portfolio selection based on CAPM. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(1), 16–25 (2011)CrossRef Ho, W.R.J., et al.: Combined DEMATEL technique with a novel MCDM model for exploring portfolio selection based on CAPM. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(1), 16–25 (2011)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Huang, M.J., Chen, M.Y., Yieh, K.: Comparing with your main competitor: the single most important task of knowledge management performance measurement. J. Inf. Sci. 33(4), 416–434 (2007)CrossRef Huang, M.J., Chen, M.Y., Yieh, K.: Comparing with your main competitor: the single most important task of knowledge management performance measurement. J. Inf. Sci. 33(4), 416–434 (2007)CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ingvaldsen, J.A.: Organizational learning: bringing the forces of production back in. Organ. Stud. 36(4), 423–444 (2015)CrossRef Ingvaldsen, J.A.: Organizational learning: bringing the forces of production back in. Organ. Stud. 36(4), 423–444 (2015)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ku, K.C., Wensley, A., Kao, H.P.: Ontology-based knowledge management for joint venture projects. Expert Syst. Appl. 35(1–2), 187–197 (2008)CrossRef Ku, K.C., Wensley, A., Kao, H.P.: Ontology-based knowledge management for joint venture projects. Expert Syst. Appl. 35(1–2), 187–197 (2008)CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kuah, C.T., Wong, C.Y.: Data envelopment analysis modeling for measuring knowledge management performance in Malaysian Higher Educational Institutions. Inf. Dev. 29(3), 200–216 (2012)CrossRef Kuah, C.T., Wong, C.Y.: Data envelopment analysis modeling for measuring knowledge management performance in Malaysian Higher Educational Institutions. Inf. Dev. 29(3), 200–216 (2012)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee, K.C., Lee, S., Kang, W.: KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance. Inf. Manag. 42(3), 469–482 (2005)CrossRef Lee, K.C., Lee, S., Kang, W.: KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance. Inf. Manag. 42(3), 469–482 (2005)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lin, L., Chang, C., Lin, Y.: Structure development and performance evaluation of construction knowledge management system. J. Civil Eng. Manag. 17(2), 184–196 (2011)CrossRef Lin, L., Chang, C., Lin, Y.: Structure development and performance evaluation of construction knowledge management system. J. Civil Eng. Manag. 17(2), 184–196 (2011)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lyu, H., Zhou, Z., Zhang, Z.: Measuring knowledge management performance in organizations: an integrative framework of balanced scorecard and fuzzy evaluation. Information 7(2), 1–11 (2016)CrossRef Lyu, H., Zhou, Z., Zhang, Z.: Measuring knowledge management performance in organizations: an integrative framework of balanced scorecard and fuzzy evaluation. Information 7(2), 1–11 (2016)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ma, M., Agarwal, R.: Through a glass darkly: information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inf. Syst. Res. 18(1), 42–67 (2007)CrossRef Ma, M., Agarwal, R.: Through a glass darkly: information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inf. Syst. Res. 18(1), 42–67 (2007)CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mitri, M.: Applying tacit knowledge management techniques for performance assessment. Comput. Educ. 41(2), 173–189 (2003)CrossRef Mitri, M.: Applying tacit knowledge management techniques for performance assessment. Comput. Educ. 41(2), 173–189 (2003)CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mohamed, M., Stankosky, M., Mohamed, M.: An empirical assessment of knowledge management criticality for sustainable development. J. Knowl. Manag. 13(5), 271–286 (2009)CrossRef Mohamed, M., Stankosky, M., Mohamed, M.: An empirical assessment of knowledge management criticality for sustainable development. J. Knowl. Manag. 13(5), 271–286 (2009)CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nakano, D., Muniz Jr., J., Batista, E.D.: Engaging environments: tacit knowledge sharing on the shop floor. J. Knowl. Manag. 17(2), 290–306 (2013)CrossRef Nakano, D., Muniz Jr., J., Batista, E.D.: Engaging environments: tacit knowledge sharing on the shop floor. J. Knowl. Manag. 17(2), 290–306 (2013)CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nejati, M.: Knowledge management performance evaluation: challenges and requirements for organizations. Tech. Technol. Educ. Manag. 5(1), 251–254 (2010) Nejati, M.: Knowledge management performance evaluation: challenges and requirements for organizations. Tech. Technol. Educ. Manag. 5(1), 251–254 (2010)
21.
go back to reference Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1), 14–37 (1994)CrossRef Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1), 14–37 (1994)CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ramsten, A.C., Säljö, R.: Communities, boundary practices and incentives for knowledge sharing? A study of the deployment of a digital control system in a process industry as a learning activity. Learn., Cult. Soc. Interact. 1(1), 33–44 (2012)CrossRef Ramsten, A.C., Säljö, R.: Communities, boundary practices and incentives for knowledge sharing? A study of the deployment of a digital control system in a process industry as a learning activity. Learn., Cult. Soc. Interact. 1(1), 33–44 (2012)CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wang, J., et al.: A synthetic method for knowledge management performance evaluation based on triangular fuzzy number and group support systems. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 39, 11–20 (2015)CrossRef Wang, J., et al.: A synthetic method for knowledge management performance evaluation based on triangular fuzzy number and group support systems. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 39, 11–20 (2015)CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wong, K.Y., et al.: Knowledge management performance measurement: measures, approaches, trends future directions. Inf. Dev. 31(3), 239–257 (2015)CrossRef Wong, K.Y., et al.: Knowledge management performance measurement: measures, approaches, trends future directions. Inf. Dev. 31(3), 239–257 (2015)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Worker and Manager Judgements About Factors that Facilitate Knowledge Sharing: Insights from the Brazilian Glass Segment
Authors
Jorge Muniz Jr.
Cleginaldo Pereira de Carvalho
Vagner Batista Ribeiro
Copyright Year
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23816-2_80