Top

Published in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

You Made Him Be Alive: Children’s Perceptions of Animacy in a Humanoid Robot

Authors : David Cameron, Samuel Fernando, Emily C. Collins, Abigail Millings, Michael Szollosy, Roger Moore, Amanda Sharkey, Tony Prescott

Published in: Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Social robots are becoming more sophisticated; in many cases they offer complex, autonomous interactions, responsive behaviors, and biomimetic appearances. These features may have significant impact on how people perceive and engage with robots; young children may be particularly influenced due to their developing ideas of agency. Young children are considered to hold naive beliefs of animacy and a tendency to mis-categorise moving objects as being alive but, with development, children can demonstrate a biological understanding of animacy. We experimentally explore the impact of children’s age and a humanoid’s movement on children’s perceptions of its animacy.

Our humanoid’s behavior varied in apparent autonomy, from motionless, to manually operated, to covertly operated. Across conditions, younger children rated the robot as being significantly more person-like than older children did. We further found an interaction effect: younger children classified the robot as significantly more machine-like if they observed direct operation in contrast observing the motionless or apparently autonomous robot. Our findings replicate field results, supporting the modal model of the developmental trajectory for children’s understanding of animacy. We outline a program of research to both deepen the theoretical understanding of children’s animacy beliefs and develop robotic characters appropriate across key stages of child development.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Jellyfish Inspired Soft Robot Prototype Which Uses Circumferential Contraction for Jet Propulsion

next chapter Analysing the Limitations of Deep Learning for Developmental Robotics

Children’s questions fall into two distinct umbrella categories: the robot’s experiences as a person and its capabilities as a machine.

Positive scores indicate more person-like; negative scores indicate more machine-like, 0 indicates an even mix of person and machine.

Sharkey, A., Sharkey, N.: Children, the elderly, and interactive robots. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 18, 32–38 (2011)CrossRef

Blancas, M., Vouloutsi, V., Grechuta, K., Verschure, P.F.M.J.: Effects of the robot’s role on human-robot interaction in an educational scenario. In: Wilson, S.P., Verschure, P.F.M.J., Mura, A., Prescott, T.J. (eds.) Living Machines 2015. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 9222, pp. 391–402. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22979-9_39 CrossRef

Cameron, D., Fernando, S., Collins, E., Millings, A., Moore, R., Sharkey, A., Prescott, T.: Impact of robot responsiveness and adult involvement on children’s social behaviours in human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the AISB Convention (2016)

Opfer, J.E., Gelman, S.A.: Development of the animate-inanimate distinction. Wiley-Blackwell Handbook Childhood Cogn. Dev. 2, 213–238 (2011)

Carey, S.: Conceptual change in childhood (1985)

Piaget, J.: The Child’s Conception of the World. Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa (1951)

Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Mubin, O., Al Mahmud, A.: Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence? Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1, 195–204 (2009)CrossRef

Bullock, M., Gelman, R., Baillargeon, R.: The development of causal reasoning. In: The Developmental Psychology of Time, pp. 209–254 (1982)

Carey, S.: The Origin of Concepts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)

10.

Goren, C.C., Sarty, M., Wu, P.Y.: Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics 56(4), 544–549 (1975)

11.

Hood, B.M., Willen, J.D., Driver, J.: Adult’s eyes trigger shifts of visual attention in human infants. Psychol. Sci. 9, 131–134 (1998)CrossRef

12.

Driver, J., Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., Baron-Cohen, S.: Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Vis. Cogn. 6, 509–540 (1999)CrossRef

13.

Johnson, S., Slaughter, V., Carey, S.: Whose gaze will infants follow? the elicitation of gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Dev. Sci. 1, 233–238 (1998)CrossRef

14.

Rochat, P., Striano, T., Morgan, R.: Who is doing what to whom? young infants’ developing sense of social causality in animated displays. Perception 33, 355–369 (2004)CrossRef

15.

Schlottmann, A., Surian, L.: Do 9-month-olds perceive causation-at-a-distance? Perception 28(9), 1105–1113 (1999)CrossRef

16.

Hamlin, J.K., Wynn, K., Bloom, P.: Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature 450(7169), 557–559 (2007)CrossRef

17.

Hamlin, J.K., Wynn, K.: Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cogn. Dev. 26, 30–39 (2011)CrossRef

18.

Heider, F., Simmel, M.: An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am. J. Psychol. 57, 243–259 (1944)CrossRef

19.

Carey, S.: Sources of conceptual change. In: Conceptual Development: Piagets Legacy, pp. 293–326 (1999)

20.

Kahn, P., Reichert, A., Gary, H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Shen, S., Ruckert, J., Gill, B.: The new ontological category hypothesis in human-robot interaction. In: 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 159–160. IEEE (2011)

21.

Somanader, M.C., Saylor, M.M., Levin, D.T.: Remote control and children’s understanding of robots. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 109, 239–247 (2011)CrossRef

22.

Okita, S.Y., Schwartz, D.L.: Young children’s understanding of animacy and entertainment robots. Int. J. Hum. Robot. 3, 393–412 (2006)CrossRef

23.

Kahn, P.H., Friedman, B., Perez-Granados, D.R., Freier, N.G.: Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interact. Stud. 7(3), 405–436 (2006)

24.

Melson, G.F., Kahn, P.H., Beck, A., Friedman, B., Roberts, T., Garrett, E., Gill, B.T.: Children’s behavior toward and understanding of robotic and living dogs. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 30(2), 92–102 (2009)CrossRef

25.

Cameron, D., Fernando, S., Millings, A., Moore, R., Sharkey, A., Prescott, T.: Children’s age influences their perceptions of a humanoid robot as being like a person or machine. In: Wilson, S.P., Verschure, P.F.M.J., Mura, A., Prescott, T.J. (eds.) Living Machines 2015. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 9222, pp. 348–353. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22979-9_34 CrossRef

26.

Cameron, D., Fernando, S., Cowles-Naja, E., Perkins, A., Millings, A., Collins, E., Szollosy, M., Moore, R., Sharkey, A., Prescott, T.: Age differences in animacy beliefs observed in childrens questions for a humanoid. In: Proceedings of the Conference Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems (in Press)

27.

Collins, E.C., Prescott, T.J., Mitchinson, B.: Saying it with light: a pilot study of affective communication using the MIRO robot. In: Wilson, S.P., Verschure, P.F.M.J., Mura, A., Prescott, T.J. (eds.) Living Machines 2015. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 9222, pp. 243–255. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22979-9_25 CrossRef

28.

Saylor, M.M., Somanader, M., Levin, D.T., Kawamura, K.: How do young children deal with hybrids of living and non-living things: the case of humanoid robots. Brit. J. Dev. Psychol. 28, 835–851 (2010)CrossRef

29.

Fukuda, H., Ueda, K.: Interaction with a moving object affects ones perception of its animacy. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2, 187–193 (2010)CrossRef

30.

Vouloutsi, V., et al.: Towards a synthetic tutor assistant: the EASEL project and its architecture. In: Lepora, N.F.F., Mura, A., Mangan, M., Verschure, P.F.M.J., Desmulliez, M., Prescott, T.J.J. (eds.) Living Machines 2016. LNCS, vol. 9793, pp. 353–364. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42417-0_32 CrossRef

31.

Reidsma, D., et al.: The EASEL project: towards educational human-robot symbiotic interaction. In: Lepora, N.F.F., Mura, A., Mangan, M., Verschure, P.F.M.J., Desmulliez, M., Prescott, T.J.J. (eds.) Living Machines 2016. LNCS, vol. 9793, pp. 297–306. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42417-0_27 CrossRef

32.

Cameron, D., Fernando, S., Millings, A., Szollosy, M., Collins, E., Moore, R., Sharkey, A., Prescott, T.: Congratulations, it’s a boy! bench-marking children’s perceptions of the robokind zeno-R25. In: Alboul, L., Damian, D., Aitken, J.M.M. (eds.) TAROS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9716, pp. 33–39. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40379-3_4

33.

Hanson, D., Baurmann, S., Riccio, T., Margolin, R., Dockins, T., Tavares, M., Carpenter, K.: Zeno: a cognitive character. AI Mag., 9–11 (2009)

34.

Mori, M., MacDorman, K.F., Kageki, N.: The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19, 98–100 (2012)CrossRef

35.

Moore, R.K.: A bayesian explanation of the uncanny valleyeffect and related psychological phenomena. Sci. Rep. 2, 864 (2012)CrossRef

36.

Gouaillier, D., Hugel, V., Blazevic, P., Kilner, C., Monceaux, J., Lafourcade, P., Marnier, B., Serre, J., Maisonnier, B.: Mechatronic design of nao humanoid. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 769–774. IEEE (2009)

37.

Mitchinson, B., Prescott, T.J.: MIRO: a robot “Mammal” with a biomimetic brain-based control system. In: Lepora, N.F.F., Mura, A., Mangan, M., Verschure, P.F.M.J., Desmulliez, M., Prescott, T.J.J. (eds.) Living Machines 2016. LNCS, vol. 9793, pp. 179–191. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42417-0_17 CrossRef

Title: You Made Him Be Alive: Children’s Perceptions of Animacy in a Humanoid Robot
Authors: David Cameron
Samuel Fernando
Emily C. Collins
Abigail Millings
Michael Szollosy
Roger Moore
Amanda Sharkey
Tony Prescott
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63536-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-63537-8

Copyright Year: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63537-8_7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner