Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

16. You’ve Got It All Backwards: Canada’s National Defence Strategy

share
SHARE

Abstract

Does Canada have a defence strategy? Taking an outsider’s perspective, this chapter argues that successive Canadian governments have kept defence strategy ambiguous on the basis of two commonplace assumptions: that domestic politics impose major constraints on the federal government in this area and that Canadians lack global agency by default. Objectively speaking, however, Canada’s ability to make strategic choices is not nearly as limited as typically depicted in policy discourse.

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 69.000 Bücher
  • über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 15 Tage kostenlos.

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 58.000 Bücher
  • über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Testen Sie jetzt 15 Tage kostenlos.

Literature
go back to reference Leuprecht, Christian, and Joel J. Sokolsky. 2015. Defense Policy “Walmart Style” Canadian Lessons in “Not-So-Grand” Grand Strategy. Armed Forces & Society 41 (3): 541–562. Accessed 29 October 2018. CrossRef Leuprecht, Christian, and Joel J. Sokolsky. 2015. Defense Policy “Walmart Style” Canadian Lessons in “Not-So-Grand” Grand Strategy. Armed Forces & Society 41 (3): 541–562. Accessed 29 October 2018. CrossRef
go back to reference Meiser, Jeffrey W. 2016–2017. Ends + Ways + Means = (Bad) Strategy . Parameters 46 (4): 81–92. Meiser, Jeffrey W. 2016–2017. Ends + Ways + Means = (Bad) Strategy . Parameters 46 (4): 81–92.
go back to reference NATO. 4 April 1949. Article 5 of the NATO Treaty. NATO. 4 April 1949. Article 5 of the NATO Treaty.
go back to reference Østhagen, Andreas, Gregory Levi Sharp, and Paal Sigurd Hilde. 2018. At Opposite Poles: Canada’s and Norway’s Approaches to Security in the Arctic. The Polar Journal 8 (1): 163–181. CrossRef Østhagen, Andreas, Gregory Levi Sharp, and Paal Sigurd Hilde. 2018. At Opposite Poles: Canada’s and Norway’s Approaches to Security in the Arctic. The Polar Journal 8 (1): 163–181. CrossRef
go back to reference Perry, David. 2018. Following the Funding in Strong, Secure, Engaged. Canadian Global Affairs Institute Policy Update. Perry, David. 2018. Following the Funding in Strong, Secure, Engaged. Canadian Global Affairs Institute Policy Update.
go back to reference Silove, Nina. 2018. Beyond the Buzzword: The Three Meanings of “Grand Strategy”. Security Studies 27 (1): 27–57. CrossRef Silove, Nina. 2018. Beyond the Buzzword: The Three Meanings of “Grand Strategy”. Security Studies 27 (1): 27–57. CrossRef
go back to reference Sokolsky, Joel, and Joseph Jockel. 2016. A Defence Review? Not Really Necessary: But If Canada Necessarily Must, Here Are Some Things to Keep in Mind and to Avoid. CDA Institute, April. Sokolsky, Joel, and Joseph Jockel. 2016. A Defence Review? Not Really Necessary: But If Canada Necessarily Must, Here Are Some Things to Keep in Mind and to Avoid. CDA Institute, April.
go back to reference Solingen, Etel. 1998. Regional Orders at Century’s Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Solingen, Etel. 1998. Regional Orders at Century’s Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence. 2014. Canada and Ballistic Missile Defence: Responding to the Evolving Threat, June. Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence. 2014. Canada and Ballistic Missile Defence: Responding to the Evolving Threat, June.
Metadata
Title
You’ve Got It All Backwards: Canada’s National Defence Strategy
Author
Lindsay Rodman
Copyright Year
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26403-1_16

Premium Partner