Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Our understanding of how to maximize the benefits of mentoring relationships for employee development has been limited by a vague understanding of what effective mentors are actually doing and how they are doing it. To begin to remedy this, we conducted one qualitative interview study of well-respected mentors to uncover the breadth and detail of their behaviors, and one quantitative study to see how a subset of these behaviors would be endorsed under two moderating conditions. Our qualitative study consisted of 28 interviews followed by detailed coding and analysis, and yielded a new framework of mentoring behaviors we named the cuboid of mentoring. This framework provides a rich set of behavioral statements that could be mined for research and practice purposes. Our quantitative investigation used a policy-capturing approach to investigate the extent to which experienced mentors endorsed mentoring objectives and behaviors under different conditions. This study showed that mentoring actions are purposeful, and the methodology demonstrates a paradigm for further study of boundary conditions of mentoring behaviors and supports conclusions from the qualitative study regarding how mentors think about the objectives and behaviors of mentoring.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Allen, T. D., Finkelstein, L. M., & Poteet, M. L. (2009). Designing workplace mentoring programs: An evidence-based approach. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossRef
Allen, T. D., & Poteet, M. L. (2011). Enhancing our knowledge of mentoring with a person-centric approach. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Science and Practice, 4, 126–130. CrossRef
Allen, T. D., Poteet, M. L., & Russell, J. E. A. (2000). Protégé selection by mentors: What makes the difference? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 271–282. CrossRef
Allen, T. D., Shockley, K. M., & Poteat, L. (2010). Protégé anxiety attachment and feedback in mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 73–80. CrossRef
Bearman, S., Blake-Beard, S., Hunt, L., & Crosby, F. J. (2007). New directions in mentoring. In T. Allen & L. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring (pp. 375–396). Malden: Blackwell.
Bertaux, D. (1981). From the life-history approach to the transformation of sociological practice. In D. Bertaux (Ed.), Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences (pp. 29–45). London: Sage.
Borman, W. C., & Brush, D. H. (1993). More progress toward a taxonomy of managerial performance requirements. Human Performance, 6, 1–21. CrossRef
Brodeur, P., Larose, S., Tarabulsy, G., Feng, B., & Forget-Dubois, N. (2015). Development and construct validation of the mentor behavior scale. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(1), 54–75. CrossRef
Cole, G. (2015). The value of mentoring: A mutually beneficial experience for mentor and mentee. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 29(4), 22–24.
Crawford, L., & Yob, I. (2011). Importance of traditional mentoring behaviors and characteristics in an online doctoral environment. Unpublished manuscript. Minneapolis, MN: Richard W. Riley College of Education and Leadership, Walden University.
Crawford, L. M., Randolph, J. J., & Yob, I. M. (2014). Theoretical development, factorial validity, and reliability of the Online Graduate Mentoring Scale. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(1), 20–37. CrossRef
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Day, D. V. (2009). Executive selection is a process not a decision. Perspectives on Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2, 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01126.x. CrossRef
Dougherty, T. W., & Dreher, G. F. (2007). Mentoring and career outcomes: Conceptual and methodological issues in an emerging literature. In B. R. Ragins & K. E. Kram (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 51-94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Hoffman, B. J., Baranik, L. E., Sauer, J. B., Baldwin, S., Morrison, M. A., Kinkade, K. M., Maher, C. P., Curtis, S., & Evans, S. C. (2013). An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 441–476. CrossRefPubMed
Ensher, E. A., & Murphy, S. E. (1997). Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and contact on mentor relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 460–481. CrossRef
Feldman, D. C., & Lankau, M. J. (2005). Executive coaching: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 31, 829–848. CrossRef
Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Finkelstein, L. M., Costanza, D. P., & Goodwin, G. F. (2017). Do your high potentials have potential? The impact of individual differences and designation on leader success. Personnel Psychology.
Finkelstein, L. M., & Poteet, M. L. (2008). Best practices in workplace formal mentoring programs. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 345–367). Malden: Blackwell. CrossRef
Fletcher, J. K., & Ragins, B. R. (2007). Stone center relational cultural theory: A window on relational mentoring. In B. Ragins & K. Kram (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 373–400). Los Angeles: Sage.
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112. CrossRef
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82. CrossRef
Hamlin, R. G., & Sage, L. (2011). Behavioural criteria of perceived mentoring effectiveness: An empirical study of effective and ineffective mentor and mentee behaviour within formal mentoring relationships. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35, 752–778. CrossRef
Hernez-Broome, G., & Hughes, R. L. (2004). Leadership development: Past, present, and future. People and Strategy, 27(1), 24–32.
Hezlett, S. A., & Gibson, S. K. (2005). Mentoring and human resource development: Where we are and where we need to go. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 446–469. CrossRef
Hill, C. E. (2005). Therapist techniques, client involvement, and the therapeutic relationship: Inextricably intertwined in the therapy process. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42, 431–442. CrossRef
Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1970). Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measures designs have exact F-distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 1582–1589. CrossRef
Kilburg, R. R. (1996). Toward a conceptual understanding and definition of executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48, 134–144. CrossRef
Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 608–625.
Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview: Scott Foresman.
Lankau, M. J., & Scandura, T. A. (2007). Mentoring as a forum for personal learning in organizations. In B. Ragins & K. Kram (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 95–122). Los Angeles: Sage.
Leskiw, S. L., & Singh, P. (2007). Leadership development: Learning from best practices. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 28, 444–464. CrossRef
Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3), Art. 8. Retrieved November 29, 2017 from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100387.
Mauchly, J. W. (1940). Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, 204–209. CrossRef
McCauley, C. D., & Guthrie, V. A. (2007). Designing relationships for learning into leader development programs. In B. Ragins & K. Kram (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 573–592). Los Angeles: Sage.
Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 220–235). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Noe, R. (1988). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology, 41, 457–479. CrossRef
O’Brien, K. E., Biga, A., Kessler, S. R., & Allen, T. D. (2010). A meta-analytic investigation of gender differences in mentoring. Journal of Management, 36, 537–554. CrossRef
Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2005). Construct equivalence across groups: An unexplored issue in mentoring research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6, 323–335. CrossRef
Petrie, N. (2014). Future trends in leadership development. The Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro. Retrieved 12/2/17 from http://insights.ccl.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/futureTrends.pdf
Ragins, B. R. (2016). From the ordinary to the extraordinary: High-quality mentoring relationships at work. Organizational Dynamics, 45, 228–244. CrossRef
Ragins, B. R., Cotton, J. L., & Miller, J. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: The effects of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1177–1194.
Scandura, T. A. (1992). Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 169–174. CrossRef
Scandura, T. A., & Pellegrini, E. K. (2007). Workplace mentoring: Theoretical approaches and methodological issues. In T. Allen & L. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring (pp. 71–92). Malden: Blackwell.
Scandura, T. A., & Ragins, B. R. (1993). The effects of sex and gender role orientation on mentorship in male-dominated occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43, 251–265. CrossRef
Underhill, C. M. (2006). The effectiveness of mentoring programs in corporate settings: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 292–307. CrossRef
Wanberg, C. R., Welsh, E. T., & Hezlett, S. A. (2003). Mentoring research: A review and dynamic process model. In J. J. Martocchio & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 22, pp. 39–124). Oxford: Elsevier.
Welsh, E. T., & Dixon, P. M. (2016). Improving mentoring outcomes: Examining factors outside the relationship. Journal of Managerial Issues, 28, 231–247.
Yob, I., & Crawford, L. (2012). Conceptual framework for mentoring doctoral students. Higher Learning Research Communications, 2, 37–50. CrossRef
- Enacting Effective Mentoring Behaviors: Development and Initial Investigation of the Cuboid of Mentoring
Lisa M. Finkelstein
Lebena S. Varghese
- Springer US
- Journal of Business and Psychology
Print ISSN: 0889-3268
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-353X
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Best Practices zu agiler Qualität