1991 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel
Endoscopic Procedural Safety
verfasst von : Professor Emmet Keeffe
Erschienen in: Quality Control in Endoscopy
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Enthalten in: Professional Book Archive
Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
In spite of the remarkable growth in the number and diversity of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures performed over the past 30 years, endoscopy has maintained a remarkably good overall safety record. Large retrospective surveys of complication rates of specific endoscopic procedures confirm that endoscopy is safe [1–4]. On the basis of variable complication rates of different types of endoscopy, each individual procedure may have its own “inherent” complication rate. For example, diagnostic procedures are safer than therapeutic procedures as is shown for colonoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Table 1. Complications may also be considered as procedure-related (e.g. bleeding, perforation) or more generic and most often sedation-related (e.g. miscellaneous cardiopulmonary adverse events).