Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Engineering with Computers
Erschienen in: Engineering with Computers 3/2017

16.11.2016 | Original Article

Energy conservation and power bonds in co-simulations: non-iterative adaptive step size control and error estimation

verfasst von: Severin Sadjina, Lars T. Kyllingstad, Stian Skjong, Eilif Pedersen

Erschienen in: Engineering with Computers | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Here, we study the flow of energy between coupled simulators in a co-simulation environment using the concept of power bonds. We introduce energy residuals which are a direct expression of the coupling errors and, hence, the accuracy of co-simulation results. We propose a novel energy-conservation-based co-simulation method (ECCO) for adaptive macro step size control to improve accuracy and efficiency. In contrast to most other co-simulation algorithms, this method is non-iterative and only requires knowledge of the current coupling data. Consequently, it allows for significant speed-ups and the protection of sensitive information contained within simulator models. A quarter car model with linear and nonlinear damping serves as a co-simulation benchmark and verifies the capabilities of the energy residual concept: reductions in the errors of up to 93% are achieved at no additional computational cost.
Vorheriger Artikel A finite element method for the numerical solution of Rayleigh–Stokes problem for a heated generalized second grade fluid with fractional derivatives
Nächster Artikel Limited conjugate gradient method for structural reliability analysis

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
Note that we use the word ‘simulator’ throughout in the sense of a subsimulator: a mathematical model of a subsystem coupled to other such models of subsystems to form a full model of a total system.
 
2
This is true if we assume an ideal bond that does not include physical energy sources or sinks. This is well justified in a co-simulation setting where (relevant) energy creation and dissipation ought to be accounted for inside subsystems. Our discussion is not limited by this choice, however, and it is fully possible to work with non-ideal bonds.
 
3
Note that some coupling schemes interpolate input values. In the Gauss–Seidel iteration pattern, for example, one simulator is stepped first using input value extrapolation, and thereafter, the second simulator is stepped using interpolation of the other system’s outputs.
 
4
The functions \(\mathbf {f}\) and \(\mathbf {g}\) may also depend on time explicitly.
 
5
Note that the sign convention for the residual power is different than the one used for energy fluxes encountered so far. A positive residual power means that the energy of the total system increases.
 
6
For a more comprehensive overview see, for example, Ref. [8] and references therein.
 
7
S\(_1\) can be solved exactly with constant extrapolation of the input \(F_\text {c}(t) = F_\text {c}(t_i)\) for \(t \in (t_i,t_{i+1}]\).
 
8
Setting \(k_\text {P} = 0\) and substantially lowering \(k_\text {I}\), for example, seems to be a much better choice to configure the PI-controller in this case.
 
Literatur
1.
Henry G, Cox I, Crossland P, Duncan J (2009) Virtual ships: Nato standards development and implementation. Report, Systems Engineering and Assessment LTD Frome. UK
2.
Harries S, Tillig F, Wilken M, Zaraphonitis G (2011) 10th International Conference on Computer and IT Applications in the Maritime Industries. Technische Universität Hamburg, Harburg, pp. 411–425
3.
Palm H, Holzmann J, Klein R, Schneider SA, Gerling D (2013) A novel approach on virtual systems prototyping based on a validated, hierarchical, modular library. Lecture, Embedded World. Nuremberg, Germany
4.
C. Bertsch, E. Ahle, U. Schulmeister (2014) 10th International Modelica Conference. LinkÖping University Electronic Press, LinkÖping Electronic Conference Proceedings, pp. 27–33
5.
6.
Verhoeven A, Tasic B, Beelen TGJ, ter Maten EJW, Mattheij RMM (2008) Industrial and applied mathematics. J Num Anal 3(3–4):275
7.
Busch M, Schweizer B (2011) Proceedings of the 7th European Nonlinear Dynamics Conference
8.
Busch M (2012) Zur effizienten Kopplung von Simulationsprogrammen. Dissertation, Universität Kassel
9.
Schierz T, Arnold M, Clauß C (2012) 9th International Modelica Conference. (Linköping University Electronic Press), Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings, pp. 205–214. doi:10.​3384/​ecp12076205
10.
11.
Viel A (2014) 10th International Modelica Conference, ed. by H. Tummescheit, K.E. Årzén (LinkÖ ping University Electronic Press, 2014), LinkÖping Electronic Conference Proceedings, pp. 213–223. doi:10.​3384/​ECP14096213
12.
13.
Benedikt M, Watzenig D, Zehetner J, Hofer A (2013) V International Conference on Computational Methods for Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering, Coupled Problems. Int Center Numer Methods Eng, pp. 1021–1032
14.
Paynter HM (1961) Analysis and Design of Engineering Systems: Class Notes for M.I.T. Course 2.751. M.I.T. Press, Boston
15.
Breedveld PC (1984) Physical systems theory in terms of bond graphs. Dissertation, Twente University
16.
Arnold M (2007) Multi-Rate Time Integration for Large Scale Multibody System Models. Springer Netherlands. IUTAM BOOKSER vol. 1, book section 1, pp. 1–10. doi:10.​1007/​978-1-4020-5981-0_​1
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Clauß C, Arnold M, Schierz T, Bastian J (2012) Tagungsband der ASIM/GI-Fachgruppen STS und GMMS. ARGESIM-Verlag, pp. 57–70
27.
28.
Bußhardt J, Isermann R (1992) American Control Conference, pp. 531–535
29.
Blochwitz T, Otter M, Arnold M, Bausch C, Elmqvist H, Junghanns A, Mauss J, Monteiro M, Neidhold T, Neumerkel D, Olsson H, Peetz JV, Wolf S, Clauß C (2011)8th International Modelica Conference. In:  Clauß C (ed) Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings, pp 105–114. doi:10.​3384/​ECP11063105
30.
Blochwitz T, Otter M, Åkesson J, Arnold M, Clauss C, Elmqvist H, Friedrich M, Junghanns A, Mauss J, Neumerkel D (2012) 9th International Modelica Conference. In:  Otter M, Zimmer D (eds) Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings, pp 173–184. doi:10.​3384/​ECP12076173
31.
32.
Skjong S, Pedersen E (2016) 2016 International Conference on Bond Graph Modeling and Simulation. Society for Modeling and Simulation International. SIMUL SERIES, pp 147–159
Metadaten
Titel
Energy conservation and power bonds in co-simulations: non-iterative adaptive step size control and error estimation
verfasst von
Severin Sadjina
Lars T. Kyllingstad
Stian Skjong
Eilif Pedersen
Publikationsdatum
16.11.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Engineering with Computers / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0177-0667
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-5663
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-016-0492-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Engineering with Computers 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Evaluating the modulus of elasticity of soil using soft computing system

Original Article

Application of quintic B-splines collocation method for solving inverse Rosenau equation with Dirichlet’s boundary conditions

Original Article

A virus-evolutionary multi-objective intelligent tool path optimization methodology for 5-axis sculptured surface CNC machining

Original Article

Limited conjugate gradient method for structural reliability analysis

Original Article

Inverse design of airfoils via an intelligent hybrid optimization technique

Original Article

A greedy sparse meshless method for solving heat conduction problems

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise