Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Many real-world problems are known as planning and scheduling problems, where resources must be allocated so as to optimize overall performance objectives. The traditional scheduling models consider performance indicators such as processing time, cost, and quality as optimization objectives. However, most of them do not take into account energy consumption and robustness . We focus our attention in a job-shop scheduling problem where machines can work at different speeds. It represents an extension of the classical job-shop scheduling problem, where each operation has to be executed by one machine, and this machine can work at different speeds. The main goal of the paper is focused on the analysis of three important objectives: energy efficiency, robustness, and makespan , and the relationship among them. We present some analytical formulas to estimate the ratio/relationship between these parameters. It can be observed that there exist a clear relationship between robustness and energy efficiency and a clear trade-off between robustness/energy efficiency and makespan. It represents an advance in the state of the art of production scheduling , so obtaining energy-efficient solutions also supposes obtaining robust solutions, and vice versa.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Billaut, J. C., Moukrim, A., & Sanlaville, E. (2008). Flexibility and robustness in scheduling. New York: Wiley. CrossRef
Blazewicz, J., Cellary, W., Slowinski, R., & Weglarz, J. (1986). Scheduling under resource constraints-deterministic models. Annals of Operations Research,7, 1–356. CrossRef
BMWi. (2009). German federal ministry of economics and technology: Energy statistics.
Bruzzone, A. A. G., Anghinolfi, D., Paolucci, M., & Tonelli, F. (2012). Energy-aware scheduling for improving manufacturing process sustainability: A mathematical model for flexible flow shops. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology,61(1), 459–462. CrossRef
Caplinskas, A., Dzemyda, G., Kiss, F., & Lupeikiene, A. (2012). Processing of undesirable business events in advanced production systems. Informatica: International Journal.,23(4), 563–579.
Dahmus, J., & Gutowski, T. (2004). An environmental analysis of machining. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and RD\&D, Anaheim, California, USA.
Dai, M., Tang, D. B., Giret, A., Salido, M. A., & Li, W. D. (2013). Energy-efficient scheduling for a flexible flow shop using an improved genetic-simulated annealing algorithm. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing.,29(5), 418–429. CrossRef
Duflou, J. R., Sutherland, J. W., Dornfeld, D., Herrmann, C., Jeswiet, J., Kara, S., et al. (2012). Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: A processes and systems approach. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology,61(2), 587–609. CrossRef
Fang, K., Uhan, N., Zhao, F., & Sutherland, J. W. (2011). A new approach to scheduling in manufacturing for power consumption and carbon footprint reduction. Journal of Manufacturing Systems.,30(4), 234–240. CrossRef
Garrido, A., Salido, M. A., Barbe, F., & López, M. A. (2000). Heuristic methods for solving job-shop scheduling problems. In ECAI-2000 Workshop on New Results in Planning, Scheduling and Design, Berlin, pp. 36–43.
Gutowski, T., Murphy, C., Allen, D., Bauer, D., Bras, B., Piwonka, T., et al. (2005). Environmentally benign manufacturing: observations from Japan, Europe and the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production,13(1), 1–17. CrossRef
IBM. (2007). Modeling with IBM ILOG CP optimizer—Practical scheduling examples.
IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimizer. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/integration/optimization/cplex-optimizer/.
Kramer, L., Barbulescu, L., & Smith, S. (2007). Understanding performance tradeoffs in algorithms for solving oversubscribed scheduling. In Proceedings 22nd Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-07).
Laborie, P. (2009). IBM ILOG CP Optimizer for detailed scheduling illustrated on three problems. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems (CPAIOR09), pp. 148–162. CrossRef
Li, W., Zein, A., Kara, S., & Herrmann, C. (2011). An investigation into fixed energy consumption of machine tools. In Glocalized solutions for sustainability in manufacturing, pp. 268–273. CrossRef
Mouzon, G., & Yildirim, M. B. (2008). A framework to minimise total energy consumption and total tardiness on a single machine. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering.,1(2), 105–116. CrossRef
Mouzon, G., Yildirim, M. B., & Twomey, J. (2007). Operational methods for minimization of energy consumption of manufacturing equipment. International Journal of Production Research,45(18–19), 4247–4271. CrossRef
Neugebauer, R., Wabner, M., Rentzsch, H., & Ihlenfeldt, S. (2011). Structure principles of energy efficient machine tools. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology,4(2), 136–147. CrossRef
Seow, Y., & Rahimifard, S. (2011). A framework for modelling energy consumption within manufacturing systems. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology,4(3), 258–264. CrossRef
Szathmary, E. (2006). A robust approach. Nature,439, 19–20. CrossRef
Verfaillie, G., & Schiex T. (1994). Solution reuse in dynamic constraint satisfaction problems. In Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), pp. 307–312.
Weinert, N., Chiotellis, S., & Seliger, G. (2011). Methodology for planning and operating energy-efficient production systems. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology,60(1), 41–44. CrossRef
- Energy Efficiency, Robustness, and Makespan Optimality in Job-Shop Scheduling Problems
M. A. Salido
D. B. Tang
- Chapter 9
in-adhesives, MKVS, Neuer Inhalt/© Zühlke, Technisches Interface Design/© scyther5 | Getty Images | iStock