Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
This chapter explores engagement dialogue as a sustainable and responsible investment (SRI ) strategy from a Nordic investor perspective. The Nordic model of engagement dialogue is grounded in the Nordic model of corporate governance and stakeholder capitalism. Based on a proprietary database from a professional SRI agent, this chapter conducts an in-depth analysis of engagement dialogue between Nordic institutional investors and MSCI World companies regarding environmental, social, and corruption risks. The main characteristics of the Nordic model of engagement dialogue are an incident-based approach, norm-based compliance, a small number of engagement cases, and long-term emphasis on risk reduction as opposed to short-term financial gains. The chapter notes that successful forms of engagement dialogue target global companies with higher levels of pre-engagement environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance, ESG transparency, and operating performance than a matched sample. Their performance remains superior to the matched sample in the post-engagement period. The chapter consequently extends previous literature on SRI strategies in the Anglo-Saxon model of activism based on shareholder resolutions, whereby companies are targeted owing to corporate governance risks and low financial performance.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Allen, F., Carletti, E., & Marquez, R. (2007). Stakeholder capitalism, corporate governance and firm value. Retrieved from http://finance.wharton.upenn.edu/~allenf/download/Vita/JF-MS6731-Revision-corporate-governance-with-figures-16sep09-final.pdf.
Blowfield, M., & Murray, A. (2014). Corporate responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bauer, R., Clark, G. L., & Viehs, M. (2013). The geography of shareholder engagement: Evidence from a large British institutional investor (SSRN Working Paper). Maastricht: Maastricht University School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University.
Bauer, R., Moers, F., & Viehs, M. (2015). Who withdraws shareholder proposals and does it matter? An analysis of sponsor identity and pay practices. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(6), 472–488. CrossRef
Becht, A., Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Rossi, S. (2009). Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK focus fund. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3093–3129. CrossRef
Bengtsson, E. (2008). Socially responsible investing in Scandinavia—A comparative analysis. Sustainable Development, 16, 155–168. CrossRef
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Capelle-Blancard, G., & Petit, A. (2017). Every little helps? ESG news and stock market reaction. Journal of Business Ethics. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3.
Carleton, W., Nelson, J., & Weisbach, M. (1998). The influence of institutions on corporate governance through private negotiations: Evidence from TIAA-CREF. Journal of Finance, 53(4), 1335–1362. CrossRef
Clark, G., Salo, J., & Hebb, T. (2008). Social and environmental shareholder activism in the public spotlight: US corporate annual meetings, campaign strategies, and environmental performance, 2001–04. Environment and Planning A, 40(6), 1370–1490. CrossRef
David, P., Bloom, M., & Hillman, A. (2007). Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 91–100. CrossRef
Deegan, C. (2015). Financial accounting theory. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.
Del Guercio, D., & Hawkins, J. (1999). The motivation and impact of pension fund activism. Journal of Financial Economics, 52, 293–340. CrossRef
Den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 901–924. CrossRef
Dimson, E., Karakas, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225–3268. CrossRef
Eurosif. (2016). European SRI study. Retrieved from http://www.eurosif.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/SRI-study-2016-HR.pdf.
Ferraro, F., & Beunza, D. (2014). Why talk? A process model of dialogue in shareholder engagement (SSRN Working Paper). Barcelona: IESE Business School, University of Navarra.
Gillan, S., & Starks, L. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2), 275–305. CrossRef
Gillan, S., & Starks, L. (2007). The evolution of shareholder activism in the United States. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19(1), 55–73. CrossRef
Gjolberg, M. (2010). Varieties of corporate social responsibility (CSR): CSR meets the “Nordic Model”. Regulation & Government, 4, 203–229. CrossRef
Goranova, M., Abouk, R., Nystrom, P., & Ehsan, S. (2017). Corporate governance antecedents to shareholder activism: A zero-inflated process. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 415–435. CrossRef
Goranova, M., & Ryan, L. (2014). Shareholder activism: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 40, 1230–1266. CrossRef
Grewal, J., Serafeim G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Shareholder activism on sustainability issues (SSRN Working Paper). Boston: Harvard Business School, Harvard University.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (2010). Control of corporate decisions: Shareholders vs. management (SSRN Working Paper). Chicago: University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
Hamilton, I., & Eriksson, J. (2011). Influence strategies in shareholder engagement: A case study of all Swedish National Pension Funds. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1(1), 44–61. CrossRef
Henisz, W., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. (2014). Spinning gold: The financial and operational returns to external stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), 1727–1748. CrossRef
Kruger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115, 304–329. CrossRef
Lekvall, P. (2014). The Nordic corporate governance model. Stockholm: TMG Sthlm.
Mallin, C. (2016). Corporate governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McNulty, T., & Nordberg, D. (2016). Ownership, activism and engagement: Institutional investors as active owners. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 346–358. CrossRef
Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.
Poulsen, T., Strand, T., & Thomsen, S. (2010). Voting power and shareholder activism: A study of Swedish shareholder meetings. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(4), 329–343. CrossRef
Rehbein, K., Logsdon, J., & Van Buren, H. (2013). Corporate responses to shareholder activists: Considering the dialogue alternative. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 137–154. CrossRef
Reid, E., & Toffel, M. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1157–1178. CrossRef
Scholtens, B., & Sievänen, R. (2013). Drivers of socially responsible investing: A case study of four Nordic countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 605–616. CrossRef
Semenova, N., Hassel, L., & Nilsson, H. (2010). The value relevance of environmental and social performance: Evidence from Swedish SIX 300 companies. The Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 3, 265–292.
Smith, M. P. (1996). Shareholder activism by institutional investors: Evidence from CalPERS. Journal of Finance, 51(1), 227–252. CrossRef
Strand, R. (2014). Scandinavia can be inspiration for creating shared value. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/84bbd770-b34d-11e3-b09d-00144feabdc0.
Strand, R., & Freeman, R. (2015). Scandinavian cooperative advantage: The theory and practice of stakeholder engagement in Scandinavia. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 65–85. CrossRef
Thomsen, S., & Conyon, M. (2012). Corporate governance: Mechanisms and systems. London: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Vidaver-Cohen, D., & Bronn, P. (2015). Reputation, responsibility, and stakeholder support in Scandinavian firms: A comparative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 49–64. CrossRef
Wang, Y., & Mao, C. (2015). Shareholder activism of public pension funds: The political facet. Journal of Banking & Finance, 60, 138–152. CrossRef
Yamahaki, C., & Frynas, G. (2016). Institutional determinants of private shareholder engagement in Brazil and South Africa: The role of regulation. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(5), 509–527. CrossRef
- Engagement Dialogue as a Nordic Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRI) Strategy
Lars G. Hassel
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia