Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Kongresse
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Veranstaltungskalender Awards MyNewsletter Firmensuche
Kunden Login
Über Einzelzugang informieren
Über Unternehmenszugang informieren
Referenzkunden
Elektrische Antriebe und Energiesysteme 2025 | 26 + 27 März 2025

19. Internationaler MTZ-Fachkongress Zukunftsantriebe

Seien Sie bei der Konferenz dabei! Dort treffen Experten aus der Automobilindustrie, Energieerzeugung und Stromnetzbetrieb auf Vertreter aus Politik und Wissenschaft. Diskutiert werden wichtige Themen der Branche.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Enhancing Transparency Through Personal Information Management Systems: Current State of Service Offerings and Considerations for Further Advancements

verfasst von : Janina Rochon

Erschienen in: Privacy and Identity Management. Sharing in a Digital World

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The aim of the present article is to analyze how Personal Information Management Systems may alleviate current problems in assuring the principle of transparency enshrined in Art. 5 of the GDPR. For that purpose, existing challenges in collecting valid consent and providing transparent information will be identified. Subsequently an analysis of the current state of developments of PIMS found on the market will be conducted and their potential for mitigating these issues will be considered.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Entangled: A Case Study of Data Exchange and Actor Relationships in a Mobility Ecosystem
Nächstes Kapitel User-Driven Privacy Factors in Trigger-Action Apps: A Comparative Analysis with General IoT
Literatur
1.
Acquisti, A., et al.: Nudges for privacy and security: understanding and assisting users’ choices online. ACM Comput. Surv. 50(3), 1– 41 (2017)
2.
Acquisti, A., Grossklags, J.: Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Secur. Priv. 3(1), 26–33. IEEE (2005)
3.
Acquisti, A., Grossklags, J.: What can behavioral economics teach us about privacy? In: Acquisti, A., Gritzalis, S., Lambrinoudakis, C., De Capitani di Vimercati, S. (eds.), Digital Privacy – Theories, Technologies and Practices, Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton, New York (2008)
4.
Adjerid, I., Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., Loewenstein, G.: Sleights of privacy: framing, disclosures, and the limits of transparency. In: Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2013, pp. 1–11, Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2013)
5.
6.
Alpers, S., Betz, S., Fritsch, A., Oberweis, A., Schiefer, G., Wagner, M.: Citizen Empowerment by a Technical Approach for Privacy Enforcement. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science (CLOSER 2018), vol. 1, pp. 589–595, SciTePress Funchal, Madeira, Portugal (2018)
7.
8.
Art. 29 WP, Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679, file:///C:/temp/20180413_article_29_wp_transparency_guidelines_7B894B16-B8B9-B044-ED400A6DBAA4FA60_51025.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2023
9.
10.
Barth, S., de Jong, M.D.T.: The privacy paradox – Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behaviour – a systematic literature review. Telemat. Inform. 34(7), 1038–1058 (2017)CrossRef
11.
Barth, S., de Jong, M.D.T., Junger, M., Hartel, P.H., Roppelt, J.C.: Putting the privacy paradox to the test: online privacy and security behaviours among users with technical knowledge, privacy awareness, and financial resources. Telemat. Inform. 41, 55–99. Elsevier (2019)
12.
Beck, H.: Behavioral Economics, 1st edn. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden (2014)CrossRef
13.
Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., Loewenstein, G.: Misplaced confidences: privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 4(3), 340–347 (2013)CrossRef
14.
Bufalieri, L., Morgia, M.L., Mei, A., Stefa,, J.: GDPR: when the right to access personal data becomes a threat. In: IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), pp. 75–83. IEEE, Beijing (2020)
15.
Bygrave, L.A, Tosoni, L.: Article 4(11). In: Kuner. C., et al. (eds.) The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, pp. 174–187, Oxford Academic (2020)
16.
Calo, M.R.: Against notice scepticism in privacy (and elsewhere). Notre Dame Law Rev. 87(3), 1027–1072 (2013)
17.
Camerer, C.F., Loewenstein, G.: Behavioral economics: past, present, future. In: Camerer, C.F., Loewenstein, G., Rabin, M. (eds.) Advances in Behavioral Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford (2004)
18.
Chang, D., Krupka, E.I., Adar, E., Acquisti, A.: Engineering information disclosure: norm shaping designs. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 587–597, Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2016)
19.
Chapin, J., Coleman, G.: Optimistic bias: what you think, what you know, or whom you know? N. Am. J. Psychol. 11(1), 121–132 (2009)
20.
Cho, H., Lee, J.-S., Chung, S.: Optimistic bias about online privacy risks: testing the moderating effects of perceived controllability and prior experience. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(5), 987–995 (2010)CrossRef
21.
Choi, H., Park, J., Jung, Y.: The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behaviour. Comput. Hum. Behav. 81, 42–51 (2018)CrossRef
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
de Terwangne, C.: Article 5. In: Kuner. C., et al.: (eds.) The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, pp. 309–320, Oxford Academic (2020)
30.
Dienst, S.: Notion of Consent. In: Rücker, D., Kugler, T. (eds.) New European General Data Protection Regulation. A Practitioners Guide, C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos, Baden-Baden (2018)
31.
32.
33.
Di Martino, M., Robyns, P., Weyts, W., Quax, P., Lamotte, W., Andries, K.: Personal information leakage by abusing the GDPR “right of access”. In: USENIX Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2019, pp. 371–386, USENIX, Santa Clara (2019)
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
Efroni, Z., Metzger, J., Mischau, L., Schirmbeck, M.: Privacy icons: a risk based approach to visualisation of data processing. Eur. Data Protect. Law Rev. 5(3), 352–366 (2019)CrossRef
39.
40.
41.
Gerber, N., Gerber, P., Volkamer, M.: Explaining the privacy paradox: a systematic review of literature investigating privacy attitude and behaviour. Comput. Secur. 77, 226–261. Elsevier (2018)
42.
Giese, J., Stabauer, M.: Factors that influence cookie acceptance. In: Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Siau, K. (eds.) HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13327, pp. 272–285. Springer, Heidelberg (2022)CrossRef
43.
Gluck, J., et al.: How short is too short? Implications of length and framing on the effectiveness of privacy notices. In: Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2016, pp. 321–340. USENIX, Colorado (2016)
44.
Gong, J., Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., Huang, Y., Feng, J., Zhang, W.: The framing effect in medical decision-making: a review of the literature. Psychol. Health Med. 18(6), 645–653 (2013)CrossRef
45.
46.
Hacker, P.: Datenprivatrecht, Moht Siebeck, Tübingen (2020)
47.
Hansen, M.: Marrying transparency tools with user-controlled identity management. In: Fischer-Hübner, S., Duquenoy, P., Zuccato, A., Martucci, L. (eds.) The Future of Identity in the Information Society. Privacy and Identity, vol. 262, pp. 199–220. IFIP— The International Federation for Information Processing, Springer, Boston (2008)
48.
Harbach, M., Hettig, M., Weber, S., Smith, M.: Using personal examples to improve risk communication for security & privacy decisions. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2647–2656, Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2014)
49.
Harkous, H., Fawaz, K., Lebret, R., Schaub, F., Shin, K.G., Aberer, K.: Polisis: automated analysis and presentation of privacy policies using deep learning. In: 27th USENIX Security Symposium, pp. 531–548, USENIX Association, Baltimore (2018)
50.
Haselton, M.G., Nettle, D., Andrews, P.W.: The evolution of cognitive bias. In: Buss, D.M. (ed.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, pp. 724–746. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken (2005)
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
Janssen, H., Cobbe, J., Singh, J.: Personal information management systems: a user centric privacy Utopia? Internet Policy Rev. 9(4), 1–25 (2020)CrossRef
56.
Jentzsch, N., Preibusch, S., Harasser, A.: Study on monetising privacy. An economic model for pricing personal information, ENISA, Heraklion (2012)
57.
Karegar, F., Pettersson, J.S., Fischer-Hübner, S.: The dilemma of user engagement in privacy notices: effects of interaction modes and habituation on user attention. ACM Trans. Priv. Secur. 23(1), 1–38. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020)
58.
Kelley, P.G., Cesca, L., Bresee, J., Cranor, L.F.: Standardizing privacy notices: an online study of the nutrition label approach. In: CHI 2010: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1573 – 1582. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2010)
59.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., Thaler, R.H.: Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econ. Perspect. 5(1), 193–206 (1991)CrossRef
60.
Knijnenburg, B., Cherry, D.: Comics as a medium for privacy notices. In: Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2016, pp. 321–340. USENIX, Colorado (2016)
61.
Laibson, D.: Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q. J. Econ. 112(2), 443–478 (1997)CrossRef
62.
Mahieu, R.I.P., Asghari, H., van Eeten, M.: Collectively exercising the right of access: individual effort, societal effect. Internet Policy Rev. 7(3), 1–23 (2018)CrossRef
63.
Marshal, J.A.R., Trimmer, P.C., Houston, A.I., McNamara, J.M.: On evolutionary explanations of cognitive biases. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28(8), 469–473 (2013)CrossRef
64.
65.
McDonald, A.M., Cranor, L.F.: The cost of reading privacy policies. J. Law Policy Inf. Soc. 4(3), 543–568. Ohio State University (2008)
66.
67.
Metzger, M.J.: Effects of site, vendor, and consumer characteristics on web site trust and disclosure. Commun. Res. 33(3), 115–205. Sage Publications, Washington (2006)
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
O’Donoghue, T., Rabin, M.: Choice and Procrastination. Quart. J. Econ. 116(1), 121–160 (2001)
73.
74.
75.
Pałka, P., Lippi, M.: Big data analytics, online terms of service and privacy policies. In: Vogl, R. (ed.) Research Handbook in Big Data Law, pp. 115–134. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, Northampton (2021)
76.
77.
Pollach, I.: What’s wrong with online privacy policies? Commun. ACM 50(9), 103–108 (2007)CrossRef
78.
79.
80.
Reidenberg, J.R., et al.: Disagreeable privacy policies: mismatches between meaning and users’ understanding. Berkeley Tech. Law J. 30(1), 39–88. University of California (2015)
81.
82.
83.
Rezaei, J.: Anchoring bias in eliciting attribute weights and values in multi-attribute decision-making. J. Decis. Syst. 30(1), 72–96. Taylor & Francis Group, London (2021)
84.
Schaub, F., Balebako, R., Durity, A.L., Cranor, L.F.: A design space for effective privacy notices. In: Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2015, pp. 1–17. USENIX, Colorado (2015)
85.
Schneider, J., Härting, N.: Wird der Datenschutz nun endlich internettauglich? Warum der Entwurf einer Datenschutz-Grundverordnung enttäuscht, ZD 2(5), 199–203 (2012)
86.
Schätzle, D.: Zum kopplungsverbot der datenschutz-grundverordnung - warum auch die dsgvo kein absolutes kopplungsverbot kennt. PinG 5, 203–208 (2017)
87.
Sent, E-.M.: Rationality and bounded rationality: you can’t have one without the other. Eur. J. Hist. Econ. Thought 25(6), 1370–1386. Taylor & Francis Group (2018)
88.
Simon, H.A.: Bounded Rationality. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds.), Utility and Probability, 1st edn, W.W. Nothon & Company, New York, London (1990)
89.
Tesfay, W.B., Hofmann, P., Nakamura, T., Kiyomoto. S., Serna, J.: PrivacyGuide: towards an implementation of the EU GDPR on internet privacy policy evaluation. In: IWSPA 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Workshop on Security and Privacy Analytics, pp. 15–21. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2018)
90.
Thibault, J.: Evaluating the Impact of the GDPR’s Data Subject Rights on Businesses, Sanford School Master of Public Policy (MPP) Program Master’s Projects (2021)
91.
Tian, X., Chen, L., Zhang, X.: The role of privacy fatigue in privacy paradox: a PSM and heterogeneity analysis. Appl. Sci. 12(19), 1–19 (2022)CrossRef
92.
93.
Urban, T., Tatang, D., Degeling, M., Holz, T., Pohlmann, N.: A study on subject data access in online advertising after the GDPR. In: Pérez-Solà, C., Navarro-Arribas, G., Biryukov, A., Garcia-Alfaro, J. (eds.) DPM/CBT -2019. LNCS, vol. 11737, pp. 61–79. Springer, Cham (2019). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-31500-9_​5CrossRef
94.
95.
Utz, C., Degeling, M., Fahl, S., Schaub, F., Holz.: (Un)informed consent: studying GDPR consent notices in the field. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 973–990, Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019)
96.
97.
98.
Voigt, P., von dem Bussche, A.: The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). A Practival Guide, 1st (edn.) C.H. Beck, München (2017)
99.
Waldman, A.E.: Cognitive biases, dark patterns, and the ‘privacy paradox.’ Curr. Opin. Psychol. 31, 105–109 (2020)CrossRef
100.
Weinmann, M., Schneider, C., Brocke, J.V.: Digital nudging - guiding judgment and decision-making in digital choice environments. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 58, 433–436 (2016)CrossRef
101.
Zikesch, P., Sörup, T.: Der Auskunftsanspruch nach Art. 15 DS-GVO. Reichweite und Begrenzung, Zeitschrift für Datenschutz 6, pp. 239–245 (2019)
102.
Zanfir-Fortuna, G.: Article 14. In: Kuner, C., et al. (eds.) The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, pp. 434–448, Oxford Academic (2020)
103.
Zimmeck, S., et al.: MAPS: scaling privacy compliance analysis to a million apps. Proc. Priv. Enhanc. Technol. 2019(3), 66–86. Sciendo (2019)
104.
Zimmer, D.: Streamingplattformen im Datenschutz-Test: Wie transparent informieren Onlineanbieter von Musik und Videos ihre Kunden über die Verwendung ihrer Daten? AK Wien, Wien (2020)
Metadaten
Titel
Enhancing Transparency Through Personal Information Management Systems: Current State of Service Offerings and Considerations for Further Advancements
verfasst von
Janina Rochon
Copyright-Jahr
2024
Buch
Privacy and Identity Management. Sharing in a Digital World

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-57977-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-57978-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2024

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57978-3_15

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise