Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Successfully developing new products is critical to an entrepreneurial firm’s continued success. Based on the resource management model, this study aims to answer the key research question: how entrepreneurial firms leverage network competence and technological capability to enhance their new product development (NPD) performance in a turbulent environment. Using data collected from 134 entrepreneurial firms in China, we investigate the performance effects of network competence and technological capability, and the moderating effects of technological turbulence and market turbulence. Our findings show that network competence has a positive impact on NPD performance and technological capability plays a mediating role between network competence and NPD performance. Technological turbulence enhances the performance effects of network competence and technological capability; market turbulence advances the performance effect of network competence, but fails to exert significant negative impact on that of technological capability. We discuss managerial implications of our findings and offer directions for future research.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Afuah, A. 2002. Mapping technological capabilities into product markets and competitive advantage: The case of cholesterol drugs. Strategic Management Journal, 23(2): 171–179. CrossRef
Ahlstrom, D. 2010. Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 10–23.
Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2002. An institutional perspective on the role of culture in shaping strategic actions by technology-focused entrepreneurial firms in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4): 53–69.
Akgün, A. E., & Lynn, G. S. 2002. Antecedents and consequences of team stability on new product development performance. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 19: 263–286.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411–423. CrossRef
Anderson, P., & Tushman, M.L. 1990. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 604–633.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120. CrossRef
Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. 2001. The resource-based view: Origins and implications. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.). Handbook of strategic management: 124–188. Oxford: Blackwell.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173–1182. CrossRef
Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. 2008. Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1): 1–14.
Calantone, R., Garcia, R., & Dröge, C. 2003. The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2): 90–103. CrossRef
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. 2003. The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128–152. CrossRef
Deng, Z. L., Hofman, P. S., & Newman, A. 2013. Ownership concentration and product innovation in Chinese private SMEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3): 717–734. CrossRef
Eisenhardt, KM & Martin, JA. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11): 1105–1121.
Fransman, M. 1989. Conceptualizing technological change in the third world in the 1980s: An interpretive survey. Journal of Development Studies, 21(4): 572–652. CrossRef
Grant, A.M. 2013. Give and take: A revolutionary approach to success. New York: Viking.
Grant, R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3): 114–135. CrossRef
Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. C., & Black, W. C. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. 1998. Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link?. Journal of Marketing, 62(10): 30–45. CrossRef
Hsu, Y. H., & Fang, W. C. 2009. Intellectual capital and new product development performance: The mediating role of organizational learning capability. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76: 664–677. CrossRef
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. 1993. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3): 53–70. CrossRef
Jeong, I., Pae, J. H., & Zhou, D. S. 2006. Antecedents and consequences of the strategic orientations in new product development: The case of Chinese manufacturers. Industrial Marketing Management, 35: 348–358. CrossRef
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54: 1–18. CrossRef
Lavie, D. 2006. Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change. Academy of Management Review, 31(1): 153–174. CrossRef
Li, C. R., Chu, C. P., & Lin, C. J. 2010. The contingent value of exploratory and exploitative learning for new product development performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 39: 1186–1197. CrossRef
Lin, P. 2009. The regulating role of environmental turbulence: An empirical study of the relationship between dynamic capabilities and performance. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Sciences), 16(6): 66–77.
Lynn, G. S., Abel, K. D., Valentine, W. S., & Wright, R. C. 1999. Key factors in increasing speed to market and improving new product success rates. Industrial Marketing Management, 28: 320–329.
Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psyochomatric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ortega, M. J. R. 2010. Competitive strategies and firm performance: Technological capabilities’ moderating roles. Journal of Business Research, 63: 1273–1281. CrossRef
Pangarkar, N., & Wu, J. 2013. Alliance formation, partner diversity, and performance of Singapore startups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3): 791–807. CrossRef
Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 28: 275–296.
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. 2001. Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research?. Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 22–40. CrossRef
Ritter, T. 1999. The networking company: Antecedents for coping with relationships and networks effectively. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5): 467–479. CrossRef
Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. 2003. Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. Journal of Business Research, 56: 745–755. CrossRef
Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. 2004. The impact of a company’s business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success. Journal of Business Research, 57: 548–556. CrossRef
Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. 2003. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 27: 339–358.
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. 2007. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1): 273–292. CrossRef
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. 1994. Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation performance relationship?. Journal of Marketing, 58(1): 46–55. CrossRef
Song, M., & Di Benedetto, C. A. 2008. Supplier’s involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. Journal of Operations Management, 26: 1–22. CrossRef
Song, M., Dröge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. 2005. Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3): 259–276. CrossRef
Song, X. M., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Schmidt, J. B. 1997. The pole of marketing in developing successful new products in South Korea and Taiwan. Journal of International Marketing, 5(3): 47–69.
Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. 1997. A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States. Journal of Marketing, 61(2): 1–18. CrossRef
Su, Z. F., Peng, J. S., Shen, H., & Xiao, T. 2013. Technological capability, marketing capability, and firm performance in turbulent conditions. Management and Organization Review, 9: 115–137. CrossRef
Tsai, K. H. 2004. The impact of technological capability on firm performance in Taiwan’s electronics industry. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15(2): 183–195. CrossRef
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509–533. CrossRef
Wei, J. 2000. Development and review of the research on the enterprise’s technological capability. Science Management Research, 5: 20–23.
Zahra, S., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185–203.
Zhan, W., & Chen, R. 2013. Dynamic capability and IJV performance: The effect of exploitation and exploration capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(2): 601–632. CrossRef
Zhao, X. Q., & Xu, Q. R. 2001. Evaluation of technological capability: Theory and method. Science of Science and Management of S&T, 4: 64–67.
Zhao, X. Q., & Xu, Q. R. 2006. Research on spiral process of technological capability’s accumulative path. Science Research Management, 1: 40–46.
Zhou, K. Z. 2006. Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: The case of China. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3): 394–402.
- Entrepreneurial firms’ network competence, technological capability, and new product development performance
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta