Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
We investigate the survival performance of new technology-based firms (NTBFs) over the business cycle and compare them against other entrepreneurial firms. Our data comprise the entire population of entrepreneurial firms entering the Swedish economy from 1991 to 2002, which we follow until 2007. Discrete-time duration models are employed to investigate whether the business cycle impacts differently on the survival likelihood of NTBFs vis-à-vis other entrepreneurial firms. Our main findings are three. First, NTBFs generally experience a lower hazard rate compared to other entrepreneurial firms, which is interpreted as a sign of their high ‘quality.’ Second, all entrepreneurial firms are sensitive to and follow a pro-cyclical pattern of survival likelihood over the business cycle. Three, when comparing NTBFs with the broader group of other entrepreneurial firms, we find that NTBFs are more sensitive to business cycle fluctuations. The above results come with a qualification, though. The sensitivity during the business cycle mainly pertains to self-employed NTBFs. Also, NTBFs’ higher survivability is only linked to not being characterized as self-employed.
Audretsch, D., & Acs, Z. (1994). New-firm startups, technology, and macroeconomic fluctuations. Small Business Economics, 6(6): 439-449.
Agarwal, R., & Gort, M. (2002). Firm and product life cycles and firm survival. American Economic Review, 92(2), 184–190. CrossRef
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323–351. CrossRef
Allison, P. D. (1982). Discrete-time method for the analysis of event histories. Sociological Methodology, 13(1982), 61–98. CrossRef
Allison, P.D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Beverly Hills, California: SAGE Publications.
Andersson, M., & Klepper, S. (2013). Characteristics and performance of new firms and spinoffs in Sweden. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(1), 245–280. CrossRef
Andersson, P., & Wadensjö, E. (2007). Do the unemployed become successful entrepreneurs? International Journal of Manpower, 28(7), 604–626. CrossRef
Arrighetti, A., & Vivarelli, M. (1999). The role of innovation in the postentry performance of new small firms: Evidence from Italy. Southern Economic Journal, 65(4), 927–939.
Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic-implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(80), 155–173. CrossRef
Åstebro, T. (2003). The return to independent invention: Evidence of unrealistic optimism, risk seeking or skewness loving?*. The Economic Journal, 113(484), 226–239. CrossRef
Audretsch, D. B. (1991). New-firm survival and the technological regime. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3), 441–450. CrossRef
Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation, growth and survival. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 441–457. CrossRef
Audretsch, D. B. (1997). Technological regimes, industrial demography and the evolution of industrial structures. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 49–82. CrossRef
Audretsch, D. B., Houweling, P., & Thurik, A. R. (2000). Firm survival in the Netherlands. Review of Industrial Organization, 16(1), 1–11. CrossRef
Autio, E., & Parhankangas, A. (1998). Employment generation potential of new, technology-based firms during a recessionary period: The case of Finland. Small Business Economics, 11(2), 113–123. CrossRef
Bates, T. (1990). Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(4), 551–559. CrossRef
Bates, T. (2005). Analysis of young, small firms that have closed: Delineating successful from unsuccessful closures. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 343–358. CrossRef
Boden, R. J., & Nucci, A. R. (2000). On the survival prospects of men’s and women’s new business ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(4), 347–362. CrossRef
Boeri, T., & Bellmann, L. (1995). Post-entry behaviour and the cycle: Evidence from Germany. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 483–500. CrossRef
Box, M. (2008). The death of firms: Exploring the effects of environment and birth cohort on firm survival in Sweden. Small Business Economics, 31(4), 379–393. CrossRef
Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2010). The missing link: Knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 105–125. CrossRef
Carrasco, R. (1999). Transitions to and from self-employment in Spain: An empirical analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(3), 315–341. CrossRef
Caves, R. E. (1998). Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(4), 1947–1982.
Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2006). Survivor: The role of innovation in firms’ survival. Research Policy, 35(5), 626–641. CrossRef
Cleves, M., Gutierrez, R.G., Gould, W., & Marchenko, Y. (2010). An introduction to survival analysis using stata. College Station, Texas: Stata Press.
Colombo, M. G., Delmastro, M., & Grilli, L. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ human capital and the start-up size of new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8–9), 1183–1211. CrossRef
Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795–816. CrossRef
Dunne, P., & Hughes, A. (1994). Age, size, growth and survival: UK companies in the 1980s. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(2), 115–140. CrossRef
Ejermo, O. (2011). Svenska uppfinnare—nytt datamaterial och ny inblick i innovationsprocessen [Swedish inventors—new data and insights into the innovation process]. Working paper. Stockholm: Entreprenörskapsforum.
Ejermo, O. (2012). Gammal uppfinner bäst – lärosätenas effekter på patentering via anställda och studenter [Old invents best - the effects of higher education institutions on patenting via employees and students]. Ekonomisk Debatt, 40(3), 37–51.
Eriksson, T., & Kuhn, J. M. (2006). Firm spin-offs in Denmark 1981–2000—patterns of entry and exit. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(5), 1021–1040. CrossRef
European Patent Office (2012). Worldwide Patent Statistics Database (PATSTAT). E.P.Office. Munich.
Eurostat (2011). High technology and knowledge-intensive sectors. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_SDDS/Annexes/hrst_st_esms_an9.pdf.
Evans, D. S. (1987). The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 567–581. CrossRef
Félix, E. G. S., Pires, C. P., & Gulamhussen, M. A. (2007). The determinants of venture capital in Europe—Evidence across countries. Journal of Financial Services Research, 44(3), 1–21.
Fotopoulos, G., & Louri, H. (2000). Determinants of hazard confronting new entry: Does financial structure matter? Review of Industrial Organization, 17(3), 285–300. CrossRef
Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2004). Effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38(8), 961–975. CrossRef
Geroski, P. (1995). What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 421–440. CrossRef
Gompers, P.A., & Lerner, J. (1998). What Drives Venture Capital Fundraising? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics, 149–192.
Hall, B. H. (1987). The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the US manufacturing sector. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 583–606. CrossRef
Headd, B. (2003). Redefining business success: Distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics, 21(1), 51–61. CrossRef
Jaffe, A. (1998). The importance of “spillovers” in the policy mission of the advance technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer, 23(2), 11–19. CrossRef
Jeng, L. A., & Wells, P. C. (2000). The determinants of venture capital funding: Evidence across countries. Journal of corporate Finance, 6(3), 241–289. CrossRef
Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica, 50(3), 649–670. CrossRef
Jovanovic, B., & MacDonald, G. M. (1994). The life cycle of a competitive industry. Journal of Political Economy, 102(2), 322–347. CrossRef
Jung, T., & Ejermo, O. (2013). Demographic patterns and trends in patenting: Gender, age, and education of inventors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Available online on Oct 2.
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. CrossRef
Klepper, S. (1996). Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 562–583.
Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. The American Economic Review, 81(1), 114–132.
Licht, G., & Nerlinger, E. (1998). New technology-based firms in Germany: A survey of the recent evidence. Research Policy, 26(9), 1005–1022. CrossRef
Lindholm Dahlstrand, Å. (1997). Entrepreneurial spin-off enterprises in Göteborg, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 5, 331–344. CrossRef
Lucas, R. E, Jr. (1978). On the size distribution of business firms. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 508–523. CrossRef
Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1999). Technological entry, exit and survival: an empirical analysis of patent data. Research Policy, 28(6), 643–660. CrossRef
Mata, J., Portugal, P., & Guimarães, P. (1995). The survival of new plants: Start-up conditions and post-entry evolution. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 459–481. CrossRef
Murray, F. (2004). The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy, 33(4), 643–659. CrossRef
Pakes, A., & Ericson, R. (1998). Empirical implications of alternative models of firm dynamics. Journal of Economic Theory, 79(1), 1–45. CrossRef
Parker, S.C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pfeiffer, F., & Reize, F. (2000). Business start-ups by the unemployed: An econometric analysis based on firm data. Labour Economics, 7(5), 629–663. CrossRef
Rickne, A., & Jacobsson, S. (1999). New technology-based firms in Sweden: A study of their direct impact on industrial renewal. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(3), 197–223. CrossRef
Romain, A., & Van Pottelsberghe, B. (2004). The determinants of venture capital: A panel data analysis of 16 OECD countries. Centre Emile Bernheim, Research Institute in Management Science, Working Paper (04/015).
Romer, P. M. (1987). Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 77(2), 56–72.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technical change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71–102. CrossRef
Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and the process of firms’ entry, survival and growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(3), 455–488. CrossRef
Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schön, L. (2010). Sweden‘s road to modernity. Stockholm: An economic history.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Transaction Publishers.
Shane, S. (2001). Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science, 47(2), 205–220. CrossRef
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (1993). It’s about time: Using discrete-time survival analysis to study duration and the timing of events. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 18(2), 155–195. CrossRef
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence: modeling change and event occurrence. USA: Oxford University Press.
Storey, D. J., & Tether, B. S. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European Union: An introduction. Research Policy, 26(9), 933–946. CrossRef
Utterback, J. M., & Suárez, F. F. (1993). Innovation, competition, and industry structure. Research Policy, 22(1), 1–21. CrossRef
Vivarelli, M., & Audretsch, D. (1998). The link between the entry decision and post-entry performance: Evidence from Italy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3), 485–500. CrossRef
Zacharakis, A. L., Bygrave, W. D., & Shepherd, D. A. (2000). Global entrepreneurship monitor. United States of America: National Entrepreneurship Assessment.
Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. The American Economic Review, 88(1), 290–306.
- Entrepreneurship and survival over the business cycle: how do new technology-based firms differ?
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia