Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Despite the rising interest in environmental strategies, few studies have examined how managerial cognition of such strategies influences actual innovation capability development. Taking a managerial cognition perspective, this study investigates how managers’ perceptions of institutional pressures relate to their focus on proactive environmental strategy, which in turn affects firms’ realized innovation capability. The findings from a primary survey and three secondary datasets of publicly listed companies in China reveal that managers’ perceived business and social pressures are positively associated with their focus on proactive environmental strategy, which consequently fosters innovation capability development. Moreover, state ownership and government administrative control weaken the impact of managerial focus on proactive environmental strategy on innovation capability. These findings have important implications for how managerial cognition supports environmental strategy and organizational capability building under the influence of institutional pressures and government intervention.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acqusitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220. CrossRef
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Alt, E., Díez-de-Castro, E., & Lloréns-Montes, F. (2015). Linking employee stakeholders to environmental performance: The role of proactive environmental strategies and shared vision. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 167–181. CrossRef
Aragón-Correa, J. A. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 556–567. CrossRef
Banerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S., & Kashyap, R. K. (2003). Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 106–122. CrossRef
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. CrossRef
Berrone, P., Fosfuri, A., & Gelabert, L. (2017). Does greenwashing pay off? Understanding the relationship between environmental actions and environmental legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 363–379. CrossRef
Berrone, P., Fosfuri, A., Gelabert, L., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2013). Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 891–909. CrossRef
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453. CrossRef
Chang, C.-H. (2011). The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: The mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 361–370. CrossRef
Chen, S., Sun, Z., Tang, S., & Wu, D. (2011). Government intervention and investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2), 259–271. CrossRef
Chen, Y., Tang, G., Jin, J., Li, J., & Paillé, P. (2015). Linking market orientation and environmental performance: The influence of environmental strategy, employee’s environmental involvement, and environmental product quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 479–500. CrossRef
Cheng, Z., Wang, F., Keung, C., & Bai, Y. (2017). Will corporate political connection influence the environmental information disclosure level? Based on the panel data of A-shares from listed companies in Shanghai stock market. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 9–221. CrossRef
Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663–680. CrossRef
Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1072–1094. CrossRef
Dixon-Fowler, H., Slater, D., Johnson, J., Ellstrand, A., & Romi, A. (2013). Beyond ‘Does it pay to be green?’ A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP-CFP Relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 353–366. CrossRef
Dupire, M., & M’Zali, B. (2016). CSR strategies in response to competitive pressures. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2981-x.
Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. (2013). Cognition and capabilities: A multi-level perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 295–340. CrossRef
Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between politically connected and nonconnected firms: A cross-country analysis. Financial Management, 39(3), 905–928. CrossRef
Faller, C. M., & zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. (2016). Does equity ownership matter for corporate social responsibility? A literature review of theories and recent empirical findings. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3122-x.
Fan, G., Wang, X., & Zhu, H. (2011). The report on the relative process of marketization of regions in China. Beijing: The Economic Science Press. (in Chinese).
Fay, M., Wang, J. Z., Draugelis, G., & Deichmann, U. (2014). Role of green governance in achieving sustainable urbanization in China. China and World Economy, 22(5), 19–36. CrossRef
Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758–781. CrossRef
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. CrossRef
Gao, Y., & Hafsi, T. (2015). Government intervention, peers’ giving and corporate philanthropy: Evidence from Chinese private SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 433–447. CrossRef
Gavetti, G. (2005). Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organization Science, 16(6), 599–617. CrossRef
Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113–137. CrossRef
Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448. CrossRef
Gröschl, S., Gabaldón, P., & Hahn, T. (2017). The co-evolution of leaders’ cognitive complexity and corporate sustainability: The case of the CEO of Puma. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3508-4.
Hao, Y., & Lu, J. (2017). The impact of government intervention on corporate investment allocations and efficiency: Evidence from China. Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12188.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.
Huang, J.-W., & Li, Y.-H. (2017). Green innovation and performance: The view of organizational capability and social reciprocity. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 309–324. CrossRef
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., & Slater, S. F. (2005). Market orientation and performance: An integration of disparate approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1173–1181. CrossRef
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42–54. CrossRef
Kaplan, S. (2011). Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3), 665–695. CrossRef
Kim, H., Park, K., & Ryu, D. (2017). Corporate environmental pesponsibility: A legal origins perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 381–402. CrossRef
Laamanen, T., & Wallin, J. (2009). Cognitive dynamics of capability development paths. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 950–981. CrossRef
Li, W., & Lu, X. (2016). Institutional interest, ownership type, and environmental capital expenditures: Evidence from the most polluting Chinese listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 459–476. CrossRef
Li, J., Xia, J., & Zajac, E. J. (2018). On the duality of political and economic stakeholder influence on firm innovation performance: Theory and evidence from Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 193–216. CrossRef
Li, W., & Zhang, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political interference: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 631–645. CrossRef
Lin, H. (2012). Cross-sector alliances for corporate social responsibility partner heterogeneity moderates environmental strategy outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 219–229. CrossRef
Liu, Y., Guo, J., & Chi, N. (2015). The antecedents and performance consequences of proactive environmental strategy: A meta-analytic review of national contingency. Management and Organization Review, 11(3), 521–557. CrossRef
Marquis, C., Jackson, S. E., & Li, Y. (2015). Building sustainable organizations in China. Management and Organization Review, 11(3), 427–440. CrossRef
Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Ozanne, L. (2010). The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm’s performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 279–298. CrossRef
Moon, J., & Shen, X. (2010). CSR in China research: Salience, focus and nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 613–629. CrossRef
Murillo-Luna, J. L., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2008). Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders’ pressure approach. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11), 1225–1240. CrossRef
Pedersen, E. R. G., Gwozdz, W., & Hvass, K. K. (2016). Exploring the relationship between business model innovation, corporate sustainability, and organisational values within the fashion industry. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3044-7.
Peng, Y. S., & Lin, S. S. (2008). Local responsiveness pressure, subsidiary resources, green management adoption and subsidiary’s performance: Evidence from Taiwanese manufactures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1), 199–212. CrossRef
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. CrossRef
Rouleau, L. (2005). Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1413–1441. CrossRef
Sadovnikova, A., & Pujari, A. (2017). The effect of green partnerships on firm value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(2), 251–267. CrossRef
Scott, R. (1995). Institutions and organizations: Foundations for organizational science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Shao, Y., Hernández, R., & Liu, P. (2015). Government intervention and corporate policies: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1205–1215. CrossRef
Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159–180. CrossRef
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729–753. CrossRef
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shu, C., Zhou, K., Xiao, Y., & Gao, S. (2016). How green management influences product innovation in China: The role of institutional benefits. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(3), 471–485. CrossRef
Walker, K., Ni, N., & Huo, W. (2014). Is the red dragon green? An examination of the antecedents and consequences of environmental proactivity in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 27–43. CrossRef
Wang, C. P., & Xu, H. G. (2011). Government intervention in investment by Chinese listed companies that have diversified into tourism. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1371–1380. CrossRef
Wei, Z., Shen, H., Zhou, K., & Li, J. (2017). How does environmental corporate social responsibility matter in a dysfunctional institutional environment? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 209–223. CrossRef
Wijethilake, C., Munir, R., & Appuhami, R. (2016). Environmental innovation strategy and organizational performance: Enabling and controlling uses of management control systems. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3259-7.
Xu, E., & Zhang, H. (2008). The impact of state shares on corporate innovation strategy and performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(3), 473–487. CrossRef
Yayavaram, S., & Chen, W.-R. (2015). Changes in firm knowledge couplings and firm innovation performance: The moderating role of technological complexity. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 377–396. CrossRef
Zhao, M. (2012). CSR-based political legitimacy strategy: Managing the state by doing good in China and Russia. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 439–460. CrossRef
Zhou, K. Z., Gao, G. Y., & Zhao, H. (2017). State ownership and firm innovation in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2), 375–404. CrossRef
Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090–1102. CrossRef
- Environmental Strategy, Institutional Force, and Innovation Capability: A Managerial Cognition Perspective
Aric Xu Wang
Kevin Zheng Zhou
- Springer Netherlands
Journal of Business Ethics
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta