Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Scheduling 3/2015

01.06.2015 | Erratum

Erratum to: A survey on offline scheduling with rejection

verfasst von: Dvir Shabtay, Nufar Gaspar, Moshe Kaspi

Erschienen in: Journal of Scheduling | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

Below, we list four oversights that were found in our paper.
1.
The result appearing in Theorem 8 (page 10) was presented earlier (in a slightly different form) by Koulamas (2011). We overlooked this result, and want to give him the proper credit for it.
 
2.
On page 4, we include the following statement: “if \(F_{1}\) is indeed the dominant criterion then using the lexicographical approach will yield a non-balanced solution for which \(A=\emptyset \) and \(\overline{A}=J\).” However, this is not always the case. Consider, for example, an instance of the \(1|rej|\epsilon (F_{1},RC)\) problem with \(F_{1}\in \{T_{\max },\varSigma T_{j},\varSigma U_{j}\}\), where it is possible to schedule the entire set of jobs (\(J\)) such that all jobs are non-tardy, i.e., such that \(T_{\max }=0\). For such an instance, using the lexicographical approach with \(F_{1}\) being the dominant criterion will yield a solution in which \(A=J\) and \(\overline{A}=\emptyset \), thereby contradicting our statement.
 
3.
The value of the positional penalty for \(\delta _{1}\sum \sum \left| W_{i}-W_{j}\right| +\delta _{2}\sum W_{j}\) in Table 4 (page 14) should be replaced by \(\xi _{j}(k)=\delta _{1}(j-1)(k-j+1)+\delta _{2}(j-1)\).
 
4.
On page 16, we mention that Steiner and Zhang (2011) present a pseudo-polynomial time optimization algorithm to solve the \(1|rej|\sum _{J_{j}\in A}T_{j}+RC\) problem in \(O(n^{4}(\sum _{j=1}^{n}p_{j} )^{3})\) time, which further implies that this algorithm can serve as an \(O(n^{7})\) time algorithm to solve the special case of equal processing times. However, we failed to observe that Steiner and Zhang provided a faster \(O(n^{2})\) time optimization algorithm to solve this special case.
 

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Koulamas, C. (2011). A unified solution approach for the due date assignment problem with tardy jobs. International Journal of Production Economics, 132, 292–295.CrossRef Koulamas, C. (2011). A unified solution approach for the due date assignment problem with tardy jobs. International Journal of Production Economics, 132, 292–295.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Steiner, G., & Zhang, R. (2011). Revised delivery-time quotation in scheduling with tardiness penalties. Operations Research, 59, 1504–1511.CrossRef Steiner, G., & Zhang, R. (2011). Revised delivery-time quotation in scheduling with tardiness penalties. Operations Research, 59, 1504–1511.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Erratum to: A survey on offline scheduling with rejection
verfasst von
Dvir Shabtay
Nufar Gaspar
Moshe Kaspi
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Scheduling / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1094-6136
Elektronische ISSN: 1099-1425
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-015-0417-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Journal of Scheduling 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe