nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

12. Establishment and Development of Benchmark Family (P21)

verfasst von : Zhiguang Cheng, Norio Takahashi (deceased), Behzad Forghani, Lanrong Liu

Erschienen in: Modeling and Application of Electromagnetic and Thermal Field in Electrical Engineering

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Testing Electromagnetic Analysis Methods (TEAM) Problem 21 (P21) was proposed by the author in November 1993 based on the industrial background of modeling stray-field loss in electrical equipment. Now, it has been extended to a TEAM Benchmark Family, including 5 sets of 16 member models, approved by the International Compumag Society (ICS). In the modeling and simulation of engineering electromagnetic field problems, it is necessary to properly deal with the nonlinear, anisotropic, and hysteretic behaviors of materials and components, multiply connected regions, multi-scale configurations, skin effect, and deep magnetic saturation behavior, etc., under standard (e.g., the excitation with sinusoidal waveform) and non-standard excitation conditions (e.g., when the excitation waveform contains higher harmonics and/or DC components). The confident validation of the modeling and simulation based on well-established benchmark models is certainly essential and challenging. This chapter briefly outlines the Problem 21-related benchmarking activities, the basic characteristics and the upgrade of the Problem 21 Family, the research on measurement and analysis method, and the model-based results. The significance of extending the scope of TEAM, establishing more realistic and challenging benchmark models, in combination with advanced material modeling, is emphasized. Further co-research projects related to Problem 21 Family are also proposed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Measurement and Prediction of Magnetic Property of GO Silicon Steel Under Non-standard Excitation Conditions

Nächstes Kapitel Analysis and Validation of Additional Iron Loss Based on Benchmark Models

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

TEAM Workshops: Test problems(ed. by L. R. Turner), April 1988.

L. R. Turner, “New directions for the TEAM Workshops,” Verification of Software for 3-D Electromagnetic Field Analysis,” International Academic Publishers, Proc. of Asian TEAM Workshop (ed by Z. Cheng, K. Jiang, and N. Takahashi), Qiandaohu, China, 1992, pp. 6–15.

N. Ida, “The TEAM Workshops: fourth round,” Proc. of TEAM Workshop on computation of applied electromagnetics in materials, 30 Jan., 1993, pp. 9–12.

Proc. of European TEAM Workshop and international seminar on electromagnetic field analysis, (ed. by Y. Crutzen, N. J. Diserens, C. R. I. Emson, and D. Rodger), Oxford, England, pp. 23–25, April 1990.

Proc. of TEAM Workshop-Qiandaohu, China(ed. by Z. Cheng, K. Jiang and N. Takahashi), 1992.

Proc. of ICEF-1996, Electromagnetic Field Problems and Application (ed. by K. Zhou), International Academic Publishers, 1997.

Proc. of ICEF-2000, Electromagnetic Field Problems and Application (ed. by W. Yan), 2001.

C. W. Trowbridge, “The future of TEAM: some personal thoughts(invited talk),” TEAM Workshop, Chengde, September 2000.

D. Xie and R. Tang, “Development of Computational Electromagnetics in China,” IEEE Trans. on Magn., vo.42, no.4, 2005, pp. 509–514.

10.

Proc. of ICEF-2008, Electromagnetic Field Problems and Application-II, vol.22(ed. by M. Chen, S. Yang, D. Xiao and X. Zhang),TSI Press Series, USA, 2008, pp. 357–366.

11.

Z. Cheng, Q. Hu, S. Gao, Z. Liu, C. Ye, M. Wu, J. Wang and H. Zhu, “An engineering-oriented loss model (Problem 21),” Proc. of the International TEAM Workshop, Miami, 1993, pp. 137–143.

12.

T. Nakata and K. Muramutsu, “Has the 3D magnetic field analysis come into practical application?” (invited), CBMAG, 1995, pp. 7–12.

13.

S. Gao, M. Wu, H. He, J. Wang, Z. Liu, Q. Hu and Z. Cheng, “Problem 21⁺: slotted non-magnetic steel plate driven by Problem 21’s source,” Proc. of the ICEF & TEAM Workshop, Yichang, 1996,pp. 366–370.

14.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, S. Gao and T. Sakura, “Loss analysis based on revised version of TEAM Problem 21,” Presented by N. Takahashi at TEAM-Sapporo, 1999.

15.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, Q. Hu and C. Fan, “TEAM-based benchmark family: Problem 21/21⁺/21^*,” Presented by Z. Cheng at 4^th IEE CEM, UK, 2002.

16.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, S. Yan, T. Asano, Q. Hu and X. Ren, “Proposal of Problem 21-based shielding model (Problem 21^’),” Proc. of TEAM Workshop, Shenyang, 2005, pp. 15–20.

17.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, S. Liu, S. Yang, C. Fan, Qi. Hu, L. Liu, M. Guo, and J. Zhang, “Benchmarking-based approach to engineering stray-field loss problems,” presented by S. Liu at ACES-2006, Miami, USA.

18.

O. Biro and K. Preis, “Solution of TEAM benchmark problem 21 (an engineering-oriented loss model),” Proceeding of the International TEAM Workshop, Aix-Les-Bains, 1994, pp. 25–27.

19.

Z. Cheng, Q. Hu, S. Gao, Z. Liu, C. Ye and M. Wu, “On the benchmark solution of a typical engineering loss problem,” 10^th Annual Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics, Monterey, 1994, pp. 335–342.

20.

Z. Cheng, Q. Hu, S. Gao, Z. Liu, C. Ye and M. Wu, “Supplementary report on problem 21,” Proc. of the International TEAM Workshop, Aix-Les-Bains, France, 1994, pp. 37–47.

21.

T. Nakata, N. Takahashi, K. Fujiwara, H. Ohashi and H. Zhu, “Analysis of an engineering-oriented loss model(Problem 21),” Proc. of the TEAM Workshop, Seoul, 1994, pp. 51–55.

22.

T. Nakata, N. Takahashi, K. Fujiwara, H. Ohashi and H. Zhu, “Analysis of flux and eddy current distribution of 3-D stray-field lossmodel(Problem 21),” Proc. of the International TEAM Workshop, Aix-Les-Bains, 1994, pp. 21–24.

23.

O. Biro, K. Pries, and K. R. Richter, “Various FEM formulation for the calculation of the calculation of transient 3D eddy currents in nonlinear media,” IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol.31, no.3, 1995, pp. 1307–1312.

24.

J.P. Bastos, N. Ida, R.C. Mesquita and J. Hector, “Problem 21: solution using edge elements and a vector potential A,” Proc. of the International TEAM Workshop, Berlin,1995, pp. 71–75.

25.

Z. Cheng, Q. Hu, S. Gao, Z. Liu and M. Wu, “Stray-field loss analysis and measurement (Problem 21),” Proc. of the International TEAM Workshop, Berlin, 1995, pp. 62–66.

26.

N. Takahashi, T. Nakata, K. Fujiwara, K. Muramatsu and T. Torii, “Time periodic finite element analysis of Problem 21,” Proc. of the International TEAM Workshop, Berlin, 1995, pp. 56–61.

27.

J. Gu, W. Yan and Q. Yang, “Computation of flux and eddy current distributions of an engineering-oriented loss model (Problem 21),” Proc. of the International TEAM Workshop, Berlin, 1995, pp. 52–55.

28.

L. Li, X. Cui and J. Yuan, “Numerical calculation of 3D eddy current loss and magnetic field(Problem 21),” Proc. of the International TEAM Workshop, Berlin, 1995, 67–70.

29.

N. Takhashi, K. Fujiwara, and T. Torill, “Analysis of eddy current in slotted plate utilizing crack element,” Electromagnetic field problems and applications (ed. by Zhou Keding), ICEF, 1996, pp. 371–375.

30.

Z. Cheng, S. Gao, Q. Hu, Z. Liu, and M. Wu, “Summary of results for Problem 21(3-D stray-field Loss model),” Proceedings of the international TEAM Workshop, Berlin, July 14,1995, pp. 76–83.

31.

J. Fetzer, S. Kurz, and G. Lehner, “The solution of TEAM Workshop Problem 21 using BEM-FEM coupling,” Proc. of the International TEAM Workshop, Okayama, 1996, pp. 19–22.

32.

C. Golavanov, Y. Marechal and G. Meunir, “Solution of TEAM Workshop problem 21,” Proc. of the International TEAM Workshop, Okayama, 1996, pp. 26–30.

33.

N. Takahashi, K. Fujiwara, and T. Torii, “Analysis of eddy current in slotted plate utilizing crack element,” Proc. of TEAM Workshop, Yichang, Electromagnetic Field Problems and Application (ed. by Zhou Keding)pp. 371–375, 1996.

34.

P. J. Leonard, D. Rodger, G. Ciuprina and D. Loan, “Solution of TEAM Problem No. 21,” Proc. of TEAM Workshop, Graz, 1996, pp. 17–19.

35.

Y. Yao, D. Xie and B. Bai, “The application of the modified impedance boundary condition to the Problem 21,” Electromagnetic Field Problems and Applications (ed. by Zhou Keding), ICEF-1996, pp. 376–379.

36.

Y. Yao, D. Xie, B. Bai, and L. Zeng,“Nonlinear transient analysis and nonlinear surface impedance method of TEAM Problem 21,” Proceedings of ICEF-Tianjin and TEAM-Chengde, 2000.

37.

Y. Hu, and R. Tang, “T-φ-φ_m + GTM method for 3-D unbounded eddy current analysis(Problem 21),” Proceedings of ICEF-Tianjin and TEAM-Chengde, 2000.

38.

H. Lin, “Solution of TEAM Workshop Problem 21 with improved sub-structure technique,” Electromagnetic Field Problems and Applications(ed. by Zhou Keding), ICEF, 1996, pp. 380–382.

39.

N. Ida and J. P. A. Bastos, Electromagnetics and calculation of fields, Springer(second edition), 1997, pp. 477–480.

40.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, S. Gao, and Z. Liu, “Some new developments of Problem 21,” Proc. of the international TEAM Workshop, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, November 1997, pp. 21–24.

41.

N. Takahashi, “Calculation of iron loss of engineering oriented loss model (Problem 21),” Proc. of the international TEAM Workshop, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, November 1997, pp. 25–26.

42.

N. Takahashi, K. Fujiwara, K. Sugiyama, and J. Takehara, “Verification of eddy current analysis of engineering oriented loss model(Problem 21),” Proc. of the ACES, USA, 1998, pp. 779–786.

43.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, S. Gao, and Q. Hu, “Hysteresis loss analysis in steel based on W_h-B_mcurve,” Proc. of CICEM, Xian, China,1999, pp. 454–457.

44.

I. Sebestyen and M. Kuczmann, “Investigation of different approaches for iron loss prediction methods using TEAM Problem 21,” Record of the 15^th Compumag Conference on the Computation of Electromagnetic Fields, Shenyang, 2005, vol.2,pp. 268–269 (OD-3); Proc. of TEAM Workshop, Shenyang, 2005, pp. 5–6.

45.

K. Ishibashi, Z. Andjelic, and D. Pusch, “Nonlinear eddy current analysis by BEM equation utilizing adaptive technique,” presented at IEEE CEFC-2008, Athens.

46.

S. Gao, Z. Liu, M. Wu, and Z. Cheng, “Problem 21: loss modelling and validation,” Proc. of TEAM Workshop, Okayama, 1996. pp. 23–25.

47.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, S. Yang, Y. Du, J. Zhang, L. Liu, Y. Fan, J. Wang, and Q. Hu,” Analysis and measurement of iron loss and linkage flux inside nonlinear magnetic steel,” Electromagnetic field problems and applications-I, vol.22, TSI press series, USA, pp. 363–366, 2008.

48.

Z. Cheng, S. Gao, J. Wang, H. He, Z. Liu, M. Wu, H. Li and Q. Hu, “Loss evaluation of non-magnetic tie-plates in transformers,” COMPEL, vol.17, no.1/2/3, 1998, pp. 347–351.

49.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, B. Forghani, X. Wang, et al, “Extended progress in TEAM Problem 21 family,” COMPEL, 33, 1/2, pp. 234–244, 2014.CrossRef

50.

Z. Cheng, B. Forghani, X. Wang, L. Liu, T. Liu, Y. Fan, J. Zhang, X. Zhao, and Y. Liu, “Engineering-oriented investigation of magnetic property modeling and application,” invited speech at the 1&2DM2016, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 55(2017), 147–158.

51.

N. Takahashi, T. Sakura, and Z. Cheng, “Nonlinear analysis of eddy current and hysteresis losses of 3-D stray field loss model (Problem 21),” IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol.37, no.5, 2001, pp. 3672–3675.CrossRef

52.

Z. Cheng, R. Hao, N. Takahashi, Q. Hu and C. Fan, “Engineering-oriented benchmarking of Problem 21 family and experimental verification,” IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 40, no.2, 2004, pp. 1394–1397.CrossRef

53.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, S. Yang, T. Asano, Q. Hu, S. Gao, X. Ren, H. Yang, L. Liu, L. Gou, “Loss spectrum and electromagnetic behavior of problem 21 family”, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol.42, no.4, pp. 1467–1470, 2006.

54.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, S. Yang, C. Fan, M. Guo, L. Liu, J. Zhang and S. Gao, “Eddy current and loss analysis of multi-steel configuration and validation,” IEEE Trans. On Magn., vol.43, no.4, 2007, pp. 1737–1740.CrossRef

55.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, B. Forghani, G. Gilbert, J. Zhang, L. Liu, Y. Fan, X. Zhang, Y. Du, J. Wang, and C. Jiao, “Analysis and measurements of iron loss and flux inside silicon steel laminations,” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, vo.45, no.3, pp. 1222–1225, 2009.

56.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, B. Forghani, et al, “Effect of excitation patterns on both iron loss and flux in solid and laminated steel configurations,” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, vol.46, no.8, pp. 3185–3188, 2010.CrossRef

57.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, B. Forghani, Y. Du, Y. Fan, L. Liu, and H. Wang, “Effect of variation of B-H properties on both iron loss and flux in silicon steel lamination,” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, vol.47, no.5, pp. 1346–1349, 2011.

58.

W. Zheng, and Z. Cheng, “Efficient finite element simulation for GO silicon steel laminations using inner-constrained laminar separation,” IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol.48, no.8, pp. 2277–2283, 2012 (IEEE regular paper).

59.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, B. Forghani, L. Liu, Y. Fan, T. Liu, J. Zhang, and X. Wang, “3-D finite element modeling and validation of power frequency multi-shielding effect,” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, vol.48, no.2, pp. 243–246, 2012.CrossRef

60.

Z. Zhao, Z. Cheng, B. Forghani, F. Liu, Y. Li, and L. Liu, “Analytical study and corresponding experiments for ironloss inside laminated core under ac-dc hybrid excitation,” International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 55(2017), 159–167.CrossRef

61.

X. Zhao, F. Meng, Z. Cheng, L. Liu, J. Zhang, and C. Fan, “Stray-field loss and flux distribution inside magnetic steel plate under harmonic excitation, COMPEL, 36, 6, pp. 1715–1728, 2017.CrossRef

62.

Z. Cheng, N. Takahashi, and B. Forghani, TEAM Problem 21 Family(V.2009), Approved by the International Compumag Society Board at Compumag-2009, Florianópolis, Brazil.

63.

T. Nakata, A. Kost, J. Sykulski, L. Turmer, O. Biro, Private communications on TEAM Problem 21, 1992–2012.

64.

O. Biro, K. Preis, W. Renhart, K. R. Richter, and G. Vrisk, “Performance of different vector potential formulations in solving multiply connected 3-D eddy current problems,” IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol.26, no.2, 1990, pp. 438–441.CrossRef

65.

J. P. Webb and B. Forghani, “T-Omega method using hierarchal edge elements,” IEE Proc.-Sci. Meas. Technol., Vol. 142, No. 2, March 1995.

66.

Z. Cheng, S. Gao, and L. Li. Eddy Current Analysis and Validation in Electrical Engineering (Supported by National Natural Science Foundation). Higher Education Press, China, ISBN 7-04-009888-1, 2001 (in Chinese).

Titel: Establishment and Development of Benchmark Family (P21)
verfasst von: Zhiguang Cheng
Norio Takahashi (deceased)
Behzad Forghani
Lanrong Liu
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Buch: Modeling and Application of Electromagnetic and Thermal Field in Electrical Engineering
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0172-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-0173-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0173-9_12

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"