nach oben

Empirical Economics

Erschienen in:

11.01.2017

Estimating export equations: a survey of the literature

verfasst von: Güzin Bayar

Erschienen in: Empirical Economics | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Export is an important component of national income. It is one of the main determinants of the development level of countries. Both developed and developing countries formulate policies to increase their exports, to increase quality, technology and value added of exported products and to gain competitive advantage in world markets. Export equations provide valuable information regarding this decision making process. Aim of this study was to conduct a survey on extensive literature on estimation of export equations. The literature on export equations can be grouped mainly into four levels of analysis from macro to micro: aggregated level exports, country-level, sector-level and firm-level analyses. In this study, we have surveyed the literature on each level. In the last part, a survey of econometric techniques used in estimation of export equations has been provided, as well.

Vorheriger Artikel Global slack hypothesis: evidence from China, India and Pakistan

Nächster Artikel On predicting the semiconductor industry cycle: a Bayesian model averaging approach

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

A rare exception to this is “giffen paradoks”. A product is called “giffen”, if for an inferior product, positive income effect due to increase in price of the product dominates the negative substitution effect. Thus, although the price of the product increases, it is demanded more.

AFTA-Asean Free Trade Area, CACM-Central American Market, NAFTA-North American Free Trade Area, ACN-Andean Community, EU-European Union, EMU-European Monetary Union (Eurozone), MERCOSUR-Southern Common Market, MENA-Middle East North Africa, COMESA-Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa, WTO-World Trade Organization.

With his VAR formulation, Sims shared Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences in 2011 with Sargent, “for their empirical research on cause and effect in the macroeconomy”.

Aaby NE, Stanley FS (1989) Management influences on export performance: a review of the empirical literature 1978–1988. Int Mark Rev 6(4):7–26CrossRef

Abadie A, Imbens GW (2009) Matching on the estimated propensity score. National Bureau Of Economic research working paper series, Working paper 15301

Abiad A, Mishra P, Topalova P (2011) How does trade evolve in the aftermath of financial crises? IMF working paper, WP/11/3

Adam A, Moutos T (2008) The trade effects of the EU-Turkey Customs Union. The World Economy, pp 685–700

Aftab M, Abbas Z, Kayani FN (2012) Impact of exchange rate volatility onsectoral exports of Pakistan: an ARDL investigation. J Chin Econ Foreign Trade Stud 5(3):215–231CrossRef

Akal M (2008) Estimating manufacturing trade structures and elasticities in Turkey: an inductive approach. J Econ Cooper 29(3):49–78

Akbostancı E, Tunç Gİ, Türüt Aşık S (2008) Environmental impact of customsunion agreement with EU on Turkey’s trade inmanufacturing industry. Appl Econ 40:2295–2304CrossRef

Akkemik AK, Göksal K (2010) Do Chinese exports crowd-out Turkish exports. Iktisat Isletme ve Finans 25(287):9–32

Aldan A, Günay M (2008) Entry to export markets and productivity: analysis of matched firms in Turkey. The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Research and Monetary Policy Department working paper no. 08/05

Altıntaş H, Çetin R, Öz B (2011) The impact of exchange rate volatility on Turkish exports: 1993–2009. South East Eur J Econ Bus 6(2):67–78CrossRef

Alvarez R, Faruq H, Lopez R (2008) New products in export markets: learning from experience and learning from others. Mimeo, Bank of Chile

Amann E, Lau B, Nıxson F (2009) Did China hurt the textiles and clothing, exports of other Asian economies, 1990–2005? Oxf Dev Stud 37(4):333–362CrossRef

Amemiya T, MaCurdy TE (1986) Instrumental-variable estimation of an error-components model. Econometrica 54:869–880CrossRef

Amurgo-Pacheco A, Pierola MD (2008) Patterns of export diversification in developing countries. World Bank Policy Research working paper no. 4473

Anderson JE (1979) A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am Econ Rev 69:106–116

Anderson JE, van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93(1):170–192CrossRef

Anderson S, De Palma A, Thisse J (1992) Discrete choice theory of product differentiation. MIT Press, Cambridge

Andersson M (2007) Entry costs and adjustments on the extensive margin—an analysis of how familiarity breeds exports. CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series, No. 81. https://static.sys.kth.se/itm/wp/cesis/cesiswp81.pdf

Araújo BCPO (2005) Os determinantes do comercio internacional ao nivel da firma: evidencias empiricas. Textos para discussâo, IPEA

Araújo BCPO, Pianto DM (2010) Export potential of Brazilian industrial firms. Econ Apl 14(4):277–297CrossRef

Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–297CrossRef

Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econ 68:29–51CrossRef

Arize A (1987) The supply and demand for imports and exports in a simultaneous model. Appl Econ 19:123–1247CrossRef

Arkolakis C (2010) Market penetration costs and the new consumers margin in international trade. J Polit Econ 118:1151–1199CrossRef

Arkolakis C, Muendler MA (2013) Exporters and their products: a collection of empirical regularities. CESifo Econ Stud 59:223–248CrossRef

Arkolakis C, Costinot A, Donaldson D, Rodriguez-Clare A (2015) The elusive pro-competitive effects of trade. NBER Working Paper No. 21370

Armington PS (1969) A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. Staff Pap Int Monet Fund 16(1):159–178CrossRef

Artan S (2012) Çekim Modeli Türkiye’nin Ticaret Akımlarının Belirleyicilerini ve Ticaret Potansiyelini Açıklayabilir Mi? Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 5(1):122–145

Ashenfelter O, Card D (1985) Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effects of training programs. Rev Econ Stat 67:648–660CrossRef

Aslan İ, Wijnbergen S (1993) Export incentives, exchange rate policy and export growth in Turkey. Rev Econ Stat 75(1):128–133CrossRef

Atıcı C, Armağan G, Tunalıoğlu R, Çınar G (2011) Does Turkey’s integration into the European union boost its agricultural exports? Agribusiness 27(3):280–291CrossRef

Aydın MF, Çıplak U, Yücel ME (2004) Export supply and import demand models for the Turkish economy. TCMB working paper, 04/09

Aysan AF, Hacihasanoglu YS (2007) Investigation on the determinants of Turkish export-boom in 2000s. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA Paper No. 5493

Bacchetta M, Beverelli C, Cadot O, Fugazza M, Grether JM, Helble M., Nicita A, Piermartini R (2012) A practical guide to trade policy analysis. UNCTAD and WTO

Bai J, Kao C (2006) On the estimation and inference of a panel cointegration model with cross-sectional dependence. In: Baltagi BH (ed) Panel data econometrics: theoretical contributions and empirical applications. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam

Bai J, Ng S (2004) A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica 72(4):191–221CrossRef

Baier SL, Bergstrand JH (2001) The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity. J Int Econ 53(1):1–27CrossRef

Baier SL, Bergstrand JH (2009) Bonus vetus OLS: a simple method for approximatinginternational trade-cost effects using the gravity equation. J Int Econ 77(1):77–85CrossRef

Balassa B (1967) Trade liberalization among industrial countries. McGraw-Hill, New York

Baldwin R, Taglioni D (2006) Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper 12516, NBER

Baldwin R, Taglioni D (2007) Trade effects of the Euro: a comparison of estimators. J Econ Integr 22(4):780–818CrossRef

Baldwin R (1994) Towards an integrated Europe. CEPR, London

Balistreri EJ, Rutherford TF (2012) Computing general equilibrium theories of monopolistic competition and heterogeneous firms. In: Dixon PB, Jorgenson DW, Barrios S, Holger G, Strobl E (eds) Handbook of computable general equilibrium modeling (2003), explaining firms’ export behaviour: R&D, spillovers and the destination market, Oxford Bulletin Of Economics And Statistics, vol 65, no 4, pp 475–496

Barrios S, Holger G, Strobl E (2003) Explaining firms’ export behaviour: R&D, spillovers and the destination market. Oxford Bull Econom Stat 65(4):475–496CrossRef

Basmann RL (1957) A generalized classical method of linear estimation of coefficients in astructural equation. Econometrica 25:77–83CrossRef

Bayar G, Tokpunar S (2014) Türkiye’nin İmalat Sanayi Sektörlerinin İhracatı-Zaman Serisi Analizi. Hacettepe Sosyoekonomi, 2014-1

Bayar G, Ünal M, Tokpunar S (2015) Determinants of Turkish exports to European Union countries: a sectoral panel data analysis. Emerg Mark Finance Trade 51(6):1–19

Beers CV, Panne GVD (2011) Geography, knowledge spillovers and small firms’ exports: an empirical examination for The Netherlands. Small Bus Econ 37:325–339CrossRef

Behrens K, Corcos G, Mion G (2013) Notes trade crisis? What trade crisis? Rev Econ Stat 95(2):702–709CrossRef

Behrens K, Ertur C, Kock W (2012) Dual gravity: using spatial econometrics to control for multilateral resistance. J Appl Econom 27:773–794CrossRef

Benedictis LD, Vicarelli C (2005) Trade potentials in gravity panel data models. Top Econ Anal Policy 5(1):Makale 20

Bergstrand JH (1985) The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Rev Econ Stat 67(3):474–481CrossRef

Bergstrand JH (1989) The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and factor proportions theory in international trade. Rev Econ Stat 71(1):143–153CrossRef

Bernard AB, Jensen JB (1999) Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect or both? J Int Econ 47(1):1–25CrossRef

Bernard A, Jensen BJ (2004) Why some firms export. Rev Econ Stat 86:561–569CrossRef

Bernard AB, Eaton J, Jensen JB, Kortum S (2003) Plants and productivity in international trade. Am Econ Rev 93:1268–1290CrossRef

Bernard AB, Redding SJ, Schott PK (2007) Comparative advantage and heterogeneous firms. Rev Econ Stud 74(1):31–66CrossRef

Bernard AB, Redding SJ, Schott PK (2011) The empirics of firm heterogeneity and international trade. NBER working paper series, working paper 17627

Berndt ER (1991) The practice of econometrics. Addison-Wesley, Reading

Bhagwati J (1958) Immiserizing growth: a geometric note. Rev Econ Stud 25:201–205CrossRef

Bhattacharya R, Wolde H (2010) Constraints on trade in the MENA region. IMF working paper, WP/10/31

Bhavani TA, Tendulkar SD (2001) Determinants of firm-level export performance: a case study of Indian textile garments and apparel industry. J Int Trade Econ Dev 10(1):65–92CrossRef

Blalock G, Roy S (2007) A firm-level examination of the exports puzzle: why East Asian exports didn’t increase after the 1997–1998 financial crisis. The World Economy

Bleaney M, Wakelin K (2002) Efficiency, innovation and exports. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 64(1):3–15CrossRef

Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87:115–143CrossRef

Bonnal M (2010) Export performance, labor standards and institutions: evidence from a dynamic panel data model. J Labor Res 31:53–66CrossRef

Bourdon HM, Korinek J (2011) To what extent do exchange rates and their volatility affect trade? OECD trade policy working papers no. 119

Brakman S, Joostein G (1987) On a two regime model of the dutch export market. De Econ 135(3):279–297

Brulhart M, Kelly MJ (1999) Ireland’s trading potential with central and eastern European countries: a gravity study. Econ Soc Rev 30(2):159–174

Bussiere M, Fidrmuc J, Schnatz B (2008) EU enlargement and trade integration: lessons from a gravity model. Rev Dev Econ 12(3):562–576CrossRef

Bustos P (2005) Rising wage inequality in the Argentinean manufacturing sector: the impact of trade and foreign investment on technology and skill upgrading. CREI Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Mimeo,

Cadot O, Iacovone L, Pierola D, Rauch F (2013) Success and failure of African exporters. J Dev Econ 101:284–296CrossRef

Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2005) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. IZA (The Institute for the Study of Labor) discussion paper no. 1588

Camaero M, Gómez-Herrera E, Tamarit C (2012) The Euro impact on trade. Long run evidence with structural breaks. Working papers in applied economics, University of Valencia, WPAE-2012-09

Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press

Carrere C (2006) Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. Eur Econ Rev 50:223–247CrossRef

Cassiman B, Martinez-Ros E (2004) Innovation and exports: evidence from Spanish manufacturing. Mimeo, IESE Business School, SPSP Research Center

Castellani D (2002) Export behavior and productivity growth: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 138(4):605–628CrossRef

Caves RE (1982) Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Cebeci T (2014) Impact of export destinations on firm performance. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WP no. 6743

Cebeci T, Fernandes AM (2013) Micro dynamics of Turkey’s export boom in the 2000s. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WP No. 6457

Cebeci T, Fernandes AM, Freund C, Pierola MD (2012) Exporter dynamics database. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WP No. 6229

Chaney T (2008) Distorted gravity: the intensive and extensive margins of international trade. Am Econ Rev 98(4):1707–1721CrossRef

Chen KM, Rau HH, Chiu RL (2011) Determinants of China’s exports to the United States and Japan. Chin Econ 44(4):19–41CrossRef

Chen MX, Wilson JS, Otsuki T (2008) Standards and export decisions: firm-level evidence from developing countries. J Int Trade Econ Dev 17(4):501–523CrossRef

Cheng I-H, Wall H (2005) Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration. Fed Reserve Bank St Louis Rev 87:49–63

Choi I (2004) Econometric theory and practice: frontiers of analysis and applied research—essays in honour of Peter C.B. Phillips. In: Saikkonen P, Choi I (eds) Unit root tests for cross-sectionally correlated panels. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Clerides S, Lauch S, Tybout JR (1998) Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Marroco. Q J Econ 113:903–947CrossRef

Choi I (2007) Nonstationary panels. In: Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbook of econometrics, vol 1. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ (1985) The impact of export strategy on export sales performance. J Int Bus Stud 16(1):37–55CrossRef

Correa P, Dayoub M, Francisco M (2011) Trade liberalization and ‘export response’: whether complementary reforms? J Int Trade Econ Dev 20(3):379–400CrossRef

Coşar EE (2002) Price and income elasticities of Turkish export demand: a panel data application. Cent Bank Rev 2:19–53

Cruz M (2014) Do export promotion agencies promote new exporters? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WP No. 7004

De Grauwe P (1988) Exchange rate variability and slowdown in international trade. IMF StaffPaper No. 35

Deardoff AV (1998) Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In: Frankel JA (ed) The regionalization of the world economy. University of Chicago, Chicago

Değer MK, Genç MC (2010) The impact of export market diversification on total exports and gross domestic product: the cointegration and causality tests on Turkish economy (1980–2007). Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F Dergisi 20:66–85

Delgado MF, Ruano SJ (2002) Firm productivity and export markets: a non-parametric approach. J Int Econ 57:397–422CrossRef

Dellas H, Zilberfarb B (1993) Real exchange rate volatility and international trade: a re-examination of the theory. South Econom J 59(4):641–647CrossRef

Din M, Ghani E, Mahmood T (2009) Determinants of export performance of Pakistan: evidence from the firm-level data. Pak Dev Rev 48(3):227–240

Dinçer N, Kandil M (2011) The effects of exchange rate fluctuations on exports: a sectoral analysis for Turkey. J Int Trade Econ Dev Int Comp Rev 20(6):809–837CrossRef

DiPietro WR, Anoruo E (2006) Creativity, innovation, and export performance. J Policy Model 28:133–139CrossRef

Dueñas-Caparas Teresa MS (2006) Determinants of export performance in the Philippine manufacturing sector. Philippine Institute for Development Studies, Discussion Paper Series No

Dutt P, Mihov I, Van Zandt T (2008) Trade diversification and economic development. INSEAD, Mimeo, New York

Eaton J, Kortum S (2002) Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica 70(5):1741–1779CrossRef

Eaton J, Kortum S, Kramarz F (2011) An anatomy of international trade: evidence from French firms. Econometrica 79(5):1453–1498CrossRef

Eberhardt M, Bond S (2009) Cross-section dependence in non-stationary panel models: a novel estimator. Munich Personal Repec Archive (MPRA) paper no. 17692

Eberhardt M, Teal F (2010) Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production. Economics series working papers 515, University of Oxford, Department of Economics

Eberhardt M, Teal F (2011) Econometrics for grumblers: a new look at the literature on cross-country growth empirics. J Econom Surv 25(1):109–155CrossRef

Égert B, Morales-Zumaquero A (2008) Exchange rate regimes, foreign exchange volatility, and export performance in central and eastern Europe: just another blur project? Rev Dev Econ 12(3):577–593CrossRef

Egger P (2002) An econometric view on estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potential. World Econ 25(2):297–312CrossRef

Ekanayake EM, Ledgerwood JR (2009) An analysis of the intra-regional trade in the Middle East and North Africa Region. Int J Bus Finance Res 3(1):19–29

Endoh M (1999) Trade creation and trade diversion in the EEC, the LAFTA and the CMEA: 1960–1994. Appl Econ 31:207–216CrossRef

Ethier W (1973) International trade and forward exchange market. Am Econ Rev 63(3):494–503

Evald MR, Klyver K, Christensen PR (2011) The effect of human capital, social capital, and perceptual values on nascent entrepreneurs’ export intentions. J Int Entrep 9:1–19CrossRef

Feenstra R (2004) Advanced international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge

Feenstra RC, Markusen ve JR, Rose AK, (2001) Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade. Can J Econ 34(2):430–447

Fernandes A, Tang H (2014) Learning to export from neighbors. Cesifo Working Paper No. 4699

Fernandes A, Freund C, Pierola M (2016) Exporter behavior, country size and stage of development: evidence from the exporter dynamics database. J Dev Econ 119:121–137CrossRef

Fontagne L, Guillin A, Mitaritonna C (2010) Estimations of tariff equivalents for the services sectors. https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/5032.pdf

Frankel J (1997) Regional trading blocs in the world economic system. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DCCrossRef

Fryges H (2006) Hidden champions-how young and small technology-oriented firms can attain high export sales ratios. ZEW Discussion Paper, No, pp 06–045

Fung HG, Gao GY, Lu J, Mano H (2008) Impact of competitive position on export propensity and intensity an empirical study of manufacturing firms in China. Chin Econ 41(5):51–67CrossRef

Gagnon J (1993) Exchange rate variability and the level of international trade. J Int Econom 34:269–287CrossRef

Gervais A (2011) Product quality, firm heterogeneity and international trade. University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame

Ghimire S, Mukherjee D, Alvi E (2013) Sectoral aid-for trade and sectoral exports: a seemingly unrelated regression analysis. Econ Bull 33(4):2744–2755

Giovannetti G, Sanfilippo M (2009) Do Chinese exports crowd-out african goods? An econometric analysis by country and sector. Eur J Dev Res 21(4):506–530CrossRef

Giovannini A (1988) Exchange rates and traded goods prices. J Int Econ 24:45–68CrossRef

Girma S, Gong Y, Görg H, Yu Z (2009) Can production subsidies explain China’s export performance? Evidence from firm-level data. Scand J Econ 111(4):863–891CrossRef

Görg H, Henry M, Strobl E (2008) Grant support and exporting activity. Rev Econ Stat 90:168–174CrossRef

Grubel H (1970) The theory of intra-industry trade. In: McDougall IA, Snape RH (eds) Studies in international economics. World Scientifiec, Amsterdam 1970

Guillin A (2011) Assesment of tariff equivalents for services considering the zero flows. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1737106 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.1737106

Güloğlu B (2011) Tam değiştirilmiş EKK (Fully modified OLS). Unpublished Lecture Notes

Gür N (2013) Does financial integration increase exports? Evidence from international industry-level data. Emerg Mark Finance Trade 49(5):112–129CrossRef

Hadri K, Kurozumi E (2012) A simple panel stationarity test in the presence of serial correlation and a common factor. Econ Lett 115:31–34CrossRef

Hadri K (2000) Testing for stationarity in heterogenous panels. Econom J 3:148–161CrossRef

Haidar JI (2012) Trade and productivity: self selection or learning by exporting in India. Econ Model 29:1766–1773CrossRef

Hallak JC, Schott PK (2011) Estimating cross-country differences in product quality. Q J Econ 126:417–474CrossRef

Hamilton CB, Winters AL (1992) Opening up international trade with Eastern Europe. Econ Policy 14:77–116CrossRef

Haq Z, Meilke K, Cranfield J (2011) The gravıty model and the problem of zero’s in agrifood trade. CATPRN Working Paper 2011-02

Harb N (2007) Trade between Euro zone and Arab countries: a panel study. Appl Econ 39:2099–2107CrossRef

Hausman J (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251–1271CrossRef

Hausman JA, Taylor WE (1981) Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica 49:1377–1398CrossRef

Head K, Mayer T (2013) Gravity equations: toolkit, cookbook, workhorse. In: Gopinath G, Helpman E, Rogoff K (eds) Handbook of international economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam

Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–162CrossRef

Helmers C, Pasteels JM (2005) TradeSim (third version), a gravity model for the calculation of trade potentials for developing countries and economies in transition. International Trade Center Working Paper

Helpman E (1984) Increasing returns, imperfect markets, and trade theory. In: Jones Ronald W, Kenen Peter B (eds) Handbook of international economics, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam

Helpman E (1987) Imperfect competition and international trade: evidence from fourteen industrial countries. J Jpn Int Econ 1(1):62–81CrossRef

Helpman E (2006) Trade, FDI and the organization of firms. J Econ Lit XLIV:589–630

Helpman E, Krugman PR (1985) Market structure and foreign trade; increasing returns, imperfect competition and the international economy. MIT, Cambridge

Helpman E, Melitz M, Rubinstein Y (2008) Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes. Q J Econ 123:441–487CrossRef

Helpman E, Melitz MJ, Yeaple RS (2004) Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. Am Econ Rev 94(1):300–316CrossRef

Hirsch S (1971) The export performance of six manufacturing industries: a comparative study of Denmark, Holland, and Israel. Praeger, New York

Hoffman R, Kassouf AL (2005) Deriving conditional and unconditional marginal effects in log earnings equations estimated by Heckman’s procedure. Appl Econ 37:1303–1311CrossRef

Hummels D, Klenow PJ (2005) The variety and quality of a nation’s exports. Am Econ Rev 95(3):704–723CrossRef

Hwang YS, Hwang MH, Dong X (2015) The relationships among firm size, innovation type, and export performance with regard to time spans. Emerg Mark Finance Trade 51:947–962CrossRef

Ibrahim N (2011) Causality between exports and productivity in the Malaysian economy. Singap Econ Rev 56(3):377–395CrossRef

Im K, Pesaran H, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogenous panels. J Econom 115(1):53–74CrossRef

Iyer K (2010) The determinants of firm-level export intensity in New Zealand agriculture and forestry. Econ Anal Policy 40(1):75–86CrossRef

Jassaud J, Rey S (2009) Long-run determinants of Japanese exports to China and the United States: a sectoral analysis. Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, Working Paper Series, CATT WP No. 4

Jensen P, Rosholm M, Verner M (2001) A comparison of different estimators for panel data sample selection models. University of Aarhus, Department of Economics Working Paper No. 2002-1

Johansen S (1991) Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59:1551–1580CrossRef

Johansen S (1995) Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef

Kapetanios G, Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2011) Panels with non-stationary multifactor error structure. J Econom 160:326–348CrossRef

Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econom 65(1):9–15

Katsikeas CS, Piercy NF (1993) Long-term export stimuli and firm characteristics in a European LDC. J Int Mark 1(3):23–47

Kien NT (2009) Gravity model by panel data approach an empirical application with implications for the ASEAN free trade area. ASEAN Econ Bull 26(3):266–277CrossRef

King A (1997) From demand equations to two regimes: the theoretical development of export models. Bull Econ Res 49(2):81–125CrossRef

King A (2000) Modelling manufactured exports in Europe: a two-regime approach. J Int Trade Econ Dev 9(2):173–192CrossRef

King A (2001) A two-regime model of exports: U.K. manufactures, 1980–1996. Open Econ Rev 12:75–94CrossRef

King G, Nielsen R (2016) Why propensity scores should not be used for matching? http://j.mp/PScore

Kneller R, Pisu M (2011). Barriers to exporting: what are they and who do they matter to? The World Economy, 2011

Koççat H (2008) Exchange rates, exports and economic growth in Turkey: evidence from Johansen cointegration tests. Int J Econ Perspect 2(1):5–11

Kong FY, Kneller R (2016) Measuring the impact of China’s export growth on its Asian neighbours. World Econ 39(2):195–220CrossRef

Kyriazidou E (1997) Estimation of a panel data sample selection model. Econometrica 65(6):1335–1364CrossRef

Krugman P (1980) Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade. Am Econ Rev 70(5):950–959

Kumar S (2009) An empirical evaluation of export demand in China. J Chin Econ Foreign Trade Stud 2(2):100–109CrossRef

Larsson R, Lyhagen J, Lothgren M (2001) Likelihood-based cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels. Econom J 4:109–142CrossRef

Lawless M, Whelan K (2014) Where do firms export, how much and why? World Econ 2014:1027–1050CrossRef

Lechner M (2010) The estimation of causal effects by difference-in-difference methods. Found Trends Econom 4(3):165–224CrossRef

Lederman D, Olarreaga M, Zavala L (2015) Export promotion and firm entry into and survival in export markets. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WP No. 7400

Lehman N, Herzer D, Martinez-Zarzoso MI, Vollmer S (2007) The impact of a customs union between Turkey and the EU on Turkey’s exports to the EU. J Common Mark Stud 45(3):719–743CrossRef

Leonidou LC (1995) Export stimulation research: review, evaluation and integration. Int Bus Rev 4(2):133–156CrossRef

Levin A, Lin C, Chu J (2002) Unit roots tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J Econom 108:1–24CrossRef

Linder SB (1961) An essay on trade and transformation. Wiley, New York

Linders M, de Groot H (2006) Estimation of the gravity equation in the presence of zero trade flow. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. TI 2006-072/3

Linnemann Hans (1966) An econometric study of international trade flows. North-Holland, Amsterdam

Liodakis G (2000) Environmental implications of international trade and uneven development: toward acritique of environmental economics. Rev Rad Polit Econ 32:40–79CrossRef

Liu JT, Tsou MW, Hammitt JK (1999) Export activity and productivity: evidence from the taiwan electronics industry. Rev World Econ 135:675–691

Maddala GS, Wu S (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:631–652CrossRef

Mah J (2007) The effect of duty drawback on export promotion: the case of Korea. J Asian Econ 18:967–973CrossRef

Máñez JA, Sanchis Llopis JA, Rochina ME (2004) Sunk costs hysteresis in Spanish manufacturing exports, working papers. Serie EC 2004-17, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A

Manova K (2008) Credit constraints, equity market liberalizations and international trade. J Int Econ 76:33–47CrossRef

Martincus CV, Carballo J (2012) Export promotion activities in developing countries: what kind of trade do they promote? J Int Trade Econ Dev 21(4):539–578CrossRef

Masakure O, Henson S, Cranfield J (2009) Standards and export performance in developing countries: evidence from Pakistan. J Int Trade Econ Dev 18(3):395–419CrossRef

Mastromarco C, Serlenga L, Shin Y (2016) Multilateral resistance and the euro effects on trade flows. In: Patuelli R, Arbia G (eds) Spatial econometric interaction modelling in advances in spatial science. Springer, Berlin, pp 253–278CrossRef

McKenzie MD (1999) The impact of exchange rate volatility on international trade flows. J Econ Surv 13(1):71–106CrossRef

McPherson MQ, Trumbull WN (2008) Rescuing observed fixed effects: using the Hausman-Taylor method for out-of-sample trade projections. Int Trade J 22(3):315–340CrossRef

Melitz MJ (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6):1695–1725CrossRef

Melitz MJ, Ottaviano GIP (2008) Market size, trade, and productivity. Rev Econ Stud 75(1):295–316CrossRef

Montobbio F, Rampa F (2005) The impact of technology and structural change on export performance in nine developing countries. World Dev 33(4):527–547CrossRef

Moon H, Perron B (2004) Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. J Econom 122:81–126CrossRef

Mundlak Y (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica 46:69–85CrossRef

Muscatelli VA, Srinivasan TG, Vines D (1992) Demand and supply factors in the determination of nie exports: a simultaneous error-correction model for Hong Kong. Econ J 102:1467–1477CrossRef

Nardis S, De Santis R, Vicarelli C (2008) The Euro’s effecs on trade in a dynamic setting. Eur J Comp Econ 5(1):73–85

Nazlıoğlu Ş (2013) Exchange rate volatility and Turkish industry-level export: panel cointegration analysis. J Int Trade Econ Dev 22(7):1088–1107CrossRef

Neyapti B, Taskin F, Üngör M (2007) Has customs union agreement really benefited Turkey’s trade? Appl Econ 39(16):2121–2132CrossRef

Nguyen AN, Pham NQ, Nguyen CD, Nguyen DN (2008) Innovation and exports in Vietnam’s SME sector. Eur J Dev Res 20(2):262–280CrossRef

Nilsson L (2000) Trade integration and the EU economic membership criteria. Eur J Polit Econ 16:807–827CrossRef

Nordas KH (2011) Measuring barriers to trade and investment in services. http://www.unescap.org/tid/artnet/mtg/reformservice_bp19.pdf

Oguledo VI, Macphee CR (1994) Gravity models: a reformulation and an application to discriminatory trade arrangements. Appl Econom 26:107–120CrossRef

Okawa Y, Van Wincoop E (2010) Gravity in international finance. Working Paper 7, Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research

Oskooee MB, Hegerty SW (2007) Exchange rate volatility andtrade flows: a review article. J Econ Stud 34:211–255CrossRef

Oskooee MB, Hegerty SW, Xu J (2012) Exchange-rate volatility and industry trade between Japan and China. Glob Econ J 12(3):1–19

Özçelik E, Taymaz E (2004) Does innovativeness matter for international competitiveness in developing countries? The case of Turkish manufacturing industries. Res Policy 33:409–424CrossRef

Özkaya E (2011) Effect of bilateral and multilateral agreements on Turkey’s export. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi 12(2):279–288

Özler Ş, Taymaz E, Yılmaz K (2009) History matters for the export decision plant level evidence from Turkish manufacturing industry. World Dev 37(2):479–488CrossRef

Patuelli R, Linders GJM, Metulini R, Griffith DA (2016) The space of gravity: spatially filtered estimation of a gravity model for bilateral trade. In: Patuelli R, Arbia G (eds) Spatial econometric interaction modelling in advances in spatial science. Springer, Berlin, pp 145–169CrossRef

Pedroni P (1995) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time-series tests with application tothe PPP hypothesis. (Indiana Working Papers in Economics No. 95-013)

Peridy N (2005) Trade prospects of the new EU neighborhood policy: evidence from Hausman and Taylor’s models. Glob Econ J 5(1), article 7

Pesaran MH, Shin Y (1999) An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Strom S (ed) Chapter 11 in econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: the Ragnar Frisch centennial symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bound testing approaches to the analysis of long run relationships. J Appl Econom 16:289–326CrossRef

Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012CrossRef

Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econom 22:265–312CrossRef

Phillips PCB, Hansen B (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Rev Econ Stud 57:99–125CrossRef

Phillips PCB, Moon HR (1999) Linear regression limit theory for nonstationary panel data. Econometrica 67(5):1057–1112CrossRef

Pineres SAG, Jorda MC (2010) Short-run effects of devaluation: a disaggregated analysis of Latin American exports. Appl Econ 42:133–142CrossRef

Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage. Free Press, New York

Poyhonen P (1963) A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Welwirtschaftliches Archiv 90(1):93–99

Prehn AB, Brümmer B, Glaubena T (2016) Gravity model estimation: fixed effects vs. random intercept Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood. Appl Econ Lett 23(11):761–764CrossRef

Rahmaddi R, Ichihashi M (2012) How do foreign and domestic demand affect exports performance? An econometric investigation of Indonesia’s exports. Mod Econ 3:32–42CrossRef

Rahmaddi R, Ichihashi M (2013) The role of foreign direct investmentin Indonesia’s manufacturing exports. Bull Indones Econ Stud 49(3):329–354CrossRef

Ramos LM, Zarzoso M (2010) The effect of technological innovation oninternational trade. Econ Open Asses Open Acces E J 4:2010–2011

Razmi A, Blecker R (2008) Developing country exports of manufactures: moving up the ladder to escape the fallacy of composition? J Dev Stud 44(1):21–48CrossRef

Redding SJ (2011) Theories of heterogeneous firms and trade. Annu Rev Econ 3(1):77–105CrossRef

Roberts MJ, Tybout JR (1997) The decision to export in Colombia: an empirical model of entry with sunk costs. Am Econ Rev 87:545–564

Rochina-Barrachina ME (1999) A new estimator for panel data sample selection models. Annales D’économie Et De Statistique 55(56):153–181CrossRef

Rodriguez G, Samy Y (2003) Analysing the effects of labour standards on US export performance. A time series approach with structural change. Appl Econ 35:1043–1051CrossRef

Rojid S (2006) COMESA trade potential: a gravity approach. Appl Econ Lett 13:947–951CrossRef

Rose A, van Wincoop E (2001) National money as a barrier to international trade: the real case for currency union. Am Econ Rev 91(2):386–390CrossRef

Rosenbaum P, Rubin D (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:41–50CrossRef

Saatçioğlu, Karaca (2010) Dolar/Euro Paritesinin Türkiye’nin İhracatina Etkisi: Ekonometrik Bir Analiz. Niğde Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F Dergisi 3(2):106–118

Sarıkaya Ç (2004) Export dynamics in Turkey. Cent Bank Rev 2:41–64

Saygılı H (2010) Sectoral export dynamics of Turkey: a panel co-integration analysis. Empir Econ 38:373–384CrossRef

Schlegelmilch BB, Crook JN (1988) Firm-level determinants of export intensity. Manag Decis Econ 9:291–300CrossRef

Schott PK (2004) Across-product versus within-product specialization in international trade. Q J Econ 119(2):647–678CrossRef

Semikyna A, Wooldridge JM (2010) Estimating panel data models in the presence of endogeneity and selection. J Econom 157(2):375–380CrossRef

Senhadji A, Montenegro C (1998) Time series analysis of export demand equations: a cross country analysis. IMF Working Papers, WP/98/149

Serlenga L, Shin Y (2013) The Euro effect on intra-EU trade: evidence from the cross sectionally dependent panel gravity models. University of York, Mimeo, New York

Shepherd B (2008) Dealing with zero trade flows. Princeton University GEM, Sciences Po, Classroom presentation, Niehaus Center

Shepherd B (2012) The gravity model of international trade: a user guide. United Nations, ESCAP

Siggel E (2006) International competitiveness and comparative advantage: a survey and a proposal for measurement. J Ind Compet Trade 6:137–159CrossRef

Silva Santos JMC, Tenreyro S (2006) The log of gravity. Rev Econ Stat 88(4):641–658CrossRef

Silva Santos JMC, Tenreyro S (2009) Trading partners and trading volumes: implementing the Helpman–Melitz–Rubinstein model empirically. Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper No. 935

Simcoe T (2013) Stata code for robust standard errors in the fixed effects Poisson. http://people.bu.edu/tsimcoe/data.html

Sims AC (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48:1–48CrossRef

Sjöholm F (2003) Which Indonesian firms export? The importance of foreign networks. Pap Reg Sci 82:333–350CrossRef

Smith RP, Fuertes A-M (2007) Panel time series. Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice (cemmap) Mimeo

Solakoğlu MN (2010) Exchange rate exposure and real exports. Appl Econ Lett 17:457–462CrossRef

Solakoğlu MN, Solakoğlu EG, Demirağ T (2008) Exchange rate volatility and exports: a firm level analysis. Appl Econ 40:921–929CrossRef

Stewart DB, McAuley A (1999) The effect of export stimulation; implications for export performance. J Mark Manag 15(6):505–518CrossRef

Suvankulov F, Güç Y (2012) Who is trading well in Central Asia? A gravity analysis of exports from the regional powers of the region. Eur J Bus Econ 5(9):21–43

Şahinbeyoglu G, Ulaşan B (1999) An empirical examination of the structural stability of export function. Central Bank of Republic of Turkey Working Paper

Tinbergen J (1962) Shaping the world economy: suggestions for an international economics policy. The Twentieth Century Fund, New York

Theil H (1954) Estimation of parameters of econometric models. Bull Int Stat Inst 34:122–128

Theil H (1958) Economic forecasts and policy, 2nd edn. North-Holland, Amsterdam 1961

Togan S, Bayar G (2016) Liberalizing transport sectors and the effects of infrastructure development: the Turkish case. In: Togan S (ed) The liberalization of transportation services in the EU and Turkey. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef

Trotignon J (2010) Does regional integration promote the multileralization of trade flows? A gravity model using panel data. J Econ Integr 25(2):223–251CrossRef

Tumbarello P (2007) Are regional trade agreements in Asia stumbling or building blocks? Implications for the Mekong-3 countries. IMF Working Paper, WP/07/53

Turkcan K (2014) Margin, intensive margin, price and quantity components on Turkey’s export growth during 1998–2011. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No 53292

Utkulu U, Seymen D (2004) Trade and competitiveness between Turkey and the EU: time series evidence. Turkish Economic Association Discussion Paper, 2004/8

Uz İ (2010) Testing for structural change in the bilateral trade elasticities of Turkey. Middle East Techn Univ Stud Dev 37:53–72

Uzay N, Demir M, Yıldırım E (2012) İhracat Performansı Açısından Teknolojik Yeniliğin Önemi: Türkıye İmalat Sanayi Örneği. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi 13(1):141–160

Verbeek M (1990) On the estimation of a fixed effects model with selectivity bias. Econom Lett 34:267–270CrossRef

Vergil H (2002) Exchange rate volatility in Turkey and its effect on trade flows. J Econ Soc Res 4(1):83–99

Vergil H (2010) Türkiye Ticaretinde Ulusal Pazar Etkisi. İktisat, İşletme ve Finans 25(286):35–59CrossRef

Vural Yİ (2011) Zortuk M (2011) Foreign direct investment as a determining factor in Turkey’s export performance. Eur J Bus Econ 4(7):13–23

Wagner J (1995) Exports, firm size, and firm dynamics. Small Bus Econ 7:29–39CrossRef

Wagner J (2002) Unobserved firm heterogeneity and the size-exports nexus: evidence from German panel data. HWWA, Technical report, Hamburg

Wagner J (2012) International trade and firm performance: a survey of empirical studies since 2006. Rev World Econ 148:235–267CrossRef

Wang Z, Winters AL (1992) The trading potential of Eastern Europe. J Econ Integr 7:113–136CrossRef

Warner D, Kreinin ME (1983) Determinants of international trade flows. Rev Econ Stat 65:96–104CrossRef

Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748CrossRef

Westerlund J (2008) Panel cointegratıon tests of the Fisher effect. J Appl Econom 23:193–233CrossRef

Westerlund J, Wilhelmsson F (2011) Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data. Appl Econ 43:641–649CrossRef

Willett TD (1986) Exchange-rate variability, international trade and resourceallocation: a perspective on recent research. J Int Money Finance 5:101–112CrossRef

Willmore LN (1992) Transnational and foreign trade: evidence from Brazil. J Dev Stud 28(2):314–335CrossRef

Wolf A (1995) Import and hedging uncertainty in international trade. J Fut Mark 15:101–110CrossRef

Wooldridge JM (1995) Selection corrections for panel data models under conditional mean independence assumptions. J Econom 68:115–132CrossRef

Wooldridge JM (2010) Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels. http://econ.msu.edu/faculty/wooldridge/docs/cre1_r4.pdf. Reached: 22 Jul 2016

Xuegang C (2008) Study on Xinjiang’s bilateral trade: using a gravity model. Asia Eur J 6:507–517CrossRef

Yalçınkaya MH, Çılbant C, Özçalık M (2009) Avrupa Birliği Sürecinde Türk İmalat Sanayi Dış Ticaretinin Rekabet Gücü: 1898–2009 Dönemi VAR Analizi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi 16(1):116–137

Yaşar M, Rejesus RM (2005) Exporting status and firm performance: evidence from a matched sample. Econ Lett 88:397–402CrossRef

Yılmaz O, Kaya V (2007) İhracat, İthalat ve Reel Doviz Kuru İlişkisi: Türkiye İçin Bir VAR Modeli. İktisat Isletme ve Finans 22(250):69–84

Yurtkur AK, Bayramoğlu AT (2012) Export dynamics in emerging market economies. Yönetim ve Ekonomi 19(1):19–33

Zarzoso IM, Lehmann FN (2003) Augmented gravity model: an empirical application To Mercosur-European union trade flows. J Appl Econ 4(2):291–316

Zellner A, Theil H (1962) Three-stage least squares: simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations. Econometrica 30:54–78CrossRef

Zhang KH (2005) How does FDI affect a host country’s export performance? The case of China. Paper presented at the International Conference of WTO, China, and the Asian Economies III, Xi’an, China, 25–26 June

Titel: Estimating export equations: a survey of the literature
verfasst von: Güzin Bayar
Publikationsdatum: 11.01.2017
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Empirical Economics / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1220-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

How school principals influence student learning

Erratum to: Analyzing the effect of dynamically assigned treatments using duration models, binary treatment models, and panel data models

House prices, credit and the effect of monetary policy in Norway: evidence from structural VAR models

The powers that are: central bank independence in the Greenspan era

Does human capital or physical capital constrain output in Japanese prefectures?

Revisiting carbon Kuznets curves with endogenous breaks modeling: evidence of decoupling and saturation (but few inverted-Us) for individual OECD countries