nach oben

Erschienen in:

2012 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

9. Estimating Market Liquidity

verfasst von : Professor Dr. Nikolaus Hautsch

Erschienen in: Econometrics of Financial High-Frequency Data

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Liquidity has been recognized as an important determinant of the efficient working of a market. Following the conventional definition of liquidity, an asset is considered as being liquid if it can be traded quickly, in large quantities and with little impact on the price. According to this concept, the measurement of liquidity requires to account for three dimensions of the transaction process: time, volume and price. Kyle (1985) defines liquidity in terms of the tightness indicated by the bid-ask spread, the depth corresponding to the amount of one-sided volume that can be absorbed by the market without inducing a revision of the bid and ask quotes and resiliency, i.e., the time in which the market returns to its equilibrium.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Modelling High-Frequency Volatility

Nächstes Kapitel Semiparametric Dynamic Proportional Hazard Models

Classical references are, for example, Keynes (1930), Demsetz (1968), Black (1971) or Glosten and Harris (1988).

See, for example, Conroy et al. (1990), Greene and Smart (1999), Bessembinder (2000) or Elyasiani et al. (2000).

See, for example, Chan and Lakonishok (1995), Keim and Madhavan (1996) or Fleming and Remolona (1999).

See, for example, Glosten (1994), Biais et al. (1995), Bangia et al. (2008) or Giot and Grammig (2006).

In cases where η → 0, the models are re-estimated using a generalized gamma distribution.

For ease of notation we omit the market-side specific index.

As both variables β_li and m _l are assumed to be unobservable, the definitions of factors and loadings are somewhat arbitrary. Here, we use a terminology which is consistent with the previous section and is commonly used in the literature of factor models. However, Härdle et al. (2009) use a converse terminology and define m _l as a factor and β_li as a factor loading.

Amihud Y (2002) Illiquidity and stock returns: cross section and time-series effects. J Finan Markets 5:31–56CrossRef

Bangia A, Diebold F, Schuermann T, Stroughair J (2008) Modeling liquidity risk, with implications for traditional market risk measurement and management. Discussion Paper FIN-99-062, New York University

Bessembinder H (2000) Tick size, spreads, and liquidity: an analysis of Nasdaq securities trading near ten dollars. J Financial Intermediation 9(3):213–239CrossRef

Biais B, Hillion P, Spatt C (1995) An empirical analysis of the limit order book and the order flow in the Paris Bourse. J Finance 50:1655–1689CrossRef

Black F (1971) Toward a fully automated exchange, part I, II. Financial Analysts J 27:29–34

Brennan MJ, Chordia T, Subrahmanyam A, Tong Q (2009) Sell-side liquidity and the cross-section of expected returns. Working Paper SSRN, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1396328

Brownlees C, Cipollini F, Gallo GM (2011) Intra-daily volume modeling and prediction for algorithmic trading. J Financ Econom 9:489–518CrossRef

Chan LKC, Lakonishok J (1995) The behaviour of stock prices around institutional trades. J Finance 4:1147–1173CrossRef

Chernozhukov V, Fernandez-Val I, Galichon A (2009) Improving point and interval estimates of monotone functions by rearrangement. Biometrika 96:559–575CrossRef

Conroy RM, Harris RS, Benet BA (1990) The effects of stock splits on bid-ask spreads. J Finance 45:1285–1295CrossRef

Demsetz H (1968) The cost of transacting. Q J Econ 82:33–53CrossRef

Diebold F, Li C (2006) Forecasting the term structure of government bond yields. J Econom 130:337–364CrossRef

Elyasiani E, Hauser S, Lauterbach B (2000) Market response to liquidity improvements: evidence from exchange listings. Financ Rev 35:1–14CrossRef

Engle RF, Lange J (2001) Predicting VNET: a model of the dynamics of market depth. J Finan Markets 2(4):113–142CrossRef

Engle RF, Patton A (2004) Impact of trades in an error-correction model of quote prices. J Financ Markets 7:1–25CrossRef

Fleming M, Remolona E-M (1999) Price formation and liquidity in the U.S. treasury market: the response to public information. J Finance 54:1901–1915CrossRef

Giot P, Grammig J (2006) How large is liquidity risk in an automated auction market? Empir Econ 30:867–887CrossRef

Glosten LR (1994) Is the electronic open limit order book inevitable. J Finance 49:1127–1161CrossRef

Glosten LR, Harris LE (1988) Estimating the components of the bid/ask spread. J Finan Econ 21:123–142CrossRef

Gouriéroux C, Jasiak J, LeFol G (1999) Intra-day market activity. J Finan Markets 2:193–226CrossRef

Goyenko RY, Holden CW, Trzcinka CA (2009) Do liquidity measures measure liquidity? J Finan Econ 92:153–181CrossRef

Greene J, Smart S (1999) Liquidity provision and noise trading: evidence from the “investment dartboard” column. J Finance 54:1885–1899CrossRef

Härdle WK, Hautsch N, Mihoci A (2009) Modelling and forecasting liquidity supply using semiparametric factor dynamics. Discussion Paper 2009-44, Collaborative Research Center 649 “Economic Risk”, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Harris L (2003) Trading & exchanges – market microstructure for practitioners. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Hasbrouck J (2007) Empirical market microstructure. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Hasbrouck J (2009) Trading costs and returns for U.S. equities: estimating effective costs from daily data. J Finance 64:1445–1477CrossRef

Hautsch N (2003) Assessing the risk of liquidity suppliers on the basis of excess demand intensities. J Financ Econom 1:189–215CrossRef

Hautsch N, Huang R (2009) The market impact of a limit order. Discussion Paper 2009/23, Collaborative Research Center 649 “Economic Risk”, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Keim DB, Madhavan A (1996) The upstairs market for large-block transactions: analysis and measurement of price effects. Rev Financ Stud 9:1–36CrossRef

Keynes J (1930) Treatise on money. MacMillan

Kyle AS (1985) Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53(6):1315–1335CrossRef

Lo I, Sapp S (2006) A structural error-correction model of best prices and depths in the foreign exchange limit order market. Working paper, Bank of Canada

Nelson C, Siegel A (1987) Parsimonious modeling of yield curves. J Bus 60:473–489CrossRef

Park B, Mammen E, Härdle W, Borak S (2009) Time series modelling with semiparametric factor dynamics. J Am Stat Assoc 104(485):284–298CrossRef

Potters M, Bouchaud J (2003) More statistical properties of order books and price impact. Physica A 324:133–140CrossRef

Roll R (1984) A simple implicit measure of the effective bid-ask spread in an efficient market. J Finance 39:1127–1139CrossRef

Titel: Estimating Market Liquidity
verfasst von: Professor Dr. Nikolaus Hautsch
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Econometrics of Financial High-Frequency Data
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21924-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-21925-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21925-2_9