Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Learning Robot Navigation Behaviors by Demonstration Using a RRT Planner Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Ethical Decision Making in Robots: Autonomy, Trust and Responsibility

Autonomy Trust and Responsibility

verfasst von : Fahad Alaieri, André Vellino

Erschienen in: Social Robotics

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Autonomous robots such as self-driving cars are already able to make decisions that have ethical consequences. As such machines make increasingly complex and important decisions, we will need to know that their decisions are trustworthy and ethically justified. Hence we will need them to be able to explain the reasons for these decisions: ethical decision-making requires that decisions be explainable with reasons. We argue that for people to trust autonomous robots we need to know which ethical principles they are applying and that their application is deterministic and predictable. If a robot is a self-improving, self-learning type of robot whose choices and decisions are based on past experience, which decision it makes in any given situation may not be entirely predictable ahead of time or explainable after the fact. This combination of non-predictability and autonomy may confer a greater degree of responsibility to the machine but it also makes them harder to trust.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel The Effects of Cognitive Biases in Long-Term Human-Robot Interactions: Case Studies Using Three Cognitive Biases on MARC the Humanoid Robot
Nächstes Kapitel How Facial Expressions and Small Talk May Influence Trust in a Robot
Literatur
1.
2.
Allen, C., Smit, I., Wallach, W.: Artificial morality: top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches. Ethics Inf. Technol. 7(3), 149–155 (2005)CrossRef
3.
Allen, C., Wallach, W., Smit, I.: Why machine ethics? IEEE Intell. Syst. 21(4), 12–17 (2006)CrossRef
4.
Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: Machine ethics: creating an ethical intelligent agent. AI Mag. 28(4), 15–26 (2007)
5.
Asaro, P.: Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Rome, Italy (2007)
6.
Asaro, P.: What should we want from a robot ethic? Int. Rev. Inform. Ethics 6, 9–16 (2006)
7.
8.
Beer, J.M., Fisk, A.D.: Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction. J. Hum.-Robot Interac. 3(2), 74–99 (2014)CrossRef
9.
Colombo, M., Hartmann, S.: Bayesian cognitive science, unification, and explanation. Br. J. Philos. Sci., axv036 (2015)
10.
Crabb, P.B., Stern, S.E.: Technology traps. In: Luppicini, R. (ed.) Ethical Impact of Technological Advancements and Applications in Society, pp. 39–46. IGI Global, April 2012
11.
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C.J., et al.: Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 529(7587), 484–489 (2016)CrossRef
12.
Dodig-Crnkovic, G., Persson, D.: Sharing moral responsibility with robots: a pragmatic approach. In: Tenth Scandinavian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, SCAI 2008, pp. 165–168 (2008)
13.
Gert, B.: Morality: Its Nature and Justification. Oxford University Press, USA (1998)
14.
Hellström, T.: On the moral responsibility of military robots. Ethics Inf. Technol. 15(2), 99–107 (2012)CrossRef
15.
Hew, P.C.: Artificial moral agents are infeasible with foreseeable technologies. Ethics Inform. Technol. 16(3), 197–206 (2014)CrossRef
16.
Jarvik, M.: How to understand moral responsibility? TRAMES: J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 7(3), 147–163 (2003)
17.
Johnson, D.G.: Computer systems: moral entities but not moral agents. Ethics Inf. Technol. 8(4), 195–204 (2006)CrossRef
18.
Johnson, D.G.: Technology with no human responsibility? J. Bus. Ethics 127(4), 707–715 (2014)CrossRef
19.
Kuflik, A.: Computers in control: rational transfer of authority or irresponsible abdication of autonomy? Ethics Inf. Technol. 1(3), 173–184 (1999)CrossRef
20.
Lomas, M., Chevalier, R., Vincent Cross II, E., Garrett, R.C., Hoare, J., Kopack, M.: Explaining robot actions. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 187–188. ACM (2012)
21.
Malle, B.F.: Integrating robot ethics and machine morality: the study and design of moral competence in robots. Ethics Inf. Technol. 18(70), 1–14 (2015)
22.
23.
24.
Noorman, M., Johnson, D.G.: Negotiating autonomy and responsibility in military robots. Ethics Inf. Technol. 16(1), 51–62 (2014)CrossRef
25.
Royakkers, L.: A literature review on new robotics: automation from love to war. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7(5), 1–22 (2015)CrossRef
26.
Scheutz, M., Malle, B.F.: think and do the right thinga plea for morally competent autonomous robots. In: 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2014)
27.
Stahl, B.C.: Responsible computers? a case for ascribing quasi-responsibility to computers independent of personhood or agency. Ethics Inf. Technol. 8(4), 205–213 (2006)CrossRef
28.
Tzafestas, S.G.: Roboethics. A Navigating Overview, vol. 79. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)CrossRef
29.
Wallach, W.: A Dangerous Master. How to Keep Technology from Slipping Beyond Our Control. Basic Books, New York (2015)
Metadaten
Titel
Ethical Decision Making in Robots: Autonomy, Trust and Responsibility
verfasst von
Fahad Alaieri
André Vellino
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Social Robotics

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47436-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-47437-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_16