nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

European Convention of Human Rights/Council of Europe

verfasst von : Mathias Möschel

Erschienen in: Comparative Perspectives on the Enforcement and Effectiveness of Antidiscrimination Law

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter describes and assesses the enforcement of anti-discrimination law at the level of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) where Article 14 constitutes the central provision prohibiting discrimination and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is the main interpreter. Enforcement of the ECtHR judgments is done—somewhat problematically—by a political body, the Committee of Ministers. More recently the ECtHR has become more involved in the enforcement process via a number of mechanisms and interpretations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The United States

Nächstes Kapitel The Inter-American Court of Human Rights

See on this expression: O’Connell (2009), p. 211.

Resolution Res (2004) 3 of the Committee of Ministers on judgments revealing an underlying systemic problem (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 May 2004, at its 114th Session), accessible at: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016805dd190.

See more in detail on this point: Sicilianos (2014), pp. 285–315.

See e.g. Parliamentary Assembly Resolutions 1516 (2006), 1787 (2011), 1955 (2011) and 2075 (2015) on the implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.

D.H. and Others v. Czech Republic [GC], Application no. 57325/00, 13 November 2007.

Sampanis and Others v. Greece, Application no. 32526/05, 5 June 2008 and Sampani and Others v. Greece, Application no. 59608/09, 11 December 2012.

Oršuš and Others v. Croatia [GC], Application no. 15766/03, 16 March 2010.

Horváth and Kiss v. Hungary, Application no. 11146/11, 29 January 2013.

See e.g. Petropoulou-Tsakiris v. Greece, Application no. 44803/04, 6 December 2007 and Stoica v. Romania, Application no. 42722/02, 4 March 2008.

See e.g. Šečič v. Croatia, Application no. 40116/02, 31 May 2009 and Abdu v. Bulgaria, Application no. 26827/08, 11 March 2014.

Sampani and Others v. Greece, Application no. 59608/09, 11 December 2012, para. 128.

See for more details on these infra at point 8.

See e.g. the Monitoring Handbook issued in 2011: https://ecthrproject.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/monitoringhandbook_calibruch1.pdf.

D.H. and Others v. Czech Republic [GC], Application no. 57325/00, 13 November 2007.

See: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/press-releases/european-commission-targets-slovakia-over-roma-school-discrimination; https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/press-releases/brussels-takes-action-against-czech-republic-over-roma-school-discrimination and http://www.equineteurope.org/European-Commission-targets-school-segregation-of-Roma-children-in-Hungary-with.

Moldovan and Others v. Romania (No. 2), Applications no. 41138/98 and 64320/01, 12 July 2005.

Kalanyos and Others v. Romania, Application no. 57884/00, 26 April 2007; Tanase and Others v. Romania, Application no. 62954/00, 26 May 2009.

Moldovan and Others v. Romania (No. 1), Applications no. 41138/98 and 64320/01, 12 July 2005.

Lăcătuş and Others v. Romania, Application no. 12694/04, 13 November 2012.

8th Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers, Supervision of the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 2014, p. 188, available at: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution/Source/Publications/CM_annreport2014_en.pdf.

See in this sense Arnardóttir (2015), pp. 224–225.

See e.g. Thlimmenos v. Greece, Application no. 34369/97, 6 April 2000 and Zarb Adami v. Malta, Application no. 17209/02, 20 June 2006.

D.H. and Others v. Czech Republic [GC], Application no. 57325/00, 13 November 2007.

Identoba and Others v. Georgia, Application no. 73235/12, 12 May 2015.

Kiyutin v. Russia, Application no. 10 March 2011.

Fabris v. France [GC], Application no. 16574/08, 7 February 2013.

Danilenkov v. Russia, Application no. 67336/01, 30 July 2009.

Petrov v. Bulgaria, Application no. 15197/02, 22 May 2008.

Zickus v. Lithuania, Application no. 26652/02, 7 April 2009.

The one exception being Schwizgebel v. Switzerland, Application no. 25762/07, 10 June 2010 where the ECtHR nevertheless found no violation.

Paraskeva Todorova v. Bulgaria, Application no. 37193/07, 25 March 2010.

See e.g. Mazurek v. France, Application no. 34496/07, 1 February 2000 and Fabris v. France [GC], Application no. 16574/08, 7 February 2013.

See supra points 7 and 8.

See http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution/Reports/pendingCases_en.asp?CaseTitleOrNumber=&StateCode=ROM&SectionCode=.

Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania (No. 1), Application no. 46430/99, 5 October 2004.

See the 8th Report by Mr. Klaas de Vries on the implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, Doc. 13864 | 09 September 2015, available at: http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=22005&lang=en.

Arnardóttir OM (2015) Cross-fertilization, clarity and consistency at an overburdened European Court of Human Rights—the case of the discrimination grounds under Article 14. Nordic J Hum Rights 33(3):224–225CrossRef

O’Connell R (2009) Cinderella comes to the ball: Art. 14 and the right to non-discrimination in the ECHR. Leg Stud 29:211CrossRef

Sicilianos LA (2014) The role of the European Court of Human Rights in the execution of its own judgments: reflections on Article 46 ECHR. In: Seibert-Fohr A, Villiger ME (eds) Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights—effects and implementation. Nomos, Baden Baden, pp 285–315

Titel: European Convention of Human Rights/Council of Europe
verfasst von: Mathias Möschel
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Comparative Perspectives on the Enforcement and Effectiveness of Antidiscrimination Law
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90067-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-90068-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90068-1_29

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"