nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

10. European Supervision Order in Pre-trial Procedures (Mutual Recognition of Supervision Measures as an Alternative to Provisional Detention)

verfasst von : Libor Klimek

Erschienen in: Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions in European Criminal Law

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The chapter deals with the European supervision order in pre-trial procedures, i.e. mutual recognition of supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention. It is divided into six sections and includes concluding observations at the end. Section 10.1 is introduction of the chapter. Section 10.2 analyses its legal basis—the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order. While Sect. 10.3 analyses its definition, scope of application and key terms, Sect. 10.4 analyses procedural issues. Section 10.5 focuses on implementation of the mechanism and Sect. 10.6 focuses on its evaluation.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Mutual Recognition of Confiscation Orders

Nächstes Kapitel European Investigation Order (Free Movement of Evidence)

Ivor (1997), p. 127; Ivor et al. (2010), p. 324; Jelínek et al. (2013), p. 315 et seq.; Čentéš (2008a), pp. 133–140; Čentéš (2008b), pp. 261–270; Čentéš et al. (2014), p. 627; Fenyk et al. (2015), p. 279; Ashworth (2015), p. 304; Jelínek et al. (2016), p. 677; Šámal et al. (2013), p. 731 et seq.; Šramel (2015), pp. 30–34.

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Council of Europe, European Treaty Series No. 5 [1950]. Rome, 4th November 1950. In-depth analysis see: Schabas (2015) and Svák (2011).

International instruments do not contain any provisions on the threshold for pre-trial detention linked to the punishment available for the offence in question. This threshold follows the national law of the Member States of the EU, which means that it varies from State to State. In some States the penalty for the offence in question is not a factor that is considered when making remand decisions. Some States allow pre-trial detention irrespective of the penalty for the offence when the suspect has no fixed abode in the territory and there is a risk that this person will abscond although the general threshold for pre-trial detention might be much higher.

European Commission (2014): ‘Green paper on mutual recognition of non-custodial pre-trial supervision measures’, COM(2004) 562 final, p. 3.

Programme of Measures to Implement the Principle of Mutual Recognition of Decisions in Criminal Matters. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 12/10 of 15th January 2001.

Measure No. 10 of the Mutual Recognition Programme.

Ventrella (2010), p. 124.

European Commission (2006): ‘Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European supervision order in pre-trial procedures between Member States of the European Union’, COM(2006) 468 final; see also: European Commission (2006): ‘Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European supervision order in pre-trial procedures between Member States of the European Union’, Commission Staff Working Document, SEC(2006)1079; European Commission (2006): ‘Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European supervision order in pre-trial procedures between Member States of the European Union’, Commission Staff Working Document, SEC(2006)1080.

Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23rd October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention. Official Journal of the European Union, L 294/20 of 11th November 2009.

Article 1 of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Article 2(1)(a)(b)(c) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order; Ivor et al. (2013), p. 630.

Recital 3 of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Recital 4 of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Rafaraci (2012), p. 68.

Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27th November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions as amended by the Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA. Official Journal of the European Union, L 337/102 of 16th December 2008.

Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13th June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States as amended by the Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 190/1 of 18th July 2002.

Article 5(3) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.

Article 4(6) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant.

Article 26(1)(a)(b) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Klimek (2012), p. 717; Klimek (2014), p. 341.

Article 3(a) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Article 3(b) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Rafaraci (2012), p. 70.

Article 8(1)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order; see also: Ryckman et al. (2009), p. 121.

Article 8(2)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Rafaraci (2012), p. 70.

Article 4(c)(d) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Klimek (2012), p. 719 et seq.; Klimek (2014), p. 342 et seq.

Article 82(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon.

Article 12(1) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Article 1 of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

European Commission (2011): ‘Strengthening mutual trust in the European judicial area – A Green Paper on the application of EU criminal justice legislation in the field of detention’, COM(2011) 327 final, pp. 4 and 7.

Article 10(2) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order .

Article 7(1)(2) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order .

Article 14(3) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Article 9(1) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order .

Article 9(2) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Klimek (2012), p. 721; Klimek (2014), p. 348.

Article 10(2) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

‘Certificate referred to in Article 10 of Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23 October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention’. Official Journal of the European Union, L 294/31 of 11th November 2009.

In line with the Annex to the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order .

Article 10(5) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order .

Article 10(6) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Council Decision 2008/976/JHA of 16th December 2008 on the European Judicial Network. Official Journal of the European Union, L 348/130 of 24th December 2008; see also Chap. 14.

Article 10(7)(8) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Belgium is an example of State which uses more official languages than one. Its official languages are Dutch, French and German (ordered from the greatest speaker population to the smallest).

Article 18(1)(a)(b)(c) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Article 18(2)(3) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Article 82(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon.

Article 12(1) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Article 12(2)(3)(4) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Article 13(1) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order .

Article 13(3) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Rafaraci (2012), p. 74.

Klimek (2012), p. 712; Klimek (2014), p. 345.

Article 14(3) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order .

Article 14(1) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 316/49 of 27th November 1995.

Pursuant to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court is limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. It has jurisdiction with respect to: the crime of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression (Article 5(1) of the Rome Statute); details see: Askin (1999), pp. 33–59; or Doria et al. (2009).

Article 14(2) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Article 20(2)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

‘Form referred to in Article 19 of Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23 October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention’. Official Journal of the European Union, L 294/37 of 11th November 2009.

Article 21(1) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Article 15(1) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order; full list of the grounds see literal wording of the Framework Decision.

European Commission (2014): ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation by the Member States of the Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA, 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA on the mutual recognition of judicial decisions on custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty, on probation decisions and alternative sanctions and on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention’, COM(2014)57 final, pp. 9 and 10.

Article 11(2)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Pursuant to Article 13(3) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Article 17 of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Article 19(1) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Article 23(3) of the Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA on the European supervision order.

Rafaraci (2012), pp. 76 and 77.

Daems et al. (2013), p. 212.

Ashworth A (2015) Sentencing and criminal justice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Askin KD (1999) Crimes within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. Crim Law Forum 10:33–59CrossRef

Čentéš J (2008a) Väzba ako najzávažnejší zásah do základných práv a slobôd [transl.: Custody as the most serious infringement of the fundamental rights and freedoms]. Trestněprávní revue 7:133–140

Čentéš J (2008b) Rozhodovanie o väzbe v prípravnom konaní a v konaní pred súdom [transl.: Deciding on custody in pre-trial proceedings and at trial]. Trestněprávní revue 7:261–270

Čentéš J et al (2014) Trestný poriadok: Veľký komentár [transl.: Criminal procedure code: big commentary]. Eurokódex, Bratislava

Daems T, Van Zyl D, Snacken S (2013) European penology? Hart, Portland

Doria J, Gasser H-P, Bassiouni MC (eds) (2009) The legal regime of the International Criminal Court: essays in honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden

Fenyk J, Císařová D, Gřivna T et al (2015) Trestní právo procesní [transl.: Criminal procedural law], 6th edn. Wolters Kluwer, Prague

Ivor J (1997) Zaistenie osôb v trestnom konaní [transl.: Detention of persons in criminal proceedings]. Iura Edition, Bratislava

Ivor J et al (2010) Trestné právo procesné [transl.: Criminal procedural law], 2nd edn. Iura edition, Bratislava

Ivor J, Klimek L, Záhora J (2013) Trestné právo Európskej únie a jeho vplyv na právny poriadok Slovenskej republiky [transl.: Criminal law of the European Union and its impact on the legal order of the Slovak Republic]. Eurokódex, Žilina

Jelínek J et al (2013) Trestní právo procesní [transl.: Criminal procedural law], 3rd edn. Leges, Prague

Jelínek J et al (2016) Trestní zákoník a trestní řád s poznámkami a judikaturou [transl.: Criminal code and criminal procedure code with comments and case-law], 6th edn. Leges, Prague

Klimek L (2012) Európsky príkaz na dohľad v predsúdnom konaní [transl.: European supervision order in pre-trial procedures]. Justičná revue 64:716–726

Klimek L (2014) Konanie o európskom príkaze na dohľad v predsúdnom konaní na úrovni Európskej únie [transl.: European supervision order in pre-trial procedures proceedings at the European Union level]. In: Záhora J (ed) Aktuálne otázky prípravného konanie trestného [transl.: Current issues of the pre-trial criminal procedure]. Conference proceedings of the international conference, 3rd April 2014, Bratislava at the Faculty of Law, Pan-European University. Leges, Prague, pp 342–352

Rafaraci T (2012) The application of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Liberty and security in Europe: a comparative analysis of pre-trial precautionary measures in criminal proceedings. Universitätsverlag Osnabrück, Osnabrück, pp 67–83

Ryckman C, Vermeulen G, De Bondt W (2009) Considerations for a future EU policy on disqualifications. In: Cools M et al (eds) Readings on criminal justice, criminal law & policing. Maklu, Antwerpen, pp 115–154

Šámal et al (2013) Trestní řád – Komentář [transl.: Criminal procedure code – commentary], 7th edn. C. H. Beck, Prague

Schabas WA (2015) The European Convention on Human Rights: a commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Šramel B (2015) Privatizácia väzenského systému: áno alebo nie? [transl.: Privatisation of prison system: yes or no?]. Trestní právo 19:30–34

Svák J (2011) Ochrana ľudských práv v troch zväzkoch [transl.: Protection of human rights in three volumes]. Eurokódex, Žilina

Ventrella M (2010) The control of people smuggling and trafficking in the EU. Ashgate, Farnham

Titel: European Supervision Order in Pre-trial Procedures (Mutual Recognition of Supervision Measures as an Alternative to Provisional Detention)
verfasst von: Libor Klimek
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions in European Criminal Law
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44375-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-44377-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44377-5_10