Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This investigation concerns two questions: i). is simple educational programming with children, compared to working on mathematical tasks, more effective in increasing scores in mathematical abilities, spatial awareness and working memory? ii), is educational programming on a digital device, compared to similar paper and pencil programming activities, more effective in increasing mathematical abilities, spatial awareness and working memory? Forty-one 5 to 6 year olds from a UK infant school were randomly allocated to one of three groups: programming+iPad technology, programming using paper and pencils, and a comparison condition involving pencil and paper mathematical addition and subtraction tasks. Two 10-min intervention sessions took place each week, over a period of six weeks, with pre-intervention and post-intervention tests administered to assess children’s mathematical abilities, spatial awareness and working memory. A series of mixed analyses of variance revealed that all three groups increased their mathematical abilities and spatial awareness. However, there were no significant increases in working memory, and there were no significant differences between any of the groups. These findings suggest that even a relatively short period of experience with programming can benefit other abilities and that the effects are similar to more directly targeted interventions. It was not found that programming using iPads resulted in higher scores than programming with paper and pencils.
Allen, M. L., Hartley, C., & Cain, K. (2015). Do iPads promote symbolic understanding and word learning in children with autism? Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00138.
Ambrosio, A, Almeida, L, Macedo, J, & Franco A. (2014). Exploring core cognitive skills of Computational Thinking. University of Sussex http://users.sussex.ac.uk/~bend/ppig2014/3ppig2014_submission_13.pdf. Accessed 6 June 6 2016.
Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 5–28. CrossRef
Buschkuehl, M., Jaeggi, S., & Jonides, J. (2012). Neuronal effects following working memory training. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 167–179. CrossRef
Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113. CrossRef
Ciampa, K. (2013). Learning in a mobile age: an investigation of student motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30, 82–96. CrossRef
Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29. CrossRef
Clements, D. (2002). Computers and early childhood mathematics. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2, 160–181. CrossRef
Computing at School. (2013). 160–181. Computing in the National Curriculum: A guide for primary teachers. Swindon: Computing at School, part of BCS.
Cox, M., Abbott, C., Webb, M., Blakeley, B., Beauchamp, T., & Rhodes, V. (2003). ICT and attainment: A review of the research literature. In ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series, No 17. Coventry: Becta/DfES.
Dezuanni, M., Dooley, K., Gattenhof, S., & Knight, L. (2015). iPads in the early years: Developing literacy and creativity. New York: Routledge. CrossRef
DiSessa, A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Boston: MIT Press.
Elliott, C., & Smith, P. (2011). British ability scales III. London: GL Assessment.
Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5-6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: a case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87–97. CrossRef
Henry, L. A., Messer, D. J., & Nash, G. (2013). Testing for near and far transfer effects with a short, face-to-face adaptive working memory training intervention in typical children. Infant and Child Development, 23(1), 84–103. CrossRef
Holmes, J., Gathercole, S., & Dunning, D. (2009). Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Developmental Science, 12, 9–15. CrossRef
Liao, Y., & Bright, G. (1991). Effects of computer programming on cognitive outcomes: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, 251–266. CrossRef
Lye, S., & Koh, J. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: what is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behaviour, 41, 51–61. CrossRef
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2012). Is working memory training effective? A meta- analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270–291. CrossRef
Melby-Lervåg, M., Reddick, T., & Hulme, C. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far transfer”: evidence from a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 512–534. CrossRef
Oliver, M. (2010). Technological determinism in educational research: some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 373–384. CrossRef
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. Cambridge: Basic Books.
Passey, D., Rogers, C., Machell, J., & McHugh, G. (2004). The motivational effect of ICT on pupils. England: DfES/University of Lancaster.
Piaget, J. (1971). Genetic epistemology. New York: W.W. Norton.
Raghubar, K. P., Barnes, M. A., & Hecht, S. A. (2010). Working memory and mathematics: a review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 110–122. CrossRef
Rowe, D. W., & Miller, M. E. (2016). Designing for diverse classrooms: using iPads and digital cameras to compose eBooks with emergent bilingual/biliterate four-year-olds. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 16(4), 425–472. CrossRef
Sarker, S., Mohapatra, S., & Sundarakrishan, J. (2017). Assessing impact of technology based digital equalizer programme on improving student learning outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 195–213. CrossRef
Tynker (2016). Programming = Better Math Skills + Fun. http://www.tynker.com/blog/articles/ideas-and-tips/programming-better-math-skills-fun. Accessed June 22 2016.
Wilkinson, G., & Robertson, G. (2006). Wide range achievement test (Fourth ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited.
- Evaluating the effectiveness of an educational programming intervention on children’s mathematics skills, spatial awareness and working memory
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA, Best Practices für die Mitarbeiter-Partizipation in der Produktentwicklung/© astrosystem | stock.adobe.com