Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
External beam radiation therapy is a common treatment method for cancer. Radiotherapy is planned with the aim to achieve conflicting goals: while a sufficiently high dose of radiation is necessary for tumour control, a low dose of radiation is desirable to avoid complications in normal, healthy, tissue. These goals are encoded in clinical protocols and a plan that does not meet the criteria set out in the protocol may have to be re-optimised using a trial and error process. To support the planning process, it is therefore important to evaluate the quality of treatment plans in order to recognise plans that will benefit from such re-optimisation and distinguish them from those for which this is unlikely to be the case. In this chapter we present a case study of evaluating the quality of prostate cancer treatment plans based on data collected from Rosemere Cancer Centre at the Royal Preston Hospital in the UK. We use Principal Component Analysis for data reduction, i.e., to select the most relevant data from the entire set available for each patient. We then apply Data Envelopment Analysis to assess the quality of individual plans. Each plan is compared against the entire set of plans to identify those that could realistically be improved. We further enhance this procedure with simulation techniques to account for uncertainties in the data for treatment plans. The proposed approach to plan evaluation provides a tool to support radiotherapy treatment planners in their task to determine the best possible radiotherapy treatment for cancer patients. With its combination of DEA, PCA and simulation, it allows focusing on the most significant determinants of plan quality, consideration of trade-offs between conflicting planning goals and incorporation of uncertainty in treatment data.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Andreo, P., Cramb, J., Fraass, B., Ionescu-Farca, F., Izewska, J., Levin, V., et al. (2004). Commissioning and quality assurance of computerized planning systems for radiation treatment of cancer: Vol. 430. International atomic energy agency technical report series. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
Antolak, J. A., Rosen, I. I., Childress, C. H., Zagars, G. K., & Pollack, A. (1998). Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 42(3), 661–672. CrossRef
Bokrantz, R., & Forsgren, A. (2013). An algorithm for approximating convex Pareto surfaces based on dual techniques. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 25(2), 377–393. CrossRef
Bortfeld, T. (2006). IMRT: A review and preview. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51(13), 363–379. CrossRef
Breedveld, S., Storchi, P. R., & Heijmen, B. J. (2009). The equivalence of multi-criteria methods for radiotherapy plan optimization. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 54(23), 7199–7209. CrossRef
Coelli, T., Rao, D., O’Donnell, C., & Battese, G. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Craft, D., & Monz, M. (2010). Simultaneous navigation of multiple Pareto surfaces, with an application to multicriteria IMRT planning with multiple beam angle configurations. Medical Physics, 37(2), 736–741. CrossRef
Craft, D., & Richter, C. (2013). Deliverable navigation for multicriteria step and shoot IMRT treatment planning. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 58(1), 87–103. CrossRef
Craft, D. L., Halabi, T. F., Shih, H. A., & Bortfeld, T. R. (2006). Approximating convex Pareto surfaces in multiobjective radiotherapy planning. Medical Physics, 33(9), 3399–3407. CrossRef
Das, I. J., Cheng, C.-W., Chopra, K. L., Mitra, R. K., Srivastava, S. P., & Glatstein, E. (2008). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: Patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 100(5), 300–307. CrossRef
Ehrgott, M., Güler, Ç., Hamacher, H. W., & Shao, L. (2008). Mathematical optimization in intensity modulated radiation therapy. 4OR, 6(3), 199–262. CrossRef
Ehrgott, M., Holder, A., & Nohadani, O. (2018). Uncertain data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(1), 231–242. CrossRef
Ehrgott, M., & Winz, I. (2008). Interactive decision support in radiation therapy treatment planning. OR Spectrum, 30(2), 311–329. CrossRef
Falkinger, M., Schell, S., Müller, J., & Wilkens, J. J. (2012). Prioritized optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy. Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik, 22(1), 21–28. CrossRef
Henríquez, F., & Castrillón, S. (2008). A novel method for the evaluation of uncertainty in dose-volume histogram computation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 70(4), 1263–1271. CrossRef
Jee, K. W., McShan, D. L., & Fraass, B. A. (2007). Lexicographic ordering: Intuitive multicriteria optimization for IMRT. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 52(7), 1845–1861. CrossRef
Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis. Springer series in statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Lin, K.-M., Ehrgott, M., & Raith, A. (2016). Integrating column generation in a method to compute a discrete representation of the non-dominated set of multi-objective linear programmes. 4OR, 15, 27 pp.
Lin, K.-M., Simpson, J., Sasso, G., Raith, A., & Ehrgott, M. (2013). Quality assessment for VMAT prostate radiotherapy planning based on DEA. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 58(16), 5753–5769. CrossRef
Moiseenko, V., Liu, M., Kristensen, S., Gelowitz, G., & Berthelet, E. (2007). Effect of bladder filling on doses to prostate and organs at risk: A treatment planning study. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 8(1), 55–68. CrossRef
Monz, M., Küfer, K.-H., Bortfeld, T. R., & Thieke, C. (2008). Pareto navigation-algorithmic foundation of interactive multi-criteria IMRT planning. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 53(4), 985. CrossRef
Niemierko, A. (1997). Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: A concept of equivalent uniform dose. Medical Physics, 24(1), 103–110. CrossRef
Roeske, J. C., Forman, J. D., Mesina, C., He, T., Pelizzari, C. A., Fontenla, E., et al. (1995). Evaluation of changes in the size and location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum during a course of external beam radiation therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 33(5), 1321–1329. CrossRef
Romeijn, H. E., Dempsey, J. F., & Li, J. G. (2004). A unifying framework for multi-criteria fluence map optimization models. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 49(10), 1991–2013. CrossRef
Roy, A., Das, I. J., & Nohadani, O. (2016). On correlations in imrt planning aims. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 17(6), 44–59. CrossRef
Ruotsalainen, H. (2009). Interactive multiobjective optimization in model-based decision making with applications. Ph.D. thesis, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.
Shao, L., & Ehrgott, M. (2016). Discrete representation of non-dominated sets in multi-objective linear programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(3), 811–836. CrossRef
Wilkens, J. J., Alaly, J. R., Zakarian, K., Thorstad, W. L., & Deasy, J. O. (2007). IMRT treatment planning based on prioritizing prescription goals. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 52(6), 1675–1692. CrossRef
- Evaluating the Quality of Radiotherapy Treatment Plans for Prostate Cancer
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta